Juliet Nabbuye Sekandi, Esther Buregyeya, Sarah Zalwango, Damalie Nakkonde, Patrick Kaggwa, Trang Ho Thu Quach, David Asiimwe, Lynn Atuyambe, Kevin Dobbin
{"title":"增强视频直接观察治疗(DOT自拍)的有效性,这是一种移动健康干预措施,可提高乌干达结核病患者的治疗依从性监测和支持:一项随机对照试验。","authors":"Juliet Nabbuye Sekandi, Esther Buregyeya, Sarah Zalwango, Damalie Nakkonde, Patrick Kaggwa, Trang Ho Thu Quach, David Asiimwe, Lynn Atuyambe, Kevin Dobbin","doi":"10.2196/57991","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Directly observed therapy (DOT) is the standard method for monitoring adherence to tuberculosis (TB) treatment. However, implementing DOT poses challenges for both patients and providers due to limited financial and human resources. Increasing evidence suggests that emerging digital adherence technologies, such as video directly observed therapy (VDOT), can serve as viable alternatives.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of VDOT compared with usual care directly observed therapy (UCDOT).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Between July 2020 and October 2021, we conducted a 2-arm, parallel-group, open-label randomized trial with a 1:1 assignment to receive either the VDOT intervention (n=72) or UCDOT (n=72) for treatment adherence monitoring at public health clinics in Kampala, Uganda. Each group was further stratified to ensure equal numbers of males and females. Eligible patients were aged 18-65 years, had a confirmed diagnosis of TB, and were undergoing daily treatment. The VDOT group was provided with a smartphone equipped with an app, while the UCDOT group followed the routine monitoring practices outlined by the Uganda National TB Program. We tested the hypothesis that VDOT was more effective than UCDOT for monitoring medication adherence. The primary outcome was adherence, defined as having ≥80% of the expected doses observed during the 6-month treatment period. An intention-to-treat analysis was conducted, and multivariable logistic regression was used to estimate the effect of the intervention on adherence monitoring. Adjusted relative risk ratios and their corresponding 95% CIs are presented. Secondary outcomes included treatment completion, loss to follow-up, death, and reasons for missed videos in the intervention group.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The intention-to-treat analysis included 142 participants, with 2 excluded due to discontinuation of medication within the first week after enrollment. The median age of participants was 34 (IQR 26-45) years. The median fraction of expected doses observed (FEDO) was significantly higher in the VDOT group compared with the UCDOT group (100, IQR 80-100 vs 30, IQR 10-60, respectively; P<.001). When using a FEDO cutoff of ≥80% to define optimal adherence, 63 of 142 (44%) patients met the threshold, with a significant difference between the VDOT and UCDOT groups (56/71, 79% vs 7/71, 10%, P<.001). After adjusting for confounders, VDOT users were significantly more likely to achieve ≥80% of their expected doses observed compared with UCDOT users (adjusted risk ratio 8.4, 95% CI 4.16-17.0). The most common reasons for failing to submit videos of medication intake were an uncharged phone battery, forgetting to record videos during medication intake, and losing the smartphone.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Enhanced VDOT was more effective than UCDOT in increasing adherence monitoring among patients with TB in Uganda. This evidence highlights the potential of digital technologies to improve treatment adherence monitoring and support in high TB burden settings with limited human resources.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04134689; http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04134689.</p>","PeriodicalId":14756,"journal":{"name":"JMIR mHealth and uHealth","volume":" ","pages":"e57991"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11783032/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effectiveness of a Mobile Health Intervention (DOT Selfie) in Increasing Treatment Adherence Monitoring and Support for Patients With Tuberculosis in Uganda: Randomized Controlled Trial.\",\"authors\":\"Juliet Nabbuye Sekandi, Esther Buregyeya, Sarah Zalwango, Damalie Nakkonde, Patrick Kaggwa, Trang Ho Thu Quach, David Asiimwe, Lynn Atuyambe, Kevin Dobbin\",\"doi\":\"10.2196/57991\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Directly observed therapy (DOT) is the standard method for monitoring adherence to tuberculosis (TB) treatment. However, implementing DOT poses challenges for both patients and providers due to limited financial and human resources. Increasing evidence suggests that emerging digital adherence technologies, such as video directly observed therapy (VDOT), can serve as viable alternatives.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of VDOT compared with usual care directly observed therapy (UCDOT).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Between July 2020 and October 2021, we conducted a 2-arm, parallel-group, open-label randomized trial with a 1:1 assignment to receive either the VDOT intervention (n=72) or UCDOT (n=72) for treatment adherence monitoring at public health clinics in Kampala, Uganda. Each group was further stratified to ensure equal numbers of males and females. Eligible patients were aged 18-65 years, had a confirmed diagnosis of TB, and were undergoing daily treatment. The VDOT group was provided with a smartphone equipped with an app, while the UCDOT group followed the routine monitoring practices outlined by the Uganda National TB Program. We tested the hypothesis that VDOT was more effective than UCDOT for monitoring medication adherence. The primary outcome was adherence, defined as having ≥80% of the expected doses observed during the 6-month treatment period. An intention-to-treat analysis was conducted, and multivariable logistic regression was used to estimate the effect of the intervention on adherence monitoring. Adjusted relative risk ratios and their corresponding 95% CIs are presented. Secondary outcomes included treatment completion, loss to follow-up, death, and reasons for missed videos in the intervention group.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The intention-to-treat analysis included 142 participants, with 2 excluded due to discontinuation of medication within the first week after enrollment. The median age of participants was 34 (IQR 26-45) years. The median fraction of expected doses observed (FEDO) was significantly higher in the VDOT group compared with the UCDOT group (100, IQR 80-100 vs 30, IQR 10-60, respectively; P<.001). When using a FEDO cutoff of ≥80% to define optimal adherence, 63 of 142 (44%) patients met the threshold, with a significant difference between the VDOT and UCDOT groups (56/71, 79% vs 7/71, 10%, P<.001). After adjusting for confounders, VDOT users were significantly more likely to achieve ≥80% of their expected doses observed compared with UCDOT users (adjusted risk ratio 8.4, 95% CI 4.16-17.0). The most common reasons for failing to submit videos of medication intake were an uncharged phone battery, forgetting to record videos during medication intake, and losing the smartphone.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Enhanced VDOT was more effective than UCDOT in increasing adherence monitoring among patients with TB in Uganda. This evidence highlights the potential of digital technologies to improve treatment adherence monitoring and support in high TB burden settings with limited human resources.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04134689; http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04134689.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14756,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JMIR mHealth and uHealth\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"e57991\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11783032/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JMIR mHealth and uHealth\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2196/57991\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JMIR mHealth and uHealth","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/57991","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:直接观察治疗(DOT)是监测结核病治疗依从性的标准。然而,由于缺乏财政和人力资源,DOT的实施对患者和提供者来说是困难的。越来越多的证据表明,视频直接观察疗法(VDOT)等新兴的数字依从性技术可以作为一种选择。目的:本研究的目的是评价VDOT与常规护理DOT的有效性。方法:在2020年7月至2021年10月期间,我们在乌干达坎帕拉的公共卫生诊所进行了一项双组平行、开放标签、1:1分配的随机试验,接受VDOT干预(n=72)或常规护理DOT (n=72),以监测治疗依从性。每组进一步分层,使男女人数相等。符合条件的患者年龄为18-65岁,确诊为结核病并接受日常治疗。VDOT组收到了装有应用程序的智能手机,而UCDOT组则按照乌干达国家结核病项目的常规做法监测治疗情况。我们检验了VDOT在监测药物依从性方面比UCDOT更有效的假设。主要结局是依从性,定义为在6个月的治疗期间观察到>=预期剂量的80%。我们进行了意向治疗(ITT)分析,并进行了多变量逻辑回归来估计干预对依从性监测的影响。我们给出了调整后的相对风险比和相关的95%置信区间。干预组的次要结局是治疗完成、随访失败、死亡和错过视频的原因。结果:意向治疗分析包括142名参与者。2名受试者因在入组后第一周内未能继续用药而被排除。中位年龄34岁(IQR:26-45岁)。VDOT组的平均预期剂量率(FEDO)显著高于UCDOT组(90%平均FEDO vs 30%平均FEDO, p < 0.001)。当使用FEDO临界值bb0 =80%作为最佳依从性时,63例(44%)患者达到了设定的阈值,VDOT和UCDOT之间存在显著差异(78.9% vs. 9.9%, p=< 0.001)。在调整混杂因素后,与UCDOT(调整后的RR)相比,VDOT使用者更有可能观察到>=80%的预期剂量。8.4, 95% ci 4.16-17.0)。未能提交服药视频的最常见原因是手机电池未充电、服药过程中忘记录制视频、丢失智能手机。结论:在乌干达的结核病患者中,增强的VDOT比UCDOT更有效地提高了对治疗依从性的观察。这一证据表明,在人力资源有限的结核病高负担环境中,数字技术有望改善对治疗依从性的监测和支持。临床试验:ClinicalTrials.govNCT04134689, http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04134689。
Effectiveness of a Mobile Health Intervention (DOT Selfie) in Increasing Treatment Adherence Monitoring and Support for Patients With Tuberculosis in Uganda: Randomized Controlled Trial.
Background: Directly observed therapy (DOT) is the standard method for monitoring adherence to tuberculosis (TB) treatment. However, implementing DOT poses challenges for both patients and providers due to limited financial and human resources. Increasing evidence suggests that emerging digital adherence technologies, such as video directly observed therapy (VDOT), can serve as viable alternatives.
Objective: This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of VDOT compared with usual care directly observed therapy (UCDOT).
Methods: Between July 2020 and October 2021, we conducted a 2-arm, parallel-group, open-label randomized trial with a 1:1 assignment to receive either the VDOT intervention (n=72) or UCDOT (n=72) for treatment adherence monitoring at public health clinics in Kampala, Uganda. Each group was further stratified to ensure equal numbers of males and females. Eligible patients were aged 18-65 years, had a confirmed diagnosis of TB, and were undergoing daily treatment. The VDOT group was provided with a smartphone equipped with an app, while the UCDOT group followed the routine monitoring practices outlined by the Uganda National TB Program. We tested the hypothesis that VDOT was more effective than UCDOT for monitoring medication adherence. The primary outcome was adherence, defined as having ≥80% of the expected doses observed during the 6-month treatment period. An intention-to-treat analysis was conducted, and multivariable logistic regression was used to estimate the effect of the intervention on adherence monitoring. Adjusted relative risk ratios and their corresponding 95% CIs are presented. Secondary outcomes included treatment completion, loss to follow-up, death, and reasons for missed videos in the intervention group.
Results: The intention-to-treat analysis included 142 participants, with 2 excluded due to discontinuation of medication within the first week after enrollment. The median age of participants was 34 (IQR 26-45) years. The median fraction of expected doses observed (FEDO) was significantly higher in the VDOT group compared with the UCDOT group (100, IQR 80-100 vs 30, IQR 10-60, respectively; P<.001). When using a FEDO cutoff of ≥80% to define optimal adherence, 63 of 142 (44%) patients met the threshold, with a significant difference between the VDOT and UCDOT groups (56/71, 79% vs 7/71, 10%, P<.001). After adjusting for confounders, VDOT users were significantly more likely to achieve ≥80% of their expected doses observed compared with UCDOT users (adjusted risk ratio 8.4, 95% CI 4.16-17.0). The most common reasons for failing to submit videos of medication intake were an uncharged phone battery, forgetting to record videos during medication intake, and losing the smartphone.
Conclusions: Enhanced VDOT was more effective than UCDOT in increasing adherence monitoring among patients with TB in Uganda. This evidence highlights the potential of digital technologies to improve treatment adherence monitoring and support in high TB burden settings with limited human resources.
期刊介绍:
JMIR mHealth and uHealth (JMU, ISSN 2291-5222) is a spin-off journal of JMIR, the leading eHealth journal (Impact Factor 2016: 5.175). JMIR mHealth and uHealth is indexed in PubMed, PubMed Central, and Science Citation Index Expanded (SCIE), and in June 2017 received a stunning inaugural Impact Factor of 4.636.
The journal focusses on health and biomedical applications in mobile and tablet computing, pervasive and ubiquitous computing, wearable computing and domotics.
JMIR mHealth and uHealth publishes since 2013 and was the first mhealth journal in Pubmed. It publishes even faster and has a broader scope with including papers which are more technical or more formative/developmental than what would be published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research.