椎体Cobb角和手术水平对退行性脊柱侧凸短节段手术疗效的影响。

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY European Spine Journal Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-14 DOI:10.1007/s00586-024-08599-7
Tomoyuki Asada, Chad Z Simon, Atahan Durbas, Myles R J Allen, Kevin J DiSilvestro, Takashi Hirase, Patawut Bovonratwet, Nishtha Singh, Olivia Tuma, Kasra Araghi, Tejas Subramanian, Maximilian K Korsun, Joshua Zhang, Eric T Kim, Cole T Kwas, Annika Bay, Amy Z Lu, Eric Mai, Yeo Eun Kim, Avani S Vaishnav, James E Dowdell, Evan D Sheha, Sheeraz A Qureshi, Sravisht Iyer
{"title":"椎体Cobb角和手术水平对退行性脊柱侧凸短节段手术疗效的影响。","authors":"Tomoyuki Asada, Chad Z Simon, Atahan Durbas, Myles R J Allen, Kevin J DiSilvestro, Takashi Hirase, Patawut Bovonratwet, Nishtha Singh, Olivia Tuma, Kasra Araghi, Tejas Subramanian, Maximilian K Korsun, Joshua Zhang, Eric T Kim, Cole T Kwas, Annika Bay, Amy Z Lu, Eric Mai, Yeo Eun Kim, Avani S Vaishnav, James E Dowdell, Evan D Sheha, Sheeraz A Qureshi, Sravisht Iyer","doi":"10.1007/s00586-024-08599-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study investigates the relationship between surgical levels and coronal deformity to identify risk factors for failing to achieve a minimal clinically important difference (MCID) in the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) following short-segment isolated decompression or fusion surgery in patients with degenerative scoliosis (DS) and concurrent lumbar canal stenosis (LCS), without severe sagittal deformity malalignment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with degenerative scoliosis who underwent 1- or 2-level lumbar isolated decompression or fusion surgery were included. Surgical level was labeled as \"Cobb-related\" when decompression or surgical levels spanned or were between end vertebrae, and \"outside\" when the operative levels did not include the end vertebrae. Logistic regression analysis was conducted to assess the factor associated with MCID achievement in ODI at 1 year postoperatively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 129 DS patients with LCS and preoperative ODI > 30 were included. At 1-year follow-up, 91 patients (70.5%) achieved MCID in ODI. No significant differences were found in demographics or overall spinal alignment between patients who did and did not achieve MCID. Logistic regression analysis revealed that Cobb-related decompression was independently associated with decreased odds of achieving MCID in ODI (adjusted Odds Ratio 0.18, 95% CI 0.42-0.79, P = 0.025).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In patients with mild to moderate coronal deformity and minimal sagittal deformity, decompression alone at or across end vertebrae significantly lowers the likelihood of achieving the MCID in ODI compared to fusion surgery, with an 84% reduction in odds. No significant difference in MCID achievement was observed between decompression and fusion surgeries outside the Cobb angle.</p>","PeriodicalId":12323,"journal":{"name":"European Spine Journal","volume":" ","pages":"773-781"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11805618/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Influence of coronal lumbar Cobb angle and surgical level on short-segment lumbar surgery outcomes in degenerative scoliosis.\",\"authors\":\"Tomoyuki Asada, Chad Z Simon, Atahan Durbas, Myles R J Allen, Kevin J DiSilvestro, Takashi Hirase, Patawut Bovonratwet, Nishtha Singh, Olivia Tuma, Kasra Araghi, Tejas Subramanian, Maximilian K Korsun, Joshua Zhang, Eric T Kim, Cole T Kwas, Annika Bay, Amy Z Lu, Eric Mai, Yeo Eun Kim, Avani S Vaishnav, James E Dowdell, Evan D Sheha, Sheeraz A Qureshi, Sravisht Iyer\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00586-024-08599-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study investigates the relationship between surgical levels and coronal deformity to identify risk factors for failing to achieve a minimal clinically important difference (MCID) in the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) following short-segment isolated decompression or fusion surgery in patients with degenerative scoliosis (DS) and concurrent lumbar canal stenosis (LCS), without severe sagittal deformity malalignment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with degenerative scoliosis who underwent 1- or 2-level lumbar isolated decompression or fusion surgery were included. Surgical level was labeled as \\\"Cobb-related\\\" when decompression or surgical levels spanned or were between end vertebrae, and \\\"outside\\\" when the operative levels did not include the end vertebrae. Logistic regression analysis was conducted to assess the factor associated with MCID achievement in ODI at 1 year postoperatively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 129 DS patients with LCS and preoperative ODI > 30 were included. At 1-year follow-up, 91 patients (70.5%) achieved MCID in ODI. No significant differences were found in demographics or overall spinal alignment between patients who did and did not achieve MCID. Logistic regression analysis revealed that Cobb-related decompression was independently associated with decreased odds of achieving MCID in ODI (adjusted Odds Ratio 0.18, 95% CI 0.42-0.79, P = 0.025).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In patients with mild to moderate coronal deformity and minimal sagittal deformity, decompression alone at or across end vertebrae significantly lowers the likelihood of achieving the MCID in ODI compared to fusion surgery, with an 84% reduction in odds. No significant difference in MCID achievement was observed between decompression and fusion surgeries outside the Cobb angle.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12323,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Spine Journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"773-781\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11805618/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Spine Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-024-08599-7\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/12/14 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Spine Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-024-08599-7","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究探讨手术水平与冠状畸形之间的关系,以确定在退行性脊柱侧凸(DS)合并并发腰椎管狭窄(LCS)患者行短节段孤立减压或融合手术后未能实现Oswestry残疾指数(ODI)最小临床重要差异(MCID)的危险因素,且无严重矢状畸形错位。方法:纳入行1节段或2节段腰椎分离减压或融合手术的退行性脊柱侧凸患者。当减压或手术水平跨越或位于末椎体之间时,手术水平被标记为“cobb相关”,当手术水平不包括末椎体时,手术水平被标记为“外部”。采用Logistic回归分析评估ODI术后1年实现MCID的相关因素。结果:共纳入129例伴有LCS的DS患者,术前ODI bb30。1年随访,91例(70.5%)ODI患者达到MCID。在实现和未实现MCID的患者之间,在人口统计学或总体脊柱对齐方面没有发现显著差异。Logistic回归分析显示,cobb相关减压与ODI患者实现MCID的几率降低独立相关(校正优势比0.18,95% CI 0.42-0.79, P = 0.025)。结论:在轻度至中度冠状畸形和轻度矢状畸形的患者中,与融合手术相比,单独在椎端或跨椎端减压可显著降低ODI中实现MCID的可能性,降低了84%的几率。Cobb角外减压和融合手术在MCID成就上无显著差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Influence of coronal lumbar Cobb angle and surgical level on short-segment lumbar surgery outcomes in degenerative scoliosis.

Purpose: This study investigates the relationship between surgical levels and coronal deformity to identify risk factors for failing to achieve a minimal clinically important difference (MCID) in the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) following short-segment isolated decompression or fusion surgery in patients with degenerative scoliosis (DS) and concurrent lumbar canal stenosis (LCS), without severe sagittal deformity malalignment.

Methods: Patients with degenerative scoliosis who underwent 1- or 2-level lumbar isolated decompression or fusion surgery were included. Surgical level was labeled as "Cobb-related" when decompression or surgical levels spanned or were between end vertebrae, and "outside" when the operative levels did not include the end vertebrae. Logistic regression analysis was conducted to assess the factor associated with MCID achievement in ODI at 1 year postoperatively.

Results: A total of 129 DS patients with LCS and preoperative ODI > 30 were included. At 1-year follow-up, 91 patients (70.5%) achieved MCID in ODI. No significant differences were found in demographics or overall spinal alignment between patients who did and did not achieve MCID. Logistic regression analysis revealed that Cobb-related decompression was independently associated with decreased odds of achieving MCID in ODI (adjusted Odds Ratio 0.18, 95% CI 0.42-0.79, P = 0.025).

Conclusion: In patients with mild to moderate coronal deformity and minimal sagittal deformity, decompression alone at or across end vertebrae significantly lowers the likelihood of achieving the MCID in ODI compared to fusion surgery, with an 84% reduction in odds. No significant difference in MCID achievement was observed between decompression and fusion surgeries outside the Cobb angle.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
European Spine Journal
European Spine Journal 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
10.70%
发文量
373
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: "European Spine Journal" is a publication founded in response to the increasing trend toward specialization in spinal surgery and spinal pathology in general. The Journal is devoted to all spine related disciplines, including functional and surgical anatomy of the spine, biomechanics and pathophysiology, diagnostic procedures, and neurology, surgery and outcomes. The aim of "European Spine Journal" is to support the further development of highly innovative spine treatments including but not restricted to surgery and to provide an integrated and balanced view of diagnostic, research and treatment procedures as well as outcomes that will enhance effective collaboration among specialists worldwide. The “European Spine Journal” also participates in education by means of videos, interactive meetings and the endorsement of educative efforts. Official publication of EUROSPINE, The Spine Society of Europe
期刊最新文献
Differentiation of typical features between Fungal spondylitis and Brucellar spondylitis on CT and new applications of CT values in diagnosis of spinal infections. Improving the accuracy of current sagittal alignment evaluation system centered around pelvic incidence: a new machine-learning based classification. Risk factors for residual neuropathic pain using specific screening tools in postoperative patients with ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament of the cervical spine. Evaluation of fracture lines in adolescent lumbar spondylolysis using MR bone imaging as an alternative to computed tomography. Correction to: ISSLS Prize in Clinical Science 2025: A randomized trial on three different minimally invasive decompression techniques for lumbar spinal stenosis. Five years follow‑up from the NORDSTEN‑SST.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1