MALDI-TOF鉴定琼脂培养基上生长的霍乱弧菌和副溶血性弧菌的评价

IF 3.9 3区 生物学 Q2 BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology Pub Date : 2025-01-08 DOI:10.1007/s00253-024-13385-y
Swapan Banerjee, Annika Flint, Madeleine B. Brosseau, Kelly Weedmark, Bojan Shutinoski
{"title":"MALDI-TOF鉴定琼脂培养基上生长的霍乱弧菌和副溶血性弧菌的评价","authors":"Swapan Banerjee,&nbsp;Annika Flint,&nbsp;Madeleine B. Brosseau,&nbsp;Kelly Weedmark,&nbsp;Bojan Shutinoski","doi":"10.1007/s00253-024-13385-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Two methods were compared for their ability to accurately identify <i>Vibrio</i> species of interest: whole genome sequencing as the reference method and MALDI-TOF MS (matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry) proteome fingerprinting. The accuracy of mass spectrometry–based identification method was evaluated for its ability to accurately identify isolates of <i>Vibrio cholerae</i> and <i>Vibrio parahaemolyticus</i>. Identification result of each isolate obtained by mass spectrometry was compared to identification by whole genome sequencing (WGS). The MALDI-TOF MS system had excellent performance for identification of <i>V. cholerae</i> and <i>V. parahaemolyticus</i> isolates grown on a non-selective solid agar media. Unlike the biochemical characterization performed by API20E. In this study, 161 isolates (<i>V. cholerae, n</i> = 33; <i>V. parahaemolyticus, n</i> = 102; <i>V.</i> spp., <i>n</i> = 23; other enteropathogens, <i>Salmonella</i> and <i>E. coli</i>, <i>n</i> = 3) were used to assess accuracy. The MALDI-TOF MS system was able to accurately identify 100% (33/33) of the <i>V. cholerae</i> isolates and 99.9% (101/102) of <i>V. parahaemolyticus</i> isolates, with 100% for both sensitivity and specificity for <i>V. cholerae</i> and 99% sensitivity and 98% specificity for <i>V. parahaemolyticus</i>. Thus, mass spectrometry for bacterial identification is comparable to the WGS. Furthermore, in comparison to a biochemical characterization, the use of MALDI-TOF MS system shortens the analysis time from over 72 h to less than 24 h.</p><p><i>• V. cholerae and V. parahaemolyticus were successfully ID-ed by MALDI-TOF</i></p><p><i>• MALDI-TOF sensitivity and specificity parallels the WGS method of identification</i></p><p><i>• MALDI-TOF is several days faster than the battery of culture-dependent methods</i></p>","PeriodicalId":8342,"journal":{"name":"Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology","volume":"109 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00253-024-13385-y.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of MALDI-TOF for identification of Vibrio cholerae and Vibrio parahaemolyticus from growth on agar media\",\"authors\":\"Swapan Banerjee,&nbsp;Annika Flint,&nbsp;Madeleine B. Brosseau,&nbsp;Kelly Weedmark,&nbsp;Bojan Shutinoski\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00253-024-13385-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Two methods were compared for their ability to accurately identify <i>Vibrio</i> species of interest: whole genome sequencing as the reference method and MALDI-TOF MS (matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry) proteome fingerprinting. The accuracy of mass spectrometry–based identification method was evaluated for its ability to accurately identify isolates of <i>Vibrio cholerae</i> and <i>Vibrio parahaemolyticus</i>. Identification result of each isolate obtained by mass spectrometry was compared to identification by whole genome sequencing (WGS). The MALDI-TOF MS system had excellent performance for identification of <i>V. cholerae</i> and <i>V. parahaemolyticus</i> isolates grown on a non-selective solid agar media. Unlike the biochemical characterization performed by API20E. In this study, 161 isolates (<i>V. cholerae, n</i> = 33; <i>V. parahaemolyticus, n</i> = 102; <i>V.</i> spp., <i>n</i> = 23; other enteropathogens, <i>Salmonella</i> and <i>E. coli</i>, <i>n</i> = 3) were used to assess accuracy. The MALDI-TOF MS system was able to accurately identify 100% (33/33) of the <i>V. cholerae</i> isolates and 99.9% (101/102) of <i>V. parahaemolyticus</i> isolates, with 100% for both sensitivity and specificity for <i>V. cholerae</i> and 99% sensitivity and 98% specificity for <i>V. parahaemolyticus</i>. Thus, mass spectrometry for bacterial identification is comparable to the WGS. Furthermore, in comparison to a biochemical characterization, the use of MALDI-TOF MS system shortens the analysis time from over 72 h to less than 24 h.</p><p><i>• V. cholerae and V. parahaemolyticus were successfully ID-ed by MALDI-TOF</i></p><p><i>• MALDI-TOF sensitivity and specificity parallels the WGS method of identification</i></p><p><i>• MALDI-TOF is several days faster than the battery of culture-dependent methods</i></p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8342,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology\",\"volume\":\"109 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00253-024-13385-y.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00253-024-13385-y\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00253-024-13385-y","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

比较了两种方法准确鉴定感兴趣弧菌物种的能力:全基因组测序作为参考方法和MALDI-TOF MS(基质辅助激光解吸/电离飞行时间质谱)蛋白质组指纹图谱。以质谱为基础的鉴定方法对霍乱弧菌和副溶血性弧菌分离株的准确性进行了评价。将质谱鉴定结果与全基因组测序(WGS)鉴定结果进行比较。MALDI-TOF MS系统对培养在非选择性固体琼脂培养基上的霍乱弧菌和副溶血性弧菌分离株具有良好的鉴定效果。与API20E进行的生化表征不同。本研究共分离161株(霍乱弧菌,n = 33;副溶血性弧菌,n = 102;V. spp., n = 23;其他肠致病菌,沙门氏菌和大肠杆菌,n = 3)评估准确性。MALDI-TOF MS系统对霍乱弧菌分离株和副溶血性弧菌分离株的鉴定准确率分别为100%(33/33)和99.9%(101/102),对霍乱弧菌的敏感性和特异性均为100%,对副溶血性弧菌的敏感性和特异性均为99%和98%。因此,质谱法用于细菌鉴定可与WGS相媲美。此外,与生物化学鉴定相比,使用MALDI-TOF MS系统将分析时间从72小时以上缩短到24小时以下。•MALDI-TOF系统成功地鉴定了霍乱弧菌和副溶血性弧菌。•MALDI-TOF的灵敏度和特异性与WGS鉴定方法相似
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Evaluation of MALDI-TOF for identification of Vibrio cholerae and Vibrio parahaemolyticus from growth on agar media

Two methods were compared for their ability to accurately identify Vibrio species of interest: whole genome sequencing as the reference method and MALDI-TOF MS (matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry) proteome fingerprinting. The accuracy of mass spectrometry–based identification method was evaluated for its ability to accurately identify isolates of Vibrio cholerae and Vibrio parahaemolyticus. Identification result of each isolate obtained by mass spectrometry was compared to identification by whole genome sequencing (WGS). The MALDI-TOF MS system had excellent performance for identification of V. cholerae and V. parahaemolyticus isolates grown on a non-selective solid agar media. Unlike the biochemical characterization performed by API20E. In this study, 161 isolates (V. cholerae, n = 33; V. parahaemolyticus, n = 102; V. spp., n = 23; other enteropathogens, Salmonella and E. coli, n = 3) were used to assess accuracy. The MALDI-TOF MS system was able to accurately identify 100% (33/33) of the V. cholerae isolates and 99.9% (101/102) of V. parahaemolyticus isolates, with 100% for both sensitivity and specificity for V. cholerae and 99% sensitivity and 98% specificity for V. parahaemolyticus. Thus, mass spectrometry for bacterial identification is comparable to the WGS. Furthermore, in comparison to a biochemical characterization, the use of MALDI-TOF MS system shortens the analysis time from over 72 h to less than 24 h.

• V. cholerae and V. parahaemolyticus were successfully ID-ed by MALDI-TOF

• MALDI-TOF sensitivity and specificity parallels the WGS method of identification

• MALDI-TOF is several days faster than the battery of culture-dependent methods

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology
Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 工程技术-生物工程与应用微生物
CiteScore
10.00
自引率
4.00%
发文量
535
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology focusses on prokaryotic or eukaryotic cells, relevant enzymes and proteins; applied genetics and molecular biotechnology; genomics and proteomics; applied microbial and cell physiology; environmental biotechnology; process and products and more. The journal welcomes full-length papers and mini-reviews of new and emerging products, processes and technologies.
期刊最新文献
The role of essential oils as eco-friendly strategy to control biofilm collected in the Colosseum (Rome, Italy) From pre-culture to solvent: current trends in Clostridium acetobutylicum cultivation MalS, a periplasmic α-amylase in Escherichia coli, has a binding affinity to glycogen with unique substrate specificities Establishment of one-step duplex TaqMan real-time PCR for detection of feline coronavirus and panleukopenia virus Enhancement of immune responses to classical swine fever virus E2 in mice by fusion or mixture with the porcine IL-28B
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1