危重病人尿量正常化方法的比较:一项多中心队列研究

IF 8.8 1区 医学 Q1 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE Critical Care Pub Date : 2024-12-19 DOI:10.1186/s13054-024-05200-x
Céline Monard, Nicolas Tebib, Bastien Trächsel, Tatiana Kelevina, Antoine Guillaume Schneider
{"title":"危重病人尿量正常化方法的比较:一项多中心队列研究","authors":"Céline Monard, Nicolas Tebib, Bastien Trächsel, Tatiana Kelevina, Antoine Guillaume Schneider","doi":"10.1186/s13054-024-05200-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Oliguria diagnosis includes the normalization of urine output (UO) by body weight. However, the rational and the method to apply to normalize UO to body weight are unclear. We aimed to explore the impact of the method applied to normalize UO on oliguria incidence and association with outcomes. We included all adult patients admitted to a Swiss (derivation cohort) and a US (MIMIC-IV database, validation cohort) ICU, except those on maintenance hemodialysis, who declined consent or had < 6 consecutive UO measurements. Among a panel of candidate variables (ideal body weight, body mass index, body surface area and adjusted body weight), we identified the best predictor for UO (i.e. the variable that was most closely associated with mean UO during ICU stay). We then compared oliguria incidence and association with 90-day mortality and acute kidney disease (AKD) at hospital discharge, according to whether UO was normalized by actual body weight (ABW) or the identified best UO predictor. The derivation and validation cohorts included respectively 15 322 and 28 610 patients. Those in the validation cohort were heavier (mean ABW 81 versus 75 kg) older (65 versus 62 years) and had a lower SAPS-II score (38 versus 43). The best UO predictor was ideal body weight (IBW). Oliguria incidence increased almost linearly across weight categories with ABW normalization but remained constant with IBW normalization. Using IBW for UO normalization rather than ABW improved the association between oliguria and 90-day mortality and AKD. It increased the proportion of patients correctly classified from 37.6 to 48.3% (mortality) and from 37.8 to 47% (AKD). All findings persisted after correction for sex and SAPS-II score and were confirmed in sensitivity analyses. UO normalization by IBW lead to a stable incidence of oliguria across categories of weight and improved the association between oliguria and outcomes. IBW should be preferred to normalize UO in critically ill patients.","PeriodicalId":10811,"journal":{"name":"Critical Care","volume":"31 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of methods to normalize urine output in critically ill patients: a multicenter cohort study\",\"authors\":\"Céline Monard, Nicolas Tebib, Bastien Trächsel, Tatiana Kelevina, Antoine Guillaume Schneider\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s13054-024-05200-x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Oliguria diagnosis includes the normalization of urine output (UO) by body weight. However, the rational and the method to apply to normalize UO to body weight are unclear. We aimed to explore the impact of the method applied to normalize UO on oliguria incidence and association with outcomes. We included all adult patients admitted to a Swiss (derivation cohort) and a US (MIMIC-IV database, validation cohort) ICU, except those on maintenance hemodialysis, who declined consent or had < 6 consecutive UO measurements. Among a panel of candidate variables (ideal body weight, body mass index, body surface area and adjusted body weight), we identified the best predictor for UO (i.e. the variable that was most closely associated with mean UO during ICU stay). We then compared oliguria incidence and association with 90-day mortality and acute kidney disease (AKD) at hospital discharge, according to whether UO was normalized by actual body weight (ABW) or the identified best UO predictor. The derivation and validation cohorts included respectively 15 322 and 28 610 patients. Those in the validation cohort were heavier (mean ABW 81 versus 75 kg) older (65 versus 62 years) and had a lower SAPS-II score (38 versus 43). The best UO predictor was ideal body weight (IBW). Oliguria incidence increased almost linearly across weight categories with ABW normalization but remained constant with IBW normalization. Using IBW for UO normalization rather than ABW improved the association between oliguria and 90-day mortality and AKD. It increased the proportion of patients correctly classified from 37.6 to 48.3% (mortality) and from 37.8 to 47% (AKD). All findings persisted after correction for sex and SAPS-II score and were confirmed in sensitivity analyses. UO normalization by IBW lead to a stable incidence of oliguria across categories of weight and improved the association between oliguria and outcomes. IBW should be preferred to normalize UO in critically ill patients.\",\"PeriodicalId\":10811,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Critical Care\",\"volume\":\"31 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Critical Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-024-05200-x\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-024-05200-x","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

少尿症的诊断包括按体重计算尿量(UO)的正常化。然而,对体重进行UO规范化的合理性和方法尚不明确。我们的目的是探讨UO正常化对少尿发生率的影响及其与预后的关系。我们纳入了瑞士(衍生队列)和美国(MIMIC-IV数据库,验证队列)ICU的所有成年患者,但维持性血液透析患者除外,这些患者拒绝同意或连续进行< 6次UO测量。在一组候选变量(理想体重、体重指数、体表面积和调整体重)中,我们确定了UO的最佳预测因子(即与ICU住院期间平均UO最密切相关的变量)。然后,我们比较了少尿发生率及其与出院时90天死亡率和急性肾脏疾病(AKD)的关系,根据UO是否通过实际体重(ABW)或确定的最佳UO预测指标进行标准化。推导和验证队列分别包括15 322例和28 610例患者。验证队列中的患者体重较重(平均体重81比75公斤),年龄较大(65比62岁),sap - ii评分较低(38比43)。理想体重(IBW)是UO的最佳预测指标。少尿发生率在体重类别中随着ABW的正常化几乎呈线性增加,但随着IBW的正常化保持不变。使用IBW而不是ABW来进行UO正常化,可以改善少尿与90天死亡率和AKD之间的关系。它使正确分类的患者比例从37.6%(死亡率)提高到48.3%,从37.8%提高到47% (AKD)。在校正性别和sap - ii评分后,所有结果仍然存在,并在敏感性分析中得到证实。通过IBW使UO正常化,可使不同体重类别的少尿发生率稳定,并改善少尿与预后之间的关联。在危重患者中,IBW应优先于UO的正常化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparison of methods to normalize urine output in critically ill patients: a multicenter cohort study
Oliguria diagnosis includes the normalization of urine output (UO) by body weight. However, the rational and the method to apply to normalize UO to body weight are unclear. We aimed to explore the impact of the method applied to normalize UO on oliguria incidence and association with outcomes. We included all adult patients admitted to a Swiss (derivation cohort) and a US (MIMIC-IV database, validation cohort) ICU, except those on maintenance hemodialysis, who declined consent or had < 6 consecutive UO measurements. Among a panel of candidate variables (ideal body weight, body mass index, body surface area and adjusted body weight), we identified the best predictor for UO (i.e. the variable that was most closely associated with mean UO during ICU stay). We then compared oliguria incidence and association with 90-day mortality and acute kidney disease (AKD) at hospital discharge, according to whether UO was normalized by actual body weight (ABW) or the identified best UO predictor. The derivation and validation cohorts included respectively 15 322 and 28 610 patients. Those in the validation cohort were heavier (mean ABW 81 versus 75 kg) older (65 versus 62 years) and had a lower SAPS-II score (38 versus 43). The best UO predictor was ideal body weight (IBW). Oliguria incidence increased almost linearly across weight categories with ABW normalization but remained constant with IBW normalization. Using IBW for UO normalization rather than ABW improved the association between oliguria and 90-day mortality and AKD. It increased the proportion of patients correctly classified from 37.6 to 48.3% (mortality) and from 37.8 to 47% (AKD). All findings persisted after correction for sex and SAPS-II score and were confirmed in sensitivity analyses. UO normalization by IBW lead to a stable incidence of oliguria across categories of weight and improved the association between oliguria and outcomes. IBW should be preferred to normalize UO in critically ill patients.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Critical Care
Critical Care 医学-危重病医学
CiteScore
20.60
自引率
3.30%
发文量
348
审稿时长
1.5 months
期刊介绍: Critical Care is an esteemed international medical journal that undergoes a rigorous peer-review process to maintain its high quality standards. Its primary objective is to enhance the healthcare services offered to critically ill patients. To achieve this, the journal focuses on gathering, exchanging, disseminating, and endorsing evidence-based information that is highly relevant to intensivists. By doing so, Critical Care seeks to provide a thorough and inclusive examination of the intensive care field.
期刊最新文献
Effect of an intensive care unit virtual reality intervention on relatives´ mental health distress: a multicenter, randomized controlled trial Enhancing depression risk assessment in critical care nurses: a call for quantitative modeling Clinical subtypes in critically ill patients with sepsis: validation and parsimonious classifier model development Relationship between skin microvascular blood flow and capillary refill time in critically ill patients Trendelenburg position is a reasonable alternative to passive leg raising for predicting volume responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients in the ICU
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1