脑深部刺激在儿科人群:临床试验前景的范围审查。

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 NEUROIMAGING Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery Pub Date : 2025-01-04 DOI:10.1159/000543289
Youngkyung Jung, Karim Mithani, Hrishikesh Suresh, Nebras Warsi, Irene E Harmsen, Sara Breitbart, Carolina Gorodetsky, Alfonso Fasano, Aria Fallah, Aristides Hadjinicolaou, Alexander Weil, George Ibrahim
{"title":"脑深部刺激在儿科人群:临床试验前景的范围审查。","authors":"Youngkyung Jung, Karim Mithani, Hrishikesh Suresh, Nebras Warsi, Irene E Harmsen, Sara Breitbart, Carolina Gorodetsky, Alfonso Fasano, Aria Fallah, Aristides Hadjinicolaou, Alexander Weil, George Ibrahim","doi":"10.1159/000543289","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>There has been rapid advancement in the development of deep brain stimulation (DBS) as a treatment option for adults for neurological and neuropsychiatric conditions. Here, we present a scoping review of completed and ongoing clinical trials focused on DBS in pediatric populations, highlighting key knowledge gaps.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Three databases (PubMed, OVID, and Embase) and the clinicaltrials.gov registry were queried to identify clinical trials for DBS in pediatric cohorts (age < 18). Prospective and retrospective case series were excluded. No restrictions were placed on the diagnoses or measured clinical outcomes. Individual patient demographics, diagnosis, DBS target, and primary endpoints were extracted and summarized.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 13 clinical trials were included in the final review, consisting of 9 completed trials (357 screened) and 4 ongoing trials (82 screened). Of the completed trials, 6 studied dystonia (both inherited and acquired; participants aged 4-18), and 3 studied drug-resistant epilepsy (participants aged 4-17). Amongst the 6 trials for dystonia, 5 used the Burke-Fahn-Marsden Dystonia Rating Scale (BFMDRS) as the primary endpoint. There were a total of 18 adverse events documented across 63 participants, with 5 of 9 studies reporting adverse events. Ongoing clinical trials are evaluating DBS for dystonia (N=2), epilepsy (N=1), and self-injurious behaviour (N=1).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This scoping review summarizes the landscape of clinical trials for DBS in children and youth. In dystonia, further research is warranted with more relevant pediatric outcome measures and for understudied patient subgroups and targets. There are also significant gaps in our understanding of evaluate the role of DBS in other neurological and neurodevelopmental disorders in pediatric populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":22078,"journal":{"name":"Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery","volume":" ","pages":"1-16"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Deep brain stimulation in pediatric populations: A scoping review of the clinical trial landscape.\",\"authors\":\"Youngkyung Jung, Karim Mithani, Hrishikesh Suresh, Nebras Warsi, Irene E Harmsen, Sara Breitbart, Carolina Gorodetsky, Alfonso Fasano, Aria Fallah, Aristides Hadjinicolaou, Alexander Weil, George Ibrahim\",\"doi\":\"10.1159/000543289\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>There has been rapid advancement in the development of deep brain stimulation (DBS) as a treatment option for adults for neurological and neuropsychiatric conditions. Here, we present a scoping review of completed and ongoing clinical trials focused on DBS in pediatric populations, highlighting key knowledge gaps.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Three databases (PubMed, OVID, and Embase) and the clinicaltrials.gov registry were queried to identify clinical trials for DBS in pediatric cohorts (age < 18). Prospective and retrospective case series were excluded. No restrictions were placed on the diagnoses or measured clinical outcomes. Individual patient demographics, diagnosis, DBS target, and primary endpoints were extracted and summarized.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 13 clinical trials were included in the final review, consisting of 9 completed trials (357 screened) and 4 ongoing trials (82 screened). Of the completed trials, 6 studied dystonia (both inherited and acquired; participants aged 4-18), and 3 studied drug-resistant epilepsy (participants aged 4-17). Amongst the 6 trials for dystonia, 5 used the Burke-Fahn-Marsden Dystonia Rating Scale (BFMDRS) as the primary endpoint. There were a total of 18 adverse events documented across 63 participants, with 5 of 9 studies reporting adverse events. Ongoing clinical trials are evaluating DBS for dystonia (N=2), epilepsy (N=1), and self-injurious behaviour (N=1).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This scoping review summarizes the landscape of clinical trials for DBS in children and youth. In dystonia, further research is warranted with more relevant pediatric outcome measures and for understudied patient subgroups and targets. There are also significant gaps in our understanding of evaluate the role of DBS in other neurological and neurodevelopmental disorders in pediatric populations.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22078,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-16\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1159/000543289\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROIMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000543289","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROIMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:脑深部电刺激(DBS)作为成人神经和神经精神疾病的治疗选择已经取得了快速进展。在此,我们对已完成和正在进行的针对儿科人群DBS的临床试验进行了范围审查,突出了关键的知识差距。方法:查询三个数据库(PubMed、OVID和Embase)和clinicaltrials.gov注册表,以确定儿童队列(年龄< 18岁)中DBS的临床试验。排除前瞻性和回顾性病例系列。对诊断或测量的临床结果没有限制。提取并总结了个体患者的人口统计、诊断、DBS目标和主要终点。结果:终审评共纳入13项临床试验,包括9项已完成的试验(筛选357项)和4项正在进行的试验(筛选82项)。在完成的试验中,6项研究了肌张力障碍(包括遗传性和获得性;参与者年龄4-18岁)和3研究耐药癫痫(参与者年龄4-17岁)。在6项针对肌张力障碍的试验中,5项采用了伯克-法恩-马斯登肌张力障碍评定量表(BFMDRS)作为主要终点。63名参与者共记录了18项不良事件,9项研究中有5项报告了不良事件。正在进行的临床试验正在评估DBS治疗肌张力障碍(N=2)、癫痫(N=1)和自残行为(N=1)。结论:本综述总结了儿童和青少年DBS临床试验的概况。在肌张力障碍中,进一步的研究需要更相关的儿科结果测量和研究不足的患者亚群和目标。在评估DBS在儿科人群中其他神经和神经发育障碍中的作用方面,我们的理解也存在重大差距。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Deep brain stimulation in pediatric populations: A scoping review of the clinical trial landscape.

Objective: There has been rapid advancement in the development of deep brain stimulation (DBS) as a treatment option for adults for neurological and neuropsychiatric conditions. Here, we present a scoping review of completed and ongoing clinical trials focused on DBS in pediatric populations, highlighting key knowledge gaps.

Methods: Three databases (PubMed, OVID, and Embase) and the clinicaltrials.gov registry were queried to identify clinical trials for DBS in pediatric cohorts (age < 18). Prospective and retrospective case series were excluded. No restrictions were placed on the diagnoses or measured clinical outcomes. Individual patient demographics, diagnosis, DBS target, and primary endpoints were extracted and summarized.

Results: A total of 13 clinical trials were included in the final review, consisting of 9 completed trials (357 screened) and 4 ongoing trials (82 screened). Of the completed trials, 6 studied dystonia (both inherited and acquired; participants aged 4-18), and 3 studied drug-resistant epilepsy (participants aged 4-17). Amongst the 6 trials for dystonia, 5 used the Burke-Fahn-Marsden Dystonia Rating Scale (BFMDRS) as the primary endpoint. There were a total of 18 adverse events documented across 63 participants, with 5 of 9 studies reporting adverse events. Ongoing clinical trials are evaluating DBS for dystonia (N=2), epilepsy (N=1), and self-injurious behaviour (N=1).

Conclusions: This scoping review summarizes the landscape of clinical trials for DBS in children and youth. In dystonia, further research is warranted with more relevant pediatric outcome measures and for understudied patient subgroups and targets. There are also significant gaps in our understanding of evaluate the role of DBS in other neurological and neurodevelopmental disorders in pediatric populations.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
33
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: ''Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery'' provides a single source for the reader to keep abreast of developments in the most rapidly advancing subspecialty within neurosurgery. Technological advances in computer-assisted surgery, robotics, imaging and neurophysiology are being applied to clinical problems with ever-increasing rapidity in stereotaxis more than any other field, providing opportunities for new approaches to surgical and radiotherapeutic management of diseases of the brain, spinal cord, and spine. Issues feature advances in the use of deep-brain stimulation, imaging-guided techniques in stereotactic biopsy and craniotomy, stereotactic radiosurgery, and stereotactically implanted and guided radiotherapeutics and biologicals in the treatment of functional and movement disorders, brain tumors, and other diseases of the brain. Background information from basic science laboratories related to such clinical advances provides the reader with an overall perspective of this field. Proceedings and abstracts from many of the key international meetings furnish an overview of this specialty available nowhere else. ''Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery'' meets the information needs of both investigators and clinicians in this rapidly advancing field.
期刊最新文献
Stereotactic Radiosurgery vs. Neuroablative Techniques for Medically Refractory Trigeminal Neuralgia: A Systematic Review and Meta Analysis of Outcomes. COMPARING DIRECTIONAL AND OMNIDIRECTIONAL DEEP BRAIN STIMULATION IN PARKINSON'S DISEASE PATIENTS. Effective Target Sites in Thalamic Stimulation for Focal Hand Dystonia. Reply to Pereira et al.: Delivering high volume, high quality and cost-effective DBS surgery. Deep brain stimulation in pediatric populations: A scoping review of the clinical trial landscape.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1