Kumaresan Cithambaram, Deirdre Corby, Liz Hartnett, David Joyce, Lynn Swinburne, Kristi Egere, Sean Healy
{"title":"残疾人基于人群的癌症筛查获取需求:定性证据综合。","authors":"Kumaresan Cithambaram, Deirdre Corby, Liz Hartnett, David Joyce, Lynn Swinburne, Kristi Egere, Sean Healy","doi":"10.1177/17446295241308708","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cancer is one of the most common causes of mortality among disabled people, and population-based screening is an effective method to identify some cancers early; however, its uptake is lower among the disabled population. There is a lack of evidence regarding why they access less, and their need to access population-based screening programmes.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To synthesise evidence of the experience of accessing population-based screening programmes for disabled people.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A qualitative evidence synthesis (QES) was carried out by searching electronic databases including Medline, CINAHL, Web of Science Core Collection, and Scopus. Grey literature was also searched for. The search yielded 32 relevant publications.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The findings are based on Levesque's conceptual framework. Several factors affect the accessibility of screening services, including people's perceptions, family support, affordability, literacy, and accessibility.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Screening services need to acknowledge the needs of disabled people and integrate reasonable accommodations to facilitate their needs.</p>","PeriodicalId":46904,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Intellectual Disabilities","volume":" ","pages":"17446295241308708"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Population-based cancer screening access needs of disabled people: A qualitative evidence synthesis.\",\"authors\":\"Kumaresan Cithambaram, Deirdre Corby, Liz Hartnett, David Joyce, Lynn Swinburne, Kristi Egere, Sean Healy\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/17446295241308708\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cancer is one of the most common causes of mortality among disabled people, and population-based screening is an effective method to identify some cancers early; however, its uptake is lower among the disabled population. There is a lack of evidence regarding why they access less, and their need to access population-based screening programmes.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To synthesise evidence of the experience of accessing population-based screening programmes for disabled people.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A qualitative evidence synthesis (QES) was carried out by searching electronic databases including Medline, CINAHL, Web of Science Core Collection, and Scopus. Grey literature was also searched for. The search yielded 32 relevant publications.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The findings are based on Levesque's conceptual framework. Several factors affect the accessibility of screening services, including people's perceptions, family support, affordability, literacy, and accessibility.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Screening services need to acknowledge the needs of disabled people and integrate reasonable accommodations to facilitate their needs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46904,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Intellectual Disabilities\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"17446295241308708\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Intellectual Disabilities\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/17446295241308708\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SPECIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Intellectual Disabilities","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17446295241308708","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SPECIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:癌症是残疾人最常见的死亡原因之一,基于人群的筛查是早期发现某些癌症的有效方法;然而,它在残疾人群中的使用率较低。缺乏证据说明为什么他们获得的服务较少,以及他们需要获得基于人群的筛查规划。目的:综合残疾人基于人群的筛查项目的经验证据。方法:检索Medline、CINAHL、Web of Science Core Collection、Scopus等电子数据库,进行定性证据合成(QES)。灰色文献也被搜索。搜索产生了32份相关出版物。结果:研究结果基于Levesque的概念框架。有几个因素影响筛查服务的可及性,包括人们的观念、家庭支持、可负担性、识字率和可及性。结论:筛查服务需要认识到残疾人的需求,并结合合理的便利措施来促进他们的需求。
Population-based cancer screening access needs of disabled people: A qualitative evidence synthesis.
Background: Cancer is one of the most common causes of mortality among disabled people, and population-based screening is an effective method to identify some cancers early; however, its uptake is lower among the disabled population. There is a lack of evidence regarding why they access less, and their need to access population-based screening programmes.
Aim: To synthesise evidence of the experience of accessing population-based screening programmes for disabled people.
Method: A qualitative evidence synthesis (QES) was carried out by searching electronic databases including Medline, CINAHL, Web of Science Core Collection, and Scopus. Grey literature was also searched for. The search yielded 32 relevant publications.
Results: The findings are based on Levesque's conceptual framework. Several factors affect the accessibility of screening services, including people's perceptions, family support, affordability, literacy, and accessibility.
Conclusion: Screening services need to acknowledge the needs of disabled people and integrate reasonable accommodations to facilitate their needs.
期刊介绍:
The principal aim of the journal is to provide a medium for the exchange of best practice, knowledge and research between academic and professional disciplines from education, social and health settings to bring about advancement of services for people with intellectual disabilities. The idea of a practice-led journal is both exciting and timely. This journal serves as a medium for all those involved with people with intellectual disabilities to submit and publish papers on issues relevant to promoting services for people with intellectual disabilities.