利用基于单细胞RNA测序的EBV捕获技术探索EBV感染在EBV- t /NKLPD中的作用。

IF 6.8 3区 医学 Q1 VIROLOGY Journal of Medical Virology Pub Date : 2024-12-16 DOI:10.1002/jmv.70094
Shunan Wang, Miao Zhong, Wenqi Zhu, Yeqin Sha, Ruize Chen, Hanning Tang, Yongle Li, Huayuan Zhu, Lei Fan
{"title":"利用基于单细胞RNA测序的EBV捕获技术探索EBV感染在EBV- t /NKLPD中的作用。","authors":"Shunan Wang,&nbsp;Miao Zhong,&nbsp;Wenqi Zhu,&nbsp;Yeqin Sha,&nbsp;Ruize Chen,&nbsp;Hanning Tang,&nbsp;Yongle Li,&nbsp;Huayuan Zhu,&nbsp;Lei Fan","doi":"10.1002/jmv.70094","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Epstein-Barr virus (EBV)-associated T/NK cell lymphoproliferative diseases (EBV-T/NKLPD) is a highly heterogeneous group of disease, whose clinical manifestations range from an indolent course to aggressive disease, making it challenging to make the concise diagnosis and to decide the best time for allogenic hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation. EBV infection is crucial to the occurrence and development of EBV-T/NKLPD [<span>1</span>]. However, the underestimated morbidity, high heterogeneity and lack of specific cell line make it difficult to decipher the concrete function of EBV in this disease [<span>2</span>].</p><p>Single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) detects gene expression in single cell, providing opportunities to dissect cell heterogeneity and the cell-to-cell interaction in tumor microenvironment, which is an excellent tool to analyze the mechanism of virus infection. 10X Genomics and SMART-seq. 2 are two most frequently-used scRNA-seq platforms. 10X Genomics can detect rare cell populations due to high cell throughout. Meanwhile, SMART-seq. 2 can detect more genes, especially low abundance transcripts. The two technologies are complementary and their combination become the dominant mode to study the virus-to-host interaction currently but the high cost is obviously unbearable to most people [<span>3</span>].</p><p>On the basis of 10X Genomics platform (Figure 1A), we added viral probes on the magnetic beads and used secondary enrichment to amplify the titer of EBV (Figure 1B). To evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of this technology, EBV+ Raji cells (<i>n</i> = 727) and EBV− A549 cells (<i>n</i> = 458) were mixed together, and were detected the level of EBV infection (Figure 1C,D). Using traditional 10X Genomics, only 303 (41.7%) Raji cells were tested EBV positive while the updated EBV capture technology detected 723 (99.4%) EBV+ Raji cells (Figure 1E). Obviously, the updated EBV capture technology improved the sensitivity and specificity of virus capturing.</p><p>This updated technology was then used to explore the role of EBV in EBV-T/NKLPD. We collected nasopharyngeal biopsy from one patient diagnosed with extranodal NK/T-cell lymphoma, nasal, as well as cutaneous biopsy from one patient diagnosed with systemic chronic active EBV disease before treatment (Figure 1F and Supporting Information: Figure 1A,B). Although EBV infection existed in all types of cells, the EBV-positive cell proportion (Figure 1G) and CNV score (Figure 1H and Supporting Information: Figure 1C) were the highest in T cells, indicating EBV tropism for T cells. In total cells, EBV+ cells had a higher CNV score compared with EBV− cells, which attributed mainly to the difference between EBV + T cells and EBV− T cells (Figure 1I and Supporting Information: Figure 1D).</p><p>Then we analyzed the gene expression of T cells (<i>n</i> = 1348) and categorized them into three clusters, including naive T cells, NK/T cells and proliferative NK/T cells, which exemplified the functional heterogeneity of the T cell population (Figure 2A). EBV infection existed in all three types of T cells. The proportion of EBV-positive cell, EBV high-expression cell and mean EBV burden were all the highest in proliferative NK/T cells (Figure 2B–E). In T cells, EBV burden was positively associated with CNV score, especially in proliferative NK/T cells, indicating the genome instability induced by EBV infection (Figure 2G and Supporting Information: Figure 1E). Comparing EBV+ cells with EBV− cells, gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) revealed different pathways enriched in different cells, indicating varying susceptibilities to EBV. Proliferation-associated signaling pathways, including E2F targets, G2M checkpoint and MYC target signaling pathway, were enriched in EBV + T cells (Figure 2F), especially in proliferative NK/T cells with high EBV burden (Supporting Information: Figure 2A,B). Pseudotime trajectory analysis showed EBV infection persistsed during the evolution of all types of T cells (Supporting Information: Figure 3A). The expression of proliferation-associated signaling pathways and genes increase as the EBV burden increasing (Supporting Information: Figure 3B,C). The stemness score of naive T cells and NK/T cells increased after EBV infection while the result was opposite in proliferative NK/T cells (Supporting Information: Figure 3D). In other cell types, metabolism-associated pathways, including oxidative phosphorylation, adipogenesis, citrate cycle, and cysteine and methionine metabolism, were obviously enriched in EBV+ cells (Supporting Information: Figure 3E). Oxidation of fatty acids- and glycolysis-associated genes had an obvious increasing trend in proliferative NK/T cells, further implying the influence of EBV on metabolism (Supporting Information: Figure 3F). Intercellular communication analysis showed EBV + T cells had the most and strongest interaction with other cells (Figure 2H). In proliferative NK/T cells, the interaction between EBV− cells and monocytes was significantly stronger than EBV+ cells (Figure 2I). In naive T cells, the interaction between EBV+ cells and endothelial cells or B cells was significantly stronger than EBV− cells (Figure 2I).</p><p>Our results showed the updated EBV capture technology based on single-cell RNA sequencing was a practical technology to study the role of EBV. In T cells, EBV infection promoted cell proliferation, genomic instability, stemness increase, and interactions with other cells. This may explain the carcinogenic mechanism of EBV in EBV-T/NKLPD. However, limited by the small sample size, our results require validation by multicenter, large-scale cohorts.</p><p>Shunan Wang and Miao Zhong designed the study, and collected and analyzed the data. Shunan Wang provided a draft of the manuscript. Wenqi Zhu, Yeqin Sha and Ruize Chen participated in data correction and analysis. Yongle Li and Hanning Tang collected the clinical samples. Shunan Wang, Huayuan Zhu and Lei Fan provided funding. Huayuan Zhu and Lei Fan supervised the study. Lei Fan reviewed and revised the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.</p><p>The Ethics Committee of Jiangsu Province Hospital of Nanjing Medical University granted its approval for this study (No. 2024-SRFA-693).</p><p>Informed consent was obtained from each patient before any samples were collected for experiments involving human tissue.</p><p>The authors declare no conflicts of interest.</p>","PeriodicalId":16354,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Virology","volume":"96 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jmv.70094","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploring the Role of EBV Infection in EBV-T/NKLPD With EBV Capture Technology Based on Single-Cell RNA Sequencing\",\"authors\":\"Shunan Wang,&nbsp;Miao Zhong,&nbsp;Wenqi Zhu,&nbsp;Yeqin Sha,&nbsp;Ruize Chen,&nbsp;Hanning Tang,&nbsp;Yongle Li,&nbsp;Huayuan Zhu,&nbsp;Lei Fan\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jmv.70094\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Epstein-Barr virus (EBV)-associated T/NK cell lymphoproliferative diseases (EBV-T/NKLPD) is a highly heterogeneous group of disease, whose clinical manifestations range from an indolent course to aggressive disease, making it challenging to make the concise diagnosis and to decide the best time for allogenic hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation. EBV infection is crucial to the occurrence and development of EBV-T/NKLPD [<span>1</span>]. However, the underestimated morbidity, high heterogeneity and lack of specific cell line make it difficult to decipher the concrete function of EBV in this disease [<span>2</span>].</p><p>Single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) detects gene expression in single cell, providing opportunities to dissect cell heterogeneity and the cell-to-cell interaction in tumor microenvironment, which is an excellent tool to analyze the mechanism of virus infection. 10X Genomics and SMART-seq. 2 are two most frequently-used scRNA-seq platforms. 10X Genomics can detect rare cell populations due to high cell throughout. Meanwhile, SMART-seq. 2 can detect more genes, especially low abundance transcripts. The two technologies are complementary and their combination become the dominant mode to study the virus-to-host interaction currently but the high cost is obviously unbearable to most people [<span>3</span>].</p><p>On the basis of 10X Genomics platform (Figure 1A), we added viral probes on the magnetic beads and used secondary enrichment to amplify the titer of EBV (Figure 1B). To evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of this technology, EBV+ Raji cells (<i>n</i> = 727) and EBV− A549 cells (<i>n</i> = 458) were mixed together, and were detected the level of EBV infection (Figure 1C,D). Using traditional 10X Genomics, only 303 (41.7%) Raji cells were tested EBV positive while the updated EBV capture technology detected 723 (99.4%) EBV+ Raji cells (Figure 1E). Obviously, the updated EBV capture technology improved the sensitivity and specificity of virus capturing.</p><p>This updated technology was then used to explore the role of EBV in EBV-T/NKLPD. We collected nasopharyngeal biopsy from one patient diagnosed with extranodal NK/T-cell lymphoma, nasal, as well as cutaneous biopsy from one patient diagnosed with systemic chronic active EBV disease before treatment (Figure 1F and Supporting Information: Figure 1A,B). Although EBV infection existed in all types of cells, the EBV-positive cell proportion (Figure 1G) and CNV score (Figure 1H and Supporting Information: Figure 1C) were the highest in T cells, indicating EBV tropism for T cells. In total cells, EBV+ cells had a higher CNV score compared with EBV− cells, which attributed mainly to the difference between EBV + T cells and EBV− T cells (Figure 1I and Supporting Information: Figure 1D).</p><p>Then we analyzed the gene expression of T cells (<i>n</i> = 1348) and categorized them into three clusters, including naive T cells, NK/T cells and proliferative NK/T cells, which exemplified the functional heterogeneity of the T cell population (Figure 2A). EBV infection existed in all three types of T cells. The proportion of EBV-positive cell, EBV high-expression cell and mean EBV burden were all the highest in proliferative NK/T cells (Figure 2B–E). In T cells, EBV burden was positively associated with CNV score, especially in proliferative NK/T cells, indicating the genome instability induced by EBV infection (Figure 2G and Supporting Information: Figure 1E). Comparing EBV+ cells with EBV− cells, gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) revealed different pathways enriched in different cells, indicating varying susceptibilities to EBV. Proliferation-associated signaling pathways, including E2F targets, G2M checkpoint and MYC target signaling pathway, were enriched in EBV + T cells (Figure 2F), especially in proliferative NK/T cells with high EBV burden (Supporting Information: Figure 2A,B). Pseudotime trajectory analysis showed EBV infection persistsed during the evolution of all types of T cells (Supporting Information: Figure 3A). The expression of proliferation-associated signaling pathways and genes increase as the EBV burden increasing (Supporting Information: Figure 3B,C). The stemness score of naive T cells and NK/T cells increased after EBV infection while the result was opposite in proliferative NK/T cells (Supporting Information: Figure 3D). In other cell types, metabolism-associated pathways, including oxidative phosphorylation, adipogenesis, citrate cycle, and cysteine and methionine metabolism, were obviously enriched in EBV+ cells (Supporting Information: Figure 3E). Oxidation of fatty acids- and glycolysis-associated genes had an obvious increasing trend in proliferative NK/T cells, further implying the influence of EBV on metabolism (Supporting Information: Figure 3F). Intercellular communication analysis showed EBV + T cells had the most and strongest interaction with other cells (Figure 2H). In proliferative NK/T cells, the interaction between EBV− cells and monocytes was significantly stronger than EBV+ cells (Figure 2I). In naive T cells, the interaction between EBV+ cells and endothelial cells or B cells was significantly stronger than EBV− cells (Figure 2I).</p><p>Our results showed the updated EBV capture technology based on single-cell RNA sequencing was a practical technology to study the role of EBV. In T cells, EBV infection promoted cell proliferation, genomic instability, stemness increase, and interactions with other cells. This may explain the carcinogenic mechanism of EBV in EBV-T/NKLPD. However, limited by the small sample size, our results require validation by multicenter, large-scale cohorts.</p><p>Shunan Wang and Miao Zhong designed the study, and collected and analyzed the data. Shunan Wang provided a draft of the manuscript. Wenqi Zhu, Yeqin Sha and Ruize Chen participated in data correction and analysis. Yongle Li and Hanning Tang collected the clinical samples. Shunan Wang, Huayuan Zhu and Lei Fan provided funding. Huayuan Zhu and Lei Fan supervised the study. Lei Fan reviewed and revised the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.</p><p>The Ethics Committee of Jiangsu Province Hospital of Nanjing Medical University granted its approval for this study (No. 2024-SRFA-693).</p><p>Informed consent was obtained from each patient before any samples were collected for experiments involving human tissue.</p><p>The authors declare no conflicts of interest.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16354,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Medical Virology\",\"volume\":\"96 12\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jmv.70094\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Medical Virology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jmv.70094\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"VIROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Virology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jmv.70094","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"VIROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

eb病毒(EBV)相关T/NK细胞淋巴增生性疾病(EBV-T/NKLPD)是一种高度异质性的疾病,其临床表现从惰性到侵袭性不等,这使得对同种异体造血干细胞移植的精确诊断和最佳时机的确定具有挑战性。EBV感染对EBV- t /NKLPD的发生和发展至关重要。然而,由于发病率被低估,异质性高,缺乏特异性细胞系,使得很难破译EBV在该疾病中的具体功能[2]。单细胞RNA测序(scRNA-seq)检测单细胞内的基因表达,为解剖肿瘤微环境中细胞异质性和细胞间相互作用提供了机会,是分析病毒感染机制的良好工具。10X Genomics和SMART-seq。2是两种最常用的scRNA-seq平台。10X基因组学可以检测到罕见的细胞群体,由于高细胞通透性。与此同时,SMART-seq。2 .可以检测到更多的基因,特别是低丰度转录本。这两种技术是互补的,它们的结合成为目前研究病毒与宿主相互作用的主导模式,但高昂的成本显然是大多数人无法承受的[10]。在10X Genomics平台的基础上(图1A),我们在磁珠上添加病毒探针,并使用二次富集扩增EBV滴度(图1B)。为了评估该技术的敏感性和特异性,将EBV+ Raji细胞(n = 727)和EBV - A549细胞(n = 458)混合在一起,检测EBV感染水平(图1C,D)。使用传统的10X Genomics,只有303个(41.7%)Raji细胞检测到EBV阳性,而更新的EBV捕获技术检测到723个(99.4%)EBV+ Raji细胞(图1E)。显然,更新后的EBV捕获技术提高了病毒捕获的敏感性和特异性。这项更新的技术随后被用于探索EBV在EBV- t /NKLPD中的作用。我们在治疗前收集了一名诊断为结外NK/ t细胞淋巴瘤的患者的鼻咽活检,以及一名诊断为全身性慢性活动性EBV疾病的患者的鼻腔和皮肤活检(图1F和支持信息:图1A,B)。虽然EBV感染存在于所有类型的细胞中,但EBV阳性细胞比例(图1G)和CNV评分(图1H和支持信息:图1C)在T细胞中最高,表明EBV对T细胞有趋向性。在总细胞中,EBV+细胞的CNV评分高于EBV -细胞,这主要归因于EBV+ T细胞和EBV - T细胞之间的差异(图1I和支持信息:图1D)。然后,我们分析了T细胞(n = 1348)的基因表达,并将其分为三组,包括幼稚T细胞、NK/T细胞和增殖NK/T细胞,这体现了T细胞群体的功能异质性(图2A)。三种类型的T细胞均存在EBV感染。增殖NK/T细胞中EBV阳性细胞、EBV高表达细胞和平均EBV负荷比例均最高(图2B-E)。在T细胞中,EBV负荷与CNV评分呈正相关,特别是在增殖性NK/T细胞中,这表明EBV感染诱导的基因组不稳定性(图2G和支持信息:图1E)。通过对EBV+细胞和EBV -细胞的基因集富集分析(GSEA)发现,不同细胞中富集的途径不同,表明对EBV的敏感性不同。增殖相关的信号通路,包括E2F靶点、G2M检查点和MYC靶点信号通路,在EBV + T细胞中富集(图2F),特别是在EBV负担高的增殖性NK/T细胞中(支持信息:图2A,B)。伪时间轨迹分析显示EBV感染在所有类型T细胞的进化过程中持续存在(支持信息:图3A)。随着EBV负荷的增加,增殖相关信号通路和基因的表达增加(支持信息:图3B,C)。EBV感染后,幼稚T细胞和NK/T细胞的干性评分升高,而增殖NK/T细胞的干性评分相反(support Information: Figure 3D)。在其他细胞类型中,代谢相关途径,包括氧化磷酸化、脂肪生成、柠檬酸循环、半胱氨酸和蛋氨酸代谢,在EBV+细胞中明显富集(支持信息:图3E)。脂肪酸和糖酵解相关基因的氧化在增殖性NK/T细胞中有明显的增加趋势,进一步表明EBV对代谢的影响(支持信息:图3F)。细胞间通讯分析显示,EBV + T细胞与其他细胞的相互作用最多、最强(图2H)。 在增殖性NK/T细胞中,EBV -细胞与单核细胞的相互作用明显强于EBV+细胞(图2I)。在初始T细胞中,EBV+细胞与内皮细胞或B细胞之间的相互作用明显强于EBV−细胞(图2I)。结果表明,基于单细胞RNA测序的新型EBV捕获技术是研究EBV作用的实用技术。在T细胞中,EBV感染促进细胞增殖、基因组不稳定、干性增加以及与其他细胞的相互作用。这可能解释EBV在EBV- t /NKLPD中的致癌机制。然而,受样本量小的限制,我们的结果需要通过多中心、大规模队列来验证。王淑楠和钟淼设计了研究,并收集和分析了数据。王淑楠提供了一份手稿草稿。朱文琪、沙叶琴、陈瑞泽参与数据校正和分析。李永乐和唐汉宁采集临床样本。王顺南、朱华远和范磊提供了资金。朱华远和范磊监督了这项研究。雷凡审阅并修改了手稿。所有作者都阅读并批准了最终的手稿。南京医科大学江苏省医院伦理委员会批准本研究(No. 2024-SRFA-693)。在为涉及人体组织的实验收集任何样本之前,必须获得每位患者的知情同意。作者声明无利益冲突。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Exploring the Role of EBV Infection in EBV-T/NKLPD With EBV Capture Technology Based on Single-Cell RNA Sequencing

Epstein-Barr virus (EBV)-associated T/NK cell lymphoproliferative diseases (EBV-T/NKLPD) is a highly heterogeneous group of disease, whose clinical manifestations range from an indolent course to aggressive disease, making it challenging to make the concise diagnosis and to decide the best time for allogenic hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation. EBV infection is crucial to the occurrence and development of EBV-T/NKLPD [1]. However, the underestimated morbidity, high heterogeneity and lack of specific cell line make it difficult to decipher the concrete function of EBV in this disease [2].

Single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) detects gene expression in single cell, providing opportunities to dissect cell heterogeneity and the cell-to-cell interaction in tumor microenvironment, which is an excellent tool to analyze the mechanism of virus infection. 10X Genomics and SMART-seq. 2 are two most frequently-used scRNA-seq platforms. 10X Genomics can detect rare cell populations due to high cell throughout. Meanwhile, SMART-seq. 2 can detect more genes, especially low abundance transcripts. The two technologies are complementary and their combination become the dominant mode to study the virus-to-host interaction currently but the high cost is obviously unbearable to most people [3].

On the basis of 10X Genomics platform (Figure 1A), we added viral probes on the magnetic beads and used secondary enrichment to amplify the titer of EBV (Figure 1B). To evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of this technology, EBV+ Raji cells (n = 727) and EBV− A549 cells (n = 458) were mixed together, and were detected the level of EBV infection (Figure 1C,D). Using traditional 10X Genomics, only 303 (41.7%) Raji cells were tested EBV positive while the updated EBV capture technology detected 723 (99.4%) EBV+ Raji cells (Figure 1E). Obviously, the updated EBV capture technology improved the sensitivity and specificity of virus capturing.

This updated technology was then used to explore the role of EBV in EBV-T/NKLPD. We collected nasopharyngeal biopsy from one patient diagnosed with extranodal NK/T-cell lymphoma, nasal, as well as cutaneous biopsy from one patient diagnosed with systemic chronic active EBV disease before treatment (Figure 1F and Supporting Information: Figure 1A,B). Although EBV infection existed in all types of cells, the EBV-positive cell proportion (Figure 1G) and CNV score (Figure 1H and Supporting Information: Figure 1C) were the highest in T cells, indicating EBV tropism for T cells. In total cells, EBV+ cells had a higher CNV score compared with EBV− cells, which attributed mainly to the difference between EBV + T cells and EBV− T cells (Figure 1I and Supporting Information: Figure 1D).

Then we analyzed the gene expression of T cells (n = 1348) and categorized them into three clusters, including naive T cells, NK/T cells and proliferative NK/T cells, which exemplified the functional heterogeneity of the T cell population (Figure 2A). EBV infection existed in all three types of T cells. The proportion of EBV-positive cell, EBV high-expression cell and mean EBV burden were all the highest in proliferative NK/T cells (Figure 2B–E). In T cells, EBV burden was positively associated with CNV score, especially in proliferative NK/T cells, indicating the genome instability induced by EBV infection (Figure 2G and Supporting Information: Figure 1E). Comparing EBV+ cells with EBV− cells, gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) revealed different pathways enriched in different cells, indicating varying susceptibilities to EBV. Proliferation-associated signaling pathways, including E2F targets, G2M checkpoint and MYC target signaling pathway, were enriched in EBV + T cells (Figure 2F), especially in proliferative NK/T cells with high EBV burden (Supporting Information: Figure 2A,B). Pseudotime trajectory analysis showed EBV infection persistsed during the evolution of all types of T cells (Supporting Information: Figure 3A). The expression of proliferation-associated signaling pathways and genes increase as the EBV burden increasing (Supporting Information: Figure 3B,C). The stemness score of naive T cells and NK/T cells increased after EBV infection while the result was opposite in proliferative NK/T cells (Supporting Information: Figure 3D). In other cell types, metabolism-associated pathways, including oxidative phosphorylation, adipogenesis, citrate cycle, and cysteine and methionine metabolism, were obviously enriched in EBV+ cells (Supporting Information: Figure 3E). Oxidation of fatty acids- and glycolysis-associated genes had an obvious increasing trend in proliferative NK/T cells, further implying the influence of EBV on metabolism (Supporting Information: Figure 3F). Intercellular communication analysis showed EBV + T cells had the most and strongest interaction with other cells (Figure 2H). In proliferative NK/T cells, the interaction between EBV− cells and monocytes was significantly stronger than EBV+ cells (Figure 2I). In naive T cells, the interaction between EBV+ cells and endothelial cells or B cells was significantly stronger than EBV− cells (Figure 2I).

Our results showed the updated EBV capture technology based on single-cell RNA sequencing was a practical technology to study the role of EBV. In T cells, EBV infection promoted cell proliferation, genomic instability, stemness increase, and interactions with other cells. This may explain the carcinogenic mechanism of EBV in EBV-T/NKLPD. However, limited by the small sample size, our results require validation by multicenter, large-scale cohorts.

Shunan Wang and Miao Zhong designed the study, and collected and analyzed the data. Shunan Wang provided a draft of the manuscript. Wenqi Zhu, Yeqin Sha and Ruize Chen participated in data correction and analysis. Yongle Li and Hanning Tang collected the clinical samples. Shunan Wang, Huayuan Zhu and Lei Fan provided funding. Huayuan Zhu and Lei Fan supervised the study. Lei Fan reviewed and revised the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

The Ethics Committee of Jiangsu Province Hospital of Nanjing Medical University granted its approval for this study (No. 2024-SRFA-693).

Informed consent was obtained from each patient before any samples were collected for experiments involving human tissue.

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Medical Virology
Journal of Medical Virology 医学-病毒学
CiteScore
23.20
自引率
2.40%
发文量
777
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Medical Virology focuses on publishing original scientific papers on both basic and applied research related to viruses that affect humans. The journal publishes reports covering a wide range of topics, including the characterization, diagnosis, epidemiology, immunology, and pathogenesis of human virus infections. It also includes studies on virus morphology, genetics, replication, and interactions with host cells. The intended readership of the journal includes virologists, microbiologists, immunologists, infectious disease specialists, diagnostic laboratory technologists, epidemiologists, hematologists, and cell biologists. The Journal of Medical Virology is indexed and abstracted in various databases, including Abstracts in Anthropology (Sage), CABI, AgBiotech News & Information, National Agricultural Library, Biological Abstracts, Embase, Global Health, Web of Science, Veterinary Bulletin, and others.
期刊最新文献
Exploring the Interplay Between Cervicovaginal Microbiome, HPV Infection, and Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia in Taiwanese Women. A Novel HTNV Budding Inhibitor Interferes the Interaction Between Viral Glycoprotein and Host ESCRT Accessory Protein ALIX. Building a Bridge Between the Mechanism of EBV Reactivation and the Treatment of EBV-Associated Cancers. Fullerene (C60 & C70)-Meso-Tris-4-Carboxyphenyl Porphyrin Dyads Inhibit Entry of Wild-Type and Drug-Resistant HIV-1 Clades B and C. Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate Versus Entecavir: Effects on Lipid Profiles and Cardiovascular Outcomes in People Living With Chronic Hepatitis B.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1