调整痴呆护理伙伴医院评估工具

IF 13 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Alzheimer's & Dementia Pub Date : 2025-01-09 DOI:10.1002/alz.085916
Beth Fields
{"title":"调整痴呆护理伙伴医院评估工具","authors":"Beth Fields","doi":"10.1002/alz.085916","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BackgroundCare partners commonly support patients living with dementia (PLWD) during and post‐hospitalization, however, they frequently report feeling excluded from care and unprepared for their caregiving tasks. While the evidence‐informed and validated Care Partner Hospital Assessment Tool (CHAT) was designed to better include and prepare family members and friends, it has not yet been adapted for the growing number of care partners supporting PLWD.ObjectiveTo adapt and finalize the CHAT for care partners of hospitalized PLWD.SettingHospitals in the United States.Study PopulationWe selected hospital‐based clinicians who had at least 5 years of professional experience working with PLWD and their family/friends, and care partners who were at least 18 years old and provided support to a PLWD who experienced a hospitalization. A total of 7 clinicians and 5 care partners were recruited. Clinicians were White (100%), female (85%), and represented social work, nursing, occupational therapy, medicine, and pharmacy. Care partners ranged in age from 41 to 73 years, were White (100%), female (100%), and provided support to a mother or mother‐in‐law (30%), spouse/partner (20%), and other relative (50%).MethodsTwo design teams each consisting of clinicians and care partners respectively—were formed to suggest adaptations to CHAT and share satisfaction with the final tool. Teams completed 5 co‐design videoconference sessions, with 2‐3 weeks between each session. Sessions lasted approximately 60 minutes and were audio recorded. The Rapid Identification of Themes from Audio‐recordings method was used to identify suggestions for adaptation between sessions, and thematic analysis was used to code the transcripts in NVivo.ResultsAdaptations to the CHAT included (a) providing options for dementia specific educational resources, (b) identifying power of attorney and care partner roles and responsibilities (c) using more comprehensive response options and simple language. After making adaptations, participants (100%) reported that they were satisfied or very satisfied with the final Dementia CHAT (i.e., D‐CHAT). Participants described the D‐CHAT as ‘empowering’, ‘comprehensive’, ‘collaborative’, and ‘helpful’.ConclusionThe converged‐upon D‐CHAT is ready for feasibility testing in the hospital setting and may help guide clinicians’ inclusion and preparation of care partners of PLWD.","PeriodicalId":7471,"journal":{"name":"Alzheimer's & Dementia","volume":"55 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":13.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Adapting the Care Partner Hospital Assessment Tool for Dementia Care\",\"authors\":\"Beth Fields\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/alz.085916\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"BackgroundCare partners commonly support patients living with dementia (PLWD) during and post‐hospitalization, however, they frequently report feeling excluded from care and unprepared for their caregiving tasks. While the evidence‐informed and validated Care Partner Hospital Assessment Tool (CHAT) was designed to better include and prepare family members and friends, it has not yet been adapted for the growing number of care partners supporting PLWD.ObjectiveTo adapt and finalize the CHAT for care partners of hospitalized PLWD.SettingHospitals in the United States.Study PopulationWe selected hospital‐based clinicians who had at least 5 years of professional experience working with PLWD and their family/friends, and care partners who were at least 18 years old and provided support to a PLWD who experienced a hospitalization. A total of 7 clinicians and 5 care partners were recruited. Clinicians were White (100%), female (85%), and represented social work, nursing, occupational therapy, medicine, and pharmacy. Care partners ranged in age from 41 to 73 years, were White (100%), female (100%), and provided support to a mother or mother‐in‐law (30%), spouse/partner (20%), and other relative (50%).MethodsTwo design teams each consisting of clinicians and care partners respectively—were formed to suggest adaptations to CHAT and share satisfaction with the final tool. Teams completed 5 co‐design videoconference sessions, with 2‐3 weeks between each session. Sessions lasted approximately 60 minutes and were audio recorded. The Rapid Identification of Themes from Audio‐recordings method was used to identify suggestions for adaptation between sessions, and thematic analysis was used to code the transcripts in NVivo.ResultsAdaptations to the CHAT included (a) providing options for dementia specific educational resources, (b) identifying power of attorney and care partner roles and responsibilities (c) using more comprehensive response options and simple language. After making adaptations, participants (100%) reported that they were satisfied or very satisfied with the final Dementia CHAT (i.e., D‐CHAT). Participants described the D‐CHAT as ‘empowering’, ‘comprehensive’, ‘collaborative’, and ‘helpful’.ConclusionThe converged‐upon D‐CHAT is ready for feasibility testing in the hospital setting and may help guide clinicians’ inclusion and preparation of care partners of PLWD.\",\"PeriodicalId\":7471,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Alzheimer's & Dementia\",\"volume\":\"55 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":13.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Alzheimer's & Dementia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/alz.085916\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Alzheimer's & Dementia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/alz.085916","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

护理伙伴通常在住院期间和住院后支持痴呆症患者(PLWD),然而,他们经常报告感觉被排除在护理之外,并且没有准备好他们的护理任务。虽然以证据为依据并经过验证的护理伙伴医院评估工具(CHAT)旨在更好地包括家庭成员和朋友并使其做好准备,但它尚未适应越来越多支持PLWD的护理伙伴。目的调整和完善住院PLWD护理伙伴的CHAT。在美国设立医院。研究人群:我们选择医院的临床医生,他们至少有5年与PLWD及其家人/朋友一起工作的专业经验,以及年满18岁并为住院的PLWD提供支持的护理伙伴。共招募了7名临床医生和5名护理伙伴。临床医生为白人(100%),女性(85%),代表社会工作、护理、职业治疗、医学和药学。护理伙伴的年龄从41岁到73岁不等,为白人(100%)、女性(100%),并为母亲或岳母(30%)、配偶/伴侣(20%)和其他亲属(50%)提供支持。方法组成两个设计小组,分别由临床医生和护理伙伴组成,以建议对CHAT的适应性,并分享对最终工具的满意度。团队完成了5次共同设计的视频会议,每次会议间隔2 - 3周。会议持续约60分钟,录音。从录音中快速识别主题方法用于确定会议之间的适应建议,并使用主题分析对NVivo中的转录本进行编码。结果对CHAT的调整包括(a)提供痴呆症特定教育资源的选择;(b)确定委托书和护理伙伴的角色和责任;(c)使用更全面的回应选项和简单的语言。在进行调整后,参与者(100%)报告他们对最终的痴呆CHAT(即D - CHAT)感到满意或非常满意。与会者将D - CHAT描述为“授权”、“全面”、“协作”和“有益”。结论融合D - CHAT可在医院环境中进行可行性测试,有助于指导临床医生纳入和准备PLWD的护理伙伴。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Adapting the Care Partner Hospital Assessment Tool for Dementia Care
BackgroundCare partners commonly support patients living with dementia (PLWD) during and post‐hospitalization, however, they frequently report feeling excluded from care and unprepared for their caregiving tasks. While the evidence‐informed and validated Care Partner Hospital Assessment Tool (CHAT) was designed to better include and prepare family members and friends, it has not yet been adapted for the growing number of care partners supporting PLWD.ObjectiveTo adapt and finalize the CHAT for care partners of hospitalized PLWD.SettingHospitals in the United States.Study PopulationWe selected hospital‐based clinicians who had at least 5 years of professional experience working with PLWD and their family/friends, and care partners who were at least 18 years old and provided support to a PLWD who experienced a hospitalization. A total of 7 clinicians and 5 care partners were recruited. Clinicians were White (100%), female (85%), and represented social work, nursing, occupational therapy, medicine, and pharmacy. Care partners ranged in age from 41 to 73 years, were White (100%), female (100%), and provided support to a mother or mother‐in‐law (30%), spouse/partner (20%), and other relative (50%).MethodsTwo design teams each consisting of clinicians and care partners respectively—were formed to suggest adaptations to CHAT and share satisfaction with the final tool. Teams completed 5 co‐design videoconference sessions, with 2‐3 weeks between each session. Sessions lasted approximately 60 minutes and were audio recorded. The Rapid Identification of Themes from Audio‐recordings method was used to identify suggestions for adaptation between sessions, and thematic analysis was used to code the transcripts in NVivo.ResultsAdaptations to the CHAT included (a) providing options for dementia specific educational resources, (b) identifying power of attorney and care partner roles and responsibilities (c) using more comprehensive response options and simple language. After making adaptations, participants (100%) reported that they were satisfied or very satisfied with the final Dementia CHAT (i.e., D‐CHAT). Participants described the D‐CHAT as ‘empowering’, ‘comprehensive’, ‘collaborative’, and ‘helpful’.ConclusionThe converged‐upon D‐CHAT is ready for feasibility testing in the hospital setting and may help guide clinicians’ inclusion and preparation of care partners of PLWD.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Alzheimer's & Dementia
Alzheimer's & Dementia 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
14.50
自引率
5.00%
发文量
299
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Alzheimer's & Dementia is a peer-reviewed journal that aims to bridge knowledge gaps in dementia research by covering the entire spectrum, from basic science to clinical trials to social and behavioral investigations. It provides a platform for rapid communication of new findings and ideas, optimal translation of research into practical applications, increasing knowledge across diverse disciplines for early detection, diagnosis, and intervention, and identifying promising new research directions. In July 2008, Alzheimer's & Dementia was accepted for indexing by MEDLINE, recognizing its scientific merit and contribution to Alzheimer's research.
期刊最新文献
AAIC Satellite Symposium slated for May 14 to 15 in Lima, Peru A multi-cohort study of longitudinal and cross-sectional Alzheimer's disease biomarkers in cognitively unimpaired older adults Malnutrition exacerbating neuropsychiatric symptoms on the Alzheimer's continuum is relevant to the cAMP signaling pathway: Human and mouse studies Compositional brain scores capture Alzheimer's disease–specific structural brain patterns along the disease continuum A neuropathology case report of a woman with Down syndrome who remained cognitively stable: Implications for resilience to neuropathology
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1