Tenesha Littleton, Yan Luo, Gloria Abura-Meerdink, Hee Yun Lee
{"title":"阿拉巴马州农村黑人健康的社会决定因素与人际暴力风险之间的关系","authors":"Tenesha Littleton, Yan Luo, Gloria Abura-Meerdink, Hee Yun Lee","doi":"10.1177/08862605241311616","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Prior research has linked the social determinants of health, such as food insecurity and housing instability, to experiences of interpersonal violence. However, little is known about how the social determinants of health are related to the risk for interpersonal violence among Black Americans living in rural, high-poverty communities in the Deep South. The intersection of rurality, racialized identity, and economic hardship makes this population particularly vulnerable to interpersonal violence, yet this population is underrepresented in the literature. This study examines the association between several social determinants of health (food insecurity, housing instability, transportation problems, social support, and health literacy) and odds of interpersonal violence while controlling for demographic factors and mental and physical health status. Data were obtained from a sample of 182 individuals (98% Black Americans) from two rural sites in Alabama. Logistic regression was used to model the relationship between the social determinants of health and current experiences of interpersonal violence. Moderate-to-severe depression (OR = 2.70, p < .05) and being married or partnered (OR = 2.96, p < .05) were associated with higher odds of interpersonal violence. Higher levels of social support were associated with lower odds of interpersonal violence (OR = 0.87, p < .01). Findings suggest that violence prevention efforts should be tailored to the local cultural context and include efforts to reduce social isolation and address symptoms of depression.","PeriodicalId":16289,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Interpersonal Violence","volume":"35 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Associations Between the Social Determinants of Health and Risk of Interpersonal Violence Among Black Americans in Rural Alabama\",\"authors\":\"Tenesha Littleton, Yan Luo, Gloria Abura-Meerdink, Hee Yun Lee\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/08862605241311616\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Prior research has linked the social determinants of health, such as food insecurity and housing instability, to experiences of interpersonal violence. However, little is known about how the social determinants of health are related to the risk for interpersonal violence among Black Americans living in rural, high-poverty communities in the Deep South. The intersection of rurality, racialized identity, and economic hardship makes this population particularly vulnerable to interpersonal violence, yet this population is underrepresented in the literature. This study examines the association between several social determinants of health (food insecurity, housing instability, transportation problems, social support, and health literacy) and odds of interpersonal violence while controlling for demographic factors and mental and physical health status. Data were obtained from a sample of 182 individuals (98% Black Americans) from two rural sites in Alabama. Logistic regression was used to model the relationship between the social determinants of health and current experiences of interpersonal violence. Moderate-to-severe depression (OR = 2.70, p < .05) and being married or partnered (OR = 2.96, p < .05) were associated with higher odds of interpersonal violence. Higher levels of social support were associated with lower odds of interpersonal violence (OR = 0.87, p < .01). Findings suggest that violence prevention efforts should be tailored to the local cultural context and include efforts to reduce social isolation and address symptoms of depression.\",\"PeriodicalId\":16289,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Interpersonal Violence\",\"volume\":\"35 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Interpersonal Violence\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/08862605241311616\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Interpersonal Violence","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08862605241311616","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
先前的研究将健康的社会决定因素,如粮食不安全和住房不稳定,与人际暴力的经历联系起来。然而,对于生活在南方腹地农村高度贫困社区的美国黑人中,健康的社会决定因素与人际暴力风险之间的关系,人们知之甚少。乡村性、种族化的身份和经济困难的交集使这一人群特别容易受到人际暴力的伤害,但这一人群在文献中代表性不足。本研究考察了健康的几个社会决定因素(粮食不安全、住房不稳定、交通问题、社会支持和健康素养)与人际暴力几率之间的关系,同时控制了人口因素和身心健康状况。数据来自阿拉巴马州两个农村地区的182人样本(98%为黑人)。使用逻辑回归来模拟健康的社会决定因素与当前人际暴力经历之间的关系。中度至重度抑郁症(OR = 2.70, p <;.05),已婚或有伴侣(or = 2.96, p <;.05)与人际暴力的高发生率相关。较高的社会支持水平与较低的人际暴力发生率相关(OR = 0.87, p <;. 01)。调查结果表明,预防暴力的工作应根据当地的文化背景进行调整,并包括减少社会孤立和解决抑郁症状的努力。
Associations Between the Social Determinants of Health and Risk of Interpersonal Violence Among Black Americans in Rural Alabama
Prior research has linked the social determinants of health, such as food insecurity and housing instability, to experiences of interpersonal violence. However, little is known about how the social determinants of health are related to the risk for interpersonal violence among Black Americans living in rural, high-poverty communities in the Deep South. The intersection of rurality, racialized identity, and economic hardship makes this population particularly vulnerable to interpersonal violence, yet this population is underrepresented in the literature. This study examines the association between several social determinants of health (food insecurity, housing instability, transportation problems, social support, and health literacy) and odds of interpersonal violence while controlling for demographic factors and mental and physical health status. Data were obtained from a sample of 182 individuals (98% Black Americans) from two rural sites in Alabama. Logistic regression was used to model the relationship between the social determinants of health and current experiences of interpersonal violence. Moderate-to-severe depression (OR = 2.70, p < .05) and being married or partnered (OR = 2.96, p < .05) were associated with higher odds of interpersonal violence. Higher levels of social support were associated with lower odds of interpersonal violence (OR = 0.87, p < .01). Findings suggest that violence prevention efforts should be tailored to the local cultural context and include efforts to reduce social isolation and address symptoms of depression.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Interpersonal Violence is devoted to the study and treatment of victims and perpetrators of interpersonal violence. It provides a forum of discussion of the concerns and activities of professionals and researchers working in domestic violence, child sexual abuse, rape and sexual assault, physical child abuse, and violent crime. With its dual focus on victims and victimizers, the journal will publish material that addresses the causes, effects, treatment, and prevention of all types of violence. JIV only publishes reports on individual studies in which the scientific method is applied to the study of some aspect of interpersonal violence. Research may use qualitative or quantitative methods. JIV does not publish reviews of research, individual case studies, or the conceptual analysis of some aspect of interpersonal violence. Outcome data for program or intervention evaluations must include a comparison or control group.