一种新的胫骨植入物设计,球窝内内侧整合和后交叉韧带保留在无限制运动对齐全膝关节置换术后具有低胫骨基板迁移:一项使用放射立体分析的队列研究。

IF 2.5 2区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS Acta Orthopaedica Pub Date : 2024-12-23 DOI:10.2340/17453674.2024.42489
Abigail E Niesen, Pranav A Tirumalai, Stephen M Howell, Maury L Hull
{"title":"一种新的胫骨植入物设计,球窝内内侧整合和后交叉韧带保留在无限制运动对齐全膝关节置换术后具有低胫骨基板迁移:一项使用放射立体分析的队列研究。","authors":"Abigail E Niesen, Pranav A Tirumalai, Stephen M Howell, Maury L Hull","doi":"10.2340/17453674.2024.42489","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong> In total knee arthroplasty (TKA), an insert with ball-in-socket (BS) medial conformity (MC) and posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) retention restores kinematics closer to native than an insert with intermediate (I) MC. However, high medial conformity might compromise baseplate stability as indicated by maximum total point motion (MTPM). Using the BS MC insert with PCL retention, we aimed to determine whether (i) the baseplate is stable as indicated by mean MTPM < 0.5 mm, (ii) baseplate stability is not strongly correlated to varus baseplate alignment, and (iii) baseplate stability, clinical outcome scores, and flexion are comparable with that of an I MC insert cohort which has demonstrated high stability, clinical outcome scores, and flexion.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong> Unrestricted kinematic alignment (unKA) TKA was performed on a cohort of 35 patients using a cemented baseplate. Biplanar radiographs acquired at timepoints up to 12 months were processed with model-based radiostereometric analysis (RSA) software to determine MTPM.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong> At 1 year, mean MTPM of 0.35 mm was significantly below 0.5 mm (P < 0.001). MTPM was not strongly correlated to varus baseplate alignment up to 9° (r = 0.12, 95% confidence interval -0.22 to 0.44). Equivalence analyses revealed that MTPM, Forgotten Joint Score, Oxford Knee Score, and maximum flexion for the sBS MC insert were comparable with the I MC insert.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong> Using the new BS MC insert with PCL retention, the tibial baseplate was stable at the group level at 1 year. Baseplate stability was not strongly related to varus baseplate and limb alignment. Comparable patient-reported outcome scores and maximum flexion/extension at 1 year were shown between the 2 insert designs.</p>","PeriodicalId":6916,"journal":{"name":"Acta Orthopaedica","volume":"95 ","pages":"758-764"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11664436/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A new tibial insert design with ball-in-socket medial conformity and posterior cruciate ligament retention has low tibial baseplate migration after unrestricted kinematically aligned total knee arthroplasty: a cohort study using radiostereometric analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Abigail E Niesen, Pranav A Tirumalai, Stephen M Howell, Maury L Hull\",\"doi\":\"10.2340/17453674.2024.42489\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong> In total knee arthroplasty (TKA), an insert with ball-in-socket (BS) medial conformity (MC) and posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) retention restores kinematics closer to native than an insert with intermediate (I) MC. However, high medial conformity might compromise baseplate stability as indicated by maximum total point motion (MTPM). Using the BS MC insert with PCL retention, we aimed to determine whether (i) the baseplate is stable as indicated by mean MTPM < 0.5 mm, (ii) baseplate stability is not strongly correlated to varus baseplate alignment, and (iii) baseplate stability, clinical outcome scores, and flexion are comparable with that of an I MC insert cohort which has demonstrated high stability, clinical outcome scores, and flexion.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong> Unrestricted kinematic alignment (unKA) TKA was performed on a cohort of 35 patients using a cemented baseplate. Biplanar radiographs acquired at timepoints up to 12 months were processed with model-based radiostereometric analysis (RSA) software to determine MTPM.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong> At 1 year, mean MTPM of 0.35 mm was significantly below 0.5 mm (P < 0.001). MTPM was not strongly correlated to varus baseplate alignment up to 9° (r = 0.12, 95% confidence interval -0.22 to 0.44). Equivalence analyses revealed that MTPM, Forgotten Joint Score, Oxford Knee Score, and maximum flexion for the sBS MC insert were comparable with the I MC insert.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong> Using the new BS MC insert with PCL retention, the tibial baseplate was stable at the group level at 1 year. Baseplate stability was not strongly related to varus baseplate and limb alignment. Comparable patient-reported outcome scores and maximum flexion/extension at 1 year were shown between the 2 insert designs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":6916,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta Orthopaedica\",\"volume\":\"95 \",\"pages\":\"758-764\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11664436/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta Orthopaedica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2340/17453674.2024.42489\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Orthopaedica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2340/17453674.2024.42489","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的:在全膝关节置换术(TKA)中,具有球窝内(BS)内侧整合(MC)和后十字韧带(PCL)保留的假体比具有中等(I) MC的假体恢复的运动学更接近于原始。然而,高内侧整合可能会损害最大总点运动(MTPM)所显示的底板稳定性。使用PCL固位的BS MC插入物,我们的目的是确定(i)底板是否稳定,如平均MTPM < 0.5 mm所示,(ii)底板稳定性与内翻的底板对齐不强相关,(iii)底板稳定性、临床结果评分和屈曲与具有高稳定性、临床结果评分和屈曲的i MC插入物队列相当。方法:对35例使用骨水泥基板的患者进行无限制运动学对齐(unKA) TKA。使用基于模型的放射立体分析(RSA)软件处理12个月时间点的双平面x线片,以确定MTPM。结果:1年时平均MTPM为0.35 mm,显著低于0.5 mm (P < 0.001)。MTPM与9°内翻的底板对准不强相关(r = 0.12, 95%可信区间为-0.22 ~ 0.44)。等效性分析显示,sBS MC植入物的MTPM、遗忘关节评分、牛津膝关节评分和最大屈曲度与I MC植入物相当。结论:使用PCL固位的新型BS MC内嵌物,1年时胫骨底板在组水平上是稳定的。底板稳定性与内翻的底板和肢体对中关系不大。对比两种植入物设计的患者报告的结果评分和1年最大屈曲/伸度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A new tibial insert design with ball-in-socket medial conformity and posterior cruciate ligament retention has low tibial baseplate migration after unrestricted kinematically aligned total knee arthroplasty: a cohort study using radiostereometric analysis.

Background and purpose:  In total knee arthroplasty (TKA), an insert with ball-in-socket (BS) medial conformity (MC) and posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) retention restores kinematics closer to native than an insert with intermediate (I) MC. However, high medial conformity might compromise baseplate stability as indicated by maximum total point motion (MTPM). Using the BS MC insert with PCL retention, we aimed to determine whether (i) the baseplate is stable as indicated by mean MTPM < 0.5 mm, (ii) baseplate stability is not strongly correlated to varus baseplate alignment, and (iii) baseplate stability, clinical outcome scores, and flexion are comparable with that of an I MC insert cohort which has demonstrated high stability, clinical outcome scores, and flexion.

Methods:  Unrestricted kinematic alignment (unKA) TKA was performed on a cohort of 35 patients using a cemented baseplate. Biplanar radiographs acquired at timepoints up to 12 months were processed with model-based radiostereometric analysis (RSA) software to determine MTPM.

Results:  At 1 year, mean MTPM of 0.35 mm was significantly below 0.5 mm (P < 0.001). MTPM was not strongly correlated to varus baseplate alignment up to 9° (r = 0.12, 95% confidence interval -0.22 to 0.44). Equivalence analyses revealed that MTPM, Forgotten Joint Score, Oxford Knee Score, and maximum flexion for the sBS MC insert were comparable with the I MC insert.

Conclusion:  Using the new BS MC insert with PCL retention, the tibial baseplate was stable at the group level at 1 year. Baseplate stability was not strongly related to varus baseplate and limb alignment. Comparable patient-reported outcome scores and maximum flexion/extension at 1 year were shown between the 2 insert designs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Acta Orthopaedica
Acta Orthopaedica 医学-整形外科
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
8.10%
发文量
105
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Acta Orthopaedica (previously Acta Orthopaedica Scandinavica) presents original articles of basic research interest, as well as clinical studies in the field of orthopedics and related sub disciplines. Ever since the journal was founded in 1930, by a group of Scandinavian orthopedic surgeons, the journal has been published for an international audience. Acta Orthopaedica is owned by the Nordic Orthopaedic Federation and is the official publication of this federation.
期刊最新文献
Curve progression in non-surgically treated patients with idiopathic scoliosis: a cohort study with 40-year follow-up. Mortality and reoperations following treatment of acetabular fractures in patients ≥ 70 years: a retrospective cohort study of 247 patients. Unloader brace or high tibial osteotomy in the treatment of the young patient with medial knee osteoarthritis: a randomized controlled trial. An algorithm for identifying causes of reoperations after orthopedic fracture surgery in health administrative data: a diagnostic accuracy study using the Danish National Patient Register. An Acta Orthopaedica educational article: Treatment of pediatric spondylolysis and spondylolisthesis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1