区分血液透析肾衰竭患者的死亡原因。

IF 3.2 Q1 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Kidney360 Pub Date : 2024-12-16 DOI:10.34067/KID.0000000681
Michelle Tran, Chun Anna Xu, Jonathan Wilson, Patti L Ephraim, Tariq Shafi, Daniel E Weiner, Benjamin A Goldstein, Julia J Scialla
{"title":"区分血液透析肾衰竭患者的死亡原因。","authors":"Michelle Tran, Chun Anna Xu, Jonathan Wilson, Patti L Ephraim, Tariq Shafi, Daniel E Weiner, Benjamin A Goldstein, Julia J Scialla","doi":"10.34067/KID.0000000681","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patients treated with maintenance hemodialysis (HD) are at high risk of death from a variety of causes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>To identify markers (i.e., risk phenotypes) that distinguish among causes of death, we used dialysis electronic health record data for a cohort of adults treated with maintenance in-center HD who died between 2003-2016. Patients were linked to the United States Renal Data System (USRDS) Files. We classified USRDS-reported causes of death into five categories: Sudden Cardiac Death (SCD), non-SCD Cardiovascular Death, Infection, Others, and Unknown. A sub-cohort was linked to the National Death Index (NDI) with similar categories defined. We used ensemble classification trees to discriminate among causes using demographics, vital signs, laboratory measures, health service utilization, and comorbidity claims from 30 days prior to death. The area under the receiver operating curves (AUCs) were all between 0.59-0.70, suggesting minimal ability to distinguish among causes using clinical risk markers. We then created nested case-control populations for each cause of death and used ridge logistic regression to evaluate clinical risk markers that associate with distinct causes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Model coefficients were similar and highly correlated across different cause of death models (i.e., 0.87 - 0.94). This suggests that most clinical risk markers are shared across causes without distinct risk phenotypes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We conclude that different causes of death may share similar clinical risk markers in the setting of kidney failure or that the causes of death attributed on USRDS or NDI forms are not precise.</p>","PeriodicalId":17882,"journal":{"name":"Kidney360","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Distinguishing Among Causes of Death for Patients with Kidney Failure on Hemodialysis.\",\"authors\":\"Michelle Tran, Chun Anna Xu, Jonathan Wilson, Patti L Ephraim, Tariq Shafi, Daniel E Weiner, Benjamin A Goldstein, Julia J Scialla\",\"doi\":\"10.34067/KID.0000000681\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patients treated with maintenance hemodialysis (HD) are at high risk of death from a variety of causes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>To identify markers (i.e., risk phenotypes) that distinguish among causes of death, we used dialysis electronic health record data for a cohort of adults treated with maintenance in-center HD who died between 2003-2016. Patients were linked to the United States Renal Data System (USRDS) Files. We classified USRDS-reported causes of death into five categories: Sudden Cardiac Death (SCD), non-SCD Cardiovascular Death, Infection, Others, and Unknown. A sub-cohort was linked to the National Death Index (NDI) with similar categories defined. We used ensemble classification trees to discriminate among causes using demographics, vital signs, laboratory measures, health service utilization, and comorbidity claims from 30 days prior to death. The area under the receiver operating curves (AUCs) were all between 0.59-0.70, suggesting minimal ability to distinguish among causes using clinical risk markers. We then created nested case-control populations for each cause of death and used ridge logistic regression to evaluate clinical risk markers that associate with distinct causes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Model coefficients were similar and highly correlated across different cause of death models (i.e., 0.87 - 0.94). This suggests that most clinical risk markers are shared across causes without distinct risk phenotypes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We conclude that different causes of death may share similar clinical risk markers in the setting of kidney failure or that the causes of death attributed on USRDS or NDI forms are not precise.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17882,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Kidney360\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Kidney360\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.34067/KID.0000000681\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kidney360","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34067/KID.0000000681","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:接受维持性血液透析(HD)治疗的患者因各种原因死亡的风险很高。方法:为了识别区分死亡原因的标志物(即风险表型),我们使用了2003-2016年期间死亡的接受维持中心HD治疗的成人队列的透析电子健康记录数据。患者被链接到美国肾脏数据系统(USRDS)文件。我们将usrds报告的死亡原因分为五类:心源性猝死(SCD)、非SCD心血管死亡、感染、其他和未知。一个亚队列与国家死亡指数(NDI)相关联,定义了类似的类别。我们使用集合分类树根据人口统计学、生命体征、实验室测量、卫生服务利用和死亡前30天的合并症索赔来区分病因。受试者工作曲线下面积(auc)均在0.59-0.70之间,表明使用临床风险标志物区分病因的能力最低。然后,我们为每种死亡原因创建了巢式病例对照人群,并使用脊逻辑回归来评估与不同原因相关的临床风险标志物。结果:不同死因模型的模型系数相似且高度相关(即0.87 - 0.94)。这表明大多数临床风险标记在没有明显风险表型的原因之间是共享的。结论:我们的结论是,在肾衰竭的情况下,不同的死亡原因可能具有相似的临床风险标记,或者USRDS或NDI表格上的死亡原因并不精确。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Distinguishing Among Causes of Death for Patients with Kidney Failure on Hemodialysis.

Background: Patients treated with maintenance hemodialysis (HD) are at high risk of death from a variety of causes.

Methods: To identify markers (i.e., risk phenotypes) that distinguish among causes of death, we used dialysis electronic health record data for a cohort of adults treated with maintenance in-center HD who died between 2003-2016. Patients were linked to the United States Renal Data System (USRDS) Files. We classified USRDS-reported causes of death into five categories: Sudden Cardiac Death (SCD), non-SCD Cardiovascular Death, Infection, Others, and Unknown. A sub-cohort was linked to the National Death Index (NDI) with similar categories defined. We used ensemble classification trees to discriminate among causes using demographics, vital signs, laboratory measures, health service utilization, and comorbidity claims from 30 days prior to death. The area under the receiver operating curves (AUCs) were all between 0.59-0.70, suggesting minimal ability to distinguish among causes using clinical risk markers. We then created nested case-control populations for each cause of death and used ridge logistic regression to evaluate clinical risk markers that associate with distinct causes.

Results: Model coefficients were similar and highly correlated across different cause of death models (i.e., 0.87 - 0.94). This suggests that most clinical risk markers are shared across causes without distinct risk phenotypes.

Conclusions: We conclude that different causes of death may share similar clinical risk markers in the setting of kidney failure or that the causes of death attributed on USRDS or NDI forms are not precise.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Kidney360
Kidney360 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Acute Kidney Injury Associated with Novel Anti-Cancer Therapies: Immunotherapy. Update on the Assessment of Glomerular Filtration Rate in Patients with Cancer. Adenovirus Interstitial Nephritis post-Kidney Transplant: Case Series and Literature Review. Analysis of Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Prognosis and Risk Factors in Patients with Primary Membranous Nephropathy. Impact of an Interdisciplinary Chronic Kidney Disease Clinic on Disease Progression, Healthcare Use, and Social Determinants of Health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1