健康教育干预对提高孕妇使用铁-叶酸补充剂的效果:系统回顾与元分析》。

IF 5.9 2区 医学 Q1 NUTRITION & DIETETICS Nutrition reviews Pub Date : 2024-12-23 DOI:10.1093/nutrit/nuae196
Jira Wakoya Feyisa, Judy Yuen-Man Siu, Xue Bai
{"title":"健康教育干预对提高孕妇使用铁-叶酸补充剂的效果:系统回顾与元分析》。","authors":"Jira Wakoya Feyisa, Judy Yuen-Man Siu, Xue Bai","doi":"10.1093/nutrit/nuae196","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context: </strong>During pregnancy, the underutilization of iron-folic acid supplements (IFAS) remains a considerable maternal and child health issue. Hence, health education intervention trials were conducted following the recommendation of the World Health Organization and epidemiological studies to enhance the utilization level of the supplements during pregnancy.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective of this meta-analysis was to evaluate the effectiveness of health education interventions in enhancing IFAS utilization during pregnancy.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>A thorough search was conducted across PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, CINAHL, Web of Science, Medline, the Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar from August 28 until October 31, 2023.</p><p><strong>Data extraction: </strong>This study incorporated randomized and quasi-experimental studies that examined the effectiveness of health education interventions in enhancing IFAS utilization during pregnancy.</p><p><strong>Data analysis: </strong>Comprehensive Meta-Analysis, version 4, which includes the prediction interval, was used for the analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In this meta-analysis and systematic review, 21 articles comprising 6643 pregnant women from different countries were included. The random-effects model was applied to determine the pooled standardized differences in means (0.786; 95% CI: 0.551, 1.021). The prediction interval shows the range of true standardized differences in means (95% CI: -0.168, 1.740), which indicates the variations in the true effect size of health education interventions in enhancing IFAS utilization during pregnancy.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In addition to pooled effect size, another significant advantage of this meta-analysis is conducting the prediction interval to determine the range of the true effect size, which ranges from -0.168 to 1.740 across the groups of different pregnant women, indicating variability in the effectiveness of the interventions in enhancing IFAS utilization during pregnancy. This might occur because most of the primary studies in this meta-analysis were conducted at healthcare facilities and mostly focused on anemic pregnant women attending antenatal care, which did not control for sociocultural determinants. Therefore, future researchers should consider these limitations.</p>","PeriodicalId":19469,"journal":{"name":"Nutrition reviews","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effectiveness of Health Education Interventions in Enhancing Iron-Folic Acid Supplement Utilization Among Pregnant Women: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Jira Wakoya Feyisa, Judy Yuen-Man Siu, Xue Bai\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/nutrit/nuae196\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Context: </strong>During pregnancy, the underutilization of iron-folic acid supplements (IFAS) remains a considerable maternal and child health issue. Hence, health education intervention trials were conducted following the recommendation of the World Health Organization and epidemiological studies to enhance the utilization level of the supplements during pregnancy.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective of this meta-analysis was to evaluate the effectiveness of health education interventions in enhancing IFAS utilization during pregnancy.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>A thorough search was conducted across PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, CINAHL, Web of Science, Medline, the Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar from August 28 until October 31, 2023.</p><p><strong>Data extraction: </strong>This study incorporated randomized and quasi-experimental studies that examined the effectiveness of health education interventions in enhancing IFAS utilization during pregnancy.</p><p><strong>Data analysis: </strong>Comprehensive Meta-Analysis, version 4, which includes the prediction interval, was used for the analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In this meta-analysis and systematic review, 21 articles comprising 6643 pregnant women from different countries were included. The random-effects model was applied to determine the pooled standardized differences in means (0.786; 95% CI: 0.551, 1.021). The prediction interval shows the range of true standardized differences in means (95% CI: -0.168, 1.740), which indicates the variations in the true effect size of health education interventions in enhancing IFAS utilization during pregnancy.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In addition to pooled effect size, another significant advantage of this meta-analysis is conducting the prediction interval to determine the range of the true effect size, which ranges from -0.168 to 1.740 across the groups of different pregnant women, indicating variability in the effectiveness of the interventions in enhancing IFAS utilization during pregnancy. This might occur because most of the primary studies in this meta-analysis were conducted at healthcare facilities and mostly focused on anemic pregnant women attending antenatal care, which did not control for sociocultural determinants. Therefore, future researchers should consider these limitations.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19469,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nutrition reviews\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nutrition reviews\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/nutrit/nuae196\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NUTRITION & DIETETICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nutrition reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/nutrit/nuae196","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在怀孕期间,叶酸铁补充剂(IFAS)的利用不足仍然是一个相当大的孕产妇和儿童健康问题。因此,根据世界卫生组织的建议和流行病学研究进行了健康教育干预试验,以提高怀孕期间补充剂的利用水平。目的:本荟萃分析的目的是评估健康教育干预在提高怀孕期间IFAS使用方面的有效性。数据来源:从2023年8月28日至10月31日,在PubMed、EMBASE、Scopus、CINAHL、Web of Science、Medline、Cochrane Library和谷歌Scholar上进行了彻底的搜索。资料提取:本研究纳入了随机和准实验研究,以检验健康教育干预在提高怀孕期间IFAS利用方面的有效性。数据分析:采用包含预测区间的综合元分析(Comprehensive Meta-Analysis, version 4)进行分析。结果:在这项荟萃分析和系统评价中,纳入了21篇文章,包括来自不同国家的6643名孕妇。采用随机效应模型确定合并标准化均数差异(0.786;95% ci: 0.551, 1.021)。预测区间显示了均数真实标准化差异的范围(95% CI: -0.168, 1.740),这表明健康教育干预在提高怀孕期间IFAS使用率方面的真实效应大小存在差异。结论:除了汇总效应量外,本荟萃分析的另一个显著优势是进行了预测区间,以确定真实效应量的范围,不同孕妇组的真实效应量范围为-0.168至1.740,表明干预措施在提高妊娠期间IFAS利用率方面的有效性存在差异。这可能是因为本荟萃分析中的大多数主要研究是在医疗机构进行的,主要集中在参加产前护理的贫血孕妇,没有控制社会文化决定因素。因此,未来的研究人员应该考虑到这些局限性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Effectiveness of Health Education Interventions in Enhancing Iron-Folic Acid Supplement Utilization Among Pregnant Women: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Context: During pregnancy, the underutilization of iron-folic acid supplements (IFAS) remains a considerable maternal and child health issue. Hence, health education intervention trials were conducted following the recommendation of the World Health Organization and epidemiological studies to enhance the utilization level of the supplements during pregnancy.

Objective: The objective of this meta-analysis was to evaluate the effectiveness of health education interventions in enhancing IFAS utilization during pregnancy.

Data sources: A thorough search was conducted across PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, CINAHL, Web of Science, Medline, the Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar from August 28 until October 31, 2023.

Data extraction: This study incorporated randomized and quasi-experimental studies that examined the effectiveness of health education interventions in enhancing IFAS utilization during pregnancy.

Data analysis: Comprehensive Meta-Analysis, version 4, which includes the prediction interval, was used for the analysis.

Results: In this meta-analysis and systematic review, 21 articles comprising 6643 pregnant women from different countries were included. The random-effects model was applied to determine the pooled standardized differences in means (0.786; 95% CI: 0.551, 1.021). The prediction interval shows the range of true standardized differences in means (95% CI: -0.168, 1.740), which indicates the variations in the true effect size of health education interventions in enhancing IFAS utilization during pregnancy.

Conclusion: In addition to pooled effect size, another significant advantage of this meta-analysis is conducting the prediction interval to determine the range of the true effect size, which ranges from -0.168 to 1.740 across the groups of different pregnant women, indicating variability in the effectiveness of the interventions in enhancing IFAS utilization during pregnancy. This might occur because most of the primary studies in this meta-analysis were conducted at healthcare facilities and mostly focused on anemic pregnant women attending antenatal care, which did not control for sociocultural determinants. Therefore, future researchers should consider these limitations.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Nutrition reviews
Nutrition reviews 医学-营养学
CiteScore
12.20
自引率
1.60%
发文量
121
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Nutrition Reviews is a highly cited, monthly, international, peer-reviewed journal that specializes in the publication of authoritative and critical literature reviews on current and emerging topics in nutrition science, food science, clinical nutrition, and nutrition policy. Readers of Nutrition Reviews include nutrition scientists, biomedical researchers, clinical and dietetic practitioners, and advanced students of nutrition.
期刊最新文献
The Role of Dietary Protein in Mitigating the Risk of Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease. Association Between Vitamin D and COVID-19-Related Outcomes: An Umbrella Review of Meta-Analyses. ILSI Europe Systematic Review: The Impact of Digestible and Nondigestible Carbohydrate Consumption for Toddlers (1-4 Years) in Relation to Health Outcomes. Mango (Mangifera indica L.) By-products in Food Processing and Health Promotion. Dietary Acid Load and Human Health: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Observational Studies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1