利用强心脏研究的流行病学数据为美洲印第安人建立查尔森合并症指数。

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities Pub Date : 2024-12-27 DOI:10.1007/s40615-024-02261-0
Paul Rogers, Christine Merenda, Richardae Araojo, Christine Lee, Milena Lolic, Ying Zhang, Jessica Reese, Kimberly Malloy, Dong Wang, Wen Zou, Joshua Xu, Elisa Lee
{"title":"利用强心脏研究的流行病学数据为美洲印第安人建立查尔森合并症指数。","authors":"Paul Rogers, Christine Merenda, Richardae Araojo, Christine Lee, Milena Lolic, Ying Zhang, Jessica Reese, Kimberly Malloy, Dong Wang, Wen Zou, Joshua Xu, Elisa Lee","doi":"10.1007/s40615-024-02261-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) is a frequently used mortality predictor based on a scoring system for the number and type of patient comorbidities health researchers have used since the late 1980s. The initial purpose of the CCI was to classify comorbid conditions, which could alter the risk of patient mortality within a 1-year time frame. However, the CCI may not accurately reflect risk among American Indians because they are a small proportion of the US population and possibly lack representation in the original patient cohort. A motivating factor in calibrating a CCI for American Indians is that this population, as a whole, experiences a greater burden of comorbidities, including diabetes mellitus, obesity, cancer, cardiovascular disease, and other chronic health conditions, than the rest of the US population.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study attempted to modify the CCI to be specific to the American Indian population utilizing the data from the still ongoing The Strong Heart Study (SHS) - a multi-center population-based longitudinal study of cardiovascular disease among American Indians. A 1-year survival analysis with mortality as the outcome was performed using the SHS morbidity and mortality surveillance data and assessing the impact of comorbidities in terms of hazard ratios with the training cohort. A Kaplan-Meier plot for a subset of the testing cohort was used to compare groups with selected mCCI-AI scores.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 3038 Phase VI participants from the SHS comprised the study population for whom mortality and morbidity surveillance data were available through December 2019. The weights generated by the SHS participants for myocardial infarction, congestive heart failure, and high blood pressure were greater than Charlson's original weights. In addition, the weights for liver illness were equivalent to Charlson's severe form of the disease. Lung cancer had the greatest overall weight derived from a hazard ratio of 8.31.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The mCCI-AI was a statistically significant predictor of 1-year mortality, classifying patients into different risk strata χ<sup>2</sup> (8, N = 1,245) = 30.56 (p = 0.0002). The mCCI-AI was able to discriminate between participants who died and those who survived 73% of the time.</p>","PeriodicalId":16921,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Developing a Charlson Comorbidity Index for the American Indian Population Using the Epidemiologic Data from the Strong Heart Study.\",\"authors\":\"Paul Rogers, Christine Merenda, Richardae Araojo, Christine Lee, Milena Lolic, Ying Zhang, Jessica Reese, Kimberly Malloy, Dong Wang, Wen Zou, Joshua Xu, Elisa Lee\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s40615-024-02261-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) is a frequently used mortality predictor based on a scoring system for the number and type of patient comorbidities health researchers have used since the late 1980s. The initial purpose of the CCI was to classify comorbid conditions, which could alter the risk of patient mortality within a 1-year time frame. However, the CCI may not accurately reflect risk among American Indians because they are a small proportion of the US population and possibly lack representation in the original patient cohort. A motivating factor in calibrating a CCI for American Indians is that this population, as a whole, experiences a greater burden of comorbidities, including diabetes mellitus, obesity, cancer, cardiovascular disease, and other chronic health conditions, than the rest of the US population.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study attempted to modify the CCI to be specific to the American Indian population utilizing the data from the still ongoing The Strong Heart Study (SHS) - a multi-center population-based longitudinal study of cardiovascular disease among American Indians. A 1-year survival analysis with mortality as the outcome was performed using the SHS morbidity and mortality surveillance data and assessing the impact of comorbidities in terms of hazard ratios with the training cohort. A Kaplan-Meier plot for a subset of the testing cohort was used to compare groups with selected mCCI-AI scores.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 3038 Phase VI participants from the SHS comprised the study population for whom mortality and morbidity surveillance data were available through December 2019. The weights generated by the SHS participants for myocardial infarction, congestive heart failure, and high blood pressure were greater than Charlson's original weights. In addition, the weights for liver illness were equivalent to Charlson's severe form of the disease. Lung cancer had the greatest overall weight derived from a hazard ratio of 8.31.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The mCCI-AI was a statistically significant predictor of 1-year mortality, classifying patients into different risk strata χ<sup>2</sup> (8, N = 1,245) = 30.56 (p = 0.0002). The mCCI-AI was able to discriminate between participants who died and those who survived 73% of the time.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16921,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40615-024-02261-0\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40615-024-02261-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:Charlson共病指数(CCI)是一种常用的死亡率预测指标,该指标基于一种评分系统,用于评估患者共病的数量和类型,自20世纪80年代末以来,卫生研究人员一直在使用该评分系统。CCI的最初目的是对合并症进行分类,这些合并症可能会在1年内改变患者死亡的风险。然而,CCI可能不能准确反映美洲印第安人的风险,因为他们只占美国人口的一小部分,可能在原始患者队列中缺乏代表性。校准美洲印第安人CCI的一个激励因素是,与美国其他人口相比,这一人口总体上承受着更大的合并症负担,包括糖尿病、肥胖、癌症、心血管疾病和其他慢性健康状况。方法:本研究利用仍在进行的强心脏研究(SHS)的数据,试图修改CCI,使其适用于美洲印第安人,这是一项针对美洲印第安人心血管疾病的多中心人群纵向研究。使用SHS发病率和死亡率监测数据进行以死亡率为结果的1年生存分析,并根据培训队列的风险比评估合并症的影响。测试队列子集的Kaplan-Meier图用于比较具有选定mCCI-AI分数的组。结果:截至2019年12月,共有3038名来自SHS的VI期参与者组成了研究人群,他们的死亡率和发病率监测数据可用。SHS参与者在心肌梗死、充血性心力衰竭和高血压方面产生的体重大于Charlson的原始体重。此外,肝脏疾病的体重与查尔森的严重形式的疾病相当。肺癌的总重量最大,风险比为8.31。结论:mCCI-AI是1年死亡率的显著预测因子,可将患者分为不同的危险层,χ2 (8, N = 1,245) = 30.56 (p = 0.0002)。mCCI-AI在73%的情况下能够区分死亡和存活的参与者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Developing a Charlson Comorbidity Index for the American Indian Population Using the Epidemiologic Data from the Strong Heart Study.

Background: The Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) is a frequently used mortality predictor based on a scoring system for the number and type of patient comorbidities health researchers have used since the late 1980s. The initial purpose of the CCI was to classify comorbid conditions, which could alter the risk of patient mortality within a 1-year time frame. However, the CCI may not accurately reflect risk among American Indians because they are a small proportion of the US population and possibly lack representation in the original patient cohort. A motivating factor in calibrating a CCI for American Indians is that this population, as a whole, experiences a greater burden of comorbidities, including diabetes mellitus, obesity, cancer, cardiovascular disease, and other chronic health conditions, than the rest of the US population.

Methods: This study attempted to modify the CCI to be specific to the American Indian population utilizing the data from the still ongoing The Strong Heart Study (SHS) - a multi-center population-based longitudinal study of cardiovascular disease among American Indians. A 1-year survival analysis with mortality as the outcome was performed using the SHS morbidity and mortality surveillance data and assessing the impact of comorbidities in terms of hazard ratios with the training cohort. A Kaplan-Meier plot for a subset of the testing cohort was used to compare groups with selected mCCI-AI scores.

Results: A total of 3038 Phase VI participants from the SHS comprised the study population for whom mortality and morbidity surveillance data were available through December 2019. The weights generated by the SHS participants for myocardial infarction, congestive heart failure, and high blood pressure were greater than Charlson's original weights. In addition, the weights for liver illness were equivalent to Charlson's severe form of the disease. Lung cancer had the greatest overall weight derived from a hazard ratio of 8.31.

Conclusions: The mCCI-AI was a statistically significant predictor of 1-year mortality, classifying patients into different risk strata χ2 (8, N = 1,245) = 30.56 (p = 0.0002). The mCCI-AI was able to discriminate between participants who died and those who survived 73% of the time.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities
Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
5.10%
发文量
263
期刊介绍: Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities reports on the scholarly progress of work to understand, address, and ultimately eliminate health disparities based on race and ethnicity. Efforts to explore underlying causes of health disparities and to describe interventions that have been undertaken to address racial and ethnic health disparities are featured. Promising studies that are ongoing or studies that have longer term data are welcome, as are studies that serve as lessons for best practices in eliminating health disparities. Original research, systematic reviews, and commentaries presenting the state-of-the-art thinking on problems centered on health disparities will be considered for publication. We particularly encourage review articles that generate innovative and testable ideas, and constructive discussions and/or critiques of health disparities.Because the Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities receives a large number of submissions, about 30% of submissions to the Journal are sent out for full peer review.
期刊最新文献
Impact of Racial Bias on Providers' Empathic Communication Behaviors with Women of Color in Postpartum Checkup. Correction: Implicit Racial Bias in Evaluation of Neonatal Opioid Withdrawal Syndrome. Factors Associated with Self-reported COVID-19 Infection and Hospitalization among Patients Seeking Care at a Comprehensive Cancer Center. The Robust Relation of Microaggressions with Alcohol-Related Problems Among Black Individuals Who Use Alcohol: the Role of Drinking to Cope with Negative Affect. Vicarious Racism, Direct Racism, and Mental Health Among Racialized Minority Healthcare Workers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1