关注实物风险:评估银行股对欧洲央行气候压力测试的反应

IF 7.5 1区 经济学 Q1 BUSINESS, FINANCE International Review of Financial Analysis Pub Date : 2025-02-01 DOI:10.1016/j.irfa.2024.103882
Franco Fiordelisi , Ornella Ricci , Gianluca Santilli
{"title":"关注实物风险:评估银行股对欧洲央行气候压力测试的反应","authors":"Franco Fiordelisi ,&nbsp;Ornella Ricci ,&nbsp;Gianluca Santilli","doi":"10.1016/j.irfa.2024.103882","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Using an event study approach, this paper examines the impact of the ECB's 2022 climate stress test on the share prices of European banks. We provide novel evidence that investors reacted negatively to both the announcement of the stress test and the publication of the results, even though there was no direct impact on regulatory capital and no detailed disclosure for individual institutions. Our unique dataset combines granular information on bank branch locations with geospatial data on several physical risks (landslides, floods and extreme temperatures) and shows that banks with branches in areas most exposed to physical risks had lower abnormal returns relative to their peers. We also examine the role of being signatory of the Principles for Responsible Banking, finding different results for the announcement and the results' disclosure dates. These results show that investors are pricing in both banks' physical risk exposure and their commitment to responsible banking, even though the regulatory framework for climate risk management is still evolving. Our findings have important implications for investors in assessing climate-related risks in their portfolios, for banks that should develop strategies to manage and mitigate these risks, not only to meet regulatory requirements, but also to preserve their market value and stakeholders' trust, as well as for policymakers in designing effective climate risk disclosure and management frameworks for the banking sector.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48226,"journal":{"name":"International Review of Financial Analysis","volume":"98 ","pages":"Article 103882"},"PeriodicalIF":7.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Spotlight on physical risk: Assessing the banks' stock reaction to the ECB climate stress test\",\"authors\":\"Franco Fiordelisi ,&nbsp;Ornella Ricci ,&nbsp;Gianluca Santilli\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.irfa.2024.103882\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Using an event study approach, this paper examines the impact of the ECB's 2022 climate stress test on the share prices of European banks. We provide novel evidence that investors reacted negatively to both the announcement of the stress test and the publication of the results, even though there was no direct impact on regulatory capital and no detailed disclosure for individual institutions. Our unique dataset combines granular information on bank branch locations with geospatial data on several physical risks (landslides, floods and extreme temperatures) and shows that banks with branches in areas most exposed to physical risks had lower abnormal returns relative to their peers. We also examine the role of being signatory of the Principles for Responsible Banking, finding different results for the announcement and the results' disclosure dates. These results show that investors are pricing in both banks' physical risk exposure and their commitment to responsible banking, even though the regulatory framework for climate risk management is still evolving. Our findings have important implications for investors in assessing climate-related risks in their portfolios, for banks that should develop strategies to manage and mitigate these risks, not only to meet regulatory requirements, but also to preserve their market value and stakeholders' trust, as well as for policymakers in designing effective climate risk disclosure and management frameworks for the banking sector.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48226,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Review of Financial Analysis\",\"volume\":\"98 \",\"pages\":\"Article 103882\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Review of Financial Analysis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1057521924008147\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS, FINANCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Review of Financial Analysis","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1057521924008147","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文采用事件研究方法,考察了欧洲央行2022年气候压力测试对欧洲银行股价的影响。我们提供了新的证据,证明投资者对压力测试的宣布和结果的公布都做出了负面反应,尽管这对监管资本没有直接影响,也没有对个别机构进行详细披露。我们独特的数据集将银行分行位置的细粒度信息与几种物理风险(山体滑坡、洪水和极端温度)的地理空间数据相结合,表明在物理风险最严重的地区设有分行的银行相对于同行的异常回报较低。我们还研究了作为《负责任银行原则》签署人的作用,发现公告和结果披露日期的不同结果。这些结果表明,尽管气候风险管理的监管框架仍在发展,但投资者正在定价银行的实际风险敞口和他们对负责任银行的承诺。我们的研究结果对投资者评估其投资组合中的气候相关风险、银行制定管理和减轻这些风险的战略(不仅要满足监管要求,还要保持其市场价值和利益相关者的信任)以及政策制定者为银行业设计有效的气候风险披露和管理框架具有重要意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Spotlight on physical risk: Assessing the banks' stock reaction to the ECB climate stress test
Using an event study approach, this paper examines the impact of the ECB's 2022 climate stress test on the share prices of European banks. We provide novel evidence that investors reacted negatively to both the announcement of the stress test and the publication of the results, even though there was no direct impact on regulatory capital and no detailed disclosure for individual institutions. Our unique dataset combines granular information on bank branch locations with geospatial data on several physical risks (landslides, floods and extreme temperatures) and shows that banks with branches in areas most exposed to physical risks had lower abnormal returns relative to their peers. We also examine the role of being signatory of the Principles for Responsible Banking, finding different results for the announcement and the results' disclosure dates. These results show that investors are pricing in both banks' physical risk exposure and their commitment to responsible banking, even though the regulatory framework for climate risk management is still evolving. Our findings have important implications for investors in assessing climate-related risks in their portfolios, for banks that should develop strategies to manage and mitigate these risks, not only to meet regulatory requirements, but also to preserve their market value and stakeholders' trust, as well as for policymakers in designing effective climate risk disclosure and management frameworks for the banking sector.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
9.80%
发文量
366
期刊介绍: The International Review of Financial Analysis (IRFA) is an impartial refereed journal designed to serve as a platform for high-quality financial research. It welcomes a diverse range of financial research topics and maintains an unbiased selection process. While not limited to U.S.-centric subjects, IRFA, as its title suggests, is open to valuable research contributions from around the world.
期刊最新文献
The role of digital financial inclusion in promoting common prosperity: Evidence from Inner Mongolia Text-based analysis of corporate nationalism and dividend policies in China Editorial Board AI culture ‘profiling’ and anti-money laundering: Efficacy vs ethics Capital regulation, regulatory avoidance, and bank systemic risk
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1