从治疗师和自杀病人的立场看急诊精神病学中的护理腐蚀和权能丧失:从治疗师和自杀患者的立场看问题。

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Health Pub Date : 2024-12-13 DOI:10.1177/13634593241303617
Julia Hagen, Birthe Loa Knizek, Heidi Hjelmeland
{"title":"从治疗师和自杀病人的立场看急诊精神病学中的护理腐蚀和权能丧失:从治疗师和自杀患者的立场看问题。","authors":"Julia Hagen, Birthe Loa Knizek, Heidi Hjelmeland","doi":"10.1177/13634593241303617","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>For people in suicidal crisis, referral to a psychiatric hospital is common. However, acute psychiatry is characterized by a lack of resources in terms of time and beds, making it challenging for therapists to provide person-centered care. In this qualitative study, we explored the experiences and positionings of therapists and suicidal patients in an acute psychiatric ward in Norway. We generated data through participatory observation and interviews with therapists and patients and analyzed the material using principles from Systematic Text Condensation supplemented with an analysis from a Positioning theory perspective. We developed two themes: <i>Therapists positioned as professionals with authority in a context with restricted action radius</i>, and <i>Patients in suicidal crisis positioned as medical subjects with limited influence</i>. In this resource-limited context, therapists managed their work and obligations by simplifying the patient's suffering and suicidality and by emphasizing medical aspects. Ensuring an efficient patient flow was a high priority. The therapists' authority and actions were closely connected to how patients were positioned and their experiences of the care. Positioning theory provides new perspectives for understanding the power imbalance in the positions of therapists and patients. The findings provide insights into acute inpatient psychiatry as a normative field where the choices and actions of both therapists and patients are restricted. In that sense, both patients and therapists can feel powerless. The findings point to significant limitations in the acute mental health care of people in suicidal crisis.</p>","PeriodicalId":12944,"journal":{"name":"Health","volume":" ","pages":"13634593241303617"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Corrosion of care and disempowerment in acute psychiatry: As seen from the positions of therapists and suicidal patients.\",\"authors\":\"Julia Hagen, Birthe Loa Knizek, Heidi Hjelmeland\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/13634593241303617\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>For people in suicidal crisis, referral to a psychiatric hospital is common. However, acute psychiatry is characterized by a lack of resources in terms of time and beds, making it challenging for therapists to provide person-centered care. In this qualitative study, we explored the experiences and positionings of therapists and suicidal patients in an acute psychiatric ward in Norway. We generated data through participatory observation and interviews with therapists and patients and analyzed the material using principles from Systematic Text Condensation supplemented with an analysis from a Positioning theory perspective. We developed two themes: <i>Therapists positioned as professionals with authority in a context with restricted action radius</i>, and <i>Patients in suicidal crisis positioned as medical subjects with limited influence</i>. In this resource-limited context, therapists managed their work and obligations by simplifying the patient's suffering and suicidality and by emphasizing medical aspects. Ensuring an efficient patient flow was a high priority. The therapists' authority and actions were closely connected to how patients were positioned and their experiences of the care. Positioning theory provides new perspectives for understanding the power imbalance in the positions of therapists and patients. The findings provide insights into acute inpatient psychiatry as a normative field where the choices and actions of both therapists and patients are restricted. In that sense, both patients and therapists can feel powerless. The findings point to significant limitations in the acute mental health care of people in suicidal crisis.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12944,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"13634593241303617\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/13634593241303617\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/13634593241303617","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

对于有自杀危机的人来说,转诊到精神病院是很常见的。然而,急性精神病学的特点是在时间和床位方面缺乏资源,这使得治疗师提供以人为本的护理具有挑战性。在这个定性研究中,我们探讨了经验和治疗师和自杀患者在挪威急性精神病病房的定位。我们通过参与式观察和对治疗师和患者的访谈来生成数据,并使用系统文本浓缩的原则来分析材料,并辅以定位理论的分析。我们发展了两个主题:治疗师被定位为在行动范围有限的背景下具有权威的专业人士,而自杀危机中的患者被定位为影响有限的医学主体。在这种资源有限的情况下,治疗师通过简化病人的痛苦和自杀倾向以及强调医疗方面来管理他们的工作和义务。确保病人的高效流动是重中之重。治疗师的权威和行动与病人的位置和他们的护理经历密切相关。定位理论为理解治疗师和患者在位置上的权力不平衡提供了新的视角。这些发现提供了对急性住院精神病学作为一个规范领域的见解,治疗师和患者的选择和行动都受到限制。从这个意义上说,患者和治疗师都感到无能为力。研究结果指出,在自杀危机人群的急性精神卫生保健方面存在重大局限性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Corrosion of care and disempowerment in acute psychiatry: As seen from the positions of therapists and suicidal patients.

For people in suicidal crisis, referral to a psychiatric hospital is common. However, acute psychiatry is characterized by a lack of resources in terms of time and beds, making it challenging for therapists to provide person-centered care. In this qualitative study, we explored the experiences and positionings of therapists and suicidal patients in an acute psychiatric ward in Norway. We generated data through participatory observation and interviews with therapists and patients and analyzed the material using principles from Systematic Text Condensation supplemented with an analysis from a Positioning theory perspective. We developed two themes: Therapists positioned as professionals with authority in a context with restricted action radius, and Patients in suicidal crisis positioned as medical subjects with limited influence. In this resource-limited context, therapists managed their work and obligations by simplifying the patient's suffering and suicidality and by emphasizing medical aspects. Ensuring an efficient patient flow was a high priority. The therapists' authority and actions were closely connected to how patients were positioned and their experiences of the care. Positioning theory provides new perspectives for understanding the power imbalance in the positions of therapists and patients. The findings provide insights into acute inpatient psychiatry as a normative field where the choices and actions of both therapists and patients are restricted. In that sense, both patients and therapists can feel powerless. The findings point to significant limitations in the acute mental health care of people in suicidal crisis.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Health
Health Multiple-
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Health: is published four times per year and attempts in each number to offer a mix of articles that inform or that provoke debate. The readership of the journal is wide and drawn from different disciplines and from workers both inside and outside the health care professions. Widely abstracted, Health: ensures authors an extensive and informed readership for their work. It also seeks to offer authors as short a delay as possible between submission and publication. Most articles are reviewed within 4-6 weeks of submission and those accepted are published within a year of that decision.
期刊最新文献
Agency, sex and drug education: Examining the response-ability of education responses to consumption, sex and harm. Sabotage, feeding and collusion after bariatric surgery. And the winner is . . .? A psychodynamic and systemic perspective on sabotage and feeding after bariatric surgery by means of a case series analysis. Distributed decision-making for lumbar spine surgery: A qualitative interview study with patients and neurosurgeons. Stigmatising space-times: Addressing healthcare stigma beyond interpersonal interactions. Narratives of reconstruction: Looking beyond biographical disruption through three Indian breast cancer memoirs.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1