在法国的一项前瞻性纵向队列研究中,产科新生儿使用尼塞维单抗进行rsv预防治疗的接受度和安全性。

IF 9.6 1区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL EClinicalMedicine Pub Date : 2024-12-09 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.102986
Charlotte Ocana de Sentuary, Clara Testard, Marion Lagrée, Maxime Leroy, Lisa Gasnier, Alicia Enes-Dias, Constance Leruste, Diariatou Diallo, Michael Génin, Thameur Rakza, François Dubos
{"title":"在法国的一项前瞻性纵向队列研究中,产科新生儿使用尼塞维单抗进行rsv预防治疗的接受度和安全性。","authors":"Charlotte Ocana de Sentuary, Clara Testard, Marion Lagrée, Maxime Leroy, Lisa Gasnier, Alicia Enes-Dias, Constance Leruste, Diariatou Diallo, Michael Génin, Thameur Rakza, François Dubos","doi":"10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.102986","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>To evaluate the acceptance and safety of the treatment of newborns with nirsevimab (a long-acting monoclonal antibody designed to prevent respiratory syncytial virus infections) during the first season of implementation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A longitudinal, prospective, single-centre cohort study was conducted from September 18th, 2023, to January 23rd, 2024 at Lille University Hospital (Lille, France). All newborns admitted to the hospital's maternity department during the study period and whose parents agreed to participate in the study were included. Parents were asked to state whether or not they agreed for their infant to receive nirsevimab. The occurrence of adverse events (AEs) 2 h after nirsevimab treatment and 7, 14 and 30 days after discharge was documented by the mother. The primary endpoint was the nirsevimab treatment acceptance rate. The secondary endpoints were the variables associated with the acceptance of nirsevimab, the reasons for accepting or refusing nirsevimab, and the treatment's real-life safety, relative to a non-treated control group of newborns.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Of the 1730 infants born in the hospital during the study period, 477 met all the inclusion criteria and were enrolled. The nirsevimab acceptance rate [95% confidence interval] was 91.6% [89.1%-94.2%]. In a multivariable analysis, the mother's age, lower parity and having a partner in work were significantly associated with nirsevimab acceptance. The most common reason for accepting treatment was \"to protect my baby\", and the most common reason for refusing treatment was the lack of long-term data on nirsevimab. The nirsevimab and control groups did not differ significantly in terms of the types and frequencies of AEs. At least one serious AE was reported for 9.4% of the infants in the nirsevimab group and for 10.3% in the control group. None of the serious AEs were considered to be related to nirsevimab treatment.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>The nirsevimab acceptance rate for newborns in the maternity unit was high during the first season of implementation. The safety profile was very good, with no significant differences between the nirsevimab group and the control group.</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>None.</p>","PeriodicalId":11393,"journal":{"name":"EClinicalMedicine","volume":"79 ","pages":"102986"},"PeriodicalIF":9.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11669793/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Acceptance and safety of the RSV-preventive treatment of newborns with nirsevimab in the maternity department: a prospective longitudinal cohort study in France.\",\"authors\":\"Charlotte Ocana de Sentuary, Clara Testard, Marion Lagrée, Maxime Leroy, Lisa Gasnier, Alicia Enes-Dias, Constance Leruste, Diariatou Diallo, Michael Génin, Thameur Rakza, François Dubos\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.102986\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>To evaluate the acceptance and safety of the treatment of newborns with nirsevimab (a long-acting monoclonal antibody designed to prevent respiratory syncytial virus infections) during the first season of implementation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A longitudinal, prospective, single-centre cohort study was conducted from September 18th, 2023, to January 23rd, 2024 at Lille University Hospital (Lille, France). All newborns admitted to the hospital's maternity department during the study period and whose parents agreed to participate in the study were included. Parents were asked to state whether or not they agreed for their infant to receive nirsevimab. The occurrence of adverse events (AEs) 2 h after nirsevimab treatment and 7, 14 and 30 days after discharge was documented by the mother. The primary endpoint was the nirsevimab treatment acceptance rate. The secondary endpoints were the variables associated with the acceptance of nirsevimab, the reasons for accepting or refusing nirsevimab, and the treatment's real-life safety, relative to a non-treated control group of newborns.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Of the 1730 infants born in the hospital during the study period, 477 met all the inclusion criteria and were enrolled. The nirsevimab acceptance rate [95% confidence interval] was 91.6% [89.1%-94.2%]. In a multivariable analysis, the mother's age, lower parity and having a partner in work were significantly associated with nirsevimab acceptance. The most common reason for accepting treatment was \\\"to protect my baby\\\", and the most common reason for refusing treatment was the lack of long-term data on nirsevimab. The nirsevimab and control groups did not differ significantly in terms of the types and frequencies of AEs. At least one serious AE was reported for 9.4% of the infants in the nirsevimab group and for 10.3% in the control group. None of the serious AEs were considered to be related to nirsevimab treatment.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>The nirsevimab acceptance rate for newborns in the maternity unit was high during the first season of implementation. The safety profile was very good, with no significant differences between the nirsevimab group and the control group.</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>None.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11393,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"EClinicalMedicine\",\"volume\":\"79 \",\"pages\":\"102986\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11669793/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"EClinicalMedicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.102986\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EClinicalMedicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.102986","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:评价在新生儿治疗的第一季中使用nirsevimab(一种用于预防呼吸道合胞病毒感染的长效单克隆抗体)的可接受性和安全性。方法:于2023年9月18日至2024年1月23日在法国里尔大学医院进行一项纵向、前瞻性、单中心队列研究。所有在研究期间住进医院产科且其父母同意参与研究的新生儿都被包括在内。父母被要求声明他们是否同意他们的婴儿接受nirsevimab。不良事件(ae)的发生在尼西维单抗治疗后2小时和出院后7、14和30天由母亲记录。研究的主要终点是尼西莫单抗治疗的接受率。次要终点是与接受nirsevimab相关的变量,接受或拒绝nirsevimab的原因,以及相对于未接受治疗的新生儿对照组的治疗的现实安全性。结果:在研究期间在医院出生的1730名婴儿中,477名符合所有纳入标准并被纳入。尼罗昔单抗的接受率[95%置信区间]为91.6%[89.1% ~ 94.2%]。在一项多变量分析中,母亲的年龄、较低的胎次和有工作伙伴与尼瑟维单抗接受度显著相关。接受治疗的最常见原因是“为了保护我的孩子”,而拒绝治疗的最常见原因是缺乏关于nirsevimab的长期数据。在ae的类型和频率方面,nirsevimab组和对照组没有显著差异。涅西维单抗组中有9.4%的婴儿报告了至少一次严重AE,对照组中有10.3%。所有严重不良反应均未被认为与奈西莫单抗治疗有关。解释:在实施的第一个季节,产科病房新生儿的尼塞维单抗接受率很高。安全性非常好,在nirsevimab组和对照组之间没有显著差异。资金:没有。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Acceptance and safety of the RSV-preventive treatment of newborns with nirsevimab in the maternity department: a prospective longitudinal cohort study in France.

Background: To evaluate the acceptance and safety of the treatment of newborns with nirsevimab (a long-acting monoclonal antibody designed to prevent respiratory syncytial virus infections) during the first season of implementation.

Methods: A longitudinal, prospective, single-centre cohort study was conducted from September 18th, 2023, to January 23rd, 2024 at Lille University Hospital (Lille, France). All newborns admitted to the hospital's maternity department during the study period and whose parents agreed to participate in the study were included. Parents were asked to state whether or not they agreed for their infant to receive nirsevimab. The occurrence of adverse events (AEs) 2 h after nirsevimab treatment and 7, 14 and 30 days after discharge was documented by the mother. The primary endpoint was the nirsevimab treatment acceptance rate. The secondary endpoints were the variables associated with the acceptance of nirsevimab, the reasons for accepting or refusing nirsevimab, and the treatment's real-life safety, relative to a non-treated control group of newborns.

Findings: Of the 1730 infants born in the hospital during the study period, 477 met all the inclusion criteria and were enrolled. The nirsevimab acceptance rate [95% confidence interval] was 91.6% [89.1%-94.2%]. In a multivariable analysis, the mother's age, lower parity and having a partner in work were significantly associated with nirsevimab acceptance. The most common reason for accepting treatment was "to protect my baby", and the most common reason for refusing treatment was the lack of long-term data on nirsevimab. The nirsevimab and control groups did not differ significantly in terms of the types and frequencies of AEs. At least one serious AE was reported for 9.4% of the infants in the nirsevimab group and for 10.3% in the control group. None of the serious AEs were considered to be related to nirsevimab treatment.

Interpretation: The nirsevimab acceptance rate for newborns in the maternity unit was high during the first season of implementation. The safety profile was very good, with no significant differences between the nirsevimab group and the control group.

Funding: None.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
EClinicalMedicine
EClinicalMedicine Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
18.90
自引率
1.30%
发文量
506
审稿时长
22 days
期刊介绍: eClinicalMedicine is a gold open-access clinical journal designed to support frontline health professionals in addressing the complex and rapid health transitions affecting societies globally. The journal aims to assist practitioners in overcoming healthcare challenges across diverse communities, spanning diagnosis, treatment, prevention, and health promotion. Integrating disciplines from various specialties and life stages, it seeks to enhance health systems as fundamental institutions within societies. With a forward-thinking approach, eClinicalMedicine aims to redefine the future of healthcare.
期刊最新文献
Global, regional, national burden of asthma from 1990 to 2021, with projections of incidence to 2050: a systematic analysis of the global burden of disease study 2021. Alcohol use and HIV suppression after completion of financial incentives for alcohol abstinence and isoniazid adherence: a randomized controlled trial. Expression of concern-Effectiveness of strategies for implementing guideline-concordant care in low back pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. O' testosterone, where is thy sting? A Urologist's reflection on testosterone and prostate cancer. Preoperative and intraoperative neuromonitoring and mapping techniques impact oncological and functional outcomes in supratentorial function-eloquent brain tumours: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1