Milind Vasudev, Amir A Hakimi, Shannen Guarina, Ashley R Lonergan, Sina J Torabi, Ellen Hong, Allison C Hu, Elaine C Martin, Naveen D Bhandarkar, Edward C Kuan, Brian J-F Wong
{"title":"内皮瓣鼻甲成形术和下鼻甲粘膜下切除术治疗鼻塞的效果。","authors":"Milind Vasudev, Amir A Hakimi, Shannen Guarina, Ashley R Lonergan, Sina J Torabi, Ellen Hong, Allison C Hu, Elaine C Martin, Naveen D Bhandarkar, Edward C Kuan, Brian J-F Wong","doi":"10.1002/lary.31966","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To compare longitudinal improvement in nasal obstruction quality-of-life outcomes between medial flap turbinoplasty (MFT) and inferior turbinate submucous resection (SMR) concurrently performed with functional septorhinoplasty.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective review of a prospectively collected cohort of patients undergoing functional septorhinoplasty between 2015 and 2022 at a tertiary academic center. Outcomes were assessed using the Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation (NOSE) questionnaire preoperatively and over 12 months postoperatively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>373 patients were analyzed with longitudinal NOSE questionnaires. Of these, 298 underwent SMR and 75 underwent MFT. The proportion of concurrent intraoperative techniques including rim graft, spreader graft, auto-spreader graft, intradomal sutures, interdomal sutures, and alar spanning sutures were not significantly different between the two cohorts. Patients in all surgical groups had a statistically and clinically significant improvement in NOSE scores between their preoperative and postoperative follow-up visits (p < 0.001). MFT patients had higher NOSE scores 1 month postoperatively (40.0 ± 30.5 vs. 31.0 ± 27.97; p = 0.017), but lower scores after 10 months (15.2 ± 13.3 vs. 25.4 ± 23.5; p = 0.036). Similarly, patients in the MFT cohort in primary rhinoplasty procedures reported higher scores initially but lower after 10 months (p = 0.024). Men in the MFT cohort reported significantly better NOSE outcomes than the SMR cohort as early as 4 months post-surgery and sustained this improvement longitudinally throughout the follow-up period (10.6 ± 12.3 vs. 22.6 ± 21.4; p = 0.012).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>MFT and SMR offer beneficial long-term nasal breathing outcomes among patients undergoing functional rhinoplasty, though further study in appropriate patient selection is indicated.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>3 Laryngoscope, 2024.</p>","PeriodicalId":49921,"journal":{"name":"Laryngoscope","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Nasal Obstruction Outcomes in Medial Flap Turbinoplasty and Inferior Turbinate Submucous Resection.\",\"authors\":\"Milind Vasudev, Amir A Hakimi, Shannen Guarina, Ashley R Lonergan, Sina J Torabi, Ellen Hong, Allison C Hu, Elaine C Martin, Naveen D Bhandarkar, Edward C Kuan, Brian J-F Wong\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/lary.31966\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To compare longitudinal improvement in nasal obstruction quality-of-life outcomes between medial flap turbinoplasty (MFT) and inferior turbinate submucous resection (SMR) concurrently performed with functional septorhinoplasty.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective review of a prospectively collected cohort of patients undergoing functional septorhinoplasty between 2015 and 2022 at a tertiary academic center. Outcomes were assessed using the Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation (NOSE) questionnaire preoperatively and over 12 months postoperatively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>373 patients were analyzed with longitudinal NOSE questionnaires. Of these, 298 underwent SMR and 75 underwent MFT. The proportion of concurrent intraoperative techniques including rim graft, spreader graft, auto-spreader graft, intradomal sutures, interdomal sutures, and alar spanning sutures were not significantly different between the two cohorts. Patients in all surgical groups had a statistically and clinically significant improvement in NOSE scores between their preoperative and postoperative follow-up visits (p < 0.001). MFT patients had higher NOSE scores 1 month postoperatively (40.0 ± 30.5 vs. 31.0 ± 27.97; p = 0.017), but lower scores after 10 months (15.2 ± 13.3 vs. 25.4 ± 23.5; p = 0.036). Similarly, patients in the MFT cohort in primary rhinoplasty procedures reported higher scores initially but lower after 10 months (p = 0.024). Men in the MFT cohort reported significantly better NOSE outcomes than the SMR cohort as early as 4 months post-surgery and sustained this improvement longitudinally throughout the follow-up period (10.6 ± 12.3 vs. 22.6 ± 21.4; p = 0.012).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>MFT and SMR offer beneficial long-term nasal breathing outcomes among patients undergoing functional rhinoplasty, though further study in appropriate patient selection is indicated.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>3 Laryngoscope, 2024.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49921,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Laryngoscope\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Laryngoscope\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.31966\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Laryngoscope","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.31966","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Nasal Obstruction Outcomes in Medial Flap Turbinoplasty and Inferior Turbinate Submucous Resection.
Objectives: To compare longitudinal improvement in nasal obstruction quality-of-life outcomes between medial flap turbinoplasty (MFT) and inferior turbinate submucous resection (SMR) concurrently performed with functional septorhinoplasty.
Methods: Retrospective review of a prospectively collected cohort of patients undergoing functional septorhinoplasty between 2015 and 2022 at a tertiary academic center. Outcomes were assessed using the Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation (NOSE) questionnaire preoperatively and over 12 months postoperatively.
Results: 373 patients were analyzed with longitudinal NOSE questionnaires. Of these, 298 underwent SMR and 75 underwent MFT. The proportion of concurrent intraoperative techniques including rim graft, spreader graft, auto-spreader graft, intradomal sutures, interdomal sutures, and alar spanning sutures were not significantly different between the two cohorts. Patients in all surgical groups had a statistically and clinically significant improvement in NOSE scores between their preoperative and postoperative follow-up visits (p < 0.001). MFT patients had higher NOSE scores 1 month postoperatively (40.0 ± 30.5 vs. 31.0 ± 27.97; p = 0.017), but lower scores after 10 months (15.2 ± 13.3 vs. 25.4 ± 23.5; p = 0.036). Similarly, patients in the MFT cohort in primary rhinoplasty procedures reported higher scores initially but lower after 10 months (p = 0.024). Men in the MFT cohort reported significantly better NOSE outcomes than the SMR cohort as early as 4 months post-surgery and sustained this improvement longitudinally throughout the follow-up period (10.6 ± 12.3 vs. 22.6 ± 21.4; p = 0.012).
Conclusion: MFT and SMR offer beneficial long-term nasal breathing outcomes among patients undergoing functional rhinoplasty, though further study in appropriate patient selection is indicated.
期刊介绍:
The Laryngoscope has been the leading source of information on advances in the diagnosis and treatment of head and neck disorders since 1890. The Laryngoscope is the first choice among otolaryngologists for publication of their important findings and techniques. Each monthly issue of The Laryngoscope features peer-reviewed medical, clinical, and research contributions in general otolaryngology, allergy/rhinology, otology/neurotology, laryngology/bronchoesophagology, head and neck surgery, sleep medicine, pediatric otolaryngology, facial plastics and reconstructive surgery, oncology, and communicative disorders. Contributions include papers and posters presented at the Annual and Section Meetings of the Triological Society, as well as independent papers, "How I Do It", "Triological Best Practice" articles, and contemporary reviews. Theses authored by the Triological Society’s new Fellows as well as papers presented at meetings of the American Laryngological Association are published in The Laryngoscope.
• Broncho-esophagology
• Communicative disorders
• Head and neck surgery
• Plastic and reconstructive facial surgery
• Oncology
• Speech and hearing defects