{"title":"[一种直接制作临时结构材料与3D打印制作临时冠的力学性能分析]。","authors":"S D Shneider, N S Nurieva, A D Yurasov","doi":"10.17116/stomat202410306120","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The aim of this work is to study the mechanical properties of temporary composite crowns and temporary composite orthopedic structures manufactured by 3D printing.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>For the two studied groups of samples: the original 3D-printed samples and the poured samples from a composite material of a certain shape, 8 samples were made and visually checked for the absence of porosity. The strength and elasticity were measured using the three-point bending method and the hardness was measured using the indentation method.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For both materials, the hardness, flexural strength and flexural elasticity show consistently high values required by GOST 24621-2015 (ISO 868:2003) [Plastics and ebonite] and GOST 4648-2014 (ISO 178:2010) [Plastics]. However, the statistical data on bending are higher for the composite material, with a larger spread of the elastic modulus value, in contrast to the 3D-printed samples.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Both materials are suitable for the manufacture of temporary orthopedic structures. For a more accurate assessment, it is necessary to continue studying the 3D-printed material for cytotoxicity, water absorption, and microstructure.</p>","PeriodicalId":35887,"journal":{"name":"Stomatologiya","volume":"103 6","pages":"20-24"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Analysis of the mechanical properties of a material of temporary structures manufactured by direct method and provisional crowns made by 3D printing].\",\"authors\":\"S D Shneider, N S Nurieva, A D Yurasov\",\"doi\":\"10.17116/stomat202410306120\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The aim of this work is to study the mechanical properties of temporary composite crowns and temporary composite orthopedic structures manufactured by 3D printing.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>For the two studied groups of samples: the original 3D-printed samples and the poured samples from a composite material of a certain shape, 8 samples were made and visually checked for the absence of porosity. The strength and elasticity were measured using the three-point bending method and the hardness was measured using the indentation method.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For both materials, the hardness, flexural strength and flexural elasticity show consistently high values required by GOST 24621-2015 (ISO 868:2003) [Plastics and ebonite] and GOST 4648-2014 (ISO 178:2010) [Plastics]. However, the statistical data on bending are higher for the composite material, with a larger spread of the elastic modulus value, in contrast to the 3D-printed samples.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Both materials are suitable for the manufacture of temporary orthopedic structures. For a more accurate assessment, it is necessary to continue studying the 3D-printed material for cytotoxicity, water absorption, and microstructure.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":35887,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Stomatologiya\",\"volume\":\"103 6\",\"pages\":\"20-24\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Stomatologiya\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17116/stomat202410306120\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Stomatologiya","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17116/stomat202410306120","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
本研究的目的是研究3D打印制造的临时复合冠和临时复合矫形结构的力学性能。材料和方法:对于两组研究样品:原始3d打印样品和由一定形状的复合材料浇注的样品,制作了8个样品,并目测有无孔隙。采用三点弯曲法测定强度和弹性,采用压痕法测定硬度。结果:两种材料的硬度、抗弯强度和抗弯弹性均符合GOST 24621-2015 (ISO 868:2003)[塑料和胶木]和GOST 4648-2014 (ISO 178:2010)[塑料]所要求的高值。然而,与3d打印样品相比,复合材料的弯曲统计数据更高,弹性模量值的分布更大。结论:两种材料均适用于临时矫形结构的制作。为了更准确的评估,有必要继续研究3d打印材料的细胞毒性,吸水率和微观结构。
[Analysis of the mechanical properties of a material of temporary structures manufactured by direct method and provisional crowns made by 3D printing].
The aim of this work is to study the mechanical properties of temporary composite crowns and temporary composite orthopedic structures manufactured by 3D printing.
Materials and methods: For the two studied groups of samples: the original 3D-printed samples and the poured samples from a composite material of a certain shape, 8 samples were made and visually checked for the absence of porosity. The strength and elasticity were measured using the three-point bending method and the hardness was measured using the indentation method.
Results: For both materials, the hardness, flexural strength and flexural elasticity show consistently high values required by GOST 24621-2015 (ISO 868:2003) [Plastics and ebonite] and GOST 4648-2014 (ISO 178:2010) [Plastics]. However, the statistical data on bending are higher for the composite material, with a larger spread of the elastic modulus value, in contrast to the 3D-printed samples.
Conclusion: Both materials are suitable for the manufacture of temporary orthopedic structures. For a more accurate assessment, it is necessary to continue studying the 3D-printed material for cytotoxicity, water absorption, and microstructure.