不同物种对急性炎症的敏感性不同的血液分子谱。

IF 6 2区 医学 Q1 BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY Molecular Medicine Pub Date : 2024-12-28 DOI:10.1186/s10020-024-01052-x
David J Gregory, Feifei Han, Peng Li, Marina A Gritsenko, Jennifer Kyle, Frank E Riley, Deborah Chavez, Vania Yotova, Renata H M Sindeaux, Mohamed B F Hawash, Fengyun Xu, Li-Yuan Hung, Douglas L Hayden, Ronald G Tompkins, Robert E Lanford, Lester Kobzik, Judith Hellman, Jon M Jacobs, Luis B Barreiro, Wenzhong Xiao, H Shaw Warren
{"title":"不同物种对急性炎症的敏感性不同的血液分子谱。","authors":"David J Gregory, Feifei Han, Peng Li, Marina A Gritsenko, Jennifer Kyle, Frank E Riley, Deborah Chavez, Vania Yotova, Renata H M Sindeaux, Mohamed B F Hawash, Fengyun Xu, Li-Yuan Hung, Douglas L Hayden, Ronald G Tompkins, Robert E Lanford, Lester Kobzik, Judith Hellman, Jon M Jacobs, Luis B Barreiro, Wenzhong Xiao, H Shaw Warren","doi":"10.1186/s10020-024-01052-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Vertebrates differ over 100,000-fold in responses to pro-inflammatory agonists such as bacterial lipopolysaccharide (LPS), complicating use of animal models to study human sepsis or inflammatory disorders. We compared transcriptomes of resting and LPS-exposed blood from six LPS-sensitive species (rabbit, pig, sheep, cow, chimpanzee, human) and four LPS-resilient species (mice, rats, baboon, rhesus), as well as plasma proteomes and lipidomes. Unexpectedly, at baseline, sensitive species already had enhanced expression of LPS-responsive genes relative to resilient species. After LPS stimulation, maximally different genes in resilient species included genes that detoxify LPS, diminish bacterial growth, discriminate sepsis from SIRS, and play roles in autophagy and apoptosis. The findings reveal the molecular landscape of species differences in inflammation. This may inform better selection of species for pre-clinical models and could lead to new therapeutic strategies that mimic mechanisms in inflammation-resilient species to limit inflammation without causing immunosuppression.</p>","PeriodicalId":18813,"journal":{"name":"Molecular Medicine","volume":"30 1","pages":"280"},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11681734/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Molecular profiles of blood from numerous species that differ in sensitivity to acute inflammation.\",\"authors\":\"David J Gregory, Feifei Han, Peng Li, Marina A Gritsenko, Jennifer Kyle, Frank E Riley, Deborah Chavez, Vania Yotova, Renata H M Sindeaux, Mohamed B F Hawash, Fengyun Xu, Li-Yuan Hung, Douglas L Hayden, Ronald G Tompkins, Robert E Lanford, Lester Kobzik, Judith Hellman, Jon M Jacobs, Luis B Barreiro, Wenzhong Xiao, H Shaw Warren\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s10020-024-01052-x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Vertebrates differ over 100,000-fold in responses to pro-inflammatory agonists such as bacterial lipopolysaccharide (LPS), complicating use of animal models to study human sepsis or inflammatory disorders. We compared transcriptomes of resting and LPS-exposed blood from six LPS-sensitive species (rabbit, pig, sheep, cow, chimpanzee, human) and four LPS-resilient species (mice, rats, baboon, rhesus), as well as plasma proteomes and lipidomes. Unexpectedly, at baseline, sensitive species already had enhanced expression of LPS-responsive genes relative to resilient species. After LPS stimulation, maximally different genes in resilient species included genes that detoxify LPS, diminish bacterial growth, discriminate sepsis from SIRS, and play roles in autophagy and apoptosis. The findings reveal the molecular landscape of species differences in inflammation. This may inform better selection of species for pre-clinical models and could lead to new therapeutic strategies that mimic mechanisms in inflammation-resilient species to limit inflammation without causing immunosuppression.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18813,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Molecular Medicine\",\"volume\":\"30 1\",\"pages\":\"280\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11681734/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Molecular Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s10020-024-01052-x\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Molecular Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s10020-024-01052-x","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

脊椎动物对细菌脂多糖(LPS)等促炎激动剂的反应差异超过10万倍,这使得使用动物模型研究人类败血症或炎症性疾病变得复杂。我们比较了6种脂多糖敏感物种(兔、猪、羊、牛、黑猩猩、人类)和4种脂多糖弹性物种(小鼠、大鼠、狒狒、恒河猴)静息和暴露于脂多糖的血液的转录组,以及血浆蛋白质组和脂质组。出乎意料的是,在基线时,敏感物种相对于弹性物种已经增强了lps响应基因的表达。在LPS刺激后,弹性物种中最大程度不同的基因包括解毒LPS、抑制细菌生长、区分脓毒症和SIRS以及参与自噬和凋亡的基因。这些发现揭示了炎症中物种差异的分子格局。这可能会为临床前模型提供更好的物种选择,并可能导致新的治疗策略,模仿炎症弹性物种的机制,在不引起免疫抑制的情况下限制炎症。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Molecular profiles of blood from numerous species that differ in sensitivity to acute inflammation.

Vertebrates differ over 100,000-fold in responses to pro-inflammatory agonists such as bacterial lipopolysaccharide (LPS), complicating use of animal models to study human sepsis or inflammatory disorders. We compared transcriptomes of resting and LPS-exposed blood from six LPS-sensitive species (rabbit, pig, sheep, cow, chimpanzee, human) and four LPS-resilient species (mice, rats, baboon, rhesus), as well as plasma proteomes and lipidomes. Unexpectedly, at baseline, sensitive species already had enhanced expression of LPS-responsive genes relative to resilient species. After LPS stimulation, maximally different genes in resilient species included genes that detoxify LPS, diminish bacterial growth, discriminate sepsis from SIRS, and play roles in autophagy and apoptosis. The findings reveal the molecular landscape of species differences in inflammation. This may inform better selection of species for pre-clinical models and could lead to new therapeutic strategies that mimic mechanisms in inflammation-resilient species to limit inflammation without causing immunosuppression.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Molecular Medicine
Molecular Medicine 医学-生化与分子生物学
CiteScore
8.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
137
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Molecular Medicine is an open access journal that focuses on publishing recent findings related to disease pathogenesis at the molecular or physiological level. These insights can potentially contribute to the development of specific tools for disease diagnosis, treatment, or prevention. The journal considers manuscripts that present material pertinent to the genetic, molecular, or cellular underpinnings of critical physiological or disease processes. Submissions to Molecular Medicine are expected to elucidate the broader implications of the research findings for human disease and medicine in a manner that is accessible to a wide audience.
期刊最新文献
Formononetin ameliorates polycystic ovary syndrome through suppressing NLRP3 inflammasome. Accumulation of advanced oxidative protein products exacerbate satellite glial cells activation and neuropathic pain. Nobiletin restores the intestinal barrier of HFD-induced obese mice by promoting MHC-II expression and lipid metabolism. Disrupting of IGF2BP3-stabilized CLDN11 mRNA by TNF-α increases intestinal permeability in obesity-related severe acute pancreatitis. AdipoR1 enhances the radiation resistance via ESR1/CCNB1IP1/cyclin B1 pathway in hepatocellular carcinoma cells.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1