改进慢性疼痛表型:使用电子健康记录的社会人口统计学和疾病相关决定因素的比较分析。

IF 4 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Journal of Pain Pub Date : 2025-01-03 DOI:10.1016/j.jpain.2025.104775
Tahmina Begum , Bhagyavalli Veeranki , Ogenna Joy Chike , Suzanne Tamang , Julia F. Simard , Jonathan Chen , Yashaar Chaichian , Sean Mackey , Beth D. Darnall , Titilola Falasinnu
{"title":"改进慢性疼痛表型:使用电子健康记录的社会人口统计学和疾病相关决定因素的比较分析。","authors":"Tahmina Begum ,&nbsp;Bhagyavalli Veeranki ,&nbsp;Ogenna Joy Chike ,&nbsp;Suzanne Tamang ,&nbsp;Julia F. Simard ,&nbsp;Jonathan Chen ,&nbsp;Yashaar Chaichian ,&nbsp;Sean Mackey ,&nbsp;Beth D. Darnall ,&nbsp;Titilola Falasinnu","doi":"10.1016/j.jpain.2025.104775","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The use of electronic health records (EHR) for chronic pain phenotyping has gained significant attention in recent years, with various algorithms being developed to enhance accuracy. Structured data fields (e.g., pain intensity, treatment modalities, diagnosis codes, and interventions) offer standardized templates for capturing specific chronic pain phenotypes. This study aims to determine which chronic pain case definitions derived from structured data elements achieve the best accuracy, and how these validation metrics vary by sociodemographic and disease-related factors. We used EHR data from 802 randomly selected adults with autoimmune rheumatic diseases seen at a large academic center in 2019. We extracted structured data elements to derive multiple phenotyping algorithms. We confirmed chronic pain case definitions via manual chart review of clinical notes, and assessed the performance of derived algorithms, e.g., sensitivity/recall, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV). The highest sensitivity (67%) was observed when using ICD codes alone, while specificity peaked at 96% with a quadrimodal algorithm combining pain scores, ICD codes, prescriptions, and interventions. Specificity was generally higher in males and younger patients, particularly those aged 18–40 years, and highest among Asian/Pacific Islander and privately insured patients. PPV was highest among patients who were female, younger, or privately insured. PPV and sensitivity were lowest among males, Asian/Pacific Islander, and older patients. Variability of phenotyping results underscores the importance of refining chronic pain phenotyping algorithms within EHRs to enhance their accuracy and applicability. While our current algorithms provide valuable insights, enhancement is needed to ensure more reliable chronic pain identification across diverse patient populations.</div></div><div><h3>Perspectives</h3><div>This study evaluates chronic pain phenotyping algorithms using electronic health records, highlighting variability in performance across sociodemographic and disease-related factors. By combining structured data elements, the findings advance chronic pain identification, promoting equitable healthcare practices and highlighting the need for tailored algorithms to address subgroup-specific biases and improve outcomes.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51095,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pain","volume":"28 ","pages":"Article 104775"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Refining chronic pain phenotypes: A comparative analysis of sociodemographic and disease-related determinants using electronic health records\",\"authors\":\"Tahmina Begum ,&nbsp;Bhagyavalli Veeranki ,&nbsp;Ogenna Joy Chike ,&nbsp;Suzanne Tamang ,&nbsp;Julia F. Simard ,&nbsp;Jonathan Chen ,&nbsp;Yashaar Chaichian ,&nbsp;Sean Mackey ,&nbsp;Beth D. Darnall ,&nbsp;Titilola Falasinnu\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jpain.2025.104775\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The use of electronic health records (EHR) for chronic pain phenotyping has gained significant attention in recent years, with various algorithms being developed to enhance accuracy. Structured data fields (e.g., pain intensity, treatment modalities, diagnosis codes, and interventions) offer standardized templates for capturing specific chronic pain phenotypes. This study aims to determine which chronic pain case definitions derived from structured data elements achieve the best accuracy, and how these validation metrics vary by sociodemographic and disease-related factors. We used EHR data from 802 randomly selected adults with autoimmune rheumatic diseases seen at a large academic center in 2019. We extracted structured data elements to derive multiple phenotyping algorithms. We confirmed chronic pain case definitions via manual chart review of clinical notes, and assessed the performance of derived algorithms, e.g., sensitivity/recall, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV). The highest sensitivity (67%) was observed when using ICD codes alone, while specificity peaked at 96% with a quadrimodal algorithm combining pain scores, ICD codes, prescriptions, and interventions. Specificity was generally higher in males and younger patients, particularly those aged 18–40 years, and highest among Asian/Pacific Islander and privately insured patients. PPV was highest among patients who were female, younger, or privately insured. PPV and sensitivity were lowest among males, Asian/Pacific Islander, and older patients. Variability of phenotyping results underscores the importance of refining chronic pain phenotyping algorithms within EHRs to enhance their accuracy and applicability. While our current algorithms provide valuable insights, enhancement is needed to ensure more reliable chronic pain identification across diverse patient populations.</div></div><div><h3>Perspectives</h3><div>This study evaluates chronic pain phenotyping algorithms using electronic health records, highlighting variability in performance across sociodemographic and disease-related factors. By combining structured data elements, the findings advance chronic pain identification, promoting equitable healthcare practices and highlighting the need for tailored algorithms to address subgroup-specific biases and improve outcomes.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51095,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Pain\",\"volume\":\"28 \",\"pages\":\"Article 104775\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Pain\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S152659002500001X\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pain","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S152659002500001X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

近年来,使用电子健康记录(EHR)进行慢性疼痛表型分析获得了极大的关注,各种算法正在开发以提高准确性。结构化数据字段(例如,疼痛强度、治疗方式、诊断代码和干预措施)为捕获特定的慢性疼痛表型提供了标准化模板。本研究旨在确定从结构化数据元素中得出的哪些慢性疼痛病例定义达到最佳准确性,以及这些验证指标如何随社会人口统计学和疾病相关因素而变化。我们使用了2019年在一个大型学术中心随机选择的802名自身免疫性风湿病成年人的电子病历数据。我们提取结构化数据元素来推导多种表型算法。我们通过临床记录的手工图表审查来确定慢性疼痛病例的定义,并评估衍生算法的性能,例如灵敏度/召回率、特异性、阳性预测值(PPV)。单独使用ICD代码时,灵敏度最高(67%),而结合疼痛评分、ICD代码、处方和干预措施的四模态算法的特异性最高为96%。特异性在男性和年轻患者中普遍较高,尤其是18-40岁的患者,在亚洲/太平洋岛民和私人保险患者中最高。女性、年轻人或私人保险患者的PPV最高。PPV和敏感性在男性、亚洲/太平洋岛民和老年患者中最低。表型结果的可变性强调了在电子病历中改进慢性疼痛表型算法以提高其准确性和适用性的重要性。虽然我们目前的算法提供了有价值的见解,但需要增强,以确保在不同的患者群体中更可靠地识别慢性疼痛。观点:本研究利用电子健康记录评估慢性疼痛表型算法,强调了不同社会人口统计学和疾病相关因素的表现差异。通过结合结构化数据元素,研究结果促进了慢性疼痛的识别,促进了公平的医疗保健实践,并强调了定制算法的必要性,以解决亚组特定的偏见并改善结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Refining chronic pain phenotypes: A comparative analysis of sociodemographic and disease-related determinants using electronic health records
The use of electronic health records (EHR) for chronic pain phenotyping has gained significant attention in recent years, with various algorithms being developed to enhance accuracy. Structured data fields (e.g., pain intensity, treatment modalities, diagnosis codes, and interventions) offer standardized templates for capturing specific chronic pain phenotypes. This study aims to determine which chronic pain case definitions derived from structured data elements achieve the best accuracy, and how these validation metrics vary by sociodemographic and disease-related factors. We used EHR data from 802 randomly selected adults with autoimmune rheumatic diseases seen at a large academic center in 2019. We extracted structured data elements to derive multiple phenotyping algorithms. We confirmed chronic pain case definitions via manual chart review of clinical notes, and assessed the performance of derived algorithms, e.g., sensitivity/recall, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV). The highest sensitivity (67%) was observed when using ICD codes alone, while specificity peaked at 96% with a quadrimodal algorithm combining pain scores, ICD codes, prescriptions, and interventions. Specificity was generally higher in males and younger patients, particularly those aged 18–40 years, and highest among Asian/Pacific Islander and privately insured patients. PPV was highest among patients who were female, younger, or privately insured. PPV and sensitivity were lowest among males, Asian/Pacific Islander, and older patients. Variability of phenotyping results underscores the importance of refining chronic pain phenotyping algorithms within EHRs to enhance their accuracy and applicability. While our current algorithms provide valuable insights, enhancement is needed to ensure more reliable chronic pain identification across diverse patient populations.

Perspectives

This study evaluates chronic pain phenotyping algorithms using electronic health records, highlighting variability in performance across sociodemographic and disease-related factors. By combining structured data elements, the findings advance chronic pain identification, promoting equitable healthcare practices and highlighting the need for tailored algorithms to address subgroup-specific biases and improve outcomes.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Pain
Journal of Pain 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
7.50%
发文量
441
审稿时长
42 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Pain publishes original articles related to all aspects of pain, including clinical and basic research, patient care, education, and health policy. Articles selected for publication in the Journal are most commonly reports of original clinical research or reports of original basic research. In addition, invited critical reviews, including meta analyses of drugs for pain management, invited commentaries on reviews, and exceptional case studies are published in the Journal. The mission of the Journal is to improve the care of patients in pain by providing a forum for clinical researchers, basic scientists, clinicians, and other health professionals to publish original research.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Table of Contents Masthead Cannabidiol reduces neuropathic pain and cognitive impairments through activation of spinal PPARγ. Individual differences in response to repeated painful stimulation: habituation, sensitization, and nocebo effects.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1