Syed Afroz Keramat, Tracy Comans, Rabeya Basri, Daniel Bailey, Deborah Brooks, Nadeeka N Dissanayaka
{"title":"澳大利亚心理困扰的健康状态效用值的估计:对未来经济评估的影响。","authors":"Syed Afroz Keramat, Tracy Comans, Rabeya Basri, Daniel Bailey, Deborah Brooks, Nadeeka N Dissanayaka","doi":"10.1016/j.jval.2024.12.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Psychological distress is a state of emotional suffering and discomfort that often manifests as anxiety, depression, or other mental health symptoms, impairing daily functioning and hindering concentration, relationships, and work or school performance. We aimed to examine the disutility associated with psychological distress.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used longitudinal data obtained from the Household, Income, and Labour Dynamics in Australia Survey. We measured health state utility values (HSUVs) using the Short-Form 6-Dimension (SF-6D) Utility Index and psychological distress using the Kessler Psychological Distress Scale. We used longitudinal fixed-effects regression model to examine the effects of psychological distress on HSUVs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The results from fixed-effects panel regression models indicate a negative effect of psychological distress on HSUVs. We found that moderate psychological distress (β = -0.057, 95% CI -0.059 to -0.055) and high psychological distress (β = -0.123, 95% CI -0.126 to -0.121) led to a significant reduction in HSUVs. These findings hold across different subsamples, such as age, gender, and race.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>By quantifying the reduction in HSUVs due to psychological distress, our study provides valuable data for future economic evaluations of healthcare interventions. The evidence generated from future economic evaluations will assist policymakers in making informed decisions about the cost-effective interventions for treating psychological distress.</p>","PeriodicalId":23508,"journal":{"name":"Value in Health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Estimation of Health State Utility Values for Psychological Distress in Australia: Implications for Future Economic Evaluations.\",\"authors\":\"Syed Afroz Keramat, Tracy Comans, Rabeya Basri, Daniel Bailey, Deborah Brooks, Nadeeka N Dissanayaka\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jval.2024.12.002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Psychological distress is a state of emotional suffering and discomfort that often manifests as anxiety, depression, or other mental health symptoms, impairing daily functioning and hindering concentration, relationships, and work or school performance. We aimed to examine the disutility associated with psychological distress.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used longitudinal data obtained from the Household, Income, and Labour Dynamics in Australia Survey. We measured health state utility values (HSUVs) using the Short-Form 6-Dimension (SF-6D) Utility Index and psychological distress using the Kessler Psychological Distress Scale. We used longitudinal fixed-effects regression model to examine the effects of psychological distress on HSUVs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The results from fixed-effects panel regression models indicate a negative effect of psychological distress on HSUVs. We found that moderate psychological distress (β = -0.057, 95% CI -0.059 to -0.055) and high psychological distress (β = -0.123, 95% CI -0.126 to -0.121) led to a significant reduction in HSUVs. These findings hold across different subsamples, such as age, gender, and race.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>By quantifying the reduction in HSUVs due to psychological distress, our study provides valuable data for future economic evaluations of healthcare interventions. The evidence generated from future economic evaluations will assist policymakers in making informed decisions about the cost-effective interventions for treating psychological distress.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23508,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Value in Health\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Value in Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jval.2024.12.002\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Value in Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jval.2024.12.002","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:心理困扰是一种情绪痛苦和不适的状态,通常表现为焦虑、抑郁或其他心理健康症状,损害日常功能,妨碍注意力集中、人际关系和工作或学习表现。我们的目的是研究与心理困扰相关的负效用。方法:我们利用从澳大利亚家庭、收入和劳动力动态(HILDA)调查中获得的纵向数据。我们使用短格式六维效用指数(SF-6D)测量健康状态效用值(hsuv),使用凯斯勒心理困扰量表(K10)测量心理困扰。我们采用纵向固定效应回归模型来检验心理困扰对hsuv的影响。结果:固定效应面板回归模型的结果表明,心理困扰对hsuv有负向影响。我们发现,中度心理困扰(β = -0.057, 95% CI = -0.059, -0.055)和重度心理困扰(β = -0.123, 95% CI = -0.126, -0.121)导致hsuv的显著减少。这些发现适用于不同的子样本,如年龄、性别和种族。结论:通过量化心理困扰导致的hsuv减少,我们的研究为未来医疗干预的经济评估提供了有价值的数据。未来经济评估产生的证据将有助于决策者就治疗心理困扰的最有效干预措施做出明智的决定。
The Estimation of Health State Utility Values for Psychological Distress in Australia: Implications for Future Economic Evaluations.
Objectives: Psychological distress is a state of emotional suffering and discomfort that often manifests as anxiety, depression, or other mental health symptoms, impairing daily functioning and hindering concentration, relationships, and work or school performance. We aimed to examine the disutility associated with psychological distress.
Methods: We used longitudinal data obtained from the Household, Income, and Labour Dynamics in Australia Survey. We measured health state utility values (HSUVs) using the Short-Form 6-Dimension (SF-6D) Utility Index and psychological distress using the Kessler Psychological Distress Scale. We used longitudinal fixed-effects regression model to examine the effects of psychological distress on HSUVs.
Results: The results from fixed-effects panel regression models indicate a negative effect of psychological distress on HSUVs. We found that moderate psychological distress (β = -0.057, 95% CI -0.059 to -0.055) and high psychological distress (β = -0.123, 95% CI -0.126 to -0.121) led to a significant reduction in HSUVs. These findings hold across different subsamples, such as age, gender, and race.
Conclusions: By quantifying the reduction in HSUVs due to psychological distress, our study provides valuable data for future economic evaluations of healthcare interventions. The evidence generated from future economic evaluations will assist policymakers in making informed decisions about the cost-effective interventions for treating psychological distress.
期刊介绍:
Value in Health contains original research articles for pharmacoeconomics, health economics, and outcomes research (clinical, economic, and patient-reported outcomes/preference-based research), as well as conceptual and health policy articles that provide valuable information for health care decision-makers as well as the research community. As the official journal of ISPOR, Value in Health provides a forum for researchers, as well as health care decision-makers to translate outcomes research into health care decisions.