Tongxin Charlotte Wang, Joseph J Wakshlag, Mason C Jager, Wayne S Schwark, Nathalie L Trottier, Jacqueline M Chevalier, Garett Pearson, Marta Cercone
{"title":"长期口服大麻二酚和大麻二酚酸全谱大麻油提取物对马没有不良影响:药代动力学和安全性研究。","authors":"Tongxin Charlotte Wang, Joseph J Wakshlag, Mason C Jager, Wayne S Schwark, Nathalie L Trottier, Jacqueline M Chevalier, Garett Pearson, Marta Cercone","doi":"10.2460/ajvr.24.08.0235","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare the pharmacokinetics of cannabidiol (CBD) and cannabidiolic acid (CBDA) in horses and to evaluate the safety of their chronic administration.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>CBD- and CBDA-rich oil (1 mg/kg) were administered orally twice daily to 7 adult horses over 6 weeks in a randomized, crossover design with a 2-week washout period. A 12-hour pharmacokinetic analysis was conducted on day 1 of each 6-week trial, followed by the measurement of peak and trough concentrations at weeks 1, 2, 4, and 6. The cannabinoids safety was assessed via daily physical examination, periodic bloodwork, and liver biopsy at the beginning and end of the study.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>12-hour pharmacokinetics revealed a higher maximum serum concentration (103 vs 12 ng/mL) and greater area under the curve (259 vs 62 ng·h/mL) for CBDA when compared to CBD. Cannabidiolic acid nadir and peak serum levels over time ranged from 46 to 122 ng/mL, which was higher than CBD (12 to 38 ng/mL). Complete blood count and serum chemistry revealed no clinically relevant changes with either CBD or CBDA. No significant abnormalities were detected on liver ultrasonographic and histopathologic evaluation on day 0 and after both phases of the study.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A dose of either 1 mg/kg of CBD or CBDA administered long term appears safe; however, CBDA serum concentrations suggest superior absorption/retention.</p><p><strong>Clinical relevance: </strong>Chronic cannabinoid supplementation in horses is safe. Considering the higher absorption of CBDA, its use is recommended to evaluate the therapeutic efficacy of this common hemp derived cannabinoid.</p>","PeriodicalId":7754,"journal":{"name":"American journal of veterinary research","volume":" ","pages":"1-10"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Chronic oral dosing of cannabidiol and cannabidiolic acid full-spectrum hemp oil extracts has no adverse effects in horses: a pharmacokinetic and safety study.\",\"authors\":\"Tongxin Charlotte Wang, Joseph J Wakshlag, Mason C Jager, Wayne S Schwark, Nathalie L Trottier, Jacqueline M Chevalier, Garett Pearson, Marta Cercone\",\"doi\":\"10.2460/ajvr.24.08.0235\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare the pharmacokinetics of cannabidiol (CBD) and cannabidiolic acid (CBDA) in horses and to evaluate the safety of their chronic administration.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>CBD- and CBDA-rich oil (1 mg/kg) were administered orally twice daily to 7 adult horses over 6 weeks in a randomized, crossover design with a 2-week washout period. A 12-hour pharmacokinetic analysis was conducted on day 1 of each 6-week trial, followed by the measurement of peak and trough concentrations at weeks 1, 2, 4, and 6. The cannabinoids safety was assessed via daily physical examination, periodic bloodwork, and liver biopsy at the beginning and end of the study.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>12-hour pharmacokinetics revealed a higher maximum serum concentration (103 vs 12 ng/mL) and greater area under the curve (259 vs 62 ng·h/mL) for CBDA when compared to CBD. Cannabidiolic acid nadir and peak serum levels over time ranged from 46 to 122 ng/mL, which was higher than CBD (12 to 38 ng/mL). Complete blood count and serum chemistry revealed no clinically relevant changes with either CBD or CBDA. No significant abnormalities were detected on liver ultrasonographic and histopathologic evaluation on day 0 and after both phases of the study.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A dose of either 1 mg/kg of CBD or CBDA administered long term appears safe; however, CBDA serum concentrations suggest superior absorption/retention.</p><p><strong>Clinical relevance: </strong>Chronic cannabinoid supplementation in horses is safe. Considering the higher absorption of CBDA, its use is recommended to evaluate the therapeutic efficacy of this common hemp derived cannabinoid.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7754,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American journal of veterinary research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-10\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American journal of veterinary research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2460/ajvr.24.08.0235\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"VETERINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of veterinary research","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2460/ajvr.24.08.0235","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:比较大麻二酚(CBD)和大麻二酸(CBDA)在马体内的药动学,并评价其长期给药的安全性。方法:在随机交叉设计中,7匹成年马每天口服两次CBD-和富含cbda的油(1 mg/kg),为期6周,洗脱期为2周。在每6周试验的第1天进行12小时药代动力学分析,然后在第1、2、4和6周测量峰谷浓度。在研究开始和结束时,通过每日体检、定期血液检查和肝活检来评估大麻素的安全性。结果:12小时药代动力学显示,与CBD相比,CBDA的最大血清浓度(103 vs 12 ng/mL)和曲线下面积(259 vs 62 ng·h/mL)更大。随着时间的推移,大麻二酚酸的最低点和峰值血清水平在46至122 ng/mL之间,高于CBD(12至38 ng/mL)。全血细胞计数和血清化学显示CBD或CBDA均无临床相关变化。第0天及两期研究结束后肝脏超声及组织病理学检查均未发现明显异常。结论:长期服用1mg /kg的CBD或CBDA似乎是安全的;然而,CBDA血清浓度表明其具有较好的吸收/保留能力。临床相关性:对马长期补充大麻素是安全的。考虑到CBDA的吸收率较高,建议使用它来评估这种常见的大麻衍生大麻素的治疗效果。
Chronic oral dosing of cannabidiol and cannabidiolic acid full-spectrum hemp oil extracts has no adverse effects in horses: a pharmacokinetic and safety study.
Objective: To compare the pharmacokinetics of cannabidiol (CBD) and cannabidiolic acid (CBDA) in horses and to evaluate the safety of their chronic administration.
Methods: CBD- and CBDA-rich oil (1 mg/kg) were administered orally twice daily to 7 adult horses over 6 weeks in a randomized, crossover design with a 2-week washout period. A 12-hour pharmacokinetic analysis was conducted on day 1 of each 6-week trial, followed by the measurement of peak and trough concentrations at weeks 1, 2, 4, and 6. The cannabinoids safety was assessed via daily physical examination, periodic bloodwork, and liver biopsy at the beginning and end of the study.
Results: 12-hour pharmacokinetics revealed a higher maximum serum concentration (103 vs 12 ng/mL) and greater area under the curve (259 vs 62 ng·h/mL) for CBDA when compared to CBD. Cannabidiolic acid nadir and peak serum levels over time ranged from 46 to 122 ng/mL, which was higher than CBD (12 to 38 ng/mL). Complete blood count and serum chemistry revealed no clinically relevant changes with either CBD or CBDA. No significant abnormalities were detected on liver ultrasonographic and histopathologic evaluation on day 0 and after both phases of the study.
Conclusions: A dose of either 1 mg/kg of CBD or CBDA administered long term appears safe; however, CBDA serum concentrations suggest superior absorption/retention.
Clinical relevance: Chronic cannabinoid supplementation in horses is safe. Considering the higher absorption of CBDA, its use is recommended to evaluate the therapeutic efficacy of this common hemp derived cannabinoid.
期刊介绍:
The American Journal of Veterinary Research supports the collaborative exchange of information between researchers and clinicians by publishing novel research findings that bridge the gulf between basic research and clinical practice or that help to translate laboratory research and preclinical studies to the development of clinical trials and clinical practice. The journal welcomes submission of high-quality original studies and review articles in a wide range of scientific fields, including anatomy, anesthesiology, animal welfare, behavior, epidemiology, genetics, heredity, infectious disease, molecular biology, oncology, pharmacology, pathogenic mechanisms, physiology, surgery, theriogenology, toxicology, and vaccinology. Species of interest include production animals, companion animals, equids, exotic animals, birds, reptiles, and wild and marine animals. Reports of laboratory animal studies and studies involving the use of animals as experimental models of human diseases are considered only when the study results are of demonstrable benefit to the species used in the research or to another species of veterinary interest. Other fields of interest or animals species are not necessarily excluded from consideration, but such reports must focus on novel research findings. Submitted papers must make an original and substantial contribution to the veterinary medicine knowledge base; preliminary studies are not appropriate.