剖宫产瘢痕异位妊娠手术中术中出血的风险:可解释机器学习预测模型的开发和验证。

IF 9.6 1区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL EClinicalMedicine Pub Date : 2024-11-29 eCollection Date: 2024-12-01 DOI:10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.102969
Xinli Chen, Huan Zhang, Dongxia Guo, Siyuan Yang, Bao Liu, Yiping Hao, Qingqing Liu, Teng Zhang, Fanrong Meng, Longyun Sun, Xinlin Jiao, Wenjing Zhang, Yanli Ban, Yugang Chi, Guowei Tao, Baoxia Cui
{"title":"剖宫产瘢痕异位妊娠手术中术中出血的风险:可解释机器学习预测模型的开发和验证。","authors":"Xinli Chen, Huan Zhang, Dongxia Guo, Siyuan Yang, Bao Liu, Yiping Hao, Qingqing Liu, Teng Zhang, Fanrong Meng, Longyun Sun, Xinlin Jiao, Wenjing Zhang, Yanli Ban, Yugang Chi, Guowei Tao, Baoxia Cui","doi":"10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.102969","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Current models for predicting intraoperative hemorrhage in cesarean scar ectopic pregnancy (CSEP) are constrained by known risk factors and conventional statistical methods. Our objective is to develop an interpretable prediction model using machine learning (ML) techniques to assess the risk of intraoperative hemorrhage during CSEP in women, followed by external validation and clinical application.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This multicenter retrospective study utilized electronic medical record (EMR) data from four tertiary medical institutions. The model was developed using data from 1680 patients with CSEP diagnosed and treated at Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Chongqing Health Center for Women and Children, and Dezhou Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital between January 1, 2008, and December 31, 2023. External validation data were obtained from Liao Cheng Dong Chang Fu District Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital between January 1, 2021, and December 31, 2023. Random forest (RF), Lasso, Boruta, and Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) were employed to identify the most influential variables in the model development data set; the best variables were selected based on reaching the λ<sub>min</sub> value. Model development involved eight machine learning methods with ten-fold cross-validation. Accuracy and decision curve analysis (DCA) were used to assess model performance for selection of the optimal model. Internal validation of the model utilized area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, Matthews correlation coefficient, and F1 score. These same indicators were also applied to evaluate external validation performance of the model. Finally, visualization techniques were used to present the optimal model which was then deployed for clinical application via network applications.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Setting λ<sub>min</sub> at the value of 0.003, the optimal variable combination containing 9 variables was selected for model development. The optimal prediction model (Bayes) had an accuracy of 0.879 (95% CI: 0.857-0.901) an AUC of 0.882 (95% CI: 0.860-0.904), a DCA curve maximum threshold probability of 0.41, and a maximum return of 7.86%. The internal validation accuracy was 0.869 (95% CI: 0.847-0.891), an AUC of 0.822 (95% CI: 0.801-0.843), a sensitivity of 0.938, a specificity of 0.422, a Matthews correlation coefficient of 0.392, and an F1 score of 0.925. In the external validation, the accuracy was 0.936 (95% CI: 0.913-0.959), an AUC of 0.853 (95% CI: 0.832-0.874), a sensitivity of 0.954, a specificity of 0.5, a Matthews correlation coefficient of 0.365, and an F1 score of 0.966. This indicates that the prediction model performed well in both internal and external validation.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>The developed prediction model, deployed in the network application, is capable of forecasting the risk of intraoperative hemorrhage during CSEP. This tool can facilitate targeted preoperative assessment and clinical decision-making for clinicians. Prospective data should be utilized in future studies to further validate the extended applicability of the model.</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province; Qilu Hospital of Shandong University.</p>","PeriodicalId":11393,"journal":{"name":"EClinicalMedicine","volume":"78 ","pages":"102969"},"PeriodicalIF":9.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11646795/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Risk of intraoperative hemorrhage during cesarean scar ectopic pregnancy surgery: development and validation of an interpretable machine learning prediction model.\",\"authors\":\"Xinli Chen, Huan Zhang, Dongxia Guo, Siyuan Yang, Bao Liu, Yiping Hao, Qingqing Liu, Teng Zhang, Fanrong Meng, Longyun Sun, Xinlin Jiao, Wenjing Zhang, Yanli Ban, Yugang Chi, Guowei Tao, Baoxia Cui\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.102969\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Current models for predicting intraoperative hemorrhage in cesarean scar ectopic pregnancy (CSEP) are constrained by known risk factors and conventional statistical methods. Our objective is to develop an interpretable prediction model using machine learning (ML) techniques to assess the risk of intraoperative hemorrhage during CSEP in women, followed by external validation and clinical application.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This multicenter retrospective study utilized electronic medical record (EMR) data from four tertiary medical institutions. The model was developed using data from 1680 patients with CSEP diagnosed and treated at Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Chongqing Health Center for Women and Children, and Dezhou Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital between January 1, 2008, and December 31, 2023. External validation data were obtained from Liao Cheng Dong Chang Fu District Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital between January 1, 2021, and December 31, 2023. Random forest (RF), Lasso, Boruta, and Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) were employed to identify the most influential variables in the model development data set; the best variables were selected based on reaching the λ<sub>min</sub> value. Model development involved eight machine learning methods with ten-fold cross-validation. Accuracy and decision curve analysis (DCA) were used to assess model performance for selection of the optimal model. Internal validation of the model utilized area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, Matthews correlation coefficient, and F1 score. These same indicators were also applied to evaluate external validation performance of the model. Finally, visualization techniques were used to present the optimal model which was then deployed for clinical application via network applications.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Setting λ<sub>min</sub> at the value of 0.003, the optimal variable combination containing 9 variables was selected for model development. The optimal prediction model (Bayes) had an accuracy of 0.879 (95% CI: 0.857-0.901) an AUC of 0.882 (95% CI: 0.860-0.904), a DCA curve maximum threshold probability of 0.41, and a maximum return of 7.86%. The internal validation accuracy was 0.869 (95% CI: 0.847-0.891), an AUC of 0.822 (95% CI: 0.801-0.843), a sensitivity of 0.938, a specificity of 0.422, a Matthews correlation coefficient of 0.392, and an F1 score of 0.925. In the external validation, the accuracy was 0.936 (95% CI: 0.913-0.959), an AUC of 0.853 (95% CI: 0.832-0.874), a sensitivity of 0.954, a specificity of 0.5, a Matthews correlation coefficient of 0.365, and an F1 score of 0.966. This indicates that the prediction model performed well in both internal and external validation.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>The developed prediction model, deployed in the network application, is capable of forecasting the risk of intraoperative hemorrhage during CSEP. This tool can facilitate targeted preoperative assessment and clinical decision-making for clinicians. Prospective data should be utilized in future studies to further validate the extended applicability of the model.</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province; Qilu Hospital of Shandong University.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11393,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"EClinicalMedicine\",\"volume\":\"78 \",\"pages\":\"102969\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11646795/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"EClinicalMedicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.102969\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/12/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EClinicalMedicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.102969","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:目前预测剖宫产瘢痕异位妊娠(CSEP)术中出血的模型受到已知危险因素和传统统计方法的限制。我们的目标是利用机器学习(ML)技术建立一个可解释的预测模型来评估女性CSEP术中出血的风险,随后进行外部验证和临床应用。方法:本多中心回顾性研究利用四所三级医疗机构的电子病历(EMR)数据。该模型使用了2008年1月1日至2023年12月31日期间在山东大学齐鲁医院、重庆市妇幼卫生中心和德州市妇幼保健院诊断和治疗的1680例CSEP患者的数据。外部验证数据于2021年1月1日至2023年12月31日从廖城市东昌福区妇幼保健院获得。采用随机森林(RF)、Lasso、Boruta和极端梯度增强(XGBoost)来识别模型开发数据集中最具影响力的变量;在达到λmin值的基础上选择最佳变量。模型开发涉及八种机器学习方法,并进行了十次交叉验证。采用准确性和决策曲线分析(DCA)来评估模型的性能,以选择最优模型。利用受试者工作特征曲线下面积(AUC)、敏感性、特异性、马修斯相关系数和F1评分对模型进行内部验证。这些相同的指标也被用于评估模型的外部验证性能。最后,利用可视化技术呈现出最优模型,并通过网络应用程序部署到临床应用中。结果:设λmin = 0.003,选择包含9个变量的最优变量组合进行模型开发。最优预测模型(Bayes)准确率为0.879 (95% CI: 0.857 ~ 0.901), AUC为0.882 (95% CI: 0.860 ~ 0.904), DCA曲线最大阈值概率为0.41,最大收益率为7.86%。内部验证准确率为0.869 (95% CI: 0.847 ~ 0.891), AUC为0.822 (95% CI: 0.801 ~ 0.843),灵敏度为0.938,特异性为0.422,Matthews相关系数为0.392,F1评分为0.925。在外部验证中,准确度为0.936 (95% CI: 0.913-0.959), AUC为0.853 (95% CI: 0.832-0.874),灵敏度为0.954,特异性为0.5,Matthews相关系数为0.365,F1评分为0.966。这表明该预测模型在内部和外部验证中都表现良好。解释:所建立的预测模型部署在网络应用中,能够预测CSEP术中出血的风险。该工具有助于临床医生进行有针对性的术前评估和临床决策。未来的研究需要利用前瞻性数据,进一步验证模型的扩展适用性。项目资助:山东省自然科学基金;山东大学齐鲁医院。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Risk of intraoperative hemorrhage during cesarean scar ectopic pregnancy surgery: development and validation of an interpretable machine learning prediction model.

Background: Current models for predicting intraoperative hemorrhage in cesarean scar ectopic pregnancy (CSEP) are constrained by known risk factors and conventional statistical methods. Our objective is to develop an interpretable prediction model using machine learning (ML) techniques to assess the risk of intraoperative hemorrhage during CSEP in women, followed by external validation and clinical application.

Methods: This multicenter retrospective study utilized electronic medical record (EMR) data from four tertiary medical institutions. The model was developed using data from 1680 patients with CSEP diagnosed and treated at Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Chongqing Health Center for Women and Children, and Dezhou Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital between January 1, 2008, and December 31, 2023. External validation data were obtained from Liao Cheng Dong Chang Fu District Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital between January 1, 2021, and December 31, 2023. Random forest (RF), Lasso, Boruta, and Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) were employed to identify the most influential variables in the model development data set; the best variables were selected based on reaching the λmin value. Model development involved eight machine learning methods with ten-fold cross-validation. Accuracy and decision curve analysis (DCA) were used to assess model performance for selection of the optimal model. Internal validation of the model utilized area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, Matthews correlation coefficient, and F1 score. These same indicators were also applied to evaluate external validation performance of the model. Finally, visualization techniques were used to present the optimal model which was then deployed for clinical application via network applications.

Findings: Setting λmin at the value of 0.003, the optimal variable combination containing 9 variables was selected for model development. The optimal prediction model (Bayes) had an accuracy of 0.879 (95% CI: 0.857-0.901) an AUC of 0.882 (95% CI: 0.860-0.904), a DCA curve maximum threshold probability of 0.41, and a maximum return of 7.86%. The internal validation accuracy was 0.869 (95% CI: 0.847-0.891), an AUC of 0.822 (95% CI: 0.801-0.843), a sensitivity of 0.938, a specificity of 0.422, a Matthews correlation coefficient of 0.392, and an F1 score of 0.925. In the external validation, the accuracy was 0.936 (95% CI: 0.913-0.959), an AUC of 0.853 (95% CI: 0.832-0.874), a sensitivity of 0.954, a specificity of 0.5, a Matthews correlation coefficient of 0.365, and an F1 score of 0.966. This indicates that the prediction model performed well in both internal and external validation.

Interpretation: The developed prediction model, deployed in the network application, is capable of forecasting the risk of intraoperative hemorrhage during CSEP. This tool can facilitate targeted preoperative assessment and clinical decision-making for clinicians. Prospective data should be utilized in future studies to further validate the extended applicability of the model.

Funding: Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province; Qilu Hospital of Shandong University.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
EClinicalMedicine
EClinicalMedicine Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
18.90
自引率
1.30%
发文量
506
审稿时长
22 days
期刊介绍: eClinicalMedicine is a gold open-access clinical journal designed to support frontline health professionals in addressing the complex and rapid health transitions affecting societies globally. The journal aims to assist practitioners in overcoming healthcare challenges across diverse communities, spanning diagnosis, treatment, prevention, and health promotion. Integrating disciplines from various specialties and life stages, it seeks to enhance health systems as fundamental institutions within societies. With a forward-thinking approach, eClinicalMedicine aims to redefine the future of healthcare.
期刊最新文献
Global, regional, national burden of asthma from 1990 to 2021, with projections of incidence to 2050: a systematic analysis of the global burden of disease study 2021. Alcohol use and HIV suppression after completion of financial incentives for alcohol abstinence and isoniazid adherence: a randomized controlled trial. Expression of concern-Effectiveness of strategies for implementing guideline-concordant care in low back pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. O' testosterone, where is thy sting? A Urologist's reflection on testosterone and prostate cancer. Preoperative and intraoperative neuromonitoring and mapping techniques impact oncological and functional outcomes in supratentorial function-eloquent brain tumours: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1