将自我报告数据纳入HIV近期分类的可能性方法。

IF 1.4 4区 数学 Q3 BIOLOGY Biometrics Pub Date : 2024-10-03 DOI:10.1093/biomtc/ujae147
Wenlong Yang, Danping Liu, Le Bao, Runze Li
{"title":"将自我报告数据纳入HIV近期分类的可能性方法。","authors":"Wenlong Yang, Danping Liu, Le Bao, Runze Li","doi":"10.1093/biomtc/ujae147","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Estimating new HIV infections is significant yet challenging due to the difficulty in distinguishing between recent and long-term infections. We demonstrate that HIV recency status (recent versus long-term) could be determined from self-report testing history and biomarkers, which are increasingly available in bio-behavioral surveys. HIV recency status is partially observed, given the self-report testing history. For example, people who tested positive for HIV over 1 year ago should have a long-term infection. Based on the nationally representative samples collected by the Population-based HIV Impact Assessment (PHIA) Project, we propose a likelihood-based probabilistic model for HIV recency classification. The model incorporates individuals with known recency status based on testing histories and individuals whose recency status could not be determined and integrates the mechanism of how HIV recency status depends on biomarkers and the mechanism of how HIV recency status, together with the self-report time of the most recent HIV test, impacts the test results. We compare our method to logistic regression and the binary classification tree (current practice) on Malawi PHIA data, as well as on simulated data. Our model obtains more efficient and less biased parameter estimates and is relatively robust to potential reporting error and model misspecification.</p>","PeriodicalId":8930,"journal":{"name":"Biometrics","volume":"80 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11647912/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A likelihood approach to incorporating self-report data in HIV recency classification.\",\"authors\":\"Wenlong Yang, Danping Liu, Le Bao, Runze Li\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/biomtc/ujae147\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Estimating new HIV infections is significant yet challenging due to the difficulty in distinguishing between recent and long-term infections. We demonstrate that HIV recency status (recent versus long-term) could be determined from self-report testing history and biomarkers, which are increasingly available in bio-behavioral surveys. HIV recency status is partially observed, given the self-report testing history. For example, people who tested positive for HIV over 1 year ago should have a long-term infection. Based on the nationally representative samples collected by the Population-based HIV Impact Assessment (PHIA) Project, we propose a likelihood-based probabilistic model for HIV recency classification. The model incorporates individuals with known recency status based on testing histories and individuals whose recency status could not be determined and integrates the mechanism of how HIV recency status depends on biomarkers and the mechanism of how HIV recency status, together with the self-report time of the most recent HIV test, impacts the test results. We compare our method to logistic regression and the binary classification tree (current practice) on Malawi PHIA data, as well as on simulated data. Our model obtains more efficient and less biased parameter estimates and is relatively robust to potential reporting error and model misspecification.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8930,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Biometrics\",\"volume\":\"80 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11647912/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Biometrics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"100\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/biomtc/ujae147\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"数学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biometrics","FirstCategoryId":"100","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/biomtc/ujae147","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"数学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

由于难以区分近期感染和长期感染,估计新的艾滋病毒感染非常重要,但也具有挑战性。我们证明HIV近发状态(近期或长期)可以从自我报告的检测历史和生物标志物中确定,这些在生物行为调查中越来越可用。根据自我报告的检测史,可以部分观察到HIV的近发状况。例如,1年前艾滋病毒检测呈阳性的人应该是长期感染。基于基于人口的HIV影响评估项目收集的具有全国代表性的样本,我们提出了一个基于似然的HIV近期分类概率模型。该模型结合了基于检测历史的已知近发状态个体和无法确定近发状态个体,整合了HIV近发状态如何依赖生物标志物的机制,以及HIV近发状态如何与最近一次HIV检测的自我报告时间一起影响检测结果的机制。我们将我们的方法与马拉维PHIA数据以及模拟数据上的逻辑回归和二分类树(目前的做法)进行比较。我们的模型获得了更有效和更少偏差的参数估计,并且对潜在的报告错误和模型错误规范具有相对的鲁棒性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A likelihood approach to incorporating self-report data in HIV recency classification.

Estimating new HIV infections is significant yet challenging due to the difficulty in distinguishing between recent and long-term infections. We demonstrate that HIV recency status (recent versus long-term) could be determined from self-report testing history and biomarkers, which are increasingly available in bio-behavioral surveys. HIV recency status is partially observed, given the self-report testing history. For example, people who tested positive for HIV over 1 year ago should have a long-term infection. Based on the nationally representative samples collected by the Population-based HIV Impact Assessment (PHIA) Project, we propose a likelihood-based probabilistic model for HIV recency classification. The model incorporates individuals with known recency status based on testing histories and individuals whose recency status could not be determined and integrates the mechanism of how HIV recency status depends on biomarkers and the mechanism of how HIV recency status, together with the self-report time of the most recent HIV test, impacts the test results. We compare our method to logistic regression and the binary classification tree (current practice) on Malawi PHIA data, as well as on simulated data. Our model obtains more efficient and less biased parameter estimates and is relatively robust to potential reporting error and model misspecification.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Biometrics
Biometrics 生物-生物学
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
5.30%
发文量
178
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Biometric Society is an international society promoting the development and application of statistical and mathematical theory and methods in the biosciences, including agriculture, biomedical science and public health, ecology, environmental sciences, forestry, and allied disciplines. The Society welcomes as members statisticians, mathematicians, biological scientists, and others devoted to interdisciplinary efforts in advancing the collection and interpretation of information in the biosciences. The Society sponsors the biennial International Biometric Conference, held in sites throughout the world; through its National Groups and Regions, it also Society sponsors regional and local meetings.
期刊最新文献
Gaussian processes for time series with lead-lag effects with applications to biology data. Weighted Q-learning for optimal dynamic treatment regimes with nonignorable missing covariates. Causal inference with cross-temporal design. Distributed model building and recursive integration for big spatial data modeling. Robust Bayesian graphical regression models for assessing tumor heterogeneity in proteomic networks.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1