使用TAS测试在线手敲击测试来检测大型社区澳大利亚老年人队列的认知衰退

IF 13 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Alzheimer's & Dementia Pub Date : 2025-01-09 DOI:10.1002/alz.091929
Jane E Alty, Xinyi Wang, Aidan Bindoff, Rebecca J St George, Eddy Roccati, Larissa Bartlett, Katherine Lawler, Alastair J Noyce, Son Tran, Anna E King, Quan Bai, James C Vickers
{"title":"使用TAS测试在线手敲击测试来检测大型社区澳大利亚老年人队列的认知衰退","authors":"Jane E Alty, Xinyi Wang, Aidan Bindoff, Rebecca J St George, Eddy Roccati, Larissa Bartlett, Katherine Lawler, Alastair J Noyce, Son Tran, Anna E King, Quan Bai, James C Vickers","doi":"10.1002/alz.091929","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BackgroundFinding low‐cost, accessible methods to detect people with early‐stage Alzheimer’s disease is a research priority for neuroprotective drug development. Subtle motor impairment of gait occurs years before episodic memory decline but there has been little investigation of whether self‐administered hand motor tests can detect this pre‐symptomatic period. This study evaluated how home‐based unsupervised keyboard tapping tests from the TAS Test protocol predict episodic memory performance in a sample of older adults without overt cognitive impairment, as a potential indicative measure of early Alzheimer’s disease.Method1,140 community participants (65.7 ± 7.4 years old; 73% female) without cognitive impairment from the ISLAND cohort study completed a 40‐second single key tapping test, a 60‐second alternate key tapping test, and a 40‐second sequence tapping test from TAS Test. Participants also completed validated CANTAB cognitive tests of episodic memory, working memory and executive function. Frequency, variability, key press duration and accuracy scores were calculated for each tapping test. Generalized linear models examined associations between keyboard tapping and cognitive performance, adjusted for confounders including age, sex, depression, anxiety and education.ResultCombination of motor features of the single key (R<jats:sup>2</jats:sup> <jats:sub>adj</jats:sub> = 8.0%, ΔAIC = 3.7), alternate key (R<jats:sup>2</jats:sup> <jats:sub>adj</jats:sub> = 7.9%, ΔAIC = 2.8), and sequence tapping tests (R<jats:sup>2</jats:sup> <jats:sub>adj</jats:sub> = 8.2%, ΔAIC = 8.4) improved estimation of episodic memory performance relative to models with demographic and mood confounders only (R<jats:sup>2</jats:sup> <jats:sub>adj</jats:sub> = 7.3%). Only tapping features of tests involving sequence tapping (R<jats:sup>2</jats:sup> <jats:sub>adj</jats:sub> = 6.3%, ΔAIC = 2.5) improved estimation of working memory. Tapping features of single key tapping tests (R<jats:sup>2</jats:sup> <jats:sub>adj</jats:sub> = 15.8%, ΔAIC = 8.3) and sequence tapping tests (R<jats:sup>2</jats:sup> <jats:sub>adj</jats:sub> =16.5%, ΔAIC = 13.7) improved the estimation of executive function performance.ConclusionBrief unsupervised and self‐administered online keyboard tapping tests predict asymptomatic episodic memory decline in a sample of older adults. This provides a potential low‐cost and brief home‐based method for risk stratification of enriched cohorts for further assessment.","PeriodicalId":7471,"journal":{"name":"Alzheimer's & Dementia","volume":"2 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":13.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Using TAS Test online hand‐tapping tests to detect cognitive decline in a large community cohort of older Australians\",\"authors\":\"Jane E Alty, Xinyi Wang, Aidan Bindoff, Rebecca J St George, Eddy Roccati, Larissa Bartlett, Katherine Lawler, Alastair J Noyce, Son Tran, Anna E King, Quan Bai, James C Vickers\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/alz.091929\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"BackgroundFinding low‐cost, accessible methods to detect people with early‐stage Alzheimer’s disease is a research priority for neuroprotective drug development. Subtle motor impairment of gait occurs years before episodic memory decline but there has been little investigation of whether self‐administered hand motor tests can detect this pre‐symptomatic period. This study evaluated how home‐based unsupervised keyboard tapping tests from the TAS Test protocol predict episodic memory performance in a sample of older adults without overt cognitive impairment, as a potential indicative measure of early Alzheimer’s disease.Method1,140 community participants (65.7 ± 7.4 years old; 73% female) without cognitive impairment from the ISLAND cohort study completed a 40‐second single key tapping test, a 60‐second alternate key tapping test, and a 40‐second sequence tapping test from TAS Test. Participants also completed validated CANTAB cognitive tests of episodic memory, working memory and executive function. Frequency, variability, key press duration and accuracy scores were calculated for each tapping test. Generalized linear models examined associations between keyboard tapping and cognitive performance, adjusted for confounders including age, sex, depression, anxiety and education.ResultCombination of motor features of the single key (R<jats:sup>2</jats:sup> <jats:sub>adj</jats:sub> = 8.0%, ΔAIC = 3.7), alternate key (R<jats:sup>2</jats:sup> <jats:sub>adj</jats:sub> = 7.9%, ΔAIC = 2.8), and sequence tapping tests (R<jats:sup>2</jats:sup> <jats:sub>adj</jats:sub> = 8.2%, ΔAIC = 8.4) improved estimation of episodic memory performance relative to models with demographic and mood confounders only (R<jats:sup>2</jats:sup> <jats:sub>adj</jats:sub> = 7.3%). Only tapping features of tests involving sequence tapping (R<jats:sup>2</jats:sup> <jats:sub>adj</jats:sub> = 6.3%, ΔAIC = 2.5) improved estimation of working memory. Tapping features of single key tapping tests (R<jats:sup>2</jats:sup> <jats:sub>adj</jats:sub> = 15.8%, ΔAIC = 8.3) and sequence tapping tests (R<jats:sup>2</jats:sup> <jats:sub>adj</jats:sub> =16.5%, ΔAIC = 13.7) improved the estimation of executive function performance.ConclusionBrief unsupervised and self‐administered online keyboard tapping tests predict asymptomatic episodic memory decline in a sample of older adults. This provides a potential low‐cost and brief home‐based method for risk stratification of enriched cohorts for further assessment.\",\"PeriodicalId\":7471,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Alzheimer's & Dementia\",\"volume\":\"2 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":13.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Alzheimer's & Dementia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/alz.091929\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Alzheimer's & Dementia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/alz.091929","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

寻找低成本、可获得的方法来检测早期阿尔茨海默病患者是神经保护药物开发的研究重点。轻微的步态运动障碍发生在情景记忆衰退前几年,但很少有关于自我给予的手部运动测试是否可以检测到症状前阶段的研究。本研究评估了TAS测试方案中基于家庭的无监督键盘敲击测试如何预测无明显认知障碍的老年人样本的情景记忆表现,作为早期阿尔茨海默病的潜在指示性测量。方法1140名社区参与者(65.7±7.4岁);来自ISLAND队列研究的无认知障碍患者(73%为女性)完成了一个40秒的单键敲击测试、一个60秒的交替键敲击测试和一个来自TAS测试的40秒序列敲击测试。参与者还完成了情景记忆、工作记忆和执行功能的CANTAB认知测试。计算每个敲击测试的频率、变异性、按键持续时间和准确性分数。广义线性模型考察了敲击键盘和认知表现之间的关系,并对年龄、性别、抑郁、焦虑和教育等混杂因素进行了调整。结果单键运动特征(R2 adj = 8.0%, ΔAIC = 3.7)、交替键运动特征(R2 adj = 7.9%, ΔAIC = 2.8)和序列敲击测试(R2 adj = 8.2%, ΔAIC = 8.4)的组合比仅包含人口统计学和情绪混杂因素的模型(R2 adj = 7.3%)改善了情景记忆表现的估计。只有包含序列叩击的叩击特征(R2 = 6.3%, ΔAIC = 2.5)改善了对工作记忆的估计。单键轻叩测试(R2 adj = 15.8%, ΔAIC = 8.3)和序列轻叩测试(R2 adj =16.5%, ΔAIC = 13.7)的轻叩特征改善了对执行功能表现的估计。结论:简单的无监督和自我管理的在线键盘敲击测试可预测老年人样本中无症状情景记忆衰退。这为进一步评估富集队列的风险分层提供了一种潜在的低成本和简单的基于家庭的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Using TAS Test online hand‐tapping tests to detect cognitive decline in a large community cohort of older Australians
BackgroundFinding low‐cost, accessible methods to detect people with early‐stage Alzheimer’s disease is a research priority for neuroprotective drug development. Subtle motor impairment of gait occurs years before episodic memory decline but there has been little investigation of whether self‐administered hand motor tests can detect this pre‐symptomatic period. This study evaluated how home‐based unsupervised keyboard tapping tests from the TAS Test protocol predict episodic memory performance in a sample of older adults without overt cognitive impairment, as a potential indicative measure of early Alzheimer’s disease.Method1,140 community participants (65.7 ± 7.4 years old; 73% female) without cognitive impairment from the ISLAND cohort study completed a 40‐second single key tapping test, a 60‐second alternate key tapping test, and a 40‐second sequence tapping test from TAS Test. Participants also completed validated CANTAB cognitive tests of episodic memory, working memory and executive function. Frequency, variability, key press duration and accuracy scores were calculated for each tapping test. Generalized linear models examined associations between keyboard tapping and cognitive performance, adjusted for confounders including age, sex, depression, anxiety and education.ResultCombination of motor features of the single key (R2 adj = 8.0%, ΔAIC = 3.7), alternate key (R2 adj = 7.9%, ΔAIC = 2.8), and sequence tapping tests (R2 adj = 8.2%, ΔAIC = 8.4) improved estimation of episodic memory performance relative to models with demographic and mood confounders only (R2 adj = 7.3%). Only tapping features of tests involving sequence tapping (R2 adj = 6.3%, ΔAIC = 2.5) improved estimation of working memory. Tapping features of single key tapping tests (R2 adj = 15.8%, ΔAIC = 8.3) and sequence tapping tests (R2 adj =16.5%, ΔAIC = 13.7) improved the estimation of executive function performance.ConclusionBrief unsupervised and self‐administered online keyboard tapping tests predict asymptomatic episodic memory decline in a sample of older adults. This provides a potential low‐cost and brief home‐based method for risk stratification of enriched cohorts for further assessment.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Alzheimer's & Dementia
Alzheimer's & Dementia 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
14.50
自引率
5.00%
发文量
299
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Alzheimer's & Dementia is a peer-reviewed journal that aims to bridge knowledge gaps in dementia research by covering the entire spectrum, from basic science to clinical trials to social and behavioral investigations. It provides a platform for rapid communication of new findings and ideas, optimal translation of research into practical applications, increasing knowledge across diverse disciplines for early detection, diagnosis, and intervention, and identifying promising new research directions. In July 2008, Alzheimer's & Dementia was accepted for indexing by MEDLINE, recognizing its scientific merit and contribution to Alzheimer's research.
期刊最新文献
AAIC Satellite Symposium slated for May 14 to 15 in Lima, Peru A multi-cohort study of longitudinal and cross-sectional Alzheimer's disease biomarkers in cognitively unimpaired older adults Malnutrition exacerbating neuropsychiatric symptoms on the Alzheimer's continuum is relevant to the cAMP signaling pathway: Human and mouse studies Compositional brain scores capture Alzheimer's disease–specific structural brain patterns along the disease continuum A neuropathology case report of a woman with Down syndrome who remained cognitively stable: Implications for resilience to neuropathology
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1