使用绝对乙醇进行中央血管栓塞辅助门静脉栓塞术。

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q2 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Clinical radiology Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-11-21 DOI:10.1016/j.crad.2024.106755
Y-H Lee, Y-C Lai, M-Y Hsu, C-Y Tsai, T-S Yeh, C-M Chen
{"title":"使用绝对乙醇进行中央血管栓塞辅助门静脉栓塞术。","authors":"Y-H Lee, Y-C Lai, M-Y Hsu, C-Y Tsai, T-S Yeh, C-M Chen","doi":"10.1016/j.crad.2024.106755","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>Compare the efficacy and procedural efficiency of central vascular plug-assisted portal vein embolization (PVE) with absolute ethanol compared to selective PVE.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Between 2016 and 2023, patients who underwent ipsilateral percutaneous transhepatic PVE were included. Selective PVE involves serial cannulation and embolization of portal veins. Central vascular plug-assisted PVE involves deploying a vascular plug at the main portal vein with embolization. Recorded data includes patient demographics, disease diagnosis, volumetry, embolization procedure, biliary drainage, surgery, and measures of future liver remnant hypertrophy (relative hypertrophy, degree of hypertrophy, and kinetic growth rate).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The cohort comprised of 30 patients (cohort mean age 64±9 years old, females n=14) of which 17 (57%) patients underwent central vascular plug-assisted PVE. Indications for PVE were predominately (87%, 26/30) due to bile duct cancer. Volumetric changes between central vascular plug-assisted PVE and selective PVE were not different between the two groups (DH 13%±5 vs 11%±4, p=0.21; and KGR 3%/week ± 2 vs 2%/week ± 2, p=0.27, respectively). Overall procedure times were shorter for central vascular plug-assisted PVE (45±20 minutes vs 112±34 minutes; p<0.001). Two adverse events occurred in selective PVE, while none in central vascular plug-assisted PVE. There was no difference in rates of surgery or no surgery for both methods (p=0.07).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Central vascular plug-assisted PVE with absolute ethanol effectively induced FLR hypertrophy, and significantly reduced procedure times due to faster embolization and simpler technique.</p>","PeriodicalId":10695,"journal":{"name":"Clinical radiology","volume":"80 ","pages":"106755"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Central vascular plug-assisted portal vein embolization with absolute ethanol.\",\"authors\":\"Y-H Lee, Y-C Lai, M-Y Hsu, C-Y Tsai, T-S Yeh, C-M Chen\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.crad.2024.106755\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>Compare the efficacy and procedural efficiency of central vascular plug-assisted portal vein embolization (PVE) with absolute ethanol compared to selective PVE.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Between 2016 and 2023, patients who underwent ipsilateral percutaneous transhepatic PVE were included. Selective PVE involves serial cannulation and embolization of portal veins. Central vascular plug-assisted PVE involves deploying a vascular plug at the main portal vein with embolization. Recorded data includes patient demographics, disease diagnosis, volumetry, embolization procedure, biliary drainage, surgery, and measures of future liver remnant hypertrophy (relative hypertrophy, degree of hypertrophy, and kinetic growth rate).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The cohort comprised of 30 patients (cohort mean age 64±9 years old, females n=14) of which 17 (57%) patients underwent central vascular plug-assisted PVE. Indications for PVE were predominately (87%, 26/30) due to bile duct cancer. Volumetric changes between central vascular plug-assisted PVE and selective PVE were not different between the two groups (DH 13%±5 vs 11%±4, p=0.21; and KGR 3%/week ± 2 vs 2%/week ± 2, p=0.27, respectively). Overall procedure times were shorter for central vascular plug-assisted PVE (45±20 minutes vs 112±34 minutes; p<0.001). Two adverse events occurred in selective PVE, while none in central vascular plug-assisted PVE. There was no difference in rates of surgery or no surgery for both methods (p=0.07).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Central vascular plug-assisted PVE with absolute ethanol effectively induced FLR hypertrophy, and significantly reduced procedure times due to faster embolization and simpler technique.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10695,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical radiology\",\"volume\":\"80 \",\"pages\":\"106755\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical radiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crad.2024.106755\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/11/21 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crad.2024.106755","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:与选择性门静脉栓塞(PVE)相比,比较绝对乙醇辅助中央血管栓塞门静脉栓塞(PVE)的疗效和手术效率:纳入2016年至2023年间接受同侧经皮经肝PVE的患者。选择性 PVE 包括连续插管和门静脉栓塞。中央血管栓塞辅助 PVE 包括在主要门静脉处部署血管栓塞并进行栓塞。记录的数据包括患者的人口统计学特征、疾病诊断、体积测量、栓塞过程、胆道引流、手术以及未来残肝肥大的测量(相对肥大、肥大程度和动力学生长率):组群由 30 名患者组成(组群平均年龄为 64±9 岁,女性 14 人),其中 17 名患者(57%)接受了中央血管栓辅助 PVE。胆管癌是PVE的主要诱因(87%,26/30)。中央血管塞辅助 PVE 和选择性 PVE 的体积变化在两组之间没有差异(分别为 DH 13%±5 vs 11%±4,P=0.21;KGR 3%/week ± 2 vs 2%/week ± 2,P=0.27)。中央血管塞辅助 PVE 的总体手术时间更短(45±20 分钟 vs 112±34 分钟;P=0.21):使用绝对乙醇的中央血管塞辅助PVE能有效诱导FLR肥大,由于栓塞速度更快、技术更简单,手术时间显著缩短。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Central vascular plug-assisted portal vein embolization with absolute ethanol.

Aim: Compare the efficacy and procedural efficiency of central vascular plug-assisted portal vein embolization (PVE) with absolute ethanol compared to selective PVE.

Materials and methods: Between 2016 and 2023, patients who underwent ipsilateral percutaneous transhepatic PVE were included. Selective PVE involves serial cannulation and embolization of portal veins. Central vascular plug-assisted PVE involves deploying a vascular plug at the main portal vein with embolization. Recorded data includes patient demographics, disease diagnosis, volumetry, embolization procedure, biliary drainage, surgery, and measures of future liver remnant hypertrophy (relative hypertrophy, degree of hypertrophy, and kinetic growth rate).

Results: The cohort comprised of 30 patients (cohort mean age 64±9 years old, females n=14) of which 17 (57%) patients underwent central vascular plug-assisted PVE. Indications for PVE were predominately (87%, 26/30) due to bile duct cancer. Volumetric changes between central vascular plug-assisted PVE and selective PVE were not different between the two groups (DH 13%±5 vs 11%±4, p=0.21; and KGR 3%/week ± 2 vs 2%/week ± 2, p=0.27, respectively). Overall procedure times were shorter for central vascular plug-assisted PVE (45±20 minutes vs 112±34 minutes; p<0.001). Two adverse events occurred in selective PVE, while none in central vascular plug-assisted PVE. There was no difference in rates of surgery or no surgery for both methods (p=0.07).

Conclusion: Central vascular plug-assisted PVE with absolute ethanol effectively induced FLR hypertrophy, and significantly reduced procedure times due to faster embolization and simpler technique.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical radiology
Clinical radiology 医学-核医学
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
3.80%
发文量
528
审稿时长
76 days
期刊介绍: Clinical Radiology is published by Elsevier on behalf of The Royal College of Radiologists. Clinical Radiology is an International Journal bringing you original research, editorials and review articles on all aspects of diagnostic imaging, including: • Computed tomography • Magnetic resonance imaging • Ultrasonography • Digital radiology • Interventional radiology • Radiography • Nuclear medicine Papers on radiological protection, quality assurance, audit in radiology and matters relating to radiological training and education are also included. In addition, each issue contains correspondence, book reviews and notices of forthcoming events.
期刊最新文献
Corrigendum to "CT histogram analysis to distinguish between acute intracerebral hemorrhage and cavernous hemangioma" [Clin Radiol 79 (11) (2024) e872-e879]. Re: Utility of zero echo time (ZTE) sequence for assessing bony lesions of skull base and calvarium. Measurement of lumbar vertebral body attenuation at PET-CT is a reliable method of diagnosing osteoporosis. Safety of CT-guided percutaneous cryoablation in patients treated for clinical T1 renal cell carcinoma with the need for pre-procedural ureteral stenting: an international cohort study. Correlation of semi-quantitative analyses and visual scores in pulmonary perfusion SPECT/CT imaging with pulmonary function test parameters in patients with interstitial lung diseases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1