实施ISO 7101第8.10.5条专业会诊中的健康素养过程的结果。

IF 1.1 Q4 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Journal of Healthcare Quality Research Pub Date : 2024-12-30 DOI:10.1016/j.jhqr.2024.11.003
A McCaskill, A Gasch-Gallen, J Montero-Marco
{"title":"实施ISO 7101第8.10.5条专业会诊中的健康素养过程的结果。","authors":"A McCaskill, A Gasch-Gallen, J Montero-Marco","doi":"10.1016/j.jhqr.2024.11.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This quasi-experimental, non-randomized study described the process of implementing ISO 7101 subclause 8.10.5 Health literacy in specialty consultations, then determined the effects of implementation on patient general health literacy scores and perceptions of quality of care.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Implementation steps were outlined, nurses were trained and used a standardized health literacy checklist with patients. The HLS<sub>19</sub>-Q12 was used to calculate patients' general health literacy scores pre- and post-implementation of subclause 8.10.5. Paired samples t-test and Wilcoxon signed-rank test determined relationships between implementation, health literacy score, and quality of care perceived.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Mean general health literacy scores increased post-implementation from 66.35 to 76.29, as did the mean score of perception of quality of care received (M=3.87 to M=3.99). Wilcoxon test for both variables was significant (P<.001), and effect size was large (d≥0.8).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Implementation of ISO 7101, subclause 8.10.5 Health literacy had a positive, statistically significant impact on patient general health literacy scores and perceptions of quality of care. This is valuable information for healthcare management decision makers as they implement new standards and seek to improve patient health outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":37347,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Healthcare Quality Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Results of the process of implementation of ISO 7101 subclause 8.10.5 Health literacy in specialty consultations.\",\"authors\":\"A McCaskill, A Gasch-Gallen, J Montero-Marco\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jhqr.2024.11.003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This quasi-experimental, non-randomized study described the process of implementing ISO 7101 subclause 8.10.5 Health literacy in specialty consultations, then determined the effects of implementation on patient general health literacy scores and perceptions of quality of care.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Implementation steps were outlined, nurses were trained and used a standardized health literacy checklist with patients. The HLS<sub>19</sub>-Q12 was used to calculate patients' general health literacy scores pre- and post-implementation of subclause 8.10.5. Paired samples t-test and Wilcoxon signed-rank test determined relationships between implementation, health literacy score, and quality of care perceived.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Mean general health literacy scores increased post-implementation from 66.35 to 76.29, as did the mean score of perception of quality of care received (M=3.87 to M=3.99). Wilcoxon test for both variables was significant (P<.001), and effect size was large (d≥0.8).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Implementation of ISO 7101, subclause 8.10.5 Health literacy had a positive, statistically significant impact on patient general health literacy scores and perceptions of quality of care. This is valuable information for healthcare management decision makers as they implement new standards and seek to improve patient health outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":37347,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Healthcare Quality Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Healthcare Quality Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhqr.2024.11.003\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Healthcare Quality Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhqr.2024.11.003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:这项准实验、非随机研究描述了在专科会诊中实施ISO 7101第8.10.5条健康素养的过程,然后确定实施对患者总体健康素养评分和护理质量感知的影响。方法:概述实施步骤,对护士进行培训,并与患者一起使用标准化的健康素养检查表。使用HLS19-Q12计算实施第8.10.5款前后患者的一般健康素养评分。配对样本t检验和Wilcoxon符号秩检验确定了实施、健康素养评分和感知到的护理质量之间的关系。结果:实施后平均一般健康素养得分从66.35提高到76.29,所接受的护理质量感知平均得分也有所提高(M=3.87至M=3.99)。结论:实施ISO 7101第8.10.5条健康素养对患者总体健康素养得分和对护理质量的认知有积极的、统计学上显著的影响。这对于医疗保健管理决策者在实施新标准并寻求改善患者健康结果时是有价值的信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Results of the process of implementation of ISO 7101 subclause 8.10.5 Health literacy in specialty consultations.

Objective: This quasi-experimental, non-randomized study described the process of implementing ISO 7101 subclause 8.10.5 Health literacy in specialty consultations, then determined the effects of implementation on patient general health literacy scores and perceptions of quality of care.

Method: Implementation steps were outlined, nurses were trained and used a standardized health literacy checklist with patients. The HLS19-Q12 was used to calculate patients' general health literacy scores pre- and post-implementation of subclause 8.10.5. Paired samples t-test and Wilcoxon signed-rank test determined relationships between implementation, health literacy score, and quality of care perceived.

Results: Mean general health literacy scores increased post-implementation from 66.35 to 76.29, as did the mean score of perception of quality of care received (M=3.87 to M=3.99). Wilcoxon test for both variables was significant (P<.001), and effect size was large (d≥0.8).

Conclusions: Implementation of ISO 7101, subclause 8.10.5 Health literacy had a positive, statistically significant impact on patient general health literacy scores and perceptions of quality of care. This is valuable information for healthcare management decision makers as they implement new standards and seek to improve patient health outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
8.30%
发文量
83
审稿时长
57 days
期刊介绍: Revista de Calidad Asistencial (Quality Healthcare) (RCA) is the official Journal of the Spanish Society of Quality Healthcare (Sociedad Española de Calidad Asistencial) (SECA) and is a tool for the dissemination of knowledge and reflection for the quality management of health services in Primary Care, as well as in Hospitals. It publishes articles associated with any aspect of research in the field of public health and health administration, including health education, epidemiology, medical statistics, health information, health economics, quality management, and health policies. The Journal publishes 6 issues, exclusively in electronic format. The Journal publishes, in Spanish, Original works, Special and Review Articles, as well as other sections. Articles are subjected to a rigorous, double blind, review process (peer review)
期刊最新文献
The person-centered medical care in pediatrics: A scoping review. [Exploring the voice of patients: Mapping their experience following care in an integrated health area]. [Humanization and professional quality of life in oncohematology and radiotherapy care: A descriptive study in a university hospital]. [Development of a checklist for the handoff of surgical pediatric patients in the PICU]. Optimizing length of hospital stay among inpatients with spinal cord injury: An observational study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1