将有生活经验的人纳入电子健康记录数据库研究,从CHOOSE研究中反思和学习。

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Health Expectations Pub Date : 2024-12-18 DOI:10.1111/hex.70131
Emma Cockcroft, Vidhi Bassi, Pearl L. H. Mok, Alex Adams, Anabel A. Claro, Alex M. Trafford, Matthew J. Carr, Darren M. Ashcroft, Emma Garavini, Rachel Temple, Roger T. Webb, Shruti Garg, Carolyn A. Chew-Graham
{"title":"将有生活经验的人纳入电子健康记录数据库研究,从CHOOSE研究中反思和学习。","authors":"Emma Cockcroft,&nbsp;Vidhi Bassi,&nbsp;Pearl L. H. Mok,&nbsp;Alex Adams,&nbsp;Anabel A. Claro,&nbsp;Alex M. Trafford,&nbsp;Matthew J. Carr,&nbsp;Darren M. Ashcroft,&nbsp;Emma Garavini,&nbsp;Rachel Temple,&nbsp;Roger T. Webb,&nbsp;Shruti Garg,&nbsp;Carolyn A. Chew-Graham","doi":"10.1111/hex.70131","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Patient and public involvement and engagement (PPIE) is integral to health research. Reporting of PPIE methods and impact is becoming increasingly common in health research. However, reporting on PPIE in studies using large, routinely collected electronic health record data sets is less common. Anecdotal evidence suggests that involvement in this research context is more challenging and offers fewer opportunities for meaningful influence on the research process.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>This paper reports the involvement approach for a Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD) study and critically reflects on the process and impact of involving young people, parents and carers in research using this UK primary care electronic health record data set.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>The CHOOSE study investigated mental health diagnoses of children and young people (1–24 years) during the COVID-19 pandemic using the CPRD. The study was informed by a Lived Experience Advisory Panel (LEAP) which consisted of 13 members including 8 young people (13–25 years) with lived experience of mental health difficulties and 5 parents/carers, with involvement activities facilitated by project partners, mental health research charity, The McPin<sup>R</sup> Foundation. We reflect on this process in this manuscript.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Key benefits of involving people with lived experience in this research included making sense of and contextualising findings and ensuring that they were focused on making a difference to young people's lives. Challenges included the fixed nature of the CPRD data, which did not capture all the information people with lived experience perceived to be important. Researchers expressed limited time for PPIE activities although that was compensated by McPin colleagues who organised and facilitated online meetings, and supported the young people, parents and carers during and between meetings.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>This paper describes an approach to patient and public involvement in an electronic health record database study. Working collaboratively with young people, carers and other stakeholders requires sufficient time and adequate resources. We also highlight the importance of appropriate training and support and being transparent about the limitations of PPIE involvement.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Patient or Public Contribution</h3>\n \n <p>Three members of the CHOOSE LEAP have been involved in conceptualising and writing this paper.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":55070,"journal":{"name":"Health Expectations","volume":"27 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/hex.70131","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Involving People With Lived Experience in Electronic Health Record Database Studies Reflections and Learning From the CHOOSE Study\",\"authors\":\"Emma Cockcroft,&nbsp;Vidhi Bassi,&nbsp;Pearl L. H. Mok,&nbsp;Alex Adams,&nbsp;Anabel A. Claro,&nbsp;Alex M. Trafford,&nbsp;Matthew J. Carr,&nbsp;Darren M. Ashcroft,&nbsp;Emma Garavini,&nbsp;Rachel Temple,&nbsp;Roger T. Webb,&nbsp;Shruti Garg,&nbsp;Carolyn A. Chew-Graham\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/hex.70131\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>Patient and public involvement and engagement (PPIE) is integral to health research. Reporting of PPIE methods and impact is becoming increasingly common in health research. However, reporting on PPIE in studies using large, routinely collected electronic health record data sets is less common. Anecdotal evidence suggests that involvement in this research context is more challenging and offers fewer opportunities for meaningful influence on the research process.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Objectives</h3>\\n \\n <p>This paper reports the involvement approach for a Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD) study and critically reflects on the process and impact of involving young people, parents and carers in research using this UK primary care electronic health record data set.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>The CHOOSE study investigated mental health diagnoses of children and young people (1–24 years) during the COVID-19 pandemic using the CPRD. The study was informed by a Lived Experience Advisory Panel (LEAP) which consisted of 13 members including 8 young people (13–25 years) with lived experience of mental health difficulties and 5 parents/carers, with involvement activities facilitated by project partners, mental health research charity, The McPin<sup>R</sup> Foundation. We reflect on this process in this manuscript.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Key benefits of involving people with lived experience in this research included making sense of and contextualising findings and ensuring that they were focused on making a difference to young people's lives. Challenges included the fixed nature of the CPRD data, which did not capture all the information people with lived experience perceived to be important. Researchers expressed limited time for PPIE activities although that was compensated by McPin colleagues who organised and facilitated online meetings, and supported the young people, parents and carers during and between meetings.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>This paper describes an approach to patient and public involvement in an electronic health record database study. Working collaboratively with young people, carers and other stakeholders requires sufficient time and adequate resources. We also highlight the importance of appropriate training and support and being transparent about the limitations of PPIE involvement.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Patient or Public Contribution</h3>\\n \\n <p>Three members of the CHOOSE LEAP have been involved in conceptualising and writing this paper.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55070,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health Expectations\",\"volume\":\"27 6\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/hex.70131\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health Expectations\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/hex.70131\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Expectations","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/hex.70131","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:患者和公众的参与和参与(PPIE)是健康研究不可或缺的一部分。在卫生研究中,报告PPIE的方法和影响越来越普遍。然而,在使用大型常规收集的电子健康记录数据集的研究中报告PPIE的情况并不常见。轶事证据表明,参与这种研究背景更具挑战性,对研究过程产生有意义影响的机会较少。目的:本文报告了临床实践研究数据链(CPRD)研究的参与方法,并批判性地反思了使用英国初级保健电子健康记录数据集进行研究时涉及年轻人、父母和照顾者的过程和影响。方法:选择研究使用CPRD调查COVID-19大流行期间儿童和年轻人(1-24岁)的心理健康诊断。该研究由生活经验咨询小组(LEAP)提供信息,该小组由13名成员组成,其中包括8名有精神健康困难生活经历的年轻人(13-25岁)和5名父母/照顾者,并由项目合作伙伴,心理健康研究慈善机构McPinR基金会促进参与活动。我们在本文中对这一过程进行了反思。结果:让有生活经验的人参与这项研究的主要好处包括理解和背景化研究结果,并确保他们专注于改变年轻人的生活。挑战包括人口普查数据的固定性质,它没有捕捉到有生活经验的人认为重要的所有信息。研究人员表示,PPIE活动的时间有限,尽管McPin的同事组织和促进了在线会议,并在会议期间和会议间隙为年轻人、父母和照顾者提供了支持。结论:本文描述了患者和公众参与电子健康记录数据库研究的方法。与年轻人、照顾者和其他利益攸关方合作需要充足的时间和资源。我们还强调适当的培训和支持的重要性,以及对PPIE参与的局限性保持透明。患者或公众贡献:CHOOSE LEAP的三名成员参与了本文的构思和写作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Involving People With Lived Experience in Electronic Health Record Database Studies Reflections and Learning From the CHOOSE Study

Background

Patient and public involvement and engagement (PPIE) is integral to health research. Reporting of PPIE methods and impact is becoming increasingly common in health research. However, reporting on PPIE in studies using large, routinely collected electronic health record data sets is less common. Anecdotal evidence suggests that involvement in this research context is more challenging and offers fewer opportunities for meaningful influence on the research process.

Objectives

This paper reports the involvement approach for a Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD) study and critically reflects on the process and impact of involving young people, parents and carers in research using this UK primary care electronic health record data set.

Methods

The CHOOSE study investigated mental health diagnoses of children and young people (1–24 years) during the COVID-19 pandemic using the CPRD. The study was informed by a Lived Experience Advisory Panel (LEAP) which consisted of 13 members including 8 young people (13–25 years) with lived experience of mental health difficulties and 5 parents/carers, with involvement activities facilitated by project partners, mental health research charity, The McPinR Foundation. We reflect on this process in this manuscript.

Results

Key benefits of involving people with lived experience in this research included making sense of and contextualising findings and ensuring that they were focused on making a difference to young people's lives. Challenges included the fixed nature of the CPRD data, which did not capture all the information people with lived experience perceived to be important. Researchers expressed limited time for PPIE activities although that was compensated by McPin colleagues who organised and facilitated online meetings, and supported the young people, parents and carers during and between meetings.

Conclusions

This paper describes an approach to patient and public involvement in an electronic health record database study. Working collaboratively with young people, carers and other stakeholders requires sufficient time and adequate resources. We also highlight the importance of appropriate training and support and being transparent about the limitations of PPIE involvement.

Patient or Public Contribution

Three members of the CHOOSE LEAP have been involved in conceptualising and writing this paper.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Health Expectations
Health Expectations 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
9.40%
发文量
251
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Health Expectations promotes critical thinking and informed debate about all aspects of patient and public involvement and engagement (PPIE) in health and social care, health policy and health services research including: • Person-centred care and quality improvement • Patients'' participation in decisions about disease prevention and management • Public perceptions of health services • Citizen involvement in health care policy making and priority-setting • Methods for monitoring and evaluating participation • Empowerment and consumerism • Patients'' role in safety and quality • Patient and public role in health services research • Co-production (researchers working with patients and the public) of research, health care and policy Health Expectations is a quarterly, peer-reviewed journal publishing original research, review articles and critical commentaries. It includes papers which clarify concepts, develop theories, and critically analyse and evaluate specific policies and practices. The Journal provides an inter-disciplinary and international forum in which researchers (including PPIE researchers) from a range of backgrounds and expertise can present their work to other researchers, policy-makers, health care professionals, managers, patients and consumer advocates.
期刊最新文献
Co-Design of the Structured Personalised Assessment for Reviews After Cancer (SPARC) Intervention Task Shifting, eHealth and Shared Decision-Making—Preference Heterogeneity in the Adult Population for Developments in Outpatient Primary Healthcare Developing a Quality Improvement Framework to Enhance the Health System User Experience for Individuals Living With Type 1 Diabetes: The Reshape T1D Study Feasibility and Applicability of Implementing the Framework for Comprehensive Understanding of Structural Stigma in Mental Healthcare Systems: A Case Example of Nepal Erratum to “What I Wish I Had Known: Examining Parent Accounts of Managing the Health of Their Child With Intellectual Disability”
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1