利用深度学习模型区分屈指肌和比目鱼肌在不同站立姿势下的活动。

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q3 NEUROSCIENCES Gait & posture Pub Date : 2024-12-11 DOI:10.1016/j.gaitpost.2024.12.014
Alireza Kamankesh , Negar Rahimi , Ioannis G. Amiridis , Chrysostomos Sahinis , Vassilia Hatzitaki , Roger M. Enoka
{"title":"利用深度学习模型区分屈指肌和比目鱼肌在不同站立姿势下的活动。","authors":"Alireza Kamankesh ,&nbsp;Negar Rahimi ,&nbsp;Ioannis G. Amiridis ,&nbsp;Chrysostomos Sahinis ,&nbsp;Vassilia Hatzitaki ,&nbsp;Roger M. Enoka","doi":"10.1016/j.gaitpost.2024.12.014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Electromyographic (EMG) recordings indicate that both the flexor digitorum brevis and soleus muscles contribute significantly to the control of standing balance, However, less is known about the adjustments in EMG activity of these two muscles across different postures.</div></div><div><h3>Research question</h3><div>The purpose of our study was to use deep-learning models to distinguish between the EMG activity of the flexor digitorum brevis and soleus muscles across four standing postures.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Deep convolutional neural networks were employed to classify standing postures based on the temporal and spatial features embedded in high-density surface EMG signals. The EMG recordings were obtained with grid electrodes placed over the flexor digitorum brevis and soleus muscles of healthy young men during four standing tasks: bipedal, tandem, one-leg, and tip-toe.</div></div><div><h3>Results and significance</h3><div>Two-way repeated-measures analysis of variance demonstrated that the model achieved significantly greater classification accuracy, particularly during tandem stance, using EMG data from flexor digitorum brevis compared with soleus muscle. Average classification accuracy was 84.6 % for flexor digitorum brevis and 79.1 % for soleus. The classification accuracy of both muscles varied across the four postures. There were significant differences in classification accuracy for flexor digitorum brevis between bipedal and tandem stances compared with one-leg and tip-toe stances. In contrast, the EMG data for soleus were only significantly different between bipedal stance and one-leg stance. These findings indicate that flexor digitorum brevis exhibited more distinct adjustments than soleus in the temporo-spatial features of EMG activity across the four postures.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12496,"journal":{"name":"Gait & posture","volume":"117 ","pages":"Pages 58-64"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Distinguishing the activity of flexor digitorum brevis and soleus across standing postures with deep learning models\",\"authors\":\"Alireza Kamankesh ,&nbsp;Negar Rahimi ,&nbsp;Ioannis G. Amiridis ,&nbsp;Chrysostomos Sahinis ,&nbsp;Vassilia Hatzitaki ,&nbsp;Roger M. Enoka\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.gaitpost.2024.12.014\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Electromyographic (EMG) recordings indicate that both the flexor digitorum brevis and soleus muscles contribute significantly to the control of standing balance, However, less is known about the adjustments in EMG activity of these two muscles across different postures.</div></div><div><h3>Research question</h3><div>The purpose of our study was to use deep-learning models to distinguish between the EMG activity of the flexor digitorum brevis and soleus muscles across four standing postures.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Deep convolutional neural networks were employed to classify standing postures based on the temporal and spatial features embedded in high-density surface EMG signals. The EMG recordings were obtained with grid electrodes placed over the flexor digitorum brevis and soleus muscles of healthy young men during four standing tasks: bipedal, tandem, one-leg, and tip-toe.</div></div><div><h3>Results and significance</h3><div>Two-way repeated-measures analysis of variance demonstrated that the model achieved significantly greater classification accuracy, particularly during tandem stance, using EMG data from flexor digitorum brevis compared with soleus muscle. Average classification accuracy was 84.6 % for flexor digitorum brevis and 79.1 % for soleus. The classification accuracy of both muscles varied across the four postures. There were significant differences in classification accuracy for flexor digitorum brevis between bipedal and tandem stances compared with one-leg and tip-toe stances. In contrast, the EMG data for soleus were only significantly different between bipedal stance and one-leg stance. These findings indicate that flexor digitorum brevis exhibited more distinct adjustments than soleus in the temporo-spatial features of EMG activity across the four postures.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12496,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Gait & posture\",\"volume\":\"117 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 58-64\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Gait & posture\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0966636224007495\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gait & posture","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0966636224007495","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:肌电图(EMG)记录表明,趾屈肌和比目鱼肌对站立平衡的控制有重要作用,然而,人们对这两块肌肉在不同姿势下的EMG活动调整知之甚少:我们研究的目的是利用深度学习模型来区分屈指肌和比目鱼肌在四种站立姿势下的肌电图活动:根据高密度表面肌电信号的时间和空间特征,采用深度卷积神经网络对站立姿势进行分类。EMG记录是通过放置在健康年轻男性屈指肌和比目鱼肌上的网格电极在四种站立任务中获得的,这四种站立任务是:双足站立、双人站立、单腿站立和踮脚站立:双向重复测量方差分析表明,与比目鱼肌相比,该模型使用屈指肌与比目鱼肌的肌电图数据,分类准确率明显更高,尤其是在双人站立时。前屈肌的平均分类准确率为 84.6%,比目鱼肌为 79.1%。在四种姿势中,两块肌肉的分类准确率各不相同。与单腿站立和踮脚站立相比,双足站立和串联站立对拇屈肌的分类准确率存在明显差异。相比之下,比目鱼肌的肌电图数据仅在双足站立和单足站立之间存在显著差异。这些发现表明,与比目鱼肌相比,屈指肌在四种姿势中的肌电图活动的时空特征表现出更明显的调整。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Distinguishing the activity of flexor digitorum brevis and soleus across standing postures with deep learning models

Background

Electromyographic (EMG) recordings indicate that both the flexor digitorum brevis and soleus muscles contribute significantly to the control of standing balance, However, less is known about the adjustments in EMG activity of these two muscles across different postures.

Research question

The purpose of our study was to use deep-learning models to distinguish between the EMG activity of the flexor digitorum brevis and soleus muscles across four standing postures.

Methods

Deep convolutional neural networks were employed to classify standing postures based on the temporal and spatial features embedded in high-density surface EMG signals. The EMG recordings were obtained with grid electrodes placed over the flexor digitorum brevis and soleus muscles of healthy young men during four standing tasks: bipedal, tandem, one-leg, and tip-toe.

Results and significance

Two-way repeated-measures analysis of variance demonstrated that the model achieved significantly greater classification accuracy, particularly during tandem stance, using EMG data from flexor digitorum brevis compared with soleus muscle. Average classification accuracy was 84.6 % for flexor digitorum brevis and 79.1 % for soleus. The classification accuracy of both muscles varied across the four postures. There were significant differences in classification accuracy for flexor digitorum brevis between bipedal and tandem stances compared with one-leg and tip-toe stances. In contrast, the EMG data for soleus were only significantly different between bipedal stance and one-leg stance. These findings indicate that flexor digitorum brevis exhibited more distinct adjustments than soleus in the temporo-spatial features of EMG activity across the four postures.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Gait & posture
Gait & posture 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
12.50%
发文量
616
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Gait & Posture is a vehicle for the publication of up-to-date basic and clinical research on all aspects of locomotion and balance. The topics covered include: Techniques for the measurement of gait and posture, and the standardization of results presentation; Studies of normal and pathological gait; Treatment of gait and postural abnormalities; Biomechanical and theoretical approaches to gait and posture; Mathematical models of joint and muscle mechanics; Neurological and musculoskeletal function in gait and posture; The evolution of upright posture and bipedal locomotion; Adaptations of carrying loads, walking on uneven surfaces, climbing stairs etc; spinal biomechanics only if they are directly related to gait and/or posture and are of general interest to our readers; The effect of aging and development on gait and posture; Psychological and cultural aspects of gait; Patient education.
期刊最新文献
Validation of an algorithm for detecting turning in people with cognitive impairment, considering dementia disease subtype Impact of mild leg length discrepancy on pelvic alignment and gait compensation in children Fully instrumented gait analysis in rare bone diseases – A scoping review of the literature Effects of external ankle braces on kinematics and kinetics of the lower limb during the cutting maneuver in healthy females The effects of Hyperkyphosis on Balance and Fall Risk in older adults: A Systematic Review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1