在供应链中零售商的商店品牌引进和质量策略的双重目的的作用

Mingyou Meng, Shiming Deng, Pin Zhou, He Xu
{"title":"在供应链中零售商的商店品牌引进和质量策略的双重目的的作用","authors":"Mingyou Meng, Shiming Deng, Pin Zhou, He Xu","doi":"10.1016/j.tre.2024.103912","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"To address stakeholders’ interests, firms increasingly adopt a dual-purpose agenda, typically involving the pursuit of profits and consumer surplus (CS). This study considers a supply chain dynamic involving a retailer and a national brand (NB) manufacturer, both potentially pursuing dual purposes, to investigate how their dual-purpose nature influences the introduction and quality strategies of the retailer’s store brand (SB). Our findings show that only the retailer pursuing CS has no impact on SB quality. However, if the NB manufacturer pursues CS, SB quality declines irrespective of the retailer’s stance. Interestingly, the for-profit retailer experiences reduced profits from SB introduction when also pursuing CS and expressing a high interest in it. Conversely, SB introduction enhances the dual-purpose manufacturer’s utility when its interest in CS is relatively high. The introduction of SB may lead to unintended price and payoff implications, with the manufacturer’s profit and the wholesale price exhibiting non-monotonic relationships with its interest in CS. Consequently, compared to the for-profit scenario, this may elevate the wholesale price, exacerbating the double marginalization effect. Additionally, when the retailer pursues CS, supply chain profit may increase because of the mitigated double marginalization effect, resulting from an unconventional reduction in retail markup rather than wholesale price. Our findings suggest that manufacturers pursuing CS could strategically alleviate profit losses stemming from retailers’ SB introduction. However, retailers should exercise caution when simultaneously introducing a SB and pursuing CS from a profitability standpoint.","PeriodicalId":49418,"journal":{"name":"Transportation Research Part E-Logistics and Transportation Review","volume":"8 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The role of dual purpose in retailer’s store brand introduction and quality strategies within a supply chain\",\"authors\":\"Mingyou Meng, Shiming Deng, Pin Zhou, He Xu\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.tre.2024.103912\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"To address stakeholders’ interests, firms increasingly adopt a dual-purpose agenda, typically involving the pursuit of profits and consumer surplus (CS). This study considers a supply chain dynamic involving a retailer and a national brand (NB) manufacturer, both potentially pursuing dual purposes, to investigate how their dual-purpose nature influences the introduction and quality strategies of the retailer’s store brand (SB). Our findings show that only the retailer pursuing CS has no impact on SB quality. However, if the NB manufacturer pursues CS, SB quality declines irrespective of the retailer’s stance. Interestingly, the for-profit retailer experiences reduced profits from SB introduction when also pursuing CS and expressing a high interest in it. Conversely, SB introduction enhances the dual-purpose manufacturer’s utility when its interest in CS is relatively high. The introduction of SB may lead to unintended price and payoff implications, with the manufacturer’s profit and the wholesale price exhibiting non-monotonic relationships with its interest in CS. Consequently, compared to the for-profit scenario, this may elevate the wholesale price, exacerbating the double marginalization effect. Additionally, when the retailer pursues CS, supply chain profit may increase because of the mitigated double marginalization effect, resulting from an unconventional reduction in retail markup rather than wholesale price. Our findings suggest that manufacturers pursuing CS could strategically alleviate profit losses stemming from retailers’ SB introduction. However, retailers should exercise caution when simultaneously introducing a SB and pursuing CS from a profitability standpoint.\",\"PeriodicalId\":49418,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Transportation Research Part E-Logistics and Transportation Review\",\"volume\":\"8 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Transportation Research Part E-Logistics and Transportation Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2024.103912\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transportation Research Part E-Logistics and Transportation Review","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2024.103912","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

为了解决利益相关者的利益,企业越来越多地采用双重目的议程,通常涉及追求利润和消费者剩余(CS)。本研究考虑了涉及零售商和国家品牌(NB)制造商的供应链动态,两者都可能追求双重目的,以调查其双重目的性质如何影响零售商的商店品牌(SB)的引入和质量策略。我们的研究结果表明,只有零售商追求CS对商品质量没有影响。然而,如果NB制造商追求CS,无论零售商的立场如何,SB的质量都会下降。有趣的是,以营利为目的的零售商在追求CS并对其表现出高度兴趣的同时,却经历了引入SB的利润减少。相反,当双重用途制造商对CS的兴趣相对较高时,引入SB会提高其效用。SB的引入可能会导致意想不到的价格和收益影响,制造商的利润和批发价格与其在CS中的利益表现出非单调关系。因此,与以营利为目的的情况相比,这可能会提高批发价格,加剧双重边缘化效应。此外,当零售商追求CS时,供应链利润可能会增加,因为减轻了双重边缘化效应,这是由于零售加价而不是批发价格的非常规降低。我们的研究结果表明,制造商追求CS可以从战略上减轻零售商引入SB所带来的利润损失。然而,从盈利的角度来看,零售商在同时引入SB和追求CS时应谨慎行事。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The role of dual purpose in retailer’s store brand introduction and quality strategies within a supply chain
To address stakeholders’ interests, firms increasingly adopt a dual-purpose agenda, typically involving the pursuit of profits and consumer surplus (CS). This study considers a supply chain dynamic involving a retailer and a national brand (NB) manufacturer, both potentially pursuing dual purposes, to investigate how their dual-purpose nature influences the introduction and quality strategies of the retailer’s store brand (SB). Our findings show that only the retailer pursuing CS has no impact on SB quality. However, if the NB manufacturer pursues CS, SB quality declines irrespective of the retailer’s stance. Interestingly, the for-profit retailer experiences reduced profits from SB introduction when also pursuing CS and expressing a high interest in it. Conversely, SB introduction enhances the dual-purpose manufacturer’s utility when its interest in CS is relatively high. The introduction of SB may lead to unintended price and payoff implications, with the manufacturer’s profit and the wholesale price exhibiting non-monotonic relationships with its interest in CS. Consequently, compared to the for-profit scenario, this may elevate the wholesale price, exacerbating the double marginalization effect. Additionally, when the retailer pursues CS, supply chain profit may increase because of the mitigated double marginalization effect, resulting from an unconventional reduction in retail markup rather than wholesale price. Our findings suggest that manufacturers pursuing CS could strategically alleviate profit losses stemming from retailers’ SB introduction. However, retailers should exercise caution when simultaneously introducing a SB and pursuing CS from a profitability standpoint.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
16.20
自引率
16.00%
发文量
285
审稿时长
62 days
期刊介绍: Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review is a reputable journal that publishes high-quality articles covering a wide range of topics in the field of logistics and transportation research. The journal welcomes submissions on various subjects, including transport economics, transport infrastructure and investment appraisal, evaluation of public policies related to transportation, empirical and analytical studies of logistics management practices and performance, logistics and operations models, and logistics and supply chain management. Part E aims to provide informative and well-researched articles that contribute to the understanding and advancement of the field. The content of the journal is complementary to other prestigious journals in transportation research, such as Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Part B: Methodological, Part C: Emerging Technologies, Part D: Transport and Environment, and Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour. Together, these journals form a comprehensive and cohesive reference for current research in transportation science.
期刊最新文献
Designing hub-based regional transportation networks with service level constraints Enhancing carsharing pricing and operations through integrated choice models PTB: A deep reinforcement learning method for flexible logistics service combination problem with spatial-temporal constraint Should live streaming be adopted for agricultural supply chain considering platform’s quality improvement and blockchain support? Returns management in a supply chain considering freight insurance and consumer disappointment aversion
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1