阴部神经注射在阴道手术中的影响:二次分析。

IF 0.8 Q4 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Urogynecology (Hagerstown, Md.) Pub Date : 2024-10-09 DOI:10.1097/SPV.0000000000001565
Margot Le Neveu, Sarah Sears, Stephen Rhodes, Emily Slopnick, Andrey Petrikovets, Jeffrey Mangel, David Sheyn
{"title":"阴部神经注射在阴道手术中的影响:二次分析。","authors":"Margot Le Neveu, Sarah Sears, Stephen Rhodes, Emily Slopnick, Andrey Petrikovets, Jeffrey Mangel, David Sheyn","doi":"10.1097/SPV.0000000000001565","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Evidence regarding the effect of pudendal nerve blockade during vaginal surgery is conflicting. Previous studies compared pudendal nerve blockade to either normal saline placebo injection or no injection, demonstrating small or no difference in pain outcomes. Studies investigating nerve blocks at the time of vaginal surgery have not evaluated the effect of infiltration of the space around the pudendal nerve.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of the study was to determine whether intraoperative pudendal nerve injection (bupivacaine or normal saline) will result in improved pain scores and satisfaction compared with patients who receive no pudendal injection.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>We performed a secondary analysis of 2 randomized controlled trials investigating postoperative pain after vaginal reconstructive surgery, comparing the outcomes of the following 3 groups: control (no pudendal injection), intervention (bilateral pudendal nerve blockade), and placebo (bilateral normal saline pudendal injections). The primary outcome was postoperative pain scores. Secondary outcomes were opioid use, patient satisfaction, and postoperative complications. Linear mixed effects models were applied to outcomes, and treatment effects with 95% confidence intervals were estimated at each time point from the model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One hundred four patients who underwent vaginal surgery were included: 36 pudendal nerve block, 35 normal saline pudendal injection, and 33 no injection. The groups were well-matched. Linear mixed effects models demonstrated no significant differences between treatment groups for postoperative pain severity scores, opioid use, and patient-reported satisfaction at each time point.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Normal saline injection and no injection seem to have no clinically meaningful difference in effect, and either could reasonably serve as control for pudendal blockade during vaginal surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":75288,"journal":{"name":"Urogynecology (Hagerstown, Md.)","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Impact of Pudendal Nerve Injection in Vaginal Surgery: A Secondary Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Margot Le Neveu, Sarah Sears, Stephen Rhodes, Emily Slopnick, Andrey Petrikovets, Jeffrey Mangel, David Sheyn\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/SPV.0000000000001565\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Evidence regarding the effect of pudendal nerve blockade during vaginal surgery is conflicting. Previous studies compared pudendal nerve blockade to either normal saline placebo injection or no injection, demonstrating small or no difference in pain outcomes. Studies investigating nerve blocks at the time of vaginal surgery have not evaluated the effect of infiltration of the space around the pudendal nerve.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of the study was to determine whether intraoperative pudendal nerve injection (bupivacaine or normal saline) will result in improved pain scores and satisfaction compared with patients who receive no pudendal injection.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>We performed a secondary analysis of 2 randomized controlled trials investigating postoperative pain after vaginal reconstructive surgery, comparing the outcomes of the following 3 groups: control (no pudendal injection), intervention (bilateral pudendal nerve blockade), and placebo (bilateral normal saline pudendal injections). The primary outcome was postoperative pain scores. Secondary outcomes were opioid use, patient satisfaction, and postoperative complications. Linear mixed effects models were applied to outcomes, and treatment effects with 95% confidence intervals were estimated at each time point from the model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One hundred four patients who underwent vaginal surgery were included: 36 pudendal nerve block, 35 normal saline pudendal injection, and 33 no injection. The groups were well-matched. Linear mixed effects models demonstrated no significant differences between treatment groups for postoperative pain severity scores, opioid use, and patient-reported satisfaction at each time point.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Normal saline injection and no injection seem to have no clinically meaningful difference in effect, and either could reasonably serve as control for pudendal blockade during vaginal surgery.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":75288,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Urogynecology (Hagerstown, Md.)\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Urogynecology (Hagerstown, Md.)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/SPV.0000000000001565\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urogynecology (Hagerstown, Md.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SPV.0000000000001565","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

重要性:关于阴部神经阻滞在阴道手术中的作用的证据是相互矛盾的。先前的研究比较了阴部神经阻断与生理盐水安慰剂注射或不注射,表明疼痛结果的差异很小或没有差异。关于阴道手术时神经阻滞的研究尚未评估阴部神经周围空间浸润的影响。目的:本研究的目的是确定术中阴部神经注射(布比卡因或生理盐水)与未接受阴部注射的患者相比,是否会改善疼痛评分和满意度。研究设计:我们对2项调查阴道重建术后疼痛的随机对照试验进行了二次分析,比较了以下3组的结果:对照组(无阴部注射)、干预组(双侧阴部神经阻断)和安慰剂组(双侧阴部注射生理盐水)。主要结局为术后疼痛评分。次要结局是阿片类药物使用、患者满意度和术后并发症。结果采用线性混合效应模型,并在模型的每个时间点估计具有95%置信区间的治疗效果。结果:104例阴道手术患者:阴部神经阻滞36例,生理盐水阴部注射35例,不注射33例。这两组匹配得很好。线性混合效应模型显示,各治疗组在术后疼痛严重程度评分、阿片类药物使用和患者在每个时间点报告的满意度方面无显著差异。结论:注射生理盐水与不注射生理盐水效果无明显差异,均可作为阴道手术中阴部阻滞的对照。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Impact of Pudendal Nerve Injection in Vaginal Surgery: A Secondary Analysis.

Importance: Evidence regarding the effect of pudendal nerve blockade during vaginal surgery is conflicting. Previous studies compared pudendal nerve blockade to either normal saline placebo injection or no injection, demonstrating small or no difference in pain outcomes. Studies investigating nerve blocks at the time of vaginal surgery have not evaluated the effect of infiltration of the space around the pudendal nerve.

Objective: The aim of the study was to determine whether intraoperative pudendal nerve injection (bupivacaine or normal saline) will result in improved pain scores and satisfaction compared with patients who receive no pudendal injection.

Study design: We performed a secondary analysis of 2 randomized controlled trials investigating postoperative pain after vaginal reconstructive surgery, comparing the outcomes of the following 3 groups: control (no pudendal injection), intervention (bilateral pudendal nerve blockade), and placebo (bilateral normal saline pudendal injections). The primary outcome was postoperative pain scores. Secondary outcomes were opioid use, patient satisfaction, and postoperative complications. Linear mixed effects models were applied to outcomes, and treatment effects with 95% confidence intervals were estimated at each time point from the model.

Results: One hundred four patients who underwent vaginal surgery were included: 36 pudendal nerve block, 35 normal saline pudendal injection, and 33 no injection. The groups were well-matched. Linear mixed effects models demonstrated no significant differences between treatment groups for postoperative pain severity scores, opioid use, and patient-reported satisfaction at each time point.

Conclusions: Normal saline injection and no injection seem to have no clinically meaningful difference in effect, and either could reasonably serve as control for pudendal blockade during vaginal surgery.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Barbed Suture Strength in Sacrocolpopexy: Does Pattern Matter? Adverse Events Associated With Female External Urinary Collection Devices. Tamsulosin to Prevent Urinary Retention After Vaginal Urogynecologic Surgery. The Effect of Concomitant Hysterectomy Route on Robotic Sacrocolpopexy Outcomes. Urogynecology Research Is Underrepresented in Top Obstetrics and Gynecology Journals.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1