电子卫生保健数据中乳腺炎诊断代码的验证。

IF 4.7 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Epidemiology Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-16 DOI:10.1097/EDE.0000000000001823
Malini B DeSilva, Elisabeth M Seburg, Kirsten Ehresmann, Gabriela Vazquez-Benitez, Yihe G Daida, Kimberly K Vesco, Elyse O Kharbanda, Kristin Palmsten
{"title":"电子卫生保健数据中乳腺炎诊断代码的验证。","authors":"Malini B DeSilva, Elisabeth M Seburg, Kirsten Ehresmann, Gabriela Vazquez-Benitez, Yihe G Daida, Kimberly K Vesco, Elyse O Kharbanda, Kristin Palmsten","doi":"10.1097/EDE.0000000000001823","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Electronic health record data are an underused source for lactation-related research. The validity of the International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision Clinical Modification (ICD-10-CM)-coded lactational mastitis is unknown.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We assessed lactational mastitis diagnosis code validity by medical record review. We included patients from three health care systems with a live birth between December 2020 and September 2022 whose infant had ≥1 well visit and for whom there was electronic health record documentation of lactation in patient or infant records. We used ICD-10-CM diagnosis codes (N61.0 and O91.2) to identify patients with suspected lactational mastitis and assessed antibiotic dispensings. We performed medical record reviews on a random sample to determine whether suspected lactational mastitis cases met definitions for \"probable\" (breast symptoms with systemic symptoms) or \"possible\" (breast symptoms without systemic symptoms) lactational mastitis. We report positive predictive values (PPV) with 95% confidence intervals (CI).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 19,660 eligible patients, 1,023 (5.2%) had either N61.0 or O91.2 diagnosis code and 768 (3.9%) had a diagnosis code and antibiotic dispensed. Chart reviews of 119 identified PPV of 76% (95% CI: 67.3, 82.9) for probable and 97% (95% CI: 91.6, 98.7) for probable or possible lactational mastitis. Restricting to those dispensed an antibiotic (n = 87), PPVs improved to 80% (95% CI: 69.6, 87.4) for probable and 100% (95% CI: 95.8, 100) for probable or possible lactational mastitis.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Diagnosis codes alone have good PPV for lactational mastitis. PPV for lactational mastitis improves when including antibiotic data, although case numbers decrease. Future research may consider the use of ICD-10 codes alone for the identification of lactational mastitis.</p>","PeriodicalId":11779,"journal":{"name":"Epidemiology","volume":" ","pages":"160-164"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Validation of Lactational Mastitis Diagnosis Codes in Electronic Health Care Data.\",\"authors\":\"Malini B DeSilva, Elisabeth M Seburg, Kirsten Ehresmann, Gabriela Vazquez-Benitez, Yihe G Daida, Kimberly K Vesco, Elyse O Kharbanda, Kristin Palmsten\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/EDE.0000000000001823\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Electronic health record data are an underused source for lactation-related research. The validity of the International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision Clinical Modification (ICD-10-CM)-coded lactational mastitis is unknown.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We assessed lactational mastitis diagnosis code validity by medical record review. We included patients from three health care systems with a live birth between December 2020 and September 2022 whose infant had ≥1 well visit and for whom there was electronic health record documentation of lactation in patient or infant records. We used ICD-10-CM diagnosis codes (N61.0 and O91.2) to identify patients with suspected lactational mastitis and assessed antibiotic dispensings. We performed medical record reviews on a random sample to determine whether suspected lactational mastitis cases met definitions for \\\"probable\\\" (breast symptoms with systemic symptoms) or \\\"possible\\\" (breast symptoms without systemic symptoms) lactational mastitis. We report positive predictive values (PPV) with 95% confidence intervals (CI).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 19,660 eligible patients, 1,023 (5.2%) had either N61.0 or O91.2 diagnosis code and 768 (3.9%) had a diagnosis code and antibiotic dispensed. Chart reviews of 119 identified PPV of 76% (95% CI: 67.3, 82.9) for probable and 97% (95% CI: 91.6, 98.7) for probable or possible lactational mastitis. Restricting to those dispensed an antibiotic (n = 87), PPVs improved to 80% (95% CI: 69.6, 87.4) for probable and 100% (95% CI: 95.8, 100) for probable or possible lactational mastitis.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Diagnosis codes alone have good PPV for lactational mastitis. PPV for lactational mastitis improves when including antibiotic data, although case numbers decrease. Future research may consider the use of ICD-10 codes alone for the identification of lactational mastitis.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11779,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Epidemiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"160-164\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Epidemiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/EDE.0000000000001823\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/12/16 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/EDE.0000000000001823","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:电子健康记录(EHR)数据是乳糜泻相关研究的一个未充分利用的来源。icd -10- cm编码乳腺炎的有效性尚不清楚。方法:采用病案复习法对乳腺炎诊断代码的有效性进行评价。我们纳入了来自三个医疗保健系统的患者,这些患者在2020年12月至2022年9月期间活产,其婴儿进行了≥1次健康检查,并且患者或婴儿记录中有EHR记录哺乳。我们使用ICD-10-CM诊断代码(N61.0和O91.2)来识别疑似哺乳期乳腺炎患者并评估抗生素配药。我们对随机样本进行了医疗记录回顾,以确定疑似哺乳期乳腺炎病例是否符合“可能的”(有全身性症状的乳房症状)或“可能的”(无全身性症状的乳房症状)乳腺炎的定义。我们报告阳性预测值(PPV), 95%置信区间(CI)。结果:在19660例符合条件的患者中,1023例(5.2%)诊断代码为N61.0或O91.2, 768例(3.9%)诊断代码为N61.0或O91.2。在119例病例的图表回顾中,可能的PPV为76% (95% CI: 67.3, 82.9),可能或可能的哺乳期乳腺炎为97% (95% CI: 91.6, 98.7)。对于那些使用抗生素的患者(n=87),可能的ppv提高到80% (95% CI: 69.6, 87.4),可能或可能的哺乳期乳腺炎的ppv提高到100% (95% CI: 95.8, 100)。结论:单纯使用诊断代码对乳腺炎有较好的诊断价值。当纳入抗生素数据时,乳腺炎的PPV改善,尽管病例数减少。未来的研究可能会考虑单独使用ICD-10代码来识别哺乳期乳腺炎。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Validation of Lactational Mastitis Diagnosis Codes in Electronic Health Care Data.

Background: Electronic health record data are an underused source for lactation-related research. The validity of the International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision Clinical Modification (ICD-10-CM)-coded lactational mastitis is unknown.

Methods: We assessed lactational mastitis diagnosis code validity by medical record review. We included patients from three health care systems with a live birth between December 2020 and September 2022 whose infant had ≥1 well visit and for whom there was electronic health record documentation of lactation in patient or infant records. We used ICD-10-CM diagnosis codes (N61.0 and O91.2) to identify patients with suspected lactational mastitis and assessed antibiotic dispensings. We performed medical record reviews on a random sample to determine whether suspected lactational mastitis cases met definitions for "probable" (breast symptoms with systemic symptoms) or "possible" (breast symptoms without systemic symptoms) lactational mastitis. We report positive predictive values (PPV) with 95% confidence intervals (CI).

Results: Among 19,660 eligible patients, 1,023 (5.2%) had either N61.0 or O91.2 diagnosis code and 768 (3.9%) had a diagnosis code and antibiotic dispensed. Chart reviews of 119 identified PPV of 76% (95% CI: 67.3, 82.9) for probable and 97% (95% CI: 91.6, 98.7) for probable or possible lactational mastitis. Restricting to those dispensed an antibiotic (n = 87), PPVs improved to 80% (95% CI: 69.6, 87.4) for probable and 100% (95% CI: 95.8, 100) for probable or possible lactational mastitis.

Conclusions: Diagnosis codes alone have good PPV for lactational mastitis. PPV for lactational mastitis improves when including antibiotic data, although case numbers decrease. Future research may consider the use of ICD-10 codes alone for the identification of lactational mastitis.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Epidemiology
Epidemiology 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
3.70%
发文量
177
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Epidemiology publishes original research from all fields of epidemiology. The journal also welcomes review articles and meta-analyses, novel hypotheses, descriptions and applications of new methods, and discussions of research theory or public health policy. We give special consideration to papers from developing countries.
期刊最新文献
Socioeconomic Status, Smoking, and Lung Cancer: Mediation and Bias Analysis in the SYNERGY Study. Low-level PM 2.5 Exposure, Cardiovascular and Nonaccidental Mortality, and Related Health Disparities in 12 US States. Influenza Activity and Preterm Birth in the Atlanta Metropolitan Area: A Time-Series Analysis from 2010 to 2017. Parameterization of Beta Distributions for Bias Parameters of Binary Exposure Misclassification in Probabilistic Bias Analysis. Back to Basics: What Descriptive Epidemiology Can Teach Us About the Recent Rise in Firearm Homicide.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1