影响1型糖尿病青少年及其父母自动胰岛素输送系统可接受性的因素

IF 6.1 3区 医学 Q1 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM Diabetes research and clinical practice Pub Date : 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1016/j.diabres.2024.111962
Roberto Franceschi , Riccardo Pertile , Marco Marigliano , Enza Mozzillo , Claudio Maffeis , Silvana Zaffani , Carlotta Dusini , Annalisa Antonelli , Giulio Maltoni , Francesca Di Candia , Erika Cantarelli , Nicola Minuto , Marta Bassi , Ivana Rabbone , Silvia Savastio , Stefano Passanisi , Fortunato Lombardo , Valentino Cherubini , Maria Alessandra Saltarelli , Stefano Tumini
{"title":"影响1型糖尿病青少年及其父母自动胰岛素输送系统可接受性的因素","authors":"Roberto Franceschi ,&nbsp;Riccardo Pertile ,&nbsp;Marco Marigliano ,&nbsp;Enza Mozzillo ,&nbsp;Claudio Maffeis ,&nbsp;Silvana Zaffani ,&nbsp;Carlotta Dusini ,&nbsp;Annalisa Antonelli ,&nbsp;Giulio Maltoni ,&nbsp;Francesca Di Candia ,&nbsp;Erika Cantarelli ,&nbsp;Nicola Minuto ,&nbsp;Marta Bassi ,&nbsp;Ivana Rabbone ,&nbsp;Silvia Savastio ,&nbsp;Stefano Passanisi ,&nbsp;Fortunato Lombardo ,&nbsp;Valentino Cherubini ,&nbsp;Maria Alessandra Saltarelli ,&nbsp;Stefano Tumini","doi":"10.1016/j.diabres.2024.111962","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Aims</h3><div>New technology has been reported as a factor driving people to choose an automatic insulin delivery system (AIDs) and to sustain its acceptance. We aimed to explore the role of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) technology (instant scanning vs. real-time) and insulin treatment modality to determine the future acceptance of AIDs among T1D individuals.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>239 consecutively enrolled T1D youth and their parents returned the AP questionnaire. All individuals were on CGM, using multiple daily injections (MDI) or sensor-augmented pump (SAP) therapy.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The AP-acceptance was more than neutral, with mean overall scores of 3.91 ± 0.47 and 3.99 ± 0.43 (p = 0.07), youths and parents, respectively. Domains’ analysis revealed high scores in intention to use, usefulness, and trust in AIDs, with favorable expected judgments by others. The items with the highest overall mean scores revealed high glucose control and QoL benefits; the main hassle was the size and discomfort of wearing two devices. Multivariate analysis found that male gender and SAP therapy were associated with a higher AP-acceptance overall score (p = 0.045, 0.015, 0.0001, respectively).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Participants receiving SAP therapy demonstrated higher expectations and optimistic views about AIDs. This treatment modality can act as a trampoline to AIDs despite individuals’ glucose control and diabetes history.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11249,"journal":{"name":"Diabetes research and clinical practice","volume":"219 ","pages":"Article 111962"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Factors influencing the acceptability of automated insulin delivery systems in youths with type 1 diabetes and their parents\",\"authors\":\"Roberto Franceschi ,&nbsp;Riccardo Pertile ,&nbsp;Marco Marigliano ,&nbsp;Enza Mozzillo ,&nbsp;Claudio Maffeis ,&nbsp;Silvana Zaffani ,&nbsp;Carlotta Dusini ,&nbsp;Annalisa Antonelli ,&nbsp;Giulio Maltoni ,&nbsp;Francesca Di Candia ,&nbsp;Erika Cantarelli ,&nbsp;Nicola Minuto ,&nbsp;Marta Bassi ,&nbsp;Ivana Rabbone ,&nbsp;Silvia Savastio ,&nbsp;Stefano Passanisi ,&nbsp;Fortunato Lombardo ,&nbsp;Valentino Cherubini ,&nbsp;Maria Alessandra Saltarelli ,&nbsp;Stefano Tumini\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.diabres.2024.111962\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Aims</h3><div>New technology has been reported as a factor driving people to choose an automatic insulin delivery system (AIDs) and to sustain its acceptance. We aimed to explore the role of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) technology (instant scanning vs. real-time) and insulin treatment modality to determine the future acceptance of AIDs among T1D individuals.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>239 consecutively enrolled T1D youth and their parents returned the AP questionnaire. All individuals were on CGM, using multiple daily injections (MDI) or sensor-augmented pump (SAP) therapy.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The AP-acceptance was more than neutral, with mean overall scores of 3.91 ± 0.47 and 3.99 ± 0.43 (p = 0.07), youths and parents, respectively. Domains’ analysis revealed high scores in intention to use, usefulness, and trust in AIDs, with favorable expected judgments by others. The items with the highest overall mean scores revealed high glucose control and QoL benefits; the main hassle was the size and discomfort of wearing two devices. Multivariate analysis found that male gender and SAP therapy were associated with a higher AP-acceptance overall score (p = 0.045, 0.015, 0.0001, respectively).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Participants receiving SAP therapy demonstrated higher expectations and optimistic views about AIDs. This treatment modality can act as a trampoline to AIDs despite individuals’ glucose control and diabetes history.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11249,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Diabetes research and clinical practice\",\"volume\":\"219 \",\"pages\":\"Article 111962\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Diabetes research and clinical practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168822724008726\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diabetes research and clinical practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168822724008726","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:据报道,新技术是促使人们选择自动胰岛素输送系统(AIDs)并维持其接受度的一个因素。我们的目的是探讨连续血糖监测(CGM)技术(即时扫描与实时)和胰岛素治疗方式在确定T1D患者未来接受艾滋病的作用。方法:239名连续入组的T1D青少年及其父母填写AP问卷。所有患者均采用CGM,每日多次注射(MDI)或传感器增强泵(SAP)治疗。结果:青少年和家长的ap接受度均高于中性,平均总分分别为3.91 ± 0.47和3.99 ± 0.43 (p = 0.07)。domain的分析显示,在使用艾滋病的意图、有用性和对艾滋病的信任方面得分很高,他人的预期判断也很好。总体平均得分最高的项目显示出较高的血糖控制和生活质量;主要的麻烦是佩戴两个设备的尺寸和不舒服。多因素分析发现,男性性别和SAP治疗与较高的ap接受度总分相关(p = 分别为0.045、0.015和0.0001)。结论:接受SAP治疗的参与者对艾滋病表现出更高的期望和乐观的看法。尽管个人有血糖控制和糖尿病史,这种治疗方式可以作为艾滋病的蹦床。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Factors influencing the acceptability of automated insulin delivery systems in youths with type 1 diabetes and their parents

Aims

New technology has been reported as a factor driving people to choose an automatic insulin delivery system (AIDs) and to sustain its acceptance. We aimed to explore the role of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) technology (instant scanning vs. real-time) and insulin treatment modality to determine the future acceptance of AIDs among T1D individuals.

Methods

239 consecutively enrolled T1D youth and their parents returned the AP questionnaire. All individuals were on CGM, using multiple daily injections (MDI) or sensor-augmented pump (SAP) therapy.

Results

The AP-acceptance was more than neutral, with mean overall scores of 3.91 ± 0.47 and 3.99 ± 0.43 (p = 0.07), youths and parents, respectively. Domains’ analysis revealed high scores in intention to use, usefulness, and trust in AIDs, with favorable expected judgments by others. The items with the highest overall mean scores revealed high glucose control and QoL benefits; the main hassle was the size and discomfort of wearing two devices. Multivariate analysis found that male gender and SAP therapy were associated with a higher AP-acceptance overall score (p = 0.045, 0.015, 0.0001, respectively).

Conclusions

Participants receiving SAP therapy demonstrated higher expectations and optimistic views about AIDs. This treatment modality can act as a trampoline to AIDs despite individuals’ glucose control and diabetes history.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Diabetes research and clinical practice
Diabetes research and clinical practice 医学-内分泌学与代谢
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
3.90%
发文量
862
审稿时长
32 days
期刊介绍: Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice is an international journal for health-care providers and clinically oriented researchers that publishes high-quality original research articles and expert reviews in diabetes and related areas. The role of the journal is to provide a venue for dissemination of knowledge and discussion of topics related to diabetes clinical research and patient care. Topics of focus include translational science, genetics, immunology, nutrition, psychosocial research, epidemiology, prevention, socio-economic research, complications, new treatments, technologies and therapy.
期刊最新文献
Resistance exercise training and its impact on metabolic syndrome in type 2 diabetes: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials Combined effects of Time-Restricted eating and exercise on short-term blood glucose management in individuals with type 2 diabetes mellitus: The TREx study, a randomised controlled trial. Comparative effect of aspirin versus clopidogrel monotherapy on incident type 2 diabetes in patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular diseases: A target trial emulation study. Cost-effectiveness of diabetes screening and diagnosis services for people with TB in the Philippines Association of quality of care and long-term mortality risk for individuals presenting with ST-segment myocardial infarction (STEMI) by diabetes mellitus status: A nationwide cohort study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1