休闲跑步者习惯性足部撞击方式对髌股关节和跟腱负荷的影响。

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q3 NEUROSCIENCES Gait & posture Pub Date : 2024-12-13 DOI:10.1016/j.gaitpost.2024.12.017
Xini Zhang , Baisheng Fu , Yuxin Li , Liqin Deng , Weijie Fu
{"title":"休闲跑步者习惯性足部撞击方式对髌股关节和跟腱负荷的影响。","authors":"Xini Zhang ,&nbsp;Baisheng Fu ,&nbsp;Yuxin Li ,&nbsp;Liqin Deng ,&nbsp;Weijie Fu","doi":"10.1016/j.gaitpost.2024.12.017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Most running biomechanics studies have focused on either the patellofemoral joint (PFJ) or Achilles tendon (AT) alone, generating fragmented understanding of how these structures interact as components of an integrated kinetic chain during running. This study was to investigate concurrent biomechanical changes in the PFJ and AT in recreational runners.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The recreational runners who are accustomed to run with rearfoot strike (RFS, <em>n</em> = 15) and forefoot strike (FFS, <em>n</em> = 15) patterns were recruited. They were instructed to run at 10 km/h in cushion shoes with their habitual strike patterns on an instrumented split-belt treadmill. Kinematics of the ankle and knee joints in the sagittal plane and ground reaction forces were recorded simultaneously. The contact force and stress at the PFJ, as well as the force, loading rate, impulse, and stress of the AT, were calculated.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The habitual RFS runners had significantly higher peak extension moment (<em>p</em> = 0.019, <em>ES</em> = 0.906), peak quadriceps force (<em>p</em> = 0.010, <em>ES</em> = 1.008), PFJ contact force (<em>p</em> = 0.007, <em>ES</em> = 1.056) and stress (<em>p</em> = 0.042, <em>ES</em> = 0.958) than habitual FFS runners. The peak plantar flexion moment (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.001, <em>ES</em> = 2.692), peak AT force (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.001, <em>ES</em> = −1.788), average (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.001, <em>ES</em> = −2.337) and peak AT loading rate (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.001, <em>ES</em> =-1.996), AT impulse (<em>p</em> = 0.002, <em>ES</em> = −1.246) and stress (<em>p</em> = 0.006, <em>ES</em> = −1.082) of the habitual RFS runners were significantly lower than those of the habitual FFS runners.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The FFS pattern could decrease PFJ load but simultaneously increased the mechanical load on the AT. Conversely, the RFS pattern increased PFJ load, but imposed less load on the AT.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12496,"journal":{"name":"Gait & posture","volume":"117 ","pages":"Pages 121-128"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of habitual foot strike patterns on patellofemoral joint and Achilles tendon loading in recreational runner\",\"authors\":\"Xini Zhang ,&nbsp;Baisheng Fu ,&nbsp;Yuxin Li ,&nbsp;Liqin Deng ,&nbsp;Weijie Fu\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.gaitpost.2024.12.017\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Most running biomechanics studies have focused on either the patellofemoral joint (PFJ) or Achilles tendon (AT) alone, generating fragmented understanding of how these structures interact as components of an integrated kinetic chain during running. This study was to investigate concurrent biomechanical changes in the PFJ and AT in recreational runners.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The recreational runners who are accustomed to run with rearfoot strike (RFS, <em>n</em> = 15) and forefoot strike (FFS, <em>n</em> = 15) patterns were recruited. They were instructed to run at 10 km/h in cushion shoes with their habitual strike patterns on an instrumented split-belt treadmill. Kinematics of the ankle and knee joints in the sagittal plane and ground reaction forces were recorded simultaneously. The contact force and stress at the PFJ, as well as the force, loading rate, impulse, and stress of the AT, were calculated.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The habitual RFS runners had significantly higher peak extension moment (<em>p</em> = 0.019, <em>ES</em> = 0.906), peak quadriceps force (<em>p</em> = 0.010, <em>ES</em> = 1.008), PFJ contact force (<em>p</em> = 0.007, <em>ES</em> = 1.056) and stress (<em>p</em> = 0.042, <em>ES</em> = 0.958) than habitual FFS runners. The peak plantar flexion moment (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.001, <em>ES</em> = 2.692), peak AT force (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.001, <em>ES</em> = −1.788), average (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.001, <em>ES</em> = −2.337) and peak AT loading rate (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.001, <em>ES</em> =-1.996), AT impulse (<em>p</em> = 0.002, <em>ES</em> = −1.246) and stress (<em>p</em> = 0.006, <em>ES</em> = −1.082) of the habitual RFS runners were significantly lower than those of the habitual FFS runners.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The FFS pattern could decrease PFJ load but simultaneously increased the mechanical load on the AT. Conversely, the RFS pattern increased PFJ load, but imposed less load on the AT.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12496,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Gait & posture\",\"volume\":\"117 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 121-128\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Gait & posture\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0966636224007550\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gait & posture","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0966636224007550","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:大多数跑步生物力学研究都只关注髌股关节(PFJ)或跟腱(AT),对这些结构在跑步过程中作为综合运动链的组成部分如何相互作用的认识比较零散。本研究旨在调查休闲跑步者 PFJ 和 AT 同时发生的生物力学变化:方法:招募习惯用后脚掌着地(RFS,n = 15)和前脚掌着地(FFS,n = 15)模式跑步的休闲跑步者。指导他们在带仪器的分带式跑步机上以 10 公里/小时的速度穿着缓冲鞋,以他们习惯的击球方式跑步。同时记录矢状面上踝关节和膝关节的运动学特性以及地面反作用力。计算了 PFJ 的接触力和应力,以及 AT 的力、加载率、冲量和应力:结果:习惯 RFS 跑者的伸展力矩峰值(p = 0.019,ES = 0.906)、股四头肌力峰值(p = 0.010,ES = 1.008)、PFJ 接触力(p = 0.007,ES = 1.056)和应力(p = 0.042,ES = 0.958)均明显高于习惯 FFS 跑者。跖屈力矩峰值(p 结论:FFS 模式可降低 PFF 接触力(p = 0.007)和压力(p = 0.042):FFS 模式可减少 PFJ 负荷,但同时增加了 AT 的机械负荷。相反,RFS 模式增加了 PFJ 负荷,但对 AT 的负荷较小。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Effects of habitual foot strike patterns on patellofemoral joint and Achilles tendon loading in recreational runner

Background

Most running biomechanics studies have focused on either the patellofemoral joint (PFJ) or Achilles tendon (AT) alone, generating fragmented understanding of how these structures interact as components of an integrated kinetic chain during running. This study was to investigate concurrent biomechanical changes in the PFJ and AT in recreational runners.

Methods

The recreational runners who are accustomed to run with rearfoot strike (RFS, n = 15) and forefoot strike (FFS, n = 15) patterns were recruited. They were instructed to run at 10 km/h in cushion shoes with their habitual strike patterns on an instrumented split-belt treadmill. Kinematics of the ankle and knee joints in the sagittal plane and ground reaction forces were recorded simultaneously. The contact force and stress at the PFJ, as well as the force, loading rate, impulse, and stress of the AT, were calculated.

Results

The habitual RFS runners had significantly higher peak extension moment (p = 0.019, ES = 0.906), peak quadriceps force (p = 0.010, ES = 1.008), PFJ contact force (p = 0.007, ES = 1.056) and stress (p = 0.042, ES = 0.958) than habitual FFS runners. The peak plantar flexion moment (p < 0.001, ES = 2.692), peak AT force (p < 0.001, ES = −1.788), average (p < 0.001, ES = −2.337) and peak AT loading rate (p < 0.001, ES =-1.996), AT impulse (p = 0.002, ES = −1.246) and stress (p = 0.006, ES = −1.082) of the habitual RFS runners were significantly lower than those of the habitual FFS runners.

Conclusion

The FFS pattern could decrease PFJ load but simultaneously increased the mechanical load on the AT. Conversely, the RFS pattern increased PFJ load, but imposed less load on the AT.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Gait & posture
Gait & posture 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
12.50%
发文量
616
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Gait & Posture is a vehicle for the publication of up-to-date basic and clinical research on all aspects of locomotion and balance. The topics covered include: Techniques for the measurement of gait and posture, and the standardization of results presentation; Studies of normal and pathological gait; Treatment of gait and postural abnormalities; Biomechanical and theoretical approaches to gait and posture; Mathematical models of joint and muscle mechanics; Neurological and musculoskeletal function in gait and posture; The evolution of upright posture and bipedal locomotion; Adaptations of carrying loads, walking on uneven surfaces, climbing stairs etc; spinal biomechanics only if they are directly related to gait and/or posture and are of general interest to our readers; The effect of aging and development on gait and posture; Psychological and cultural aspects of gait; Patient education.
期刊最新文献
Validation of an algorithm for detecting turning in people with cognitive impairment, considering dementia disease subtype Impact of mild leg length discrepancy on pelvic alignment and gait compensation in children Fully instrumented gait analysis in rare bone diseases – A scoping review of the literature Effects of external ankle braces on kinematics and kinetics of the lower limb during the cutting maneuver in healthy females The effects of Hyperkyphosis on Balance and Fall Risk in older adults: A Systematic Review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1