Jean-Louis Thoumas, Amandine Cavaroc, Damien Sery, François Leulier, Filipe De Vadder
{"title":"在一个青少年营养不良的小鼠模型中,次优再喂养补偿了发育迟缓。","authors":"Jean-Louis Thoumas, Amandine Cavaroc, Damien Sery, François Leulier, Filipe De Vadder","doi":"10.1016/j.tjnut.2025.01.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Early postnatal life is a critical period of rapid growth in mammals, heavily reliant on adequate nutrition. Protein-energy malnutrition (PEM) during this window can lead to stunting and wasting, with lasting health consequences.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study developed a mouse model of juvenile PEM to assess the effects of refeeding with various diets and interventions on growth recovery, including probiotic supplementation and suboptimal refeeding diets. Outcomes included length and weight catch-up, organ weights, and glucose tolerance.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Juvenile male and female C57Bl/6J mice (N = 8 to 11/group) were fed a low-protein diet (LPD, 5% kcal from protein) starting at postnatal day 14 (P14) to which the pups and dams had access. Following weaning, mice were refed an optimal diet (27% kcal from protein) at different times (P28 to P56). Male mice received additional interventions, including supplementation with Lactiplantibacillus plantarum WJL (Lp<sup>WJL</sup>) during refeeding or refeeding with a Western diet (WD), 15.3% kcal from protein, or a modified Western diet (MWD) 7.5% kcal from protein. Statistical analyses used analysis of variance, analysis of covariance, and principal component analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Optimal refeeding restored growth in females (body weight in optimal-fed: 20.5 ± 0.3 g vs. 19.4 ± 0.6 g in P56-refed), but males showed persistent stunting (26.8 ± 0.7 g vs. 21.9 ± 0.9 g; P < 0.05). In males, Lp<sup>WJL</sup> did not enhance growth recovery and exacerbated glucose intolerance in suboptimal refeeding groups. Males refed WD or MWD restored body length but showed impaired glucose metabolism, particularly in mice refed WD, with glycemia 30 min after glucose challenge reaching 20.4 ± 4.0 mM vs. 14.3 ± 3.0 mM in optimal-fed mice (P < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Sex-dependent differences in recovery from PEM were evident, with males showing incomplete growth recovery despite optimal refeeding. Suboptimal diets compensated for stunting but impaired glucose metabolism, and Lp<sup>WJL</sup> did not improve growth outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":16620,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nutrition","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Suboptimal Refeeding Compensates Stunting in a Mouse Model of Juvenile Malnutrition.\",\"authors\":\"Jean-Louis Thoumas, Amandine Cavaroc, Damien Sery, François Leulier, Filipe De Vadder\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.tjnut.2025.01.002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Early postnatal life is a critical period of rapid growth in mammals, heavily reliant on adequate nutrition. Protein-energy malnutrition (PEM) during this window can lead to stunting and wasting, with lasting health consequences.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study developed a mouse model of juvenile PEM to assess the effects of refeeding with various diets and interventions on growth recovery, including probiotic supplementation and suboptimal refeeding diets. Outcomes included length and weight catch-up, organ weights, and glucose tolerance.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Juvenile male and female C57Bl/6J mice (N = 8 to 11/group) were fed a low-protein diet (LPD, 5% kcal from protein) starting at postnatal day 14 (P14) to which the pups and dams had access. Following weaning, mice were refed an optimal diet (27% kcal from protein) at different times (P28 to P56). Male mice received additional interventions, including supplementation with Lactiplantibacillus plantarum WJL (Lp<sup>WJL</sup>) during refeeding or refeeding with a Western diet (WD), 15.3% kcal from protein, or a modified Western diet (MWD) 7.5% kcal from protein. Statistical analyses used analysis of variance, analysis of covariance, and principal component analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Optimal refeeding restored growth in females (body weight in optimal-fed: 20.5 ± 0.3 g vs. 19.4 ± 0.6 g in P56-refed), but males showed persistent stunting (26.8 ± 0.7 g vs. 21.9 ± 0.9 g; P < 0.05). In males, Lp<sup>WJL</sup> did not enhance growth recovery and exacerbated glucose intolerance in suboptimal refeeding groups. Males refed WD or MWD restored body length but showed impaired glucose metabolism, particularly in mice refed WD, with glycemia 30 min after glucose challenge reaching 20.4 ± 4.0 mM vs. 14.3 ± 3.0 mM in optimal-fed mice (P < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Sex-dependent differences in recovery from PEM were evident, with males showing incomplete growth recovery despite optimal refeeding. Suboptimal diets compensated for stunting but impaired glucose metabolism, and Lp<sup>WJL</sup> did not improve growth outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16620,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Nutrition\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Nutrition\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tjnut.2025.01.002\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"NUTRITION & DIETETICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tjnut.2025.01.002","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:出生后早期是哺乳动物快速生长的关键时期,严重依赖于充足的营养。这一时期的蛋白质-能量营养不良(PEM)可导致发育迟缓和消瘦,对健康造成持久影响。目的:本研究建立了幼年PEM小鼠模型,以评估不同饲料和干预措施(包括益生菌补充和次优饲料)对PEM幼鼠生长恢复的影响。结果包括长度和体重追赶,器官重量和葡萄糖耐量。方法:C57Bl/6J幼鼠雄性和雌性(N = 8 ~ 11只/组)在仔鼠和母鼠出生后第14天(P14)开始饲喂低蛋白饲粮(LPD, 5% kcal来源于蛋白质)。断奶后,小鼠在不同时间喂食最佳日粮(27%卡路里来自蛋白质)(P28至P56)。雄性小鼠接受额外的干预,包括在重新喂食期间补充植物乳杆菌WJL (LpWJL),或重新喂食西方饮食(WD, 15.3%卡路里来自蛋白质)或改良西方饮食(MWD, 7.5%卡路里来自蛋白质)。统计分析采用方差分析、方差分析和主成分分析。结果:最佳再喂养恢复了雌性的生长(最佳再喂养组体重20.5±0.3 g vs . p56饲养组体重19.4±0.6 g),但雄性发育迟缓(26.8±0.7 g vs . 21.9±0.9 g;P < 0.05)。在雄性中,LpWJL并没有促进生长恢复,并加重了次优再喂养组的葡萄糖耐受不良。饲喂WD或MWD的雄性小鼠恢复了体长,但葡萄糖代谢受损,尤其是饲喂WD的小鼠,葡萄糖刺激后30分钟血糖达到20.4±4.0 mM,而饲喂WD的小鼠为14.3±3.0 mM (P < 0.05)。结论:从PEM中恢复的性别差异是明显的,雄性即使再喂食也表现出不完全的生长恢复。次优饮食补偿了发育迟缓,但损害了葡萄糖代谢,LpWJL没有改善生长结果。
Suboptimal Refeeding Compensates Stunting in a Mouse Model of Juvenile Malnutrition.
Background: Early postnatal life is a critical period of rapid growth in mammals, heavily reliant on adequate nutrition. Protein-energy malnutrition (PEM) during this window can lead to stunting and wasting, with lasting health consequences.
Objectives: This study developed a mouse model of juvenile PEM to assess the effects of refeeding with various diets and interventions on growth recovery, including probiotic supplementation and suboptimal refeeding diets. Outcomes included length and weight catch-up, organ weights, and glucose tolerance.
Methods: Juvenile male and female C57Bl/6J mice (N = 8 to 11/group) were fed a low-protein diet (LPD, 5% kcal from protein) starting at postnatal day 14 (P14) to which the pups and dams had access. Following weaning, mice were refed an optimal diet (27% kcal from protein) at different times (P28 to P56). Male mice received additional interventions, including supplementation with Lactiplantibacillus plantarum WJL (LpWJL) during refeeding or refeeding with a Western diet (WD), 15.3% kcal from protein, or a modified Western diet (MWD) 7.5% kcal from protein. Statistical analyses used analysis of variance, analysis of covariance, and principal component analysis.
Results: Optimal refeeding restored growth in females (body weight in optimal-fed: 20.5 ± 0.3 g vs. 19.4 ± 0.6 g in P56-refed), but males showed persistent stunting (26.8 ± 0.7 g vs. 21.9 ± 0.9 g; P < 0.05). In males, LpWJL did not enhance growth recovery and exacerbated glucose intolerance in suboptimal refeeding groups. Males refed WD or MWD restored body length but showed impaired glucose metabolism, particularly in mice refed WD, with glycemia 30 min after glucose challenge reaching 20.4 ± 4.0 mM vs. 14.3 ± 3.0 mM in optimal-fed mice (P < 0.05).
Conclusions: Sex-dependent differences in recovery from PEM were evident, with males showing incomplete growth recovery despite optimal refeeding. Suboptimal diets compensated for stunting but impaired glucose metabolism, and LpWJL did not improve growth outcomes.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Nutrition (JN/J Nutr) publishes peer-reviewed original research papers covering all aspects of experimental nutrition in humans and other animal species; special articles such as reviews and biographies of prominent nutrition scientists; and issues, opinions, and commentaries on controversial issues in nutrition. Supplements are frequently published to provide extended discussion of topics of special interest.