[病因对颈袢前根-喉返神经吻合治疗单侧声带麻痹疗效的影响]。

Y N Gao, S C Chen, W Wang, M Li, M H Zhu, X M Song, J Y Peng, R S Huang, H L Zheng
{"title":"[病因对颈袢前根-喉返神经吻合治疗单侧声带麻痹疗效的影响]。","authors":"Y N Gao, S C Chen, W Wang, M Li, M H Zhu, X M Song, J Y Peng, R S Huang, H L Zheng","doi":"10.3760/cma.j.cn115330-20240723-00442","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> To explore the efficacy of ansa cervicalis anterior root-recurrent laryngeal nerve (RLN) anastomosis in the treatment of unilateral vocal fold paralysis (UVFP) and to analyze the effect of different pathogenic factors on efficacy. <b>Methods:</b> From January 2010 to January 2022, 428 patients (187 males and 241 females) at Changhai Hospital with UVFP who underwent ansa cervicalis anterior root-RLN anastomosis due to thyroid surgery, thoracic surgery, idiopathic vocal ford paralysis or high cranial base injury were analyzed. The course of nerve injury ranged from 6 to 24 months. Videostroboscopy, auditory perceptual evaluation parameters (GRBAS including Grade, Roughness, Breathiness, Asthenia, Strain), Voice Handicap Index (VHI-10), acoustic analysis including Jitter, Shimmer and noise to harmonic ratio (NHR), maximum phonation time (MPT) and laryngeal electromyography were used to evaluate the surgery efficacy, and the therapeutic difference of the above 4 different etiology patients receiving the operation was compared. Data processing was performed using SPSS 26.0 statistical software, and Wilcoxon signed rank test was used. Kruskal Wallis one-way ANOVA was used for those with equal variance. <b>Results:</b> At 12 months after operation, the affected vocal ford position, vocal ford edge, glottal closure, symmetry and regularity of vocal ford vibration were significantly improved in all four groups (<i>P</i><0.01). G, R, B, A, S, VHI-10, Jitter, Shimmer and NHR were significantly lower than those before operation, while, MPT was significantly longer (<i>P</i><0.01). Also, the maximum voluntary motor unit recruitment (VMUR) in the affected thyroarytenoid muscles and posterior cricoarytenoid muscles was significantly improved after surgery (<i>P</i><0.01). However, the results of thyroid surgery group, thoracic surgery group and idiopathic vocal ford paralysis group were better than those of high cranial base injury group respectively, and the differences were statistically significant (<i>P</i><0.05). <b>Conclusion:</b> Ansa cervicalis anterior root-RLN anastomosis has an obvious efficacy on the recovery of phonatory function in UVFP patients with different causes, but the high cranial base injury is significantly worse than that of vocal ford paralysis caused by other causes.</p>","PeriodicalId":23987,"journal":{"name":"Chinese journal of otorhinolaryngology head and neck surgery","volume":"59 ","pages":"1286-1292"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Influence of etiology on the efficacy of ansa cervicalis anterior root-recurrent laryngeal nerve anastomosis in the treatment of unilateral vocal ford paralysis].\",\"authors\":\"Y N Gao, S C Chen, W Wang, M Li, M H Zhu, X M Song, J Y Peng, R S Huang, H L Zheng\",\"doi\":\"10.3760/cma.j.cn115330-20240723-00442\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> To explore the efficacy of ansa cervicalis anterior root-recurrent laryngeal nerve (RLN) anastomosis in the treatment of unilateral vocal fold paralysis (UVFP) and to analyze the effect of different pathogenic factors on efficacy. <b>Methods:</b> From January 2010 to January 2022, 428 patients (187 males and 241 females) at Changhai Hospital with UVFP who underwent ansa cervicalis anterior root-RLN anastomosis due to thyroid surgery, thoracic surgery, idiopathic vocal ford paralysis or high cranial base injury were analyzed. The course of nerve injury ranged from 6 to 24 months. Videostroboscopy, auditory perceptual evaluation parameters (GRBAS including Grade, Roughness, Breathiness, Asthenia, Strain), Voice Handicap Index (VHI-10), acoustic analysis including Jitter, Shimmer and noise to harmonic ratio (NHR), maximum phonation time (MPT) and laryngeal electromyography were used to evaluate the surgery efficacy, and the therapeutic difference of the above 4 different etiology patients receiving the operation was compared. Data processing was performed using SPSS 26.0 statistical software, and Wilcoxon signed rank test was used. Kruskal Wallis one-way ANOVA was used for those with equal variance. <b>Results:</b> At 12 months after operation, the affected vocal ford position, vocal ford edge, glottal closure, symmetry and regularity of vocal ford vibration were significantly improved in all four groups (<i>P</i><0.01). G, R, B, A, S, VHI-10, Jitter, Shimmer and NHR were significantly lower than those before operation, while, MPT was significantly longer (<i>P</i><0.01). Also, the maximum voluntary motor unit recruitment (VMUR) in the affected thyroarytenoid muscles and posterior cricoarytenoid muscles was significantly improved after surgery (<i>P</i><0.01). However, the results of thyroid surgery group, thoracic surgery group and idiopathic vocal ford paralysis group were better than those of high cranial base injury group respectively, and the differences were statistically significant (<i>P</i><0.05). <b>Conclusion:</b> Ansa cervicalis anterior root-RLN anastomosis has an obvious efficacy on the recovery of phonatory function in UVFP patients with different causes, but the high cranial base injury is significantly worse than that of vocal ford paralysis caused by other causes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23987,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Chinese journal of otorhinolaryngology head and neck surgery\",\"volume\":\"59 \",\"pages\":\"1286-1292\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Chinese journal of otorhinolaryngology head and neck surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn115330-20240723-00442\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chinese journal of otorhinolaryngology head and neck surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn115330-20240723-00442","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:探讨颈袢前根-喉返神经(RLN)吻合术治疗单侧声带麻痹(UVFP)的疗效,并分析不同致病因素对疗效的影响。方法:对2010年1月至2022年1月在长海医院因甲状腺手术、胸外科、特发性声带麻痹或颅底高位损伤行颈前根- rln吻合术的UVFP患者428例(男187例,女241例)进行分析。神经损伤病程6 ~ 24个月。采用频闪视像、听觉感知评价参数(GRBAS包括Grade、Roughness、Breathiness、Asthenia、Strain)、Voice Handicap Index (VHI-10)、声学分析包括Jitter、Shimmer、noise to harmonic ratio (NHR)、maximum发声时间(MPT)、喉肌电图评价手术疗效,并比较上述4例不同病因患者接受手术的治疗差异。数据处理采用SPSS 26.0统计软件,采用Wilcoxon符号秩检验。方差相等的采用Kruskal Wallis单因素方差分析。结果:术后12个月,四组患者受损伤的声带位置、声带边缘、声门闭合、声带振动的对称性和规律性均有明显改善(ppppp)。结论:颈安前根- rln吻合术对不同原因的UVFP患者发声功能恢复均有明显疗效,但高颅底损伤明显差于其他原因引起的声带瘫痪。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[Influence of etiology on the efficacy of ansa cervicalis anterior root-recurrent laryngeal nerve anastomosis in the treatment of unilateral vocal ford paralysis].

Objective: To explore the efficacy of ansa cervicalis anterior root-recurrent laryngeal nerve (RLN) anastomosis in the treatment of unilateral vocal fold paralysis (UVFP) and to analyze the effect of different pathogenic factors on efficacy. Methods: From January 2010 to January 2022, 428 patients (187 males and 241 females) at Changhai Hospital with UVFP who underwent ansa cervicalis anterior root-RLN anastomosis due to thyroid surgery, thoracic surgery, idiopathic vocal ford paralysis or high cranial base injury were analyzed. The course of nerve injury ranged from 6 to 24 months. Videostroboscopy, auditory perceptual evaluation parameters (GRBAS including Grade, Roughness, Breathiness, Asthenia, Strain), Voice Handicap Index (VHI-10), acoustic analysis including Jitter, Shimmer and noise to harmonic ratio (NHR), maximum phonation time (MPT) and laryngeal electromyography were used to evaluate the surgery efficacy, and the therapeutic difference of the above 4 different etiology patients receiving the operation was compared. Data processing was performed using SPSS 26.0 statistical software, and Wilcoxon signed rank test was used. Kruskal Wallis one-way ANOVA was used for those with equal variance. Results: At 12 months after operation, the affected vocal ford position, vocal ford edge, glottal closure, symmetry and regularity of vocal ford vibration were significantly improved in all four groups (P<0.01). G, R, B, A, S, VHI-10, Jitter, Shimmer and NHR were significantly lower than those before operation, while, MPT was significantly longer (P<0.01). Also, the maximum voluntary motor unit recruitment (VMUR) in the affected thyroarytenoid muscles and posterior cricoarytenoid muscles was significantly improved after surgery (P<0.01). However, the results of thyroid surgery group, thoracic surgery group and idiopathic vocal ford paralysis group were better than those of high cranial base injury group respectively, and the differences were statistically significant (P<0.05). Conclusion: Ansa cervicalis anterior root-RLN anastomosis has an obvious efficacy on the recovery of phonatory function in UVFP patients with different causes, but the high cranial base injury is significantly worse than that of vocal ford paralysis caused by other causes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
相关文献
二甲双胍通过HDAC6和FoxO3a转录调控肌肉生长抑制素诱导肌肉萎缩
IF 8.9 1区 医学Journal of Cachexia, Sarcopenia and MusclePub Date : 2021-11-02 DOI: 10.1002/jcsm.12833
Min Ju Kang, Ji Wook Moon, Jung Ok Lee, Ji Hae Kim, Eun Jeong Jung, Su Jin Kim, Joo Yeon Oh, Sang Woo Wu, Pu Reum Lee, Sun Hwa Park, Hyeon Soo Kim
具有疾病敏感单倍型的非亲属供体脐带血移植后的1型糖尿病
IF 3.2 3区 医学Journal of Diabetes InvestigationPub Date : 2022-11-02 DOI: 10.1111/jdi.13939
Kensuke Matsumoto, Taisuke Matsuyama, Ritsu Sumiyoshi, Matsuo Takuji, Tadashi Yamamoto, Ryosuke Shirasaki, Haruko Tashiro
封面:蛋白质组学分析确定IRSp53和fastin是PRV输出和直接细胞-细胞传播的关键
IF 3.4 4区 生物学ProteomicsPub Date : 2019-12-02 DOI: 10.1002/pmic.201970201
Fei-Long Yu, Huan Miao, Jinjin Xia, Fan Jia, Huadong Wang, Fuqiang Xu, Lin Guo
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12432
期刊介绍: Chinese journal of otorhinolaryngology head and neck surgery is a high-level medical science and technology journal sponsored and published directly by the Chinese Medical Association, reflecting the significant research progress in the field of otorhinolaryngology head and neck surgery in China, and striving to promote the domestic and international academic exchanges for the purpose of running the journal. Over the years, the journal has been ranked first in the total citation frequency list of national scientific and technical journals published by the Documentation and Intelligence Center of the Chinese Academy of Sciences and the China Science Citation Database, and has always ranked first among the scientific and technical journals in the related fields. Chinese journal of otorhinolaryngology head and neck surgery has been included in the authoritative databases PubMed, Chinese core journals, CSCD.
期刊最新文献
[Multicenter retrospective analysis of transoral robotic surgery for parapharyngeal space neoplasm]. [Multi-center retrospective study of transoral robotic surgery for supraglottic laryngeal cancer]. [Multicenter study on the efficacy of transoral robotic surgery for malignant tongue base tumors]. [A new useful tool for minimally invasive and scarless resection of head and neck tumors: transoral robotic surgery]. [Complication of transoral robotic surgery: single institution study].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1