Igor R G Passaglia, Endrigo O Bastos, Lucas B Moura, Murilo S Secanho, Nivaldo Alonso
{"title":"基于三维计算重建和眶体积评估的眶骨骨折修复评估。","authors":"Igor R G Passaglia, Endrigo O Bastos, Lucas B Moura, Murilo S Secanho, Nivaldo Alonso","doi":"10.1097/GOX.0000000000006409","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Three-dimensional (3D) models generated from computed tomography (CT) images efficiently and accurately complement surgical comprehension. Additionally, computer modeling provides a substrate for comparative analysis of the treated orbit volume. This study aimed to investigate cases of orbital bone fractures with regard to orbital-defect correction, through 3D computational structural modeling and evaluation of orbital volume.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 136 cases of orbital fractures with a diagnosis and surgical treatment were identified, of which 15 were selected based on inclusion and exclusion criteria. The construction of the preoperative and postoperative 3D models was based on CT images, supported by a medical imaging design system; this technique enabled the calculation of orbital volumetric measurements with the normal contralateral orbit as a reference.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Three-dimensional modeling in the preoperative and postoperative periods was performed for each patient. This study revealed that (1) preoperatively, the affected side had greater volume followed by postoperative reduction and (2) after surgical correction, the affected side had smaller volume and was equivalent to the unaffected side. However, there were no statistically significant differences between the periods (preoperative and postoperative) with regard to the mean and distribution of orbital volume or between the mean orbital volumes of the 2 sides.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Using 3D computer modeling of bone structures, it is possible to evaluate orbital bone fractures after surgical correction. The effectiveness of preoperative and postoperative treatments was confirmed by comparing orbital volumetrics. It was not possible to assess soft tissues due to postoperative edema.</p>","PeriodicalId":20149,"journal":{"name":"Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Global Open","volume":"12 12","pages":"e6409"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11661703/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Orbital Bone Fracture Repair Evaluation Through 3-Dimensional Computational Reconstruction and Orbital Volumetric Assessment.\",\"authors\":\"Igor R G Passaglia, Endrigo O Bastos, Lucas B Moura, Murilo S Secanho, Nivaldo Alonso\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/GOX.0000000000006409\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Three-dimensional (3D) models generated from computed tomography (CT) images efficiently and accurately complement surgical comprehension. Additionally, computer modeling provides a substrate for comparative analysis of the treated orbit volume. This study aimed to investigate cases of orbital bone fractures with regard to orbital-defect correction, through 3D computational structural modeling and evaluation of orbital volume.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 136 cases of orbital fractures with a diagnosis and surgical treatment were identified, of which 15 were selected based on inclusion and exclusion criteria. The construction of the preoperative and postoperative 3D models was based on CT images, supported by a medical imaging design system; this technique enabled the calculation of orbital volumetric measurements with the normal contralateral orbit as a reference.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Three-dimensional modeling in the preoperative and postoperative periods was performed for each patient. This study revealed that (1) preoperatively, the affected side had greater volume followed by postoperative reduction and (2) after surgical correction, the affected side had smaller volume and was equivalent to the unaffected side. However, there were no statistically significant differences between the periods (preoperative and postoperative) with regard to the mean and distribution of orbital volume or between the mean orbital volumes of the 2 sides.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Using 3D computer modeling of bone structures, it is possible to evaluate orbital bone fractures after surgical correction. The effectiveness of preoperative and postoperative treatments was confirmed by comparing orbital volumetrics. It was not possible to assess soft tissues due to postoperative edema.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20149,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Global Open\",\"volume\":\"12 12\",\"pages\":\"e6409\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11661703/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Global Open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000006409\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/12/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Global Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000006409","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Orbital Bone Fracture Repair Evaluation Through 3-Dimensional Computational Reconstruction and Orbital Volumetric Assessment.
Background: Three-dimensional (3D) models generated from computed tomography (CT) images efficiently and accurately complement surgical comprehension. Additionally, computer modeling provides a substrate for comparative analysis of the treated orbit volume. This study aimed to investigate cases of orbital bone fractures with regard to orbital-defect correction, through 3D computational structural modeling and evaluation of orbital volume.
Methods: A total of 136 cases of orbital fractures with a diagnosis and surgical treatment were identified, of which 15 were selected based on inclusion and exclusion criteria. The construction of the preoperative and postoperative 3D models was based on CT images, supported by a medical imaging design system; this technique enabled the calculation of orbital volumetric measurements with the normal contralateral orbit as a reference.
Results: Three-dimensional modeling in the preoperative and postoperative periods was performed for each patient. This study revealed that (1) preoperatively, the affected side had greater volume followed by postoperative reduction and (2) after surgical correction, the affected side had smaller volume and was equivalent to the unaffected side. However, there were no statistically significant differences between the periods (preoperative and postoperative) with regard to the mean and distribution of orbital volume or between the mean orbital volumes of the 2 sides.
Conclusions: Using 3D computer modeling of bone structures, it is possible to evaluate orbital bone fractures after surgical correction. The effectiveness of preoperative and postoperative treatments was confirmed by comparing orbital volumetrics. It was not possible to assess soft tissues due to postoperative edema.
期刊介绍:
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open is an open access, peer reviewed, international journal focusing on global plastic and reconstructive surgery.Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open publishes on all areas of plastic and reconstructive surgery, including basic science/experimental studies pertinent to the field and also clinical articles on such topics as: breast reconstruction, head and neck surgery, pediatric and craniofacial surgery, hand and microsurgery, wound healing, and cosmetic and aesthetic surgery. Clinical studies, experimental articles, ideas and innovations, and techniques and case reports are all welcome article types. Manuscript submission is open to all surgeons, researchers, and other health care providers world-wide who wish to communicate their research results on topics related to plastic and reconstructive surgery. Furthermore, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open, a complimentary journal to Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, provides an open access venue for the publication of those research studies sponsored by private and public funding agencies that require open access publication of study results. Its mission is to disseminate high quality, peer reviewed research in plastic and reconstructive surgery to the widest possible global audience, through an open access platform. As an open access journal, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open offers its content for free to any viewer. Authors of articles retain their copyright to the materials published. Additionally, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open provides rapid review and publication of accepted papers.