湖泊淤泥上次生演替植被生长公园的城市再野生化感知:景观偏好和感知物种丰富度

IF 6 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES Urban Forestry & Urban Greening Pub Date : 2024-12-19 DOI:10.1016/j.ufug.2024.128648
Shangchun Hu, Jiahui Liu, Jing Que, Xing Su, Baoqin Li, Cancan Quan
{"title":"湖泊淤泥上次生演替植被生长公园的城市再野生化感知:景观偏好和感知物种丰富度","authors":"Shangchun Hu, Jiahui Liu, Jing Que, Xing Su, Baoqin Li, Cancan Quan","doi":"10.1016/j.ufug.2024.128648","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Urbanisation often distances people from nature, impacting health and well-being. Urban rewilding reintroduces wilderness into cities, supporting biodiversity and reconnecting people with nature. This study investigates public perception of biodiversity and aesthetic preferences in rewilded urban sites, using Jiangyangfan Ecological Park in Hangzhou, China, as a case study. The park includes rewilded and semi-rewilded plots with varying degrees of human intervention. Participants, including non-experts and landscape architecture students, evaluated photos of the plots for species richness and aesthetic appeal. Results indicate a strong correlation between perceived and measured species richness for non-experts, though this correlation is weaker for students. Non-experts prefer semi-rewilded plots, associating higher species richness with higher aesthetic value, while students’ preferences do not vary significantly with species richness. The correlation between habitat management intensity and aesthetic preferences is weak for both groups, suggesting a balance between natural and managed landscapes can enhance public appreciation. The study highlights the public’s ability to perceive biodiversity and the importance of integrating public preferences in urban rewilding efforts. It underscores the need for nature education to improve biodiversity appreciation, promoting sustainable urban rewilding practices. Our results highlight the potential of semi-rewilding as a balanced approach within urban rewilding, helping to reconcile aesthetic and biodiversity goals in areas where they may conflict.","PeriodicalId":49394,"journal":{"name":"Urban Forestry & Urban Greening","volume":"202 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Perceptions of urban rewilding in a park with secondary succession vegetation growth on lake silt: Landscape preferences and perceived species richness\",\"authors\":\"Shangchun Hu, Jiahui Liu, Jing Que, Xing Su, Baoqin Li, Cancan Quan\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ufug.2024.128648\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Urbanisation often distances people from nature, impacting health and well-being. Urban rewilding reintroduces wilderness into cities, supporting biodiversity and reconnecting people with nature. This study investigates public perception of biodiversity and aesthetic preferences in rewilded urban sites, using Jiangyangfan Ecological Park in Hangzhou, China, as a case study. The park includes rewilded and semi-rewilded plots with varying degrees of human intervention. Participants, including non-experts and landscape architecture students, evaluated photos of the plots for species richness and aesthetic appeal. Results indicate a strong correlation between perceived and measured species richness for non-experts, though this correlation is weaker for students. Non-experts prefer semi-rewilded plots, associating higher species richness with higher aesthetic value, while students’ preferences do not vary significantly with species richness. The correlation between habitat management intensity and aesthetic preferences is weak for both groups, suggesting a balance between natural and managed landscapes can enhance public appreciation. The study highlights the public’s ability to perceive biodiversity and the importance of integrating public preferences in urban rewilding efforts. It underscores the need for nature education to improve biodiversity appreciation, promoting sustainable urban rewilding practices. Our results highlight the potential of semi-rewilding as a balanced approach within urban rewilding, helping to reconcile aesthetic and biodiversity goals in areas where they may conflict.\",\"PeriodicalId\":49394,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Urban Forestry & Urban Greening\",\"volume\":\"202 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Urban Forestry & Urban Greening\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2024.128648\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urban Forestry & Urban Greening","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2024.128648","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

城市化往往使人们远离自然,影响健康和福祉。城市野生化将荒野重新引入城市,支持生物多样性,并将人与自然重新联系起来。本研究以杭州江阳帆生态园为研究对象,探讨了野生城市景观中公众对生物多样性的认知和审美偏好。该公园包括重新野生和半重新野生的地块,有不同程度的人为干预。参与者,包括非专家和风景园林专业的学生,根据物种丰富度和审美吸引力来评估这些地块的照片。结果表明,对于非专家来说,感知到的物种丰富度和测量到的物种丰富度之间存在很强的相关性,而对于学生来说,这种相关性较弱。非专家偏好半野生地块,物种丰富度越高,审美价值越高,而学生偏好随物种丰富度变化不显著。生境管理强度与审美偏好之间的相关性较弱,这表明自然景观与管理景观之间的平衡可以提高公众的鉴赏力。这项研究强调了公众感知生物多样性的能力,以及在城市野生动物重建工作中整合公众偏好的重要性。报告强调需要开展自然教育,以提高对生物多样性的认识,促进可持续的城市再野生化做法。我们的研究结果强调了半野化作为城市野化中的一种平衡方法的潜力,有助于在可能冲突的地区调和美学和生物多样性目标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Perceptions of urban rewilding in a park with secondary succession vegetation growth on lake silt: Landscape preferences and perceived species richness
Urbanisation often distances people from nature, impacting health and well-being. Urban rewilding reintroduces wilderness into cities, supporting biodiversity and reconnecting people with nature. This study investigates public perception of biodiversity and aesthetic preferences in rewilded urban sites, using Jiangyangfan Ecological Park in Hangzhou, China, as a case study. The park includes rewilded and semi-rewilded plots with varying degrees of human intervention. Participants, including non-experts and landscape architecture students, evaluated photos of the plots for species richness and aesthetic appeal. Results indicate a strong correlation between perceived and measured species richness for non-experts, though this correlation is weaker for students. Non-experts prefer semi-rewilded plots, associating higher species richness with higher aesthetic value, while students’ preferences do not vary significantly with species richness. The correlation between habitat management intensity and aesthetic preferences is weak for both groups, suggesting a balance between natural and managed landscapes can enhance public appreciation. The study highlights the public’s ability to perceive biodiversity and the importance of integrating public preferences in urban rewilding efforts. It underscores the need for nature education to improve biodiversity appreciation, promoting sustainable urban rewilding practices. Our results highlight the potential of semi-rewilding as a balanced approach within urban rewilding, helping to reconcile aesthetic and biodiversity goals in areas where they may conflict.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.70
自引率
12.50%
发文量
289
审稿时长
70 days
期刊介绍: Urban Forestry and Urban Greening is a refereed, international journal aimed at presenting high-quality research with urban and peri-urban woody and non-woody vegetation and its use, planning, design, establishment and management as its main topics. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening concentrates on all tree-dominated (as joint together in the urban forest) as well as other green resources in and around urban areas, such as woodlands, public and private urban parks and gardens, urban nature areas, street tree and square plantations, botanical gardens and cemeteries. The journal welcomes basic and applied research papers, as well as review papers and short communications. Contributions should focus on one or more of the following aspects: -Form and functions of urban forests and other vegetation, including aspects of urban ecology. -Policy-making, planning and design related to urban forests and other vegetation. -Selection and establishment of tree resources and other vegetation for urban environments. -Management of urban forests and other vegetation. Original contributions of a high academic standard are invited from a wide range of disciplines and fields, including forestry, biology, horticulture, arboriculture, landscape ecology, pathology, soil science, hydrology, landscape architecture, landscape planning, urban planning and design, economics, sociology, environmental psychology, public health, and education.
期刊最新文献
Perceptions of ecosystem services and disservices in urban greenspaces: Insights from a shrinking city The ideal dispersion range of park cooling island in summer time Urban-rural shifts in elemental composition in leaves and topsoil of street trees in a subtropical city of China Changes in use of natural outdoor environments and health of women in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic Global approaches for ecological restoration in urban environments: A PRISMA review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1