通过下肢表现和膝关节肌肉骨骼状况自我报告的结果测量来评估身体功能:范围回顾。

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy Pub Date : 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1016/j.bjpt.2024.101166
Andrés Pierobon , Will Taylor , Richelle Caya , Federico Villalba , Santiago Soliño , Pablo Oscar Policastro , Richard Siegert , Ben Darlow
{"title":"通过下肢表现和膝关节肌肉骨骼状况自我报告的结果测量来评估身体功能:范围回顾。","authors":"Andrés Pierobon ,&nbsp;Will Taylor ,&nbsp;Richelle Caya ,&nbsp;Federico Villalba ,&nbsp;Santiago Soliño ,&nbsp;Pablo Oscar Policastro ,&nbsp;Richard Siegert ,&nbsp;Ben Darlow","doi":"10.1016/j.bjpt.2024.101166","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Physical function assessment is key for the management of knee musculoskeletal conditions. There are a wide variety of self-reported outcome measures (SROMs) and performance-based outcome measures (PBOMs) to assess physical function of individuals with knee conditions. However, the content of these measures has not been explored.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To explore the range and frequency of physical functions assessed by lower limb PBOMs and SROMs for people with knee osteoarthritis (OA), anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries, and patellofemoral pain (PFP).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A scoping review was conducted. We included development or measurement properties studies of knee functional outcome measures for populations with knee OA, ACL injuries, and PFP. We extracted the physical functions assessed in each measure. Each identified physical function was linked to a code from the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) framework.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>4146 articles were screened. A total of 143 articles were included. The median number of physical functions assessed was nine for SROMs and one for PBOMs. The three most assessed physical functions were climbing stairs, walking short distances, and standing up from sitting. Climbing stairs was the most assessed physical function in measures for knee OA and PFP populations, whereas jumping was in measures for the ACL-injured population.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>SROMs assess a broader range of physical functions, whereas PBOMs focus on discrete activities. ACL and PFP measures evaluated more challenging physical functions than knee OA measures. Current physical function outcome measures are not well suited to assess performance in knee OA populations with mild or diverse levels of impairment.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49621,"journal":{"name":"Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy","volume":"29 1","pages":"Article 101166"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11698925/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Physical functions assessed by lower limb performance-based and self-reported outcome measures for knee musculoskeletal conditions: A scoping review\",\"authors\":\"Andrés Pierobon ,&nbsp;Will Taylor ,&nbsp;Richelle Caya ,&nbsp;Federico Villalba ,&nbsp;Santiago Soliño ,&nbsp;Pablo Oscar Policastro ,&nbsp;Richard Siegert ,&nbsp;Ben Darlow\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.bjpt.2024.101166\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Physical function assessment is key for the management of knee musculoskeletal conditions. There are a wide variety of self-reported outcome measures (SROMs) and performance-based outcome measures (PBOMs) to assess physical function of individuals with knee conditions. However, the content of these measures has not been explored.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To explore the range and frequency of physical functions assessed by lower limb PBOMs and SROMs for people with knee osteoarthritis (OA), anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries, and patellofemoral pain (PFP).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A scoping review was conducted. We included development or measurement properties studies of knee functional outcome measures for populations with knee OA, ACL injuries, and PFP. We extracted the physical functions assessed in each measure. Each identified physical function was linked to a code from the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) framework.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>4146 articles were screened. A total of 143 articles were included. The median number of physical functions assessed was nine for SROMs and one for PBOMs. The three most assessed physical functions were climbing stairs, walking short distances, and standing up from sitting. Climbing stairs was the most assessed physical function in measures for knee OA and PFP populations, whereas jumping was in measures for the ACL-injured population.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>SROMs assess a broader range of physical functions, whereas PBOMs focus on discrete activities. ACL and PFP measures evaluated more challenging physical functions than knee OA measures. Current physical function outcome measures are not well suited to assess performance in knee OA populations with mild or diverse levels of impairment.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49621,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy\",\"volume\":\"29 1\",\"pages\":\"Article 101166\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11698925/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1413355524005744\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1413355524005744","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:身体功能评估是膝关节肌肉骨骼疾病管理的关键。目前有多种自我报告结果测量法(SROM)和基于表现的结果测量法(PBOM)来评估膝关节疾病患者的身体功能。然而,这些测量方法的内容尚未得到探讨:目的:探讨膝关节骨性关节炎(OA)、前交叉韧带(ACL)损伤和髌股关节疼痛(PFP)患者的下肢PBOM和SROM所评估的身体功能的范围和频率:方法:我们进行了一次范围审查。我们纳入了针对膝关节 OA、前交叉韧带损伤和 PFP 患者的膝关节功能结果测量的开发或测量特性研究。我们提取了每项测量所评估的身体功能。每项确定的身体功能都与《国际功能、残疾和健康分类》(ICF)框架中的代码相关联:结果:共筛选出 4146 篇文章。共纳入 143 篇文章。SROM评估的身体功能中位数为9项,PBOM为1项。评估最多的三种身体机能是爬楼梯、短距离行走和坐立。在针对膝关节OA和PFP人群的测量中,爬楼梯是评估最多的身体功能,而在针对前交叉韧带损伤人群的测量中,跳跃是评估最多的身体功能:结论:SROM 评估的身体机能范围更广,而 PBOM 则侧重于离散活动。与膝关节OA测量相比,前交叉韧带和膝关节功能障碍测量评估的身体功能更具挑战性。目前的身体功能结果测量并不适合评估轻度或不同程度损伤的膝关节OA人群的表现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Physical functions assessed by lower limb performance-based and self-reported outcome measures for knee musculoskeletal conditions: A scoping review

Background

Physical function assessment is key for the management of knee musculoskeletal conditions. There are a wide variety of self-reported outcome measures (SROMs) and performance-based outcome measures (PBOMs) to assess physical function of individuals with knee conditions. However, the content of these measures has not been explored.

Objective

To explore the range and frequency of physical functions assessed by lower limb PBOMs and SROMs for people with knee osteoarthritis (OA), anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries, and patellofemoral pain (PFP).

Methods

A scoping review was conducted. We included development or measurement properties studies of knee functional outcome measures for populations with knee OA, ACL injuries, and PFP. We extracted the physical functions assessed in each measure. Each identified physical function was linked to a code from the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) framework.

Results

4146 articles were screened. A total of 143 articles were included. The median number of physical functions assessed was nine for SROMs and one for PBOMs. The three most assessed physical functions were climbing stairs, walking short distances, and standing up from sitting. Climbing stairs was the most assessed physical function in measures for knee OA and PFP populations, whereas jumping was in measures for the ACL-injured population.

Conclusion

SROMs assess a broader range of physical functions, whereas PBOMs focus on discrete activities. ACL and PFP measures evaluated more challenging physical functions than knee OA measures. Current physical function outcome measures are not well suited to assess performance in knee OA populations with mild or diverse levels of impairment.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
8.80%
发文量
53
审稿时长
74 days
期刊介绍: The Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy (BJPT) is the official publication of the Brazilian Society of Physical Therapy Research and Graduate Studies (ABRAPG-Ft). It publishes original research articles on topics related to the areas of physical therapy and rehabilitation sciences, including clinical, basic or applied studies on the assessment, prevention, and treatment of movement disorders.
期刊最新文献
A Brazilian Association of Women´s Health Physical Therapy (ABRAFISM) guideline on the terminology of pelvic floor muscle function and assessment Reply to letter to editor for article: ‘‘Development, reliability, and validity of the mobility assessment scale in hospitalized patients (HMob).’’ Pain revolution in the public health system: Active coping strategies for chronic pain unit Letter to the editor about the article “Development, reliability, and validity of the mobility assessment scale in hospitalized patients (HMob)” Physical therapy assistance in labor: A systematic review and meta-analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1