QIAstat-Dx胃肠道检测板在汇总粪便样本中的性能验证和评价。

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q2 PARASITOLOGY Acta tropica Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-26 DOI:10.1016/j.actatropica.2024.107514
Xinbin Chen, Huina Huang, Ying Su, Xiaojian Zhou, Menghua Liao, Yanhua Li, Zidong Cheng, Muzi Jin, Jie Tian, Haibo Wang
{"title":"QIAstat-Dx胃肠道检测板在汇总粪便样本中的性能验证和评价。","authors":"Xinbin Chen, Huina Huang, Ying Su, Xiaojian Zhou, Menghua Liao, Yanhua Li, Zidong Cheng, Muzi Jin, Jie Tian, Haibo Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.actatropica.2024.107514","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In the current study, the analytical sensitivity, analytical specificity, reproducibility, anti-interferences ability, and clinical performance of the QIAstat-Dx Gastrointestinal Panel (GIP) system were evaluated using pooled stool samples. Results showed that the pooled sample test detected the selected ten targets exclusively, with no cross reaction with any other targets of common enteropathogens. The analytical sensitivity of the pooled sample test on QIAstat-Dx GIP system was 10<sup>2</sup> CFU/ml for Shigella spp., 10<sup>3</sup> CFU/ml for Salmonella spp., Y. enterocolitica, Enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli, Enteropathogenic E. coli, 10<sup>4</sup> CFU/ml for V. cholerae, 10<sup>2</sup> copies/ml for Norovirus, 10<sup>3</sup> copies/ml for Rotavirus, Astrovirus, Sapovirus, respectively. The Coefficients of variation (CV) during the detection of V. cholerae, Salmonella spp., Y. enterocolitica, Enterotoxigenic E. coli, Enteropathogenic E. coli, Shigella spp., Rotavirus, Norovirus, Astrovirus, and Sapovirus detection was 2.3 %, 2.7 %, 3.9 %, 4.2 %, 1.7 %, 2.6 %, 6.7 %, 1.4 %, 1.3 % and 2.7 %, respectively, indicating the high reproducibility of the pooled sample test, except for Rotavirus. When potentially interfering agents were added, the shifted Ct value was less than the cut off value, suggesting the good anti-interferences ability. During clinical evaluation, the pooled sample test was 97.8 % concordant with gold standard methods (bacterial culture for bacteria and qPCR for viruses). Our results suggest that QIAstat-Dx GIP system could be used for pooled sample test for enteropathogens screening, which would be more economical and could improve throughput while provide comparable test performance.</p>","PeriodicalId":7240,"journal":{"name":"Acta tropica","volume":" ","pages":"107514"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Validation and evaluation of the performance of QIAstat-Dx gastrointestinal panel in pooled stool samples.\",\"authors\":\"Xinbin Chen, Huina Huang, Ying Su, Xiaojian Zhou, Menghua Liao, Yanhua Li, Zidong Cheng, Muzi Jin, Jie Tian, Haibo Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.actatropica.2024.107514\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>In the current study, the analytical sensitivity, analytical specificity, reproducibility, anti-interferences ability, and clinical performance of the QIAstat-Dx Gastrointestinal Panel (GIP) system were evaluated using pooled stool samples. Results showed that the pooled sample test detected the selected ten targets exclusively, with no cross reaction with any other targets of common enteropathogens. The analytical sensitivity of the pooled sample test on QIAstat-Dx GIP system was 10<sup>2</sup> CFU/ml for Shigella spp., 10<sup>3</sup> CFU/ml for Salmonella spp., Y. enterocolitica, Enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli, Enteropathogenic E. coli, 10<sup>4</sup> CFU/ml for V. cholerae, 10<sup>2</sup> copies/ml for Norovirus, 10<sup>3</sup> copies/ml for Rotavirus, Astrovirus, Sapovirus, respectively. The Coefficients of variation (CV) during the detection of V. cholerae, Salmonella spp., Y. enterocolitica, Enterotoxigenic E. coli, Enteropathogenic E. coli, Shigella spp., Rotavirus, Norovirus, Astrovirus, and Sapovirus detection was 2.3 %, 2.7 %, 3.9 %, 4.2 %, 1.7 %, 2.6 %, 6.7 %, 1.4 %, 1.3 % and 2.7 %, respectively, indicating the high reproducibility of the pooled sample test, except for Rotavirus. When potentially interfering agents were added, the shifted Ct value was less than the cut off value, suggesting the good anti-interferences ability. During clinical evaluation, the pooled sample test was 97.8 % concordant with gold standard methods (bacterial culture for bacteria and qPCR for viruses). Our results suggest that QIAstat-Dx GIP system could be used for pooled sample test for enteropathogens screening, which would be more economical and could improve throughput while provide comparable test performance.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7240,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta tropica\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"107514\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta tropica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actatropica.2024.107514\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/12/26 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PARASITOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta tropica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actatropica.2024.107514","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PARASITOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在本研究中,通过收集粪便样本,对QIAstat-Dx胃肠道面板(GIP)系统的分析灵敏度、分析特异性、再现性、抗干扰能力和临床性能进行了评估。结果表明,该方法对筛选出的10个靶点进行了特异性检测,与其他常见肠道病原菌靶点均无交叉反应。QIAstat-Dx GIP系统对志贺氏菌、沙门氏菌、小肠结肠炎耶尔森菌、产肠毒素大肠杆菌、肠致病性大肠杆菌的检测灵敏度分别为102 CFU/ml、103 CFU/ml、104 CFU/ml、诺如病毒102拷贝/ml、轮状病毒103拷贝/ml、星状病毒103拷贝/ml。霍乱弧菌、沙门氏菌、小肠结肠炎耶尔森菌、产肠毒素大肠杆菌、肠致病性大肠杆菌、志贺氏菌、轮状病毒、诺如病毒、星状病毒和萨波病毒检测的变异系数(CV)分别为2.3%、2.7%、3.9%、4.2%、1.7%、2.6%、6.7%、1.4%、1.3%和2.7%,表明除轮状病毒外,合并样本检测的重复性高。加入潜在干扰剂后,位移Ct值小于截止值,抗干扰能力较好。在临床评估中,合并样本测试与金标准方法(细菌培养和病毒qPCR)的一致性为97.8%。本研究结果表明,QIAstat-Dx GIP系统可用于肠道病原菌筛选的合并样本检测,该系统在提供相当的检测性能的同时,更经济、更有效地提高了检测通量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Validation and evaluation of the performance of QIAstat-Dx gastrointestinal panel in pooled stool samples.

In the current study, the analytical sensitivity, analytical specificity, reproducibility, anti-interferences ability, and clinical performance of the QIAstat-Dx Gastrointestinal Panel (GIP) system were evaluated using pooled stool samples. Results showed that the pooled sample test detected the selected ten targets exclusively, with no cross reaction with any other targets of common enteropathogens. The analytical sensitivity of the pooled sample test on QIAstat-Dx GIP system was 102 CFU/ml for Shigella spp., 103 CFU/ml for Salmonella spp., Y. enterocolitica, Enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli, Enteropathogenic E. coli, 104 CFU/ml for V. cholerae, 102 copies/ml for Norovirus, 103 copies/ml for Rotavirus, Astrovirus, Sapovirus, respectively. The Coefficients of variation (CV) during the detection of V. cholerae, Salmonella spp., Y. enterocolitica, Enterotoxigenic E. coli, Enteropathogenic E. coli, Shigella spp., Rotavirus, Norovirus, Astrovirus, and Sapovirus detection was 2.3 %, 2.7 %, 3.9 %, 4.2 %, 1.7 %, 2.6 %, 6.7 %, 1.4 %, 1.3 % and 2.7 %, respectively, indicating the high reproducibility of the pooled sample test, except for Rotavirus. When potentially interfering agents were added, the shifted Ct value was less than the cut off value, suggesting the good anti-interferences ability. During clinical evaluation, the pooled sample test was 97.8 % concordant with gold standard methods (bacterial culture for bacteria and qPCR for viruses). Our results suggest that QIAstat-Dx GIP system could be used for pooled sample test for enteropathogens screening, which would be more economical and could improve throughput while provide comparable test performance.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Acta tropica
Acta tropica 医学-寄生虫学
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
11.10%
发文量
383
审稿时长
37 days
期刊介绍: Acta Tropica, is an international journal on infectious diseases that covers public health sciences and biomedical research with particular emphasis on topics relevant to human and animal health in the tropics and the subtropics.
期刊最新文献
Effectiveness of a timed praziquantel treatment of school children in relation to seasonal transmission of urogenital schistosomiasis in Northwestern Tanzania. Nation-wide surveillance of ticks (Acari: Ixodidae) on dogs and cats in Singapore. Transcriptome analysis reveals significant discrepancies between two in vitro models of host-trematode interaction. Exploring the mechanism and drug candidates of alveolar echinococcosis affecting liver fibrosis through analysis of existing microarray data. In vitro antischistosomal activity of Artemisia species.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1