关节镜下孤立距腓骨前韧带修复慢性外侧踝关节不稳的下伸肌支持带加固与非加固的比较:系统回顾和荟萃分析。

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine Pub Date : 2024-12-20 eCollection Date: 2024-12-01 DOI:10.1177/23259671241270305
Lei Shan, Binzhi Zhao, Hanzhou Wang, Yanrui Zhao, Shuo Diao, Xiaopei Xu, Yuling Gao, Qingnan Sun, Tianchao Lu, Junlin Zhou, Yang Liu
{"title":"关节镜下孤立距腓骨前韧带修复慢性外侧踝关节不稳的下伸肌支持带加固与非加固的比较:系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Lei Shan, Binzhi Zhao, Hanzhou Wang, Yanrui Zhao, Shuo Diao, Xiaopei Xu, Yuling Gao, Qingnan Sun, Tianchao Lu, Junlin Zhou, Yang Liu","doi":"10.1177/23259671241270305","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Approximately 20% of acute ankle sprains progress to chronic lateral ankle instability (CLAI), requiring surgical intervention. When only the anterior talofibular ligament (ATFL) is ruptured, it is controversial whether to perform arthroscopic inferior extensor retinacular (IER) reinforcement.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To assess the postoperative outcomes of IER reinforcement versus nonreinforcement in arthroscopic treatment of CLAI with ATFL-only injury.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Systematic review; Level of evidence, 3.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines, the PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, and Web of Science databases were searched for publications on arthroscopic ATFL repair with versus without IER reinforcement. The final search date was July 7, 2023. Through a comprehensive meta-analysis, functional outcomes (American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society Ankle-Hindfoot [AOFAS], Karlsson-Peterson [K-P], and Foot and Ankle Outcome Score [FAOS] scores), radiological outcomes (talar anterior translation and talar tilt), and complication rates (superficial peroneal nerve injury, knot irritation, and total complications) were evaluated. The mean difference (MD) was compared for continuous outcomes, and the odds ratios (ORs) were compared for categorical outcomes between the patients with versus without IER reinforcement.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 4 studies (n = 271 patients; 157 male, 114 female; 141 patients with IER reinforcement, 130 without IER reinforcement) were included in the final analysis. There were no significant differences between the patients with versus without reinforcement regarding AOFAS score (MD = 0.72 [95% CI, -2.17 to 3.61]; <i>P</i> = .63; <i>I</i> <sup>2</sup> = 0%), any of the FAOS subscores, talar anterior translation (MD = 0.10 [95% CI, -0.53 to 0.73]; <i>P</i> = .76; <i>I</i> <sup>2</sup> = 0%), talar tilt (MD = 0.14 [95% CI, -0.86 to 1.13]; <i>P</i> = .79; <i>I</i> <sup>2</sup> = 0%), or total complications (OR = 2.29 [95% CI, 0.92 to 5.71]; <i>P</i> = .07; <i>I</i> <sup>2</sup> = 24%). However, the IER reinforcement group showed superior postoperative K-P scores compared with the nonreinforcement group (MD = 6.22 [95% CI, 2.17 to 10.26]; <i>P</i> = .003; <i>I</i> <sup>2</sup> = 0%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results of the meta-analysis suggest that IER reinforcement may not be necessary for achieving satisfactory postoperative outcomes in CLAI with ATFL-only injury. Further research is required to investigate the impact of ligament injury severity, body weight, and concomitant calcaneofibular ligament injuries on the results.</p><p><strong>Registration: </strong>CRD42023447669 (PROSPERO).</p>","PeriodicalId":19646,"journal":{"name":"Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine","volume":"12 12","pages":"23259671241270305"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11662387/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of Inferior Extensor Retinacular Reinforcement Versus Nonreinforcement in Arthroscopic Isolated Anterior Talofibular Ligament Repair for Chronic Lateral Ankle Instability: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Lei Shan, Binzhi Zhao, Hanzhou Wang, Yanrui Zhao, Shuo Diao, Xiaopei Xu, Yuling Gao, Qingnan Sun, Tianchao Lu, Junlin Zhou, Yang Liu\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/23259671241270305\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Approximately 20% of acute ankle sprains progress to chronic lateral ankle instability (CLAI), requiring surgical intervention. When only the anterior talofibular ligament (ATFL) is ruptured, it is controversial whether to perform arthroscopic inferior extensor retinacular (IER) reinforcement.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To assess the postoperative outcomes of IER reinforcement versus nonreinforcement in arthroscopic treatment of CLAI with ATFL-only injury.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Systematic review; Level of evidence, 3.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines, the PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, and Web of Science databases were searched for publications on arthroscopic ATFL repair with versus without IER reinforcement. The final search date was July 7, 2023. Through a comprehensive meta-analysis, functional outcomes (American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society Ankle-Hindfoot [AOFAS], Karlsson-Peterson [K-P], and Foot and Ankle Outcome Score [FAOS] scores), radiological outcomes (talar anterior translation and talar tilt), and complication rates (superficial peroneal nerve injury, knot irritation, and total complications) were evaluated. The mean difference (MD) was compared for continuous outcomes, and the odds ratios (ORs) were compared for categorical outcomes between the patients with versus without IER reinforcement.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 4 studies (n = 271 patients; 157 male, 114 female; 141 patients with IER reinforcement, 130 without IER reinforcement) were included in the final analysis. There were no significant differences between the patients with versus without reinforcement regarding AOFAS score (MD = 0.72 [95% CI, -2.17 to 3.61]; <i>P</i> = .63; <i>I</i> <sup>2</sup> = 0%), any of the FAOS subscores, talar anterior translation (MD = 0.10 [95% CI, -0.53 to 0.73]; <i>P</i> = .76; <i>I</i> <sup>2</sup> = 0%), talar tilt (MD = 0.14 [95% CI, -0.86 to 1.13]; <i>P</i> = .79; <i>I</i> <sup>2</sup> = 0%), or total complications (OR = 2.29 [95% CI, 0.92 to 5.71]; <i>P</i> = .07; <i>I</i> <sup>2</sup> = 24%). However, the IER reinforcement group showed superior postoperative K-P scores compared with the nonreinforcement group (MD = 6.22 [95% CI, 2.17 to 10.26]; <i>P</i> = .003; <i>I</i> <sup>2</sup> = 0%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results of the meta-analysis suggest that IER reinforcement may not be necessary for achieving satisfactory postoperative outcomes in CLAI with ATFL-only injury. Further research is required to investigate the impact of ligament injury severity, body weight, and concomitant calcaneofibular ligament injuries on the results.</p><p><strong>Registration: </strong>CRD42023447669 (PROSPERO).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19646,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine\",\"volume\":\"12 12\",\"pages\":\"23259671241270305\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11662387/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/23259671241270305\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/12/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/23259671241270305","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:大约20%的急性踝关节扭伤发展为慢性踝关节外侧不稳定(CLAI),需要手术干预。当仅距腓骨前韧带(ATFL)破裂时,是否进行关节镜下伸肌支持带(IER)加固是有争议的。目的:评价关节镜下治疗CLAI合并atfl损伤时IER加固与非IER加固的术后效果。研究设计:系统评价;证据水平,3。方法:使用PRISMA(首选报告项目用于系统评价和荟萃分析)指南,检索PubMed、Cochrane图书馆、Embase和Web of Science数据库,检索有关关节镜下ATFL修复与未进行IER加固的出版物。最后一次搜索日期是2023年7月7日。通过综合meta分析,评估功能结局(美国骨科足踝学会踝后足[AOFAS]、Karlsson-Peterson [K-P]和足踝结局评分[FAOS]评分)、影像学结局(距骨前平移和距骨倾斜)和并发症发生率(腓浅神经损伤、骨节刺激和总并发症)。比较了连续结果的平均差异(MD),并比较了接受和未接受IER强化的患者的分类结果的优势比(ORs)。结果:共4项研究(n = 271例患者;男性157人,女性114人;最终分析纳入了141例IER强化患者(130例未进行IER强化)。强化组与未强化组的AOFAS评分差异无统计学意义(MD = 0.72 [95% CI, -2.17 ~ 3.61];P = .63;I 2 = 0%),任何FAOS评分,距骨前平移(MD = 0.10 [95% CI, -0.53至0.73];P = .76;I 2 = 0%),距骨倾斜(MD = 0.14 [95% CI, -0.86至1.13];P = .79;I 2 = 0%)或总并发症(or = 2.29 [95% CI, 0.92 ~ 5.71];P = .07;i2 = 24%)。然而,与非强化组相比,IER强化组的术后K-P评分更高(MD = 6.22 [95% CI, 2.17至10.26];P = .003;i2 = 0%)。结论:荟萃分析的结果表明,对于仅伴有atfl损伤的CLAI患者,可能不需要IER强化来获得满意的术后结果。韧带损伤的严重程度、体重以及伴随的跟腓骨韧带损伤对结果的影响需要进一步的研究。注册:CRD42023447669(普洛斯彼罗)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparison of Inferior Extensor Retinacular Reinforcement Versus Nonreinforcement in Arthroscopic Isolated Anterior Talofibular Ligament Repair for Chronic Lateral Ankle Instability: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Background: Approximately 20% of acute ankle sprains progress to chronic lateral ankle instability (CLAI), requiring surgical intervention. When only the anterior talofibular ligament (ATFL) is ruptured, it is controversial whether to perform arthroscopic inferior extensor retinacular (IER) reinforcement.

Purpose: To assess the postoperative outcomes of IER reinforcement versus nonreinforcement in arthroscopic treatment of CLAI with ATFL-only injury.

Study design: Systematic review; Level of evidence, 3.

Methods: Using PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines, the PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, and Web of Science databases were searched for publications on arthroscopic ATFL repair with versus without IER reinforcement. The final search date was July 7, 2023. Through a comprehensive meta-analysis, functional outcomes (American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society Ankle-Hindfoot [AOFAS], Karlsson-Peterson [K-P], and Foot and Ankle Outcome Score [FAOS] scores), radiological outcomes (talar anterior translation and talar tilt), and complication rates (superficial peroneal nerve injury, knot irritation, and total complications) were evaluated. The mean difference (MD) was compared for continuous outcomes, and the odds ratios (ORs) were compared for categorical outcomes between the patients with versus without IER reinforcement.

Results: A total of 4 studies (n = 271 patients; 157 male, 114 female; 141 patients with IER reinforcement, 130 without IER reinforcement) were included in the final analysis. There were no significant differences between the patients with versus without reinforcement regarding AOFAS score (MD = 0.72 [95% CI, -2.17 to 3.61]; P = .63; I 2 = 0%), any of the FAOS subscores, talar anterior translation (MD = 0.10 [95% CI, -0.53 to 0.73]; P = .76; I 2 = 0%), talar tilt (MD = 0.14 [95% CI, -0.86 to 1.13]; P = .79; I 2 = 0%), or total complications (OR = 2.29 [95% CI, 0.92 to 5.71]; P = .07; I 2 = 24%). However, the IER reinforcement group showed superior postoperative K-P scores compared with the nonreinforcement group (MD = 6.22 [95% CI, 2.17 to 10.26]; P = .003; I 2 = 0%).

Conclusion: The results of the meta-analysis suggest that IER reinforcement may not be necessary for achieving satisfactory postoperative outcomes in CLAI with ATFL-only injury. Further research is required to investigate the impact of ligament injury severity, body weight, and concomitant calcaneofibular ligament injuries on the results.

Registration: CRD42023447669 (PROSPERO).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine
Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine Medicine-Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
7.70%
发文量
876
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine (OJSM), developed by the American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine (AOSSM), is a global, peer-reviewed, open access journal that combines the interests of researchers and clinical practitioners across orthopaedic sports medicine, arthroscopy, and knee arthroplasty. Topics include original research in the areas of: -Orthopaedic Sports Medicine, including surgical and nonsurgical treatment of orthopaedic sports injuries -Arthroscopic Surgery (Shoulder/Elbow/Wrist/Hip/Knee/Ankle/Foot) -Relevant translational research -Sports traumatology/epidemiology -Knee and shoulder arthroplasty The OJSM also publishes relevant systematic reviews and meta-analyses. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).
期刊最新文献
Association Between Autograft Choice and Psychological Readiness to Return to Sport After ACL Reconstruction. Evaluating the Mechanical Axis for Detection of Posterior Tibial Slope Malalignment in ACL-Deficient Knees on Lateral Radiographs. Evaluation of Thigh Muscle Strength in Adolescent Patients After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With Lateral Extra-articular Tenodesis or Anterolateral Ligament Reconstruction. Relationship Between Quadriceps Strength at 6 Months Postoperatively and Improvement in Patient-Reported Knee Function After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction. Association of Preoperative Cartilage T1ρ Values With Progression of Knee Osteoarthritis 10 Years After Anatomical Double-Bundle ACL Reconstruction: Follow-up of a Previous Prospective Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1