癌症育龄妇女生育决策经验的探讨:质性系统回顾。

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING Research in Nursing & Health Pub Date : 2024-12-20 DOI:10.1002/nur.22435
Zitong Zhang, Yilin Zhang, Cai Deng, Wanting Zhang, Yunyun Peng, Guiyuan Ma, Sulan Lin, Carmen Wing Han Chan, Ka Ming Chow, Can Gu
{"title":"癌症育龄妇女生育决策经验的探讨:质性系统回顾。","authors":"Zitong Zhang, Yilin Zhang, Cai Deng, Wanting Zhang, Yunyun Peng, Guiyuan Ma, Sulan Lin, Carmen Wing Han Chan, Ka Ming Chow, Can Gu","doi":"10.1002/nur.22435","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Women of reproductive age with cancer face unique considerations in terms of fertility. The related decision-making process is complicated, and insufficient support can lead to decisional conflict. The aim of this qualitative systematic review was to identify and integrate qualitative evidence regarding the fertility decision-making process of women of reproductive age undergoing treatment for cancer. A qualitative systematic review was conducted following the Joanna Briggs Institute's methodology. Eight electronic databases were searched from inception to June 2023 for articles describing qualitative studies of the fertility decision-making process of women of reproductive age with cancer. Only original, full-text literature was examined, no limitation was placed on the publication language. Finally, 18 studies were included in a thematic analysis. We identified three analytical themes, namely \"Perceived changes in fertility,\" \"Influential participants in the decision-making process\" and \"Hard fertility decision-making processes of women,\" and nine descriptive themes that described the three analytical themes in detail. The results of qualitative synthesis emphasized that for women of reproductive age with cancer, fertility decision-making is a complex and dynamic process. These patients had experienced decisional conflict. Decision support from health care professionals was considered to be essential, and the use of patient decision aids in clinical settings was recommended. The synthesis results clarify women's fertility decision-making process, decision needs and the influencing factors, which offer evidence to guide the development of applicable patient decision aid tools to provide high-quality fertility services to women. TRIAL REGISTRATION: PROSPERO Registration Number: CRD42023434490.</p>","PeriodicalId":54492,"journal":{"name":"Research in Nursing & Health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploration of the Fertility Decision-Making Experiences of Women of Reproductive Age With Cancer: A Qualitative Systematic Review.\",\"authors\":\"Zitong Zhang, Yilin Zhang, Cai Deng, Wanting Zhang, Yunyun Peng, Guiyuan Ma, Sulan Lin, Carmen Wing Han Chan, Ka Ming Chow, Can Gu\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/nur.22435\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Women of reproductive age with cancer face unique considerations in terms of fertility. The related decision-making process is complicated, and insufficient support can lead to decisional conflict. The aim of this qualitative systematic review was to identify and integrate qualitative evidence regarding the fertility decision-making process of women of reproductive age undergoing treatment for cancer. A qualitative systematic review was conducted following the Joanna Briggs Institute's methodology. Eight electronic databases were searched from inception to June 2023 for articles describing qualitative studies of the fertility decision-making process of women of reproductive age with cancer. Only original, full-text literature was examined, no limitation was placed on the publication language. Finally, 18 studies were included in a thematic analysis. We identified three analytical themes, namely \\\"Perceived changes in fertility,\\\" \\\"Influential participants in the decision-making process\\\" and \\\"Hard fertility decision-making processes of women,\\\" and nine descriptive themes that described the three analytical themes in detail. The results of qualitative synthesis emphasized that for women of reproductive age with cancer, fertility decision-making is a complex and dynamic process. These patients had experienced decisional conflict. Decision support from health care professionals was considered to be essential, and the use of patient decision aids in clinical settings was recommended. The synthesis results clarify women's fertility decision-making process, decision needs and the influencing factors, which offer evidence to guide the development of applicable patient decision aid tools to provide high-quality fertility services to women. TRIAL REGISTRATION: PROSPERO Registration Number: CRD42023434490.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54492,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Research in Nursing & Health\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Research in Nursing & Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.22435\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research in Nursing & Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.22435","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

患有癌症的育龄妇女在生育方面面临着独特的考虑。相关的决策过程是复杂的,支持不足会导致决策冲突。本定性系统综述的目的是识别和整合有关接受癌症治疗的育龄妇女生育决策过程的定性证据。根据乔安娜布里格斯研究所的方法进行了定性的系统回顾。从建立到2023年6月,我们检索了8个电子数据库中描述癌症育龄妇女生育决策过程定性研究的文章。只审查了原始的全文文献,对出版语言没有限制。最后,18项研究被纳入专题分析。我们确定了三个分析主题,即“生育率的感知变化”、“决策过程中有影响力的参与者”和“妇女的生育率艰难决策过程”,以及九个详细描述这三个分析主题的描述性主题。定性综合的结果强调,对于患有癌症的育龄妇女来说,生育决策是一个复杂和动态的过程。这些病人都经历过决策冲突。卫生保健专业人员的决策支持被认为是必不可少的,建议在临床环境中使用患者决策辅助工具。综合结果明确了妇女生育决策过程、决策需求及其影响因素,为指导开发适用的患者决策辅助工具,为妇女提供高质量的生育服务提供依据。试验注册:普洛斯彼罗注册号:CRD42023434490。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Exploration of the Fertility Decision-Making Experiences of Women of Reproductive Age With Cancer: A Qualitative Systematic Review.

Women of reproductive age with cancer face unique considerations in terms of fertility. The related decision-making process is complicated, and insufficient support can lead to decisional conflict. The aim of this qualitative systematic review was to identify and integrate qualitative evidence regarding the fertility decision-making process of women of reproductive age undergoing treatment for cancer. A qualitative systematic review was conducted following the Joanna Briggs Institute's methodology. Eight electronic databases were searched from inception to June 2023 for articles describing qualitative studies of the fertility decision-making process of women of reproductive age with cancer. Only original, full-text literature was examined, no limitation was placed on the publication language. Finally, 18 studies were included in a thematic analysis. We identified three analytical themes, namely "Perceived changes in fertility," "Influential participants in the decision-making process" and "Hard fertility decision-making processes of women," and nine descriptive themes that described the three analytical themes in detail. The results of qualitative synthesis emphasized that for women of reproductive age with cancer, fertility decision-making is a complex and dynamic process. These patients had experienced decisional conflict. Decision support from health care professionals was considered to be essential, and the use of patient decision aids in clinical settings was recommended. The synthesis results clarify women's fertility decision-making process, decision needs and the influencing factors, which offer evidence to guide the development of applicable patient decision aid tools to provide high-quality fertility services to women. TRIAL REGISTRATION: PROSPERO Registration Number: CRD42023434490.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
73
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Research in Nursing & Health ( RINAH ) is a peer-reviewed general research journal devoted to publication of a wide range of research that will inform the practice of nursing and other health disciplines. The editors invite reports of research describing problems and testing interventions related to health phenomena, health care and self-care, clinical organization and administration; and the testing of research findings in practice. Research protocols are considered if funded in a peer-reviewed process by an agency external to the authors’ home institution and if the work is in progress. Papers on research methods and techniques are appropriate if they go beyond what is already generally available in the literature and include description of successful use of the method. Theory papers are accepted if each proposition is supported by research evidence. Systematic reviews of the literature are reviewed if PRISMA guidelines are followed. Letters to the editor commenting on published articles are welcome.
期刊最新文献
Subtypes of Job Satisfaction and Health-Related Quality of Life in Chinese Male Nurses: A Latent Profile Analysis. The Relationship Between a Hospital's Magnet Status and LGBTQ+ Inclusivity in Policies and Practices in US Hospitals. PhD-DNP Collaboration: An Integrative Review of Scholarly Partnerships in Nursing. Training of Nurse Interventionists to Optimize Intervention Fidelity in a Telehealth Pilot Study. Experiences With a Substitution System for Clinical Nurses' Leave of Absence: A Qualitative Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1