{"title":"土壤磷矿化研究:放射性同位素标记技术综述与综合","authors":"Chongyang Li, Jordon Wade, Andrew J. Margenot","doi":"10.1016/j.soilbio.2024.109701","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Predicting soil phosphorus (P) bioavailability requires an understanding of organic P mineralization (P<sub>min</sub>) but assessing P<sub>min</sub> rates is challenging. Recent advances in the use of radioisotopic P labeling enable estimates of P<sub>min</sub> rates in soil. However, there is yet no standardization of radioisotopic dilution methods, potentially compromising comparison of results among studies. We conducted a systematic literature search to (1) synthesize the varying procedures among different studies, (2) compare the soil P<sub>min</sub> results obtained via two most commonly used approaches, isotopically exchangeable kinetics (IEK) and isotope pool dilution (IPD), and (3) address the methodological advantages and limitations of IEK and IPD. We identified and analyzed 98 studies, and found large discrepancies in study-specific radioisotope spike level, soil incubation period and extraction methods used to estimate the soil available P pool. On average, a spike level of 10-20 kBq g<sup>-1</sup> soil was used among studies but empirical assessments are required to confirm that this assumed range of spike level is sufficient to measure exchangeable P. We found that incubation duration should be ≤14 d because there is an increasing possibility of measuring declining cumulative gross P<sub>min</sub> values beyond 14 d, even though reduced cumulative rate with additional time is theoretically impossible. Gross P<sub>min</sub> rates were lower by IPD compared to IEK. However, 18 studies reported undetectable gross P<sub>min</sub>, possibly due to the unverified but widely made assumption that biotic and abiotic process rates are additive. The complexity of the methodological issues necessitated a more nuanced approach via an advanced statistical approach (e.g., decision tree) to select a method based on trade-offs. To address the methodological issues identified in this review, a greater quantity and quality of observations need to be collected (e.g., well-designed experiments, data quality assurance such as quenching correction).","PeriodicalId":21888,"journal":{"name":"Soil Biology & Biochemistry","volume":"30 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"In pursuit of soil P mineralization: a review and synthesis of radioisotopic labeling techniques\",\"authors\":\"Chongyang Li, Jordon Wade, Andrew J. Margenot\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.soilbio.2024.109701\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Predicting soil phosphorus (P) bioavailability requires an understanding of organic P mineralization (P<sub>min</sub>) but assessing P<sub>min</sub> rates is challenging. Recent advances in the use of radioisotopic P labeling enable estimates of P<sub>min</sub> rates in soil. However, there is yet no standardization of radioisotopic dilution methods, potentially compromising comparison of results among studies. We conducted a systematic literature search to (1) synthesize the varying procedures among different studies, (2) compare the soil P<sub>min</sub> results obtained via two most commonly used approaches, isotopically exchangeable kinetics (IEK) and isotope pool dilution (IPD), and (3) address the methodological advantages and limitations of IEK and IPD. We identified and analyzed 98 studies, and found large discrepancies in study-specific radioisotope spike level, soil incubation period and extraction methods used to estimate the soil available P pool. On average, a spike level of 10-20 kBq g<sup>-1</sup> soil was used among studies but empirical assessments are required to confirm that this assumed range of spike level is sufficient to measure exchangeable P. We found that incubation duration should be ≤14 d because there is an increasing possibility of measuring declining cumulative gross P<sub>min</sub> values beyond 14 d, even though reduced cumulative rate with additional time is theoretically impossible. Gross P<sub>min</sub> rates were lower by IPD compared to IEK. However, 18 studies reported undetectable gross P<sub>min</sub>, possibly due to the unverified but widely made assumption that biotic and abiotic process rates are additive. The complexity of the methodological issues necessitated a more nuanced approach via an advanced statistical approach (e.g., decision tree) to select a method based on trade-offs. To address the methodological issues identified in this review, a greater quantity and quality of observations need to be collected (e.g., well-designed experiments, data quality assurance such as quenching correction).\",\"PeriodicalId\":21888,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Soil Biology & Biochemistry\",\"volume\":\"30 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Soil Biology & Biochemistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2024.109701\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SOIL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Soil Biology & Biochemistry","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2024.109701","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOIL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
In pursuit of soil P mineralization: a review and synthesis of radioisotopic labeling techniques
Predicting soil phosphorus (P) bioavailability requires an understanding of organic P mineralization (Pmin) but assessing Pmin rates is challenging. Recent advances in the use of radioisotopic P labeling enable estimates of Pmin rates in soil. However, there is yet no standardization of radioisotopic dilution methods, potentially compromising comparison of results among studies. We conducted a systematic literature search to (1) synthesize the varying procedures among different studies, (2) compare the soil Pmin results obtained via two most commonly used approaches, isotopically exchangeable kinetics (IEK) and isotope pool dilution (IPD), and (3) address the methodological advantages and limitations of IEK and IPD. We identified and analyzed 98 studies, and found large discrepancies in study-specific radioisotope spike level, soil incubation period and extraction methods used to estimate the soil available P pool. On average, a spike level of 10-20 kBq g-1 soil was used among studies but empirical assessments are required to confirm that this assumed range of spike level is sufficient to measure exchangeable P. We found that incubation duration should be ≤14 d because there is an increasing possibility of measuring declining cumulative gross Pmin values beyond 14 d, even though reduced cumulative rate with additional time is theoretically impossible. Gross Pmin rates were lower by IPD compared to IEK. However, 18 studies reported undetectable gross Pmin, possibly due to the unverified but widely made assumption that biotic and abiotic process rates are additive. The complexity of the methodological issues necessitated a more nuanced approach via an advanced statistical approach (e.g., decision tree) to select a method based on trade-offs. To address the methodological issues identified in this review, a greater quantity and quality of observations need to be collected (e.g., well-designed experiments, data quality assurance such as quenching correction).
期刊介绍:
Soil Biology & Biochemistry publishes original research articles of international significance focusing on biological processes in soil and their applications to soil and environmental quality. Major topics include the ecology and biochemical processes of soil organisms, their effects on the environment, and interactions with plants. The journal also welcomes state-of-the-art reviews and discussions on contemporary research in soil biology and biochemistry.