Brooke A Levandowski, Kk Naimool, Susan B Rietberg-Miller, Petra L Aldrich
{"title":"是的,这很重要:从多个角度评估纽约州卫生部资助的提供者与服务相关的文化能力。","authors":"Brooke A Levandowski, Kk Naimool, Susan B Rietberg-Miller, Petra L Aldrich","doi":"10.1177/15248399241300575","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>While cultural competency has been recognized as an important feature in health care delivery, evaluating intervention effectiveness is often overlooked.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This project used an explanatory sequential mixed methods study design within a community-based participatory research structure. A 29-item Organization cultural competency Checklist was created and distributed to a purposive sample of staff at 55 New York State (NYS) Department of Health AIDS Institute-funded health and human service providers. Organizations recruited clients to complete a 27-item Client Checklist. Basic univariate analyses were conducted on quantitative items (Stata v.18). For questions asked to both groups, we conducted chi-square tests to determine statistically significant differences (p-value < 0.10). Qualitative stories about the impact of culturally competent care provision were analyzed using the Most Significant Change process by a Community Advisory Board (CAB) of LGBTQ+ NYS residents.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The Organization Checklist had 92 responses from 37 organizations. The Client Checklist yielded 32 responses from five organizations. While high agreement between client and staff was reached on the majority of items, opportunities for improvement included updated intake forms and strengthening relationships with other local LGBTQ+ organizations. Using 62 raw stories, the CAB identified two main themes of affirming and un-affirming care, further organized into personal, perception, provider, and systemic categories.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Clients reported higher engagement in health-seeking behavior with culturally competent providers and care-avoidance with culturally incompetent care. Clients decided the safety of expending emotional labor to educate providers. Improving organizational cultural competency is an ongoing process requiring consistent and prompt attention.</p>","PeriodicalId":47956,"journal":{"name":"Health Promotion Practice","volume":" ","pages":"15248399241300575"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Yes, It Matters: Assessing Service-Related Cultural Competency of New York State Department of Health-Funded Providers From Multiple Angles.\",\"authors\":\"Brooke A Levandowski, Kk Naimool, Susan B Rietberg-Miller, Petra L Aldrich\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/15248399241300575\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>While cultural competency has been recognized as an important feature in health care delivery, evaluating intervention effectiveness is often overlooked.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This project used an explanatory sequential mixed methods study design within a community-based participatory research structure. A 29-item Organization cultural competency Checklist was created and distributed to a purposive sample of staff at 55 New York State (NYS) Department of Health AIDS Institute-funded health and human service providers. Organizations recruited clients to complete a 27-item Client Checklist. Basic univariate analyses were conducted on quantitative items (Stata v.18). For questions asked to both groups, we conducted chi-square tests to determine statistically significant differences (p-value < 0.10). Qualitative stories about the impact of culturally competent care provision were analyzed using the Most Significant Change process by a Community Advisory Board (CAB) of LGBTQ+ NYS residents.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The Organization Checklist had 92 responses from 37 organizations. The Client Checklist yielded 32 responses from five organizations. While high agreement between client and staff was reached on the majority of items, opportunities for improvement included updated intake forms and strengthening relationships with other local LGBTQ+ organizations. Using 62 raw stories, the CAB identified two main themes of affirming and un-affirming care, further organized into personal, perception, provider, and systemic categories.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Clients reported higher engagement in health-seeking behavior with culturally competent providers and care-avoidance with culturally incompetent care. Clients decided the safety of expending emotional labor to educate providers. Improving organizational cultural competency is an ongoing process requiring consistent and prompt attention.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47956,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health Promotion Practice\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"15248399241300575\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health Promotion Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/15248399241300575\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Promotion Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15248399241300575","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
Yes, It Matters: Assessing Service-Related Cultural Competency of New York State Department of Health-Funded Providers From Multiple Angles.
Background: While cultural competency has been recognized as an important feature in health care delivery, evaluating intervention effectiveness is often overlooked.
Methods: This project used an explanatory sequential mixed methods study design within a community-based participatory research structure. A 29-item Organization cultural competency Checklist was created and distributed to a purposive sample of staff at 55 New York State (NYS) Department of Health AIDS Institute-funded health and human service providers. Organizations recruited clients to complete a 27-item Client Checklist. Basic univariate analyses were conducted on quantitative items (Stata v.18). For questions asked to both groups, we conducted chi-square tests to determine statistically significant differences (p-value < 0.10). Qualitative stories about the impact of culturally competent care provision were analyzed using the Most Significant Change process by a Community Advisory Board (CAB) of LGBTQ+ NYS residents.
Results: The Organization Checklist had 92 responses from 37 organizations. The Client Checklist yielded 32 responses from five organizations. While high agreement between client and staff was reached on the majority of items, opportunities for improvement included updated intake forms and strengthening relationships with other local LGBTQ+ organizations. Using 62 raw stories, the CAB identified two main themes of affirming and un-affirming care, further organized into personal, perception, provider, and systemic categories.
Discussion: Clients reported higher engagement in health-seeking behavior with culturally competent providers and care-avoidance with culturally incompetent care. Clients decided the safety of expending emotional labor to educate providers. Improving organizational cultural competency is an ongoing process requiring consistent and prompt attention.
期刊介绍:
Health Promotion Practice (HPP) publishes authoritative articles devoted to the practical application of health promotion and education. It publishes information of strategic importance to a broad base of professionals engaged in the practice of developing, implementing, and evaluating health promotion and disease prevention programs. The journal"s editorial board is committed to focusing on the applications of health promotion and public health education interventions, programs and best practice strategies in various settings, including but not limited to, community, health care, worksite, educational, and international settings. Additionally, the journal focuses on the development and application of public policy conducive to the promotion of health and prevention of disease.