研究加利福尼亚州大麻和酒精销售点与自残伤害的互动关联:时空分析。

IF 4.7 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Epidemiology Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-16 DOI:10.1097/EDE.0000000000001822
Rafael Charris, Jennifer Ahern, Dorie E Apollonio, Victoria Jent, Laurie M Jacobs, Shelley Jung, Laura A Schmidt, Paul Gruenewald, Ellicott C Matthay
{"title":"研究加利福尼亚州大麻和酒精销售点与自残伤害的互动关联:时空分析。","authors":"Rafael Charris, Jennifer Ahern, Dorie E Apollonio, Victoria Jent, Laurie M Jacobs, Shelley Jung, Laura A Schmidt, Paul Gruenewald, Ellicott C Matthay","doi":"10.1097/EDE.0000000000001822","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cannabis use and alcohol use are associated with self-harm injuries, but little research has assessed links between recreational cannabis outlet openings on rates of self-harm within communities or the interactions of cannabis outlets with the density of alcohol outlets. We estimated the associations of recreational cannabis outlets, alcohol outlets, and their interaction on rates of fatal and nonfatal self-harm injuries in California, 2017-2019.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using California statewide data on recreational cannabis outlets, alcohol outlets, and hospital discharges and deaths due to self-harm injuries, we conducted Bayesian spatiotemporal analyses of quarterly ZIP code-level data over 3 years, accounting for confounders and spatial autocorrelation. Using the model posteriors, we estimated parameters corresponding to hypothetical shifts in outlet densities.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>If recreational cannabis outlets had never opened, we estimated that nonfatal self-harm injuries would have been -0.35 per 100,000 lower (95% credible interval [CI]: -1.25, 0.51), while fatal self-harm injuries would have been -0.004 per 100,000 lower (95% CI: -0.26, 0.25). These associations did not depend on alcohol outlet density, but a hypothetical 20% reduction in alcohol outlet densities was associated with fewer self-harm injuries (risk difference per 100,000, nonfatal: -1.59; 95% CI: -2.60, -0.59; fatal: -0.10; 95% CI: -0.37, 0.16). Associations for nonfatal incidents were strongest for people aged 15-34 years, and White and Hispanic people.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We did not find evidence that the introduction of recreational cannabis outlets was associated with self-harm injuries or that cannabis and alcohol outlet densities interact, but alcohol outlet density had a strong association with nonfatal self-harm injuries.</p>","PeriodicalId":11779,"journal":{"name":"Epidemiology","volume":" ","pages":"196-206"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11774197/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Examining the Interactive Associations of Cannabis and Alcohol Outlets With Self-harm Injuries in California: A Spatiotemporal Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Rafael Charris, Jennifer Ahern, Dorie E Apollonio, Victoria Jent, Laurie M Jacobs, Shelley Jung, Laura A Schmidt, Paul Gruenewald, Ellicott C Matthay\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/EDE.0000000000001822\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cannabis use and alcohol use are associated with self-harm injuries, but little research has assessed links between recreational cannabis outlet openings on rates of self-harm within communities or the interactions of cannabis outlets with the density of alcohol outlets. We estimated the associations of recreational cannabis outlets, alcohol outlets, and their interaction on rates of fatal and nonfatal self-harm injuries in California, 2017-2019.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using California statewide data on recreational cannabis outlets, alcohol outlets, and hospital discharges and deaths due to self-harm injuries, we conducted Bayesian spatiotemporal analyses of quarterly ZIP code-level data over 3 years, accounting for confounders and spatial autocorrelation. Using the model posteriors, we estimated parameters corresponding to hypothetical shifts in outlet densities.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>If recreational cannabis outlets had never opened, we estimated that nonfatal self-harm injuries would have been -0.35 per 100,000 lower (95% credible interval [CI]: -1.25, 0.51), while fatal self-harm injuries would have been -0.004 per 100,000 lower (95% CI: -0.26, 0.25). These associations did not depend on alcohol outlet density, but a hypothetical 20% reduction in alcohol outlet densities was associated with fewer self-harm injuries (risk difference per 100,000, nonfatal: -1.59; 95% CI: -2.60, -0.59; fatal: -0.10; 95% CI: -0.37, 0.16). Associations for nonfatal incidents were strongest for people aged 15-34 years, and White and Hispanic people.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We did not find evidence that the introduction of recreational cannabis outlets was associated with self-harm injuries or that cannabis and alcohol outlet densities interact, but alcohol outlet density had a strong association with nonfatal self-harm injuries.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11779,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Epidemiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"196-206\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11774197/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Epidemiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/EDE.0000000000001822\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/12/16 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/EDE.0000000000001822","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:使用大麻和饮酒与自残伤害有关,但很少有研究评估娱乐性大麻销售点的开设与社区内自残率之间的联系,或大麻销售点与饮酒销售点密度之间的相互作用。我们估算了加利福尼亚州 2017-2019 年休闲大麻销售点、酒精销售点及其相互作用对致命和非致命自残率的影响:利用加利福尼亚州全州范围内有关休闲大麻销售点、酒精销售点以及自残伤害导致的出院和死亡的数据,我们对 3 年内的季度 ZIP 代码级数据进行了贝叶斯时空分析,并考虑了混杂因素和空间自相关性。利用模型后验,我们估算了与销售点密度假设变化相对应的参数:如果娱乐性大麻销售点从未开张,我们估计非致命性自残伤害事故将每 10 万人减少 -0.35(95% 可信区间:-1.25, 0.51),而致命性自残伤害事故将每 10 万人减少 -0.004(95%CI:-0.26, 0.25)。这些关联并不取决于酒类销售点的密度,但假设酒类销售点密度降低 20%,则自残伤害的发生率会降低(每 10 万人中的发生率,非致命性:-1.59;95%CI:-2.60,-0.59;致命性:-0.10;95%CI:-0.37,0.16)。15-34岁人群、白人和西班牙裔人群与非致命性事故的关联性最强:我们没有发现证据表明娱乐性大麻销售点的引入与自残伤害有关,也没有证据表明大麻和酒精销售点的密度相互影响,但酒精销售点的密度与非致命性自残伤害有密切关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Examining the Interactive Associations of Cannabis and Alcohol Outlets With Self-harm Injuries in California: A Spatiotemporal Analysis.

Background: Cannabis use and alcohol use are associated with self-harm injuries, but little research has assessed links between recreational cannabis outlet openings on rates of self-harm within communities or the interactions of cannabis outlets with the density of alcohol outlets. We estimated the associations of recreational cannabis outlets, alcohol outlets, and their interaction on rates of fatal and nonfatal self-harm injuries in California, 2017-2019.

Methods: Using California statewide data on recreational cannabis outlets, alcohol outlets, and hospital discharges and deaths due to self-harm injuries, we conducted Bayesian spatiotemporal analyses of quarterly ZIP code-level data over 3 years, accounting for confounders and spatial autocorrelation. Using the model posteriors, we estimated parameters corresponding to hypothetical shifts in outlet densities.

Results: If recreational cannabis outlets had never opened, we estimated that nonfatal self-harm injuries would have been -0.35 per 100,000 lower (95% credible interval [CI]: -1.25, 0.51), while fatal self-harm injuries would have been -0.004 per 100,000 lower (95% CI: -0.26, 0.25). These associations did not depend on alcohol outlet density, but a hypothetical 20% reduction in alcohol outlet densities was associated with fewer self-harm injuries (risk difference per 100,000, nonfatal: -1.59; 95% CI: -2.60, -0.59; fatal: -0.10; 95% CI: -0.37, 0.16). Associations for nonfatal incidents were strongest for people aged 15-34 years, and White and Hispanic people.

Conclusion: We did not find evidence that the introduction of recreational cannabis outlets was associated with self-harm injuries or that cannabis and alcohol outlet densities interact, but alcohol outlet density had a strong association with nonfatal self-harm injuries.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Epidemiology
Epidemiology 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
3.70%
发文量
177
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Epidemiology publishes original research from all fields of epidemiology. The journal also welcomes review articles and meta-analyses, novel hypotheses, descriptions and applications of new methods, and discussions of research theory or public health policy. We give special consideration to papers from developing countries.
期刊最新文献
Socioeconomic Status, Smoking, and Lung Cancer: Mediation and Bias Analysis in the SYNERGY Study. Low-level PM 2.5 Exposure, Cardiovascular and Nonaccidental Mortality, and Related Health Disparities in 12 US States. Influenza Activity and Preterm Birth in the Atlanta Metropolitan Area: A Time-Series Analysis from 2010 to 2017. Parameterization of Beta Distributions for Bias Parameters of Binary Exposure Misclassification in Probabilistic Bias Analysis. Back to Basics: What Descriptive Epidemiology Can Teach Us About the Recent Rise in Firearm Homicide.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1