C. Dijkman, A. R. Thomas, L. van Boekel, I. Koenraadt -Van Oost, R. C. I. van Geenen
{"title":"用于伤口闭合的组织粘合剂作为订书机的辅助工具,可减少全膝关节置换术后的伤口引流","authors":"C. Dijkman, A. R. Thomas, L. van Boekel, I. Koenraadt -Van Oost, R. C. I. van Geenen","doi":"10.1007/s00402-024-05658-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Wound drainage after total knee or hip arthroplasty is a relatively frequent complication. It results in delayed mobilization, prolonged hospital stay, increased costs and is associated with an increased risk of infection. In this study, tissue adhesive was administered as an adjunct to skin closure with staples.</p><h3>Methods</h3><p>From February 2017, in a cohort of 1000 consecutive patients receiving primary total hip, total knee (TKA) or unicondylar knee arthroplasty, tissue adhesive was administered after skin closure with staples. Patients were prospectively analyzed for increased duration of hospital admission due to wound drainage. This cohort was compared to a consecutive cohort of 1000 patients before February 2017, treated with the same perioperative protocol, except for administration of tissue adhesive for skin closure. Difference in number of patients requiring prolonged hospital stay due to wound drainage was assessed between the two cohorts. Besides, costs of tissue adhesive were compared to change in hospital admission costs to assess the cost-effectiveness.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>The number of patients requiring prolonged hospital admission due to wound drainage was significantly reduced in the study group compared to the group not treated with tissue adhesive (39/990 patients vs. 68/961 patients, <i>p</i> = 0.002). The mean number of extra days of hospital admission due to wound drainage was also significantly lower in the tissue adhesive cohort (0.06 vs. 0.13 days). The mean number of extra days in hospital only proved to be significant in the TKA cohort. Total money saved by preventing prolonged hospital admission in general cohort amounted €19,610.</p><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>This study proves that tissue adhesive as an adjunct to staples for wound closure after total knee arthroplasty reduces wound drainage and is cost effective. Besides, this could potentially lead to lower rates of periprosthetic joint infection. Therefore, the use of tissue adhesive in total knee arthroplasty would be recommended.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8326,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery","volume":"145 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Tissue adhesive for wound closure, as adjunct to staples, reduces postoperative wound drainage after total knee arthroplasty\",\"authors\":\"C. Dijkman, A. R. Thomas, L. van Boekel, I. Koenraadt -Van Oost, R. C. I. van Geenen\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00402-024-05658-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Wound drainage after total knee or hip arthroplasty is a relatively frequent complication. It results in delayed mobilization, prolonged hospital stay, increased costs and is associated with an increased risk of infection. In this study, tissue adhesive was administered as an adjunct to skin closure with staples.</p><h3>Methods</h3><p>From February 2017, in a cohort of 1000 consecutive patients receiving primary total hip, total knee (TKA) or unicondylar knee arthroplasty, tissue adhesive was administered after skin closure with staples. Patients were prospectively analyzed for increased duration of hospital admission due to wound drainage. This cohort was compared to a consecutive cohort of 1000 patients before February 2017, treated with the same perioperative protocol, except for administration of tissue adhesive for skin closure. Difference in number of patients requiring prolonged hospital stay due to wound drainage was assessed between the two cohorts. Besides, costs of tissue adhesive were compared to change in hospital admission costs to assess the cost-effectiveness.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>The number of patients requiring prolonged hospital admission due to wound drainage was significantly reduced in the study group compared to the group not treated with tissue adhesive (39/990 patients vs. 68/961 patients, <i>p</i> = 0.002). The mean number of extra days of hospital admission due to wound drainage was also significantly lower in the tissue adhesive cohort (0.06 vs. 0.13 days). The mean number of extra days in hospital only proved to be significant in the TKA cohort. Total money saved by preventing prolonged hospital admission in general cohort amounted €19,610.</p><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>This study proves that tissue adhesive as an adjunct to staples for wound closure after total knee arthroplasty reduces wound drainage and is cost effective. Besides, this could potentially lead to lower rates of periprosthetic joint infection. Therefore, the use of tissue adhesive in total knee arthroplasty would be recommended.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8326,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery\",\"volume\":\"145 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00402-024-05658-y\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00402-024-05658-y","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:全膝关节或髋关节置换术后伤口引流是比较常见的并发症。它导致行动延迟、住院时间延长、费用增加,并与感染风险增加有关。在这项研究中,组织粘接剂被用作订书钉闭合皮肤的辅助手段。方法自2017年2月起,在1000例连续接受原发性全髋关节、全膝关节(TKA)或单髁膝关节置换术的患者中,用订书钉闭合皮肤后给予组织粘接剂。对因伤口引流而增加住院时间的患者进行前瞻性分析。该队列与2017年2月之前的1000例患者的连续队列进行比较,这些患者接受了相同的围手术期治疗方案,除了使用组织粘接剂进行皮肤闭合。评估两个队列中因伤口引流而需要延长住院时间的患者数量的差异。此外,将组织黏合剂的成本与住院费用的变化进行比较,以评估成本-效果。结果与未使用组织粘接剂治疗组相比,研究组因伤口引流而需要延长住院时间的患者数量明显减少(39/990 vs 68/961, p = 0.002)。在组织粘接剂组中,因伤口引流而额外住院的平均天数也明显较低(0.06天对0.13天)。平均额外住院天数仅在TKA队列中被证明是显著的。防止一般队列长期住院所节省的资金总额为19 610欧元。结论组织粘接剂用于全膝关节置换术后缝合,可减少创面引流,具有较好的成本效益。此外,这可能会降低假体周围关节感染的发生率。因此,推荐在全膝关节置换术中使用组织粘接剂。
Tissue adhesive for wound closure, as adjunct to staples, reduces postoperative wound drainage after total knee arthroplasty
Background
Wound drainage after total knee or hip arthroplasty is a relatively frequent complication. It results in delayed mobilization, prolonged hospital stay, increased costs and is associated with an increased risk of infection. In this study, tissue adhesive was administered as an adjunct to skin closure with staples.
Methods
From February 2017, in a cohort of 1000 consecutive patients receiving primary total hip, total knee (TKA) or unicondylar knee arthroplasty, tissue adhesive was administered after skin closure with staples. Patients were prospectively analyzed for increased duration of hospital admission due to wound drainage. This cohort was compared to a consecutive cohort of 1000 patients before February 2017, treated with the same perioperative protocol, except for administration of tissue adhesive for skin closure. Difference in number of patients requiring prolonged hospital stay due to wound drainage was assessed between the two cohorts. Besides, costs of tissue adhesive were compared to change in hospital admission costs to assess the cost-effectiveness.
Results
The number of patients requiring prolonged hospital admission due to wound drainage was significantly reduced in the study group compared to the group not treated with tissue adhesive (39/990 patients vs. 68/961 patients, p = 0.002). The mean number of extra days of hospital admission due to wound drainage was also significantly lower in the tissue adhesive cohort (0.06 vs. 0.13 days). The mean number of extra days in hospital only proved to be significant in the TKA cohort. Total money saved by preventing prolonged hospital admission in general cohort amounted €19,610.
Conclusion
This study proves that tissue adhesive as an adjunct to staples for wound closure after total knee arthroplasty reduces wound drainage and is cost effective. Besides, this could potentially lead to lower rates of periprosthetic joint infection. Therefore, the use of tissue adhesive in total knee arthroplasty would be recommended.
期刊介绍:
"Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery" is a rich source of instruction and information for physicians in clinical practice and research in the extensive field of orthopaedics and traumatology. The journal publishes papers that deal with diseases and injuries of the musculoskeletal system from all fields and aspects of medicine. The journal is particularly interested in papers that satisfy the information needs of orthopaedic clinicians and practitioners. The journal places special emphasis on clinical relevance.
"Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery" is the official journal of the German Speaking Arthroscopy Association (AGA).