急诊科的频繁使用是其他医疗服务的补充或替代吗?来自南卡罗来纳州医疗补助计划参保者的证据。

IF 3.1 2区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Health Services Research Pub Date : 2025-01-02 DOI:10.1111/1475-6773.14430
Theodoros V Giannouchos, Ronald G Pirrallo, Brad Wright
{"title":"急诊科的频繁使用是其他医疗服务的补充或替代吗?来自南卡罗来纳州医疗补助计划参保者的证据。","authors":"Theodoros V Giannouchos, Ronald G Pirrallo, Brad Wright","doi":"10.1111/1475-6773.14430","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare healthcare services utilization across the healthcare system between frequent and non-frequent emergency department (ED) users among Medicaid enrollees in South Carolina.</p><p><strong>Study setting and design: </strong>We conducted a retrospective, longitudinal study of individuals with at least one ED visit in 2017 in South Carolina and identified their healthcare services visits over 730 days (2 years) after their first ED visit. We classified individuals based on intensity of ED use: superfrequent (≥9 ED visits/year), frequent (4-8 ED visits/year), and non-frequent ED users (≤3 visits/year). We estimated differences between the three groups of ED users and non-ED hospital and office-based visits using multivariable two-part regression models.</p><p><strong>Data sources and analytic sample: </strong>We used statewide Medicaid claims from January 2017 to December 2019 for ED users aged 18-64 years with continuous Medicaid enrollment. We analyzed data on all frequent and superfrequent users and selected a 4:1 random sample among all non-frequent users (~half of all non-frequent users).</p><p><strong>Principal findings: </strong>The study included 52,845 ED users, of whom 42,764 were non-frequent, 7677 frequent, and 2404 superfrequent users. Within 2 years from the date of their first ED visit, superfrequent ED users averaged 38.3 ED visits, frequent ED users 10.9 ED visits, and non-frequent ED users 2.6 ED visits (p < 0.001). Compared with non-frequent users, frequent and superfrequent ED users had more comorbidities and chronic conditions on average (1.6 vs. 3.5 vs. 6.4, p < 0.001). Both frequent and superfrequent users had more hospital visits beyond the ED overall (marginal effects: 0.23, 95% CI 0.18-0.27; 0.40, 95% CI 0.29-0.50), and more outpatient office visits overall (marginal effects: 4.39, 95% CI 2.52-6.27; 9.23, 95% CI 5.66-12.81), including primary care and most specialists' visits, compared with non-frequent users.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Frequent ED users utilized non-ED hospital and outpatient office-based healthcare services significantly more than non-frequent ED users. These findings can guide tailored interventions using data across the healthcare system to efficiently coordinate care, contain costs, and improve health outcomes for these individuals.</p>","PeriodicalId":55065,"journal":{"name":"Health Services Research","volume":" ","pages":"e14430"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Is frequent emergency department use a complement or substitute for other healthcare services? Evidence from South Carolina Medicaid enrollees.\",\"authors\":\"Theodoros V Giannouchos, Ronald G Pirrallo, Brad Wright\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/1475-6773.14430\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare healthcare services utilization across the healthcare system between frequent and non-frequent emergency department (ED) users among Medicaid enrollees in South Carolina.</p><p><strong>Study setting and design: </strong>We conducted a retrospective, longitudinal study of individuals with at least one ED visit in 2017 in South Carolina and identified their healthcare services visits over 730 days (2 years) after their first ED visit. We classified individuals based on intensity of ED use: superfrequent (≥9 ED visits/year), frequent (4-8 ED visits/year), and non-frequent ED users (≤3 visits/year). We estimated differences between the three groups of ED users and non-ED hospital and office-based visits using multivariable two-part regression models.</p><p><strong>Data sources and analytic sample: </strong>We used statewide Medicaid claims from January 2017 to December 2019 for ED users aged 18-64 years with continuous Medicaid enrollment. We analyzed data on all frequent and superfrequent users and selected a 4:1 random sample among all non-frequent users (~half of all non-frequent users).</p><p><strong>Principal findings: </strong>The study included 52,845 ED users, of whom 42,764 were non-frequent, 7677 frequent, and 2404 superfrequent users. Within 2 years from the date of their first ED visit, superfrequent ED users averaged 38.3 ED visits, frequent ED users 10.9 ED visits, and non-frequent ED users 2.6 ED visits (p < 0.001). Compared with non-frequent users, frequent and superfrequent ED users had more comorbidities and chronic conditions on average (1.6 vs. 3.5 vs. 6.4, p < 0.001). Both frequent and superfrequent users had more hospital visits beyond the ED overall (marginal effects: 0.23, 95% CI 0.18-0.27; 0.40, 95% CI 0.29-0.50), and more outpatient office visits overall (marginal effects: 4.39, 95% CI 2.52-6.27; 9.23, 95% CI 5.66-12.81), including primary care and most specialists' visits, compared with non-frequent users.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Frequent ED users utilized non-ED hospital and outpatient office-based healthcare services significantly more than non-frequent ED users. These findings can guide tailored interventions using data across the healthcare system to efficiently coordinate care, contain costs, and improve health outcomes for these individuals.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55065,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health Services Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"e14430\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health Services Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6773.14430\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Services Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6773.14430","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:比较医疗保健系统中频繁和非频繁急诊科(ED)用户在南卡罗来纳医疗补助登记者中的医疗服务利用率。研究设置和设计:我们对2017年在南卡罗来纳州至少进行过一次急诊科就诊的个人进行了回顾性、纵向研究,并确定了他们在第一次急诊科就诊后超过730天(2年)的医疗服务就诊情况。我们根据ED使用的强度对个体进行了分类:超频(≥9次/年)、频繁(4-8次/年)和非频繁(≤3次/年)。我们使用多变量两部分回归模型估计了三组急诊科使用者与非急诊科医院和办公室就诊之间的差异。数据来源和分析样本:我们使用了2017年1月至2019年12月全州范围内18-64岁连续参加医疗补助计划的ED用户的医疗补助申请。我们分析了所有频繁用户和超频繁用户的数据,并在所有非频繁用户(约占所有非频繁用户的一半)中选择了4:1的随机样本。主要发现:该研究包括52,845名ED使用者,其中42,764名是不频繁使用者,7677名是频繁使用者,2404名是超频繁使用者。在第一次就诊后的2年内,急诊科频繁使用者平均38.3次就诊,急诊科频繁使用者平均10.9次就诊,非急诊科频繁使用者平均2.6次就诊(p结论:急诊科频繁使用者使用非急诊科医院和门诊医疗服务的频率明显高于非急诊科频繁使用者。这些发现可以指导使用整个医疗保健系统的数据进行量身定制的干预措施,以有效地协调护理,控制成本,并改善这些个体的健康结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Is frequent emergency department use a complement or substitute for other healthcare services? Evidence from South Carolina Medicaid enrollees.

Objective: To compare healthcare services utilization across the healthcare system between frequent and non-frequent emergency department (ED) users among Medicaid enrollees in South Carolina.

Study setting and design: We conducted a retrospective, longitudinal study of individuals with at least one ED visit in 2017 in South Carolina and identified their healthcare services visits over 730 days (2 years) after their first ED visit. We classified individuals based on intensity of ED use: superfrequent (≥9 ED visits/year), frequent (4-8 ED visits/year), and non-frequent ED users (≤3 visits/year). We estimated differences between the three groups of ED users and non-ED hospital and office-based visits using multivariable two-part regression models.

Data sources and analytic sample: We used statewide Medicaid claims from January 2017 to December 2019 for ED users aged 18-64 years with continuous Medicaid enrollment. We analyzed data on all frequent and superfrequent users and selected a 4:1 random sample among all non-frequent users (~half of all non-frequent users).

Principal findings: The study included 52,845 ED users, of whom 42,764 were non-frequent, 7677 frequent, and 2404 superfrequent users. Within 2 years from the date of their first ED visit, superfrequent ED users averaged 38.3 ED visits, frequent ED users 10.9 ED visits, and non-frequent ED users 2.6 ED visits (p < 0.001). Compared with non-frequent users, frequent and superfrequent ED users had more comorbidities and chronic conditions on average (1.6 vs. 3.5 vs. 6.4, p < 0.001). Both frequent and superfrequent users had more hospital visits beyond the ED overall (marginal effects: 0.23, 95% CI 0.18-0.27; 0.40, 95% CI 0.29-0.50), and more outpatient office visits overall (marginal effects: 4.39, 95% CI 2.52-6.27; 9.23, 95% CI 5.66-12.81), including primary care and most specialists' visits, compared with non-frequent users.

Conclusions: Frequent ED users utilized non-ED hospital and outpatient office-based healthcare services significantly more than non-frequent ED users. These findings can guide tailored interventions using data across the healthcare system to efficiently coordinate care, contain costs, and improve health outcomes for these individuals.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Health Services Research
Health Services Research 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
5.90%
发文量
193
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Health Services Research (HSR) is a peer-reviewed scholarly journal that provides researchers and public and private policymakers with the latest research findings, methods, and concepts related to the financing, organization, delivery, evaluation, and outcomes of health services. Rated as one of the top journals in the fields of health policy and services and health care administration, HSR publishes outstanding articles reporting the findings of original investigations that expand knowledge and understanding of the wide-ranging field of health care and that will help to improve the health of individuals and communities.
期刊最新文献
Patient-Provider Race Concordance and Primary Care Suicide Risk Screening in the Veterans Health Administration. Recruitment and Retention of Rural Health Professionals in Minnesota. Identifying Barriers to Being Offered and Accepting a Telehealth Visit for Cancer Care: Unpacking the Multi-Levels of Documented Racial Disparities in Telehealth Use. Integrated health systems and medical care quality during the COVID-19 pandemic. Addressing Staffing Shortages in Nursing Homes: Does Relaxing Training and Licensing Requirements Increase Nurse Aide Staffing?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1