手部和前臂部分伸肌腱撕裂伤的处理:英国一项全国性的实践调查。

Alistair Jm Reed, Ryckie G Wade, Justin Cr Wormald, Kathryn Dickson, Angelos Mantelakis, David Izadi, Dominic Furniss
{"title":"手部和前臂部分伸肌腱撕裂伤的处理:英国一项全国性的实践调查。","authors":"Alistair Jm Reed, Ryckie G Wade, Justin Cr Wormald, Kathryn Dickson, Angelos Mantelakis, David Izadi, Dominic Furniss","doi":"10.1016/j.bjps.2024.11.028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Partial extensor tendon lacerations of the hand and forearm are common. There is a lack of evidence to guide their management and it is also unclear at what threshold surgeons would consider repair necessary. This study aimed to identify national surgical management of partial extensor tendon lacerations of the hand and forearm (zones 2-8) and assess surgeons' willingness to randomise in a future trial.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A 34-item online survey was developed by the steering group and, via a trainee-led collaborative model, was disseminated to plastic and orthopaedic surgeons in the UK. Summary data were calculated for each survey item, and the variations between zones and specialties were explored using linear regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>142 complete responses were recorded (response rate 71%). On average, respondents said that 46% tendon division was the maximum they would manage in clinical practice without surgical repair. There was no significant difference in this percentage between zones or surgical specialties. Importantly, the majority (83%) of surgeons would be willing to randomise patients in a clinical trial to repair versus no-repair, within 29%-61% tendon division, demonstrating clinical equipoise.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There is significant variation in UK practice regarding the surgical management of partial extensor tendon lacerations of the hand and forearm and clinical equipoise exists regarding the decision to repair or not. A definitive randomised trial is warranted to identify the optimum management of this common injury.</p>","PeriodicalId":94104,"journal":{"name":"Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery : JPRAS","volume":"101 ","pages":"46-52"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Management of partial extensor tendon lacerations of the hand and forearm: A national survey of practice in the United Kingdom.\",\"authors\":\"Alistair Jm Reed, Ryckie G Wade, Justin Cr Wormald, Kathryn Dickson, Angelos Mantelakis, David Izadi, Dominic Furniss\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.bjps.2024.11.028\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Partial extensor tendon lacerations of the hand and forearm are common. There is a lack of evidence to guide their management and it is also unclear at what threshold surgeons would consider repair necessary. This study aimed to identify national surgical management of partial extensor tendon lacerations of the hand and forearm (zones 2-8) and assess surgeons' willingness to randomise in a future trial.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A 34-item online survey was developed by the steering group and, via a trainee-led collaborative model, was disseminated to plastic and orthopaedic surgeons in the UK. Summary data were calculated for each survey item, and the variations between zones and specialties were explored using linear regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>142 complete responses were recorded (response rate 71%). On average, respondents said that 46% tendon division was the maximum they would manage in clinical practice without surgical repair. There was no significant difference in this percentage between zones or surgical specialties. Importantly, the majority (83%) of surgeons would be willing to randomise patients in a clinical trial to repair versus no-repair, within 29%-61% tendon division, demonstrating clinical equipoise.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There is significant variation in UK practice regarding the surgical management of partial extensor tendon lacerations of the hand and forearm and clinical equipoise exists regarding the decision to repair or not. A definitive randomised trial is warranted to identify the optimum management of this common injury.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94104,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery : JPRAS\",\"volume\":\"101 \",\"pages\":\"46-52\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery : JPRAS\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2024.11.028\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery : JPRAS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2024.11.028","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:手部和前臂的部分伸肌腱撕裂是常见的。缺乏指导其治疗的证据,也不清楚外科医生认为修复的阈值是多少。本研究旨在确定手和前臂(2-8区)部分伸肌腱撕裂伤的国家外科治疗方法,并评估外科医生在未来试验中随机化的意愿。方法:指导小组制定了一份包含34个项目的在线调查,并通过实习生主导的合作模式,向英国的整形和矫形外科医生传播。对每个调查项目进行汇总数据计算,并利用线性回归探讨不同地区和专业之间的差异。结果:完整应答142例,有效率71%。平均而言,受访者表示46%的肌腱分裂是他们在临床实践中不进行手术修复的最大值。在不同地区或外科专科之间,这一比例没有显著差异。重要的是,大多数(83%)的外科医生愿意在临床试验中随机分配患者进行修复或不修复,在29%-61%的肌腱分裂范围内,证明临床平衡。结论:对于手部和前臂部分伸肌腱撕裂伤的手术处理,英国的实践存在显著差异,在决定是否修复方面存在临床平衡。有必要进行一项明确的随机试验,以确定这种常见损伤的最佳治疗方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Management of partial extensor tendon lacerations of the hand and forearm: A national survey of practice in the United Kingdom.

Background: Partial extensor tendon lacerations of the hand and forearm are common. There is a lack of evidence to guide their management and it is also unclear at what threshold surgeons would consider repair necessary. This study aimed to identify national surgical management of partial extensor tendon lacerations of the hand and forearm (zones 2-8) and assess surgeons' willingness to randomise in a future trial.

Methods: A 34-item online survey was developed by the steering group and, via a trainee-led collaborative model, was disseminated to plastic and orthopaedic surgeons in the UK. Summary data were calculated for each survey item, and the variations between zones and specialties were explored using linear regression.

Results: 142 complete responses were recorded (response rate 71%). On average, respondents said that 46% tendon division was the maximum they would manage in clinical practice without surgical repair. There was no significant difference in this percentage between zones or surgical specialties. Importantly, the majority (83%) of surgeons would be willing to randomise patients in a clinical trial to repair versus no-repair, within 29%-61% tendon division, demonstrating clinical equipoise.

Conclusions: There is significant variation in UK practice regarding the surgical management of partial extensor tendon lacerations of the hand and forearm and clinical equipoise exists regarding the decision to repair or not. A definitive randomised trial is warranted to identify the optimum management of this common injury.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The effect of massive liposuction surgery of the abdomen and flanks on insulin and some adipokines. Letter comments on: 'Current trends in retraction of plastic surgery and reconstruction research'. The rising NHS burden from cosmetic surgery procedures performed abroad and non-surgical procedures performed in the United Kingdom. Response to José Antonio Arellano et al. to their comments on our article "A single-center retrospective comparison of muscle versus cutaneous free flaps for posterior elbow defect reconstruction". In Reply to Comment on "Timing of sentinel lymph node biopsy and lymphoscintigraphy before surgery for melanoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis".
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1