Camila M Mateo, Danny McCormick, Chrissie Connors, Gaurab Basu
{"title":"从理论到行动:基于纵向项目的医师研究生反种族主义课程评价。","authors":"Camila M Mateo, Danny McCormick, Chrissie Connors, Gaurab Basu","doi":"10.1177/23821205241303643","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Few opportunities exist for postgraduate physicians to learn to address racism in their professional practice. We created a virtual, 5-session antiracism course that included the development of a formal action project to address racism at participants' home institution.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We delivered this curriculum virtually to 2 cohorts (2021 and 2022) of postgraduate physicians, nationally. The curriculum had 3 educational aims: (1) to increase knowledge on antiracism, (2) to increase comfort and engagement in discussing antiracism at home institutions, and (3) to increase self-efficacy to execute an institution-based project. Theory-informed practice, community building, and project-based learning were used to achieve our educational aims. We analyzed changes in these domains in addressing racism using matched 7-item Likert-scale questions from pre- and post-course surveys and the Wilcoxon signed rank test. We assessed perceptions and impacts of the course with post-course survey items using descriptive statistics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Forty-three of 50 participants (86%) who completed pre- and post-course surveys were included in the analysis. We found pre-post course increases in mean scores (converted from Likert scales), for all 15 paired questions. For example, we found improvements in understanding the historical context of racism in medical institutions (mean score change: 5.12 [SD 1.00] to 6.42 [SD 0.76], <i>P</i> < .001), comfort in talking to colleagues about racism (5.21 [SD 1.08] to 6.19 [SD 0.70], <i>P</i> < .001), and capacity to address racism in patient care at their home institution (4.51 [SD 1.35] to 5.56 [SD 0.91], <i>P</i> < 0.001). 93% reported the course increased the likelihood of working to address racism at their institution.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This project-based antiracism course for postgraduate learners increased self-reported knowledge of, comfort with, and self-efficacy in addressing racism and was well received by participants.</p>","PeriodicalId":45121,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Education and Curricular Development","volume":"11 ","pages":"23821205241303643"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11632890/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"From Theory to Action: Evaluation of a Longitudinal Project-Based Antiracism Course for Post-Graduate Physicians.\",\"authors\":\"Camila M Mateo, Danny McCormick, Chrissie Connors, Gaurab Basu\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/23821205241303643\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Few opportunities exist for postgraduate physicians to learn to address racism in their professional practice. We created a virtual, 5-session antiracism course that included the development of a formal action project to address racism at participants' home institution.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We delivered this curriculum virtually to 2 cohorts (2021 and 2022) of postgraduate physicians, nationally. The curriculum had 3 educational aims: (1) to increase knowledge on antiracism, (2) to increase comfort and engagement in discussing antiracism at home institutions, and (3) to increase self-efficacy to execute an institution-based project. Theory-informed practice, community building, and project-based learning were used to achieve our educational aims. We analyzed changes in these domains in addressing racism using matched 7-item Likert-scale questions from pre- and post-course surveys and the Wilcoxon signed rank test. We assessed perceptions and impacts of the course with post-course survey items using descriptive statistics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Forty-three of 50 participants (86%) who completed pre- and post-course surveys were included in the analysis. We found pre-post course increases in mean scores (converted from Likert scales), for all 15 paired questions. For example, we found improvements in understanding the historical context of racism in medical institutions (mean score change: 5.12 [SD 1.00] to 6.42 [SD 0.76], <i>P</i> < .001), comfort in talking to colleagues about racism (5.21 [SD 1.08] to 6.19 [SD 0.70], <i>P</i> < .001), and capacity to address racism in patient care at their home institution (4.51 [SD 1.35] to 5.56 [SD 0.91], <i>P</i> < 0.001). 93% reported the course increased the likelihood of working to address racism at their institution.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This project-based antiracism course for postgraduate learners increased self-reported knowledge of, comfort with, and self-efficacy in addressing racism and was well received by participants.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45121,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Medical Education and Curricular Development\",\"volume\":\"11 \",\"pages\":\"23821205241303643\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11632890/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Medical Education and Curricular Development\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/23821205241303643\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Education and Curricular Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/23821205241303643","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:很少有机会存在的研究生医生学习解决种族主义在他们的专业实践。我们创建了一个虚拟的五节课反种族主义课程,其中包括制定一个正式的行动项目,以解决参与者所在机构的种族主义问题。方法:我们在全国范围内对2组(2021年和2022年)研究生医师进行了虚拟课程教学。该课程有三个教育目标:(1)增加反种族主义知识;(2)增加在国内机构讨论反种族主义时的舒适感和参与度;(3)提高执行机构项目的自我效能感。以理论为基础的实践、社区建设和基于项目的学习被用来实现我们的教育目标。我们使用课前和课后调查中匹配的7项李克特量表问题和Wilcoxon签名秩检验来分析这些领域在解决种族主义方面的变化。我们评估的看法和影响的课程后调查项目使用描述性统计。结果:50名参与者中有43名(86%)完成了课程前和课程后的调查,被纳入分析。我们发现,所有15个配对问题的平均分数(从李克特量表转换)在课程前有所增加。例如,我们发现对医疗机构种族主义历史背景的理解有所改善(平均得分变化:5.12 [SD 1.00]至6.42 [SD 0.76], P P P结论:针对研究生学习者的基于项目的反种族主义课程提高了自我报告的种族主义知识,舒适度和自我效能,并受到参与者的好评。
From Theory to Action: Evaluation of a Longitudinal Project-Based Antiracism Course for Post-Graduate Physicians.
Objectives: Few opportunities exist for postgraduate physicians to learn to address racism in their professional practice. We created a virtual, 5-session antiracism course that included the development of a formal action project to address racism at participants' home institution.
Methods: We delivered this curriculum virtually to 2 cohorts (2021 and 2022) of postgraduate physicians, nationally. The curriculum had 3 educational aims: (1) to increase knowledge on antiracism, (2) to increase comfort and engagement in discussing antiracism at home institutions, and (3) to increase self-efficacy to execute an institution-based project. Theory-informed practice, community building, and project-based learning were used to achieve our educational aims. We analyzed changes in these domains in addressing racism using matched 7-item Likert-scale questions from pre- and post-course surveys and the Wilcoxon signed rank test. We assessed perceptions and impacts of the course with post-course survey items using descriptive statistics.
Results: Forty-three of 50 participants (86%) who completed pre- and post-course surveys were included in the analysis. We found pre-post course increases in mean scores (converted from Likert scales), for all 15 paired questions. For example, we found improvements in understanding the historical context of racism in medical institutions (mean score change: 5.12 [SD 1.00] to 6.42 [SD 0.76], P < .001), comfort in talking to colleagues about racism (5.21 [SD 1.08] to 6.19 [SD 0.70], P < .001), and capacity to address racism in patient care at their home institution (4.51 [SD 1.35] to 5.56 [SD 0.91], P < 0.001). 93% reported the course increased the likelihood of working to address racism at their institution.
Conclusion: This project-based antiracism course for postgraduate learners increased self-reported knowledge of, comfort with, and self-efficacy in addressing racism and was well received by participants.