磁性药物靶向的实验和数值模拟:我们可以信任基于粒子的模型吗?

IF 1.8 Q3 ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC IEEE Journal on Multiscale and Multiphysics Computational Techniques Pub Date : 2024-12-20 DOI:10.1109/JMMCT.2024.3520488
Angelika S. Thalmayer;Keyu Xiao;Paul Wolff;Georg Fischer
{"title":"磁性药物靶向的实验和数值模拟:我们可以信任基于粒子的模型吗?","authors":"Angelika S. Thalmayer;Keyu Xiao;Paul Wolff;Georg Fischer","doi":"10.1109/JMMCT.2024.3520488","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The development of trustworthy simulation models is crucial for planning drug administration in magnetic drug targeting (MDT) interventions for future cancer treatment. In the MDT cancer therapy, the drug is bound to magnetic nanoparticles, which act as carriers and are guided through the cardiovascular system into the tumor region using an external magnetic field. Thus, the modeling represents a multiphysical problem and can be approached either by particle-based or concentration-based models. In this paper, both simulation approaches are implemented in COMSOL Multiphysics in a typical magnetic drug targeting scenario, verified by measurements, and compared among each other. Two different particle concentrations with and without an applied magnetic field of a Halbach array consisting of five permanent magnets in a tube flow system with a laminar velocity flow were investigated. Within this scope, an analytical model for calculating the system response for the detection of nanoparticles with a commercial susceptometer is derived, too. Considering the two implemented models and the investigated scenario, the concentration-based model shows a considerably better agreement with the experimental results for both with and without an applied magnetic field. The spatial resolution of the particle-based model is reduced due to the limited number of considered particles resulting in an inaccurate system response. Overall, the high number of new publications shows the need for research in this interdisciplinary research field to improve therapeutic success.","PeriodicalId":52176,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Journal on Multiscale and Multiphysics Computational Techniques","volume":"10 ","pages":"69-84"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Experimental and Numerical Modeling of Magnetic Drug Targeting: Can We Trust Particle-Based Models?\",\"authors\":\"Angelika S. Thalmayer;Keyu Xiao;Paul Wolff;Georg Fischer\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/JMMCT.2024.3520488\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The development of trustworthy simulation models is crucial for planning drug administration in magnetic drug targeting (MDT) interventions for future cancer treatment. In the MDT cancer therapy, the drug is bound to magnetic nanoparticles, which act as carriers and are guided through the cardiovascular system into the tumor region using an external magnetic field. Thus, the modeling represents a multiphysical problem and can be approached either by particle-based or concentration-based models. In this paper, both simulation approaches are implemented in COMSOL Multiphysics in a typical magnetic drug targeting scenario, verified by measurements, and compared among each other. Two different particle concentrations with and without an applied magnetic field of a Halbach array consisting of five permanent magnets in a tube flow system with a laminar velocity flow were investigated. Within this scope, an analytical model for calculating the system response for the detection of nanoparticles with a commercial susceptometer is derived, too. Considering the two implemented models and the investigated scenario, the concentration-based model shows a considerably better agreement with the experimental results for both with and without an applied magnetic field. The spatial resolution of the particle-based model is reduced due to the limited number of considered particles resulting in an inaccurate system response. Overall, the high number of new publications shows the need for research in this interdisciplinary research field to improve therapeutic success.\",\"PeriodicalId\":52176,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"IEEE Journal on Multiscale and Multiphysics Computational Techniques\",\"volume\":\"10 \",\"pages\":\"69-84\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"IEEE Journal on Multiscale and Multiphysics Computational Techniques\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10810735/\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Journal on Multiscale and Multiphysics Computational Techniques","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10810735/","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

开发可靠的模拟模型对于规划未来癌症治疗的磁性药物靶向(MDT)干预药物管理至关重要。在MDT癌症治疗中,药物与磁性纳米颗粒结合,磁性纳米颗粒作为载体,利用外部磁场引导通过心血管系统进入肿瘤区域。因此,建模代表了一个多物理问题,可以通过基于粒子或基于浓度的模型来接近。在本文中,这两种模拟方法在COMSOL Multiphysics中实现,在一个典型的磁性药物靶向场景中,通过测量验证,并相互比较。研究了在有和没有外加磁场的情况下,由五个永磁体组成的哈尔巴赫阵列在具有层流速度的管流系统中两种不同的颗粒浓度。在此范围内,还推导了用商用电纳计检测纳米粒子时计算系统响应的解析模型。考虑到两个实现的模型和所研究的场景,在有外加磁场和没有外加磁场的情况下,基于浓度的模型与实验结果的一致性要好得多。由于考虑的粒子数量有限,导致系统响应不准确,因此基于粒子的模型的空间分辨率降低。总的来说,大量的新出版物表明,需要在这个跨学科的研究领域进行研究,以提高治疗成功率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Experimental and Numerical Modeling of Magnetic Drug Targeting: Can We Trust Particle-Based Models?
The development of trustworthy simulation models is crucial for planning drug administration in magnetic drug targeting (MDT) interventions for future cancer treatment. In the MDT cancer therapy, the drug is bound to magnetic nanoparticles, which act as carriers and are guided through the cardiovascular system into the tumor region using an external magnetic field. Thus, the modeling represents a multiphysical problem and can be approached either by particle-based or concentration-based models. In this paper, both simulation approaches are implemented in COMSOL Multiphysics in a typical magnetic drug targeting scenario, verified by measurements, and compared among each other. Two different particle concentrations with and without an applied magnetic field of a Halbach array consisting of five permanent magnets in a tube flow system with a laminar velocity flow were investigated. Within this scope, an analytical model for calculating the system response for the detection of nanoparticles with a commercial susceptometer is derived, too. Considering the two implemented models and the investigated scenario, the concentration-based model shows a considerably better agreement with the experimental results for both with and without an applied magnetic field. The spatial resolution of the particle-based model is reduced due to the limited number of considered particles resulting in an inaccurate system response. Overall, the high number of new publications shows the need for research in this interdisciplinary research field to improve therapeutic success.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
27
期刊最新文献
Scale-Compressed Technique in Finite-Difference Time-Domain Method for Multi-Layered Anisotropic Media Experimental and Numerical Modeling of Magnetic Drug Targeting: Can We Trust Particle-Based Models? Table of Contents Editorial Rigorous Indoor Wireless Communication System Simulations With Deep Learning-Based Radio Propagation Models
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1